Drug Safety

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 303–310 | Cite as

Medication Errors

How Common Are They and What Can Be Done to Prevent Them?
  • David W. Bates
Leading Article


Medication errors are common in hospitals, but only about 1 in a 100 actually results in harm to the patient. Conversely, only about 30% of injuries due to drugs in hospitals are associated with a medication error, and are thus preventable. Nonetheless, drugs are used so frequently that the total number of preventable drug injuries that occur is substantial, and these injuries are costly.

Changing the systems by which drugs are ordered and administered holds substantial potential for reducing the number of drug-related injuries. Computerised ordering systems, in which orders are written on-line by a physician and the physician can receive feedback on the suitability of the order during the process of making it, appear likely to have an especially large impact on reducing medication errors.


Adis International Limited Medication Error Adverse Drug Event Computerise Physician Order Entry Potential ADEs 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bates DW, Cullen D, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA 1995; 274: 29–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson JA, Bootman JL. Drug-related morbidity and mortality: a cost-of-illness model. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 1949–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA 1995; 274: 35–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans RS, Classen DC, Stevens LE, et al. Using a hospital information system to assess the effects of adverse drug events. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993; 17: 161–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASHP guidelines on preventing medication errors in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1993; 50: 305–14Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 555–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barker KN, Allan EL. Research on drug-use-system errors. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 1995; 52: 400–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lesar TS, Briceland LL, Delcoure K, et al. Medication prescribing errors in a teaching hospital. JAMA 1990; 263: 2329–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Folli HL, Poole RL, Benitz WE, et al. Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children’s hospitals. Pediatrics 1987; 79: 718–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bates DW, Boyle DL, Van der Vliet MB, et al. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10: 199–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Leeuwen DH. Are medication error rates useful as comparative measures of organisational performance? Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1994; 20: 192–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deming WE. Out of the crisis. Cambridge (MA): MIT-CAES, 1986Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Juran JM. Quality control handbook. New York: McGraw Hill, 1988Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 53–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laffel G, Blumenthal D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organisations. JAMA 1989; 262: 2869–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA 1995; 272: 1851–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shultz SM, White SJ, Latiolais CJ. Medication errors reduced by unit-dose. Hospitals 1973; 47: 106–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simborg DW, Derewicz HJ. A highly automated hospital medication system: five years’ experience and evaluation. Ann Intern Med 1975; 83: 342–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Efficacy and cost-containment in hospital pharmacotherapy: state of the art and future directions. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1984; 62: 447–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ambrose PJ, Smith WE, Palarea ER. A decade of experience with a clinical pharmacokinetics service. Am J Hosp Pharm 1988; 45: 1879–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach (‘academic detailing’) to improve clinical decision-making. JAMA 1990; 263: 549–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brown G. Assessing the clinical impact of pharmacists’ interventions. Am J Hosp Pharm 1991; 48: 2644–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paterno MD, Teich JM, Seger DL, et al. A practical method for presenting drug interactions to clinicians. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. In pressGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 108–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bates DW, Kuperman G, Teich JM. Computerised physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care 1994; 2(4): 18–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, et al. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations: effects on resource utilisation. JAMA 1993; 269: 379–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bates DW, O’Neil AC, Boyle D, et al. Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 404–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klein EG, Santora JA, Pascale PM, et al. Medication cart-filling time, accuracy and cost with an automated dispensing system. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994; 51: 1193–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brient K. Barcoding facilitates patient-focused care. Healthc Inform 1995; 12: 38–42PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Bates
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Medicine, Department of MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations