Drugs & Aging

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 331–342

Bacterial Skin Infections in the Elderly

Diagnosis and Treatment
Therapy In Practice


Skin and soft tissue infections are quite common in elderly people. A number of special conditions and circumstances need to be considered in the diagnosis and therapy. It is important to try to establish the causative organism, exclude other cutaneous disorders and identify precipitating factors. Treatment modalities include antiseptics, topical and systemic antibacterials, dressings and biotherapy.

Skin infections presenting with erythema, blisters, pustules, and ulcerations or in body folds are described in detail. Cellulitis and infected ulcers are the most commonly encountered cutaneous infections in the elderly. Accurate and quick diagnosis and treatment are imperative to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. Appropriate antibacterials, antiseptics and dressings are necessary depending on the severity of the clinical presentation and resistance patterns. Laboratory tests, such as skin swabs, to establish the exact pathogen take time and the results might represent colonisation rather than infection of the skin. Cellulitis should be clinically distinguished from erysipelas and necrotising fasciitis. The latter is a life-threatening condition, which in the majority of cases requires surgical debridement of the infected tissue. Blisters and honey-coloured crusts are typical features of impetigo. It is very contagious and close contacts should be examined. Folliculitis is a commonly seen skin infection, which often responds to the use of antiseptics and topical antibacterials. More severe pustular skin eruptions, such as furunculosis and carbunculosis, usually require treatment with systemic antibacterials. Intertrigo and erythrasma have a predilection for the body folds, especially the axillae and groin, and topical therapy is usually sufficient. Secondary skin infections are often the result of persistent pruritus associated with increasing dryness of the aging skin. Emollients and antihistamines are useful measures. Primary cutaneous disorders and systemic diseases should be excluded with the aid of appropriate investigations, such as blood tests and skin biopsy. Staphylococcus aureus and β-haemolytic streptococci are the most common causative organisms of cutaneous infections.


  1. 1.
    Cummings DM, Uttech KM. Antibiotics for common infections in the elderly. Prim Care 1990; 17: 883–903PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben-Yehuda A, Weksler ME. Immune senescence: mechanisms and clinical implications. J Geriatr Dermatol 1993; 1: 77–84Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell RA, High KP. Alterations of immune defence mechanisms in the elderly: the role of nutrition. Infect Med 1997; 14: 415–24Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lertzman BH, Gaspari AA. Drug treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in elderly long-term care residents. Drugs Aging 1996; 9: 109–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alinovi A, Bassissi P, Pini M. Systemic administration of antibiotics in the management of venous ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986; 15: 186–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansson C, Hoborn J, Moeller A, et al. The microbial flora in venous leg ulcers without clinical signs of infection. Acta Derm Venereol 1995; 75: 24–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lutomski DM, Trott AT, Runyon JM, et al. Microbiology of adult cellulitis. J Fam Pract 1988; 26: 45–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bandak SI, Turnak MR, Allen BS, et al. Oral antimicrobial susceptibilities of Streptococcus pyogenes recently isolated in five countries. Int J Clin Pract 2000; 54: 585–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bisno AL, Stevens DL. Streptococcal infections of skin and soft tissues. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 240–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenberg RN, Kennedy DJ, Reilly PM, et al. Treatment of bone, joint, and soft-tissue infections with oral ciprofloxacin. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 151–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansson C, Faergemann J. The effect of antiseptic solutions on microorganisms in venous leg ulcers. Acta Derm Venereol 1995; 75: 31–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tatnall FM, Leigh IM, Gibson JR. Comparative study of antiseptic toxicity on basal keratinocytes, transformed human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Skin Pharmacol 1990; 3: 157–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mulliken JB, Healey NA, Glowacki J. Povidone-iodine and tensile strength of wounds in rats. J Trauma 1980; 20: 323–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Viljanto J. Disinfection of surgical wounds without inhibition of normal wound healing. Arch Surg 1980; 115: 253–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wood B, Rademaker M, Molan P. Manuka honey, a low cost leg ulcer dressing. N Z Med J 1997; 110: 107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newton H. Using sugar paste to heal postoperative wounds. Nurs Times plus 2000; 96(36 Suppl.): 15–6Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coady MS. Eusol: the continuing controversy. BMJ 1992; 304: 1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Humzah MD, Marshall J, Breach NM. EUSOL: The plastic surgeon’s choice? J R Coll Surg Edinb 1996; 41: 269–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gilchrist B, Reed C. The bacteriology of chronic venous ulcers treated with occlusive hydrocolloid dressings. Br J Dermatol 1989; 121: 337–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mumcuoglu KY, Ingber A, Gilead L, et al. Maggot therapy for the treatment of intractable wounds. Int J Dermatol 1999; 38: 623–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cottam JA, Shenefelt PD, Sinnott JT, et al. Common skin infections in the elderly. Infect Med 1999; 16: 280–3, 287-90Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cox NH, Colver GB, Paterson WD. Management and morbidity of cellulitis of the leg. J R Soc Med 1998; 91: 634–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bakker P, Van Doorne H, Gooskens V, et al. Activity of gentian violet and brilliant green against some microorganisms associated with skin infections. Int J Dermatol 1992; 31: 210–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brothers TE, Tagge DU, Stutley JE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging differentiates between necrotizing and non-necrotizing fasciitis of the lower extremity. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 416–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stone HH. Soft tissue infections. Am Surg 2000; 66: 162–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brandt MM, Corpron CA, Wahl WL. Necrotizing soft tissue infections: a surgical disease. Am Surg 2000; 66: 967–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilkinson JD. Fusidic acid in dermatology. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 37–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, McGechie DF, et al. Qualitative bacteriology and leg ulcer healing. J Wound Care 1996; 5: 277–80PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffUK
  2. 2.Skin CentreCity HospitalBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations