Advertisement

Molecular Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 62–64 | Cite as

Erythropoietin Receptor (EpoR) Agonism Is Used to Treat a Wide Range of Disease

  • Fabian Sanchis-Gomar
  • Carme Perez-Quilis
  • Giuseppe Lippi
Open Access
Commentary

Abstract

The erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) was discovered and described in red blood cells (RBCs), stimulating its proliferation and survival. The target in humans for EpoR agonists drugs appears clear—to treat anemia. However, there is evidence of the pleitropic actions of erythropoietin (Epo). For that reason, rhEpo therapy was suggested as a reliable approach for treating a broad range of pathologies, including heart and cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease), spinal cord injury, stroke, diabetic retinopathy and rare diseases (Friedreich ataxia). Unfortunately, the side effects of rhEpo are also evident. A new generation of nonhematopoietic EpoR agonists drugs (asialoEpo, Cepo and ARA 290) have been investigated and further developed. These EpoR agonists, without the erythropoietic activity of Epo, while preserving its tissue-protective properties, will provide better outcomes in ongoing clinical trials. Nonhematopoietic EpoR agonists represent safer and more effective surrogates for the treatment of several diseases such as brain and peripheral nerve injury, diabetic complications, renal ischemia, rare diseases, myocardial infarction, chronic heart disease and others.

In principle, the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) was discovered and described in red blood cell (RBC) progenitors, stimulating its proliferation and survival. Erythropoietin (Epo) is mainly synthesized in fetal liver and adult kidneys (1, 2, 3). Therefore, it was hypothesized that Epo act exclusively on erythroid progenitor cells. Accordingly, the target in humans for EpoR agonists drugs (such as recombinant erythropoietin [rhEpo], in general, called erythropoiesis-simulating agents) appears clear (that is, to treat anemia). However, evidence of a kaleidoscope of pleitropic actions of Epo has been provided (4,5). The Epo/EpoR axis research involved an initial journey from laboratory basic research to clinical therapeutics. However, as a consequence of clinical observations, basic research on Epo/EpoR comes back to expand its clinical therapeutic applicability.

Although kidney and liver have long been considered the major sources of synthesis, Epo mRNA expression has also been detected in the brain (neurons and glial cells), lung, heart, bone marrow, spleen, hair follicles, reproductive tract and osteoblasts (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Accordingly, EpoR was detected in other cells, such as neurons, astrocytes, microglia, immune cells, cancer cell lines, endothelial cells, bone marrow stromal cells and cells of heart, reproductive system, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, pancreas and skeletal muscle (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27). Conversely, Sinclair et al. (28) reported data questioning the presence or function of EpoR on non-hematopoietic cells (endothelial, neuronal and cardiac cells), suggesting that further studies are needed to confirm the diversity of EpoR. Elliott et al. (29) also showed that EpoR is virtually undetectable in human renal cells and other tissues with no detectable EpoR on cell surfaces. These results have raised doubts about the preclinical basis for studies exploring pleiotropic actions of rhEpo (30).

For the above-mentioned data, a return to basic research studies has become necessary, and many studies in animal models have been initiated or have already been performed. The effect of rhEpo administration on angiogenesis, myogenesis, shift in muscle fiber types and oxidative enzyme activities in skeletal muscle (4,31), cardiac muscle mitochondrial biogenesis (32), cognitive effects (31), antiapoptotic and antiinflammatory actions (33, 34, 35, 36, 37) and plasma glucose concentrations (38) has been extensively studied. Neuro- and cardioprotection properties have been mainly described. Accordingly, rhEpo therapy was suggested as a reliable approach for treating a broad range of pathologies, including heart and cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease), spinal cord injury, stroke, diabetic retinopathy and rare diseases (Friedreich ataxia).

Unfortunately, the side effects of rhEpo are also evident. Epo is involved in regulating tumor angiogenesis (39) and probably in the survival and growth of tumor cells (25,40,41). rhEpo administration also induces serious side effects such as hypertension, polycythemia, myocardial infarction, stroke and seizures, platelet activation and increased thromboembolic risk, and immunogenicity (42, 43, 44, 45, 46), with the most common being hypertension (47,48). A new generation of non-hematopoietic EpoR agonists drugs have hence been investigated and further developed in animals models. These compounds, namely asialoerythropoietin (asialoEpo) and carbamylated Epo (Cepo), were developed for preserving tissue-protective properties but reducing the erythropoietic activity of native Epo (49,50). These drugs will provide better outcome in ongoing clinical trials. The advantage of using nonhematopoietic Epo analogs is to avoid the stimulation of hematopoiesis and thereby the prevention of an increased hematocrit with a subsequent procoagulant status or increased blood pressure. In this regard, a new study by van Rijt et al. has shed new light on this topic (51). A new non-hematopoietic EpoR agonist analog named ARA 290 has been developed, promising cytoprotective capacities to prevent renal ischemia/reperfusion injury (51). ARA 290 is a short peptide that has shown no safety concerns in preclinical and human studies. In addition, ARA 290 has proven efficacious in cardiac disorders (52,53), neuropathic pain (54) and sarcoidosis-induced chronic neuropathic pain (55). Thus, ARA 290 is a novel non-hematopoietic EpoR agonist with promising therapeutic options in treating a wide range of pathologies and without increased risks of cardiovascular events.

Overall, this new generation of EpoR agonists without the erythropoietic activity of Epo while preserving tissue-protective properties of Epo will provide better outcomes in ongoing clinical trials (49,50). Nonhematopoietic EpoR agonists represent safer and more effective surrogates for the treatment of several diseases, such as brain and peripheral nerve injury, diabetic complications, renal ischemia, rare diseases, myocardial infarction, chronic heart disease and others.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests as defined by Molecular Medicine, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and discussion reported in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Digicaylioglu M, et al. (1995) Localization of specific erythropoietin binding sites in defined areas of the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92: 3717–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jelkmann W. (1992) Erythropoietin: structure, control of production, and function. Physiol. Rev. 72: 449–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haase VH. (2013) Regulation of erythropoiesis by hypoxia-inducible factors. Blood Rev. 27:41–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rotter R, et al. (2008) Erythropoietin improves functional and histological recovery of traumatized skeletal muscle tissue. J. Orthop. Res. 26:1618–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jelkmann W. (2007) Erythropoietin after a century of research: younger than ever. Eur. J. Haematol. 78:183–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dame C, et al. (1998) Erythropoietin mRNA expression in human fetal and neonatal tissue. Blood. 92:3218–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marti HH, et al. (1996) Erythropoietin gene expression in human, monkey and murine brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 8:666–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marti HH, et al. (1997) Detection of erythropoietin in human liquor: intrinsic erythropoietin production in the brain. Kidney Int. 51:416–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernaudin M, et al. (2000) Neurons and astrocytes express EPO mRNA: oxygen-sensing mechanisms that involve the redox-state of the brain. Glia. 30:271–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Magnanti M, et al. (2001) Erythropoietin expression in primary rat Sertoli and peritubular myoid cells. Blood. 98:2872–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dame C, et al. (2000) Erythropoietin gene expression in different areas of the developing human central nervous system. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 125:69–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fandrey J, Bunn HF. (1993) In vivo and in vitro regulation of erythropoietin mRNA: measurement by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Blood. 81:617–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bodo E, et al. (2007) Human hair follicles are an extrarenal source and a nonhematopoietic target of erythropoietin. FASEB J. 21:3346–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yasuda Y, et al. (1998) Estrogen-dependent production of erythropoietin in uterus and its implication in uterine angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 273:25381–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kobayashi T, et al. (2002) Epididymis is a novel site of erythropoietin production in mouse reproductive organs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 296:145–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Masuda S, et al. (2000) The oviduct produces erythropoietin in an estrogen- and oxygen-dependent manner. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 278:E1038–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rankin EB, et al. (2012) The HIF signaling pathway in osteoblasts directly modulates erythropoiesis through the production of EPO. Cell. 149:63–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Acs G, et al. (2001) Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor expression in human cancer. Cancer Res. 61:3561–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lundby C, et al. (2008) Erythropoietin receptor in human skeletal muscle and the effects of acute and long-term injections with recombinant human erythropoietin on the skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 104:1154–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Broxmeyer HE. (2011) Erythropoietin surprises: an immune saga. Immunity. 34:6–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nairz M, et al. (2011) Erythropoietin contrastingly affects bacterial infection and experimental colitis by inhibiting nuclear factor-kappaB-inducible immune pathways. Immunity. 34:61–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nairz M, et al. (2012) The pleiotropic effects of erythropoietin in infection and inflammation. Microbes Infect. 14:238–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brines M, Cerami A. (2006) Discovering erythropoietin’s extra-hematopoietic functions: biology and clinical promise. Kidney Int. 70:246–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choi D, et al. (2010) Erythropoietin protects against diabetes through direct effects on pancreatic beta cells. J. Exp. Med. 207:2831–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hand CC, Brines M. (2011) Promises and pitfalls in erythopoietin-mediated tissue protection: are nonerythropoietic derivatives a way forward? J. Investig. Med. 59:1073–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McGee SJ, et al. (2012) Effects of erythropoietin on the bone microenvironment. Growth Factors. 30:22–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sytkowski AJ. (2011) The neurobiology of erythropoietin. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 31:931–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sinclair AM, et al. (2010) Functional erythropoietin receptor is undetectable in endothelial, cardiac, neuronal, and renal cells. Blood. 115:4264–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Elliott S, et al. (2011) Lack of expression and function of erythropoietin receptors in the kidney. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27:2733–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jelkmann W, Elliott S. (2012) Erythropoietin and the vascular wall: the controversy continues. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012, Jun 6. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lundby C, Olsen NV. (2011) Effects of recombinant human erythropoietin in normal humans. J. Physiol. 589:1265–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Carraway MS, et al. (2010) Erythropoietin activates mitochondrial biogenesis and couples red cell mass to mitochondrial mass in the heart. Circ. Res. 106:1722–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Prunier F, et al. (2012) Single high-dose erythropoietin administration immediately after reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the erythropoietin in myocardial infarction trial. Am. Heart J. 163:200–7. e1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moon C, et al. (2003) Erythropoietin reduces myocardial infarction and left ventricular functional decline after coronary artery ligation in rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:11612–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Parsa CJ, et al. (2003) A novel protective effect of erythropoietin in the infarcted heart. J. Clin. Invest. 112:999–1007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tamareille S, et al. (2009) Myocardial reperfusion injury management: erythropoietin compared with postconditioning. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 297:H2035–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Prunier F, et al. (2007) Delayed erythropoietin therapy reduces post-MI cardiac remodeling only at a dose that mobilizes endothelial progenitor cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 292:H522–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cayla J, et al. (1999) Effects of recombinant erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) on plasma glucose concentration in endurance-trained rats. Acta Physiol. Scand. 166:247–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ribatti D. (2010) Erythropoietin and tumor angiogenesis. Stem Cells Dev. 19:1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Szenajch J, et al. (2010) The role of erythropoietin and its receptor in growth, survival and therapeutic response of human tumor cells: from clinic to bench—a critical review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1806:82–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oster HS, et al. (2012) Erythropoietin: the swinging pendulum. Leuk. Res. 36:939–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shin SK, et al. (2012) Immunogenicity of recombinant human erythropoietin in Korea: a two-year cross-sectional study. Biologicals. 40:254–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Macdougall IC, et al. (2012) Antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia in chronic kidney disease patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: new insights. Kidney Int. 81:727–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ponikowski P, et al. (2007) Effect of darbepoetin alfa on exercise tolerance in anemic patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49:753–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. (2007) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of two dosing regimens of darbepoetin alfa in patients with heart failure and anaemia. Eur. Heart J. 28:2208–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marchioli R, et al. (2013) Cardiovascular events and intensity of treatment in polycythemia vera. N. Engl. J. Med. 368:22–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lubas A, et al. (2010) Renal vascular response to angiotensin II inhibition in intensive antihypertensive treatment of essential hypertension. Arch. Med. Sci. 6:533–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Banach M, et al. (2010) Controversies in hypertension treatment. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 8:731–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cicero AF, Ertek S. (2010) Preclinical and clinical evidence of nephro- and cardiovascular protective effects of glycosaminoglycans. Arch. Med. Sci. 6:469–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Durmaz O, et al. (2011) Recombinant human erythropoietin beta: the effect of weekly dosing on anemia, quality of life, and long-term outcomes in pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 28:461–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    van Rijt WG, et al. (2013) ARA290, a non-erythropoietic EPO derivative, attenuates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Transl. Med. 11:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Joshi D, et al. (2012) Potential of novel EPO derivatives in limb ischemia. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2012:213785.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ahmet I, et al. (2011) A small nonerythropoietic helix B surface peptide based upon erythropoietin structure is cardioprotective against ischemic myocardial damage. Mol. Med. 17:194–200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Swartjes M, et al. (2011) ARA290, a peptide derived from the tertiary structure of erythropoietin, produces long-term relief of neuropathic pain: an experimental study in rats and beta-common receptor knockout mice. Anesthesiology. 115:1084–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Heij L, et al. (2013) Safety and efficacy of ARA 290 in sarcoidosis patients with symptoms of small fiber neuropathy: a randomized, doubleblind pilot study. Mol. Med. 18:1430–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabian Sanchis-Gomar
    • 1
  • Carme Perez-Quilis
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Lippi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Valencia, Research Foundation of the University Clinic Hospital of Valencia/INCLIVAValenciaSpain
  2. 2.CIBERERThe Biomedical Network Research Centre on Rare DiseasesValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Clinical Chemistry and Haematology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAcademic Hospital of ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations