Advertisement

Molecular Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 9–10, pp 917–924 | Cite as

Rapamycin Ameliorates Dystrophic Phenotype in mdx Mouse Skeletal Muscle

  • Saman Eghtesad
  • Siddharth Jhunjhunwala
  • Steven R. Little
  • Paula R. Clemens
Research Article

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) Is an X-linked, lethal, degenerative disease that results from mutations In the dystrophin gene, causing necrosis and inflammation in skeletal muscle tissue. Treatments that reduce muscle fiber destruction and immune cell infiltration can ameliorate DMD pathology. We treated the mdx mouse, a model for DMD, with the immunosuppressant drug rapamycin (RAPA) both locally and systemically to examine its effects on dystrophic mdx muscles. We observed a significant reduction of muscle fiber necrosis in treated mdx mouse tibialis anterior (TA) and diaphragm (Dia) muscles 6 wks post-treatment. This effect was associated with a significant reduction in infiltration of effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in skeletal muscle tissue, while Foxp3+ regulatory T cells were preserved. Because RAPA exerts its effects through the mammalian target of RAPA (mTOR), we studied the activation of mTOR in mdx TA and Dia with and without RAPA treatment. Surprisingly, mTOR activation levels in mdx TA were not different from control C57BL/10 (B10). However, mTOR activation was different in Dia between mdx and B10; mTOR activation levels did not rise between 6 and 12 wks of age in mdx Dia muscle, whereas a rise in mTOR activation level was observed in B10 Dia muscle. Furthermore, mdx Dia, but not TA, muscle mTOR activation was responsive to RAPA treatment.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniel P Reay for providing valuable technical support and for breeding mice used in these studies. This work was supported by F31-NS056780-01A2 (S Eghtesad) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), KL2 RR024154 (SR Little) from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the NIH and grant W81XWH-05-1-0334 (PR Clemens) from the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. The myosin (embryonic) monoclonal antibody developed by HM Blau was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA, USA.

References

  1. 1.
    Drousiotou A, et al. (1998) Neonatal screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a novel semiquantitative application of the bioluminescence test for creatine kinase in a pilot national program in Cyprus. Genet. Test. 2:55–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emery AE. (1991) Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases—a world survey. Neuromuscul. Disord. 1:19–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parsons EP, Bradley DM, Clarke AJ. (2003) Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch. Dis. Child. 88:91–2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emery AE. (1990) Dystrophin function. Lancet. 335:1289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffman EP, Brown RH Jr, Kunkel LM. (1987) Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell. 51:919–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffman EP, Schwartz L. (1991) Dystrophin and disease. Mol. Aspects Med. 12:175–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bulfield G, Siller W, Wight P, Moore K. (1984) X Chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) in the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81:1189–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farini A, et al. (2007) T and B lymphocyte depletion has a marked effect on the fibrosis of dystrophic skeletal muscles in the scid/mdx mouse. J. Pathol. 213:229–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spencer MJ, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Dorshkind K, Tidball JG. (2001) Helper (CD4(+)) and cytotoxic (CD8(+)) T cells promote the pathology of dystrophin-deficient muscle. Clin. Immunol. 98:235–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burleson, RL, Marbarger, PD, Jermanovich, N, Brennan, AM, Scruggs, BF. (1981) A prospective study of methylprednisolone and prednisone as immunosuppressive agents in clinical renal transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 13:339–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Y, Chen Y, Liu FQ, Lamb JR, Tam PK. (2008) Combined treatment with triptolide and rapamycin prolongs graft survival in a mouse model of cardiac transplantation. Transpl. Int. 21:483–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vilquin JT, et al. (1995) Successful myoblast allotransplantation in mdx mice using rapamycin. Transplantation. 59:422–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomson AW, Turnquist HR, Raimondi G. (2009) Immunoregulatory functions of mTOR inhibition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9:324–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Libetta C, et al. (2007) The effect of sirolimus- or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression effects on T-cell subsets in vivo. Kidney Int. 72:114–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Battaglia M, et al. (2006) Rapamycin promotes expansion of functional CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells of both healthy subjects and type 1 diabetic patients. J. Immunol. 177:8338–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Battaglia M, Stabilini A, Roncarolo MG. (2005) Rapamycin selectively expands CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells. Blood. 105:4743–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hedhli N, Pelat M, Depre C. (2005) Protein turnover in cardiac cell growth and survival. Cardiovasc. Res. 68:186–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikenoue T, Hong S, Inoki K. (2009) Monitoring mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity. Methods Enzymol. 452:165–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang X, et al. (2008) The mammalian target of rapamycin-signaling pathway in regulating metabolism and growth. J. Anim. Sci. 86:E36–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou H, Huang S. (2010) The complexes of mammalian target of rapamycin. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 11:409–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bodine SC, et al. (2001) Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat. Cell. Biol. 3:1014–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rommel C, et al. (2001) Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways. Nat. Cell. Biol. 3:1009–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mouisel E, Vignaud A, Hourde C, Butler-Browne G, Ferry A. (2010) Muscle weakness and atrophy are associated with decreased regenerative capacity and changes in mTOR signaling in skeletal muscles of venerable (18–24-month-old) dystrophic mdx mice. Muscle Nerve. 41:809–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jhunjhunwala S, Raimondi G, Thomson AW, Little SR. (2009) Delivery of rapamycin to dendritic cells using degradable microparticles. J. Control Release. 133:191–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spencer MJ, Tidball JG. (2001) Do immune cells promote the pathology of dystrophin-deficient myopathies? Neuromuscul. Disord. 11:556–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lange CM, et al. (2010) Increased frequency of regulatory T cells and selection of highly potent CD62L+ cells during treatment of human lung transplant recipients with rapamycin. Transpl. Int. 23:266–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iannitti T, Capone S, Feder D, Palmieri B. (2010) Clinical use of immunosuppressants in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Clin. Neuromuscul. Dis. 12:1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Charfi S, et al. (2007) Successful treatment of post-renal transplant gastric and pulmonary Ka-posi’s sarcoma with conversion to rapamycin treatment. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 18:617–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Iglesias J, et al. (2003) Rapamycin-based rescue therapy after chronic rejection in a pediatric liver transplant patient. Transpl. Int. 16:765–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kerkar N, et al. (2005) Rapamycin successfully treats post-transplant autoimmune hepatitis. Am. J. Transplant. 5:1085–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Haxhinasto S, Mathis D, Benoist C. (2008) The AKT-mTOR axis regulates de novo differentiation of CD4+Foxp3+ cells. J. Exp. Med. 205:565–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sauer S, et al. (2008) T cell receptor signaling controls Foxp3 expression via PI3K, Akt, and mTOR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:7797–802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Strauss L, et al. (2007) Selective Survival of Naturally Occurring Human CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells Cultured with Rapamycin. J. Immunol. 178:320–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stedman HH, et al. (1991) The mdx mouse diaphragm reproduces the degenerative changes of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature. 352:536–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Drummond MJ, et al. (2009) Rapamycin administration in humans blocks the contraction-induced increase in skeletal muscle protein synthesis. J. Physiol. 587:1535–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Risson V, et al. (2009) Muscle inactivation of mTOR causes metabolic and dystrophin defects leading to severe myopathy. J. Cell Biol. 187:859–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu B, et al. (2010) Dose-dependent restoration of dystrophin expression in cardiac muscle of dystrophic mice by systemically delivered morpholino. Gene Ther. 17:132–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Esser K. (2008) Regulation of mTOR signaling in skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 8:338–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ge Y, et al. (2009) mTOR regulates skeletal muscle regeneration in vivo through kinasedependent and kinase-independent mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 297:C1434–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pende M. (2006) mTOR, Akt, S6 kinases and the control of skeletal muscle growth. Bull. Cancer. 93:E39–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fluckey JD, et al. (2004) Insulin facilitation of muscle protein synthesis following resistance exercise in hindlimb-suspended rats is independent of a rapamycin-sensitive pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 287:E1070–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robinson J, et al. (2009) Oral rapamycin reduces tumour burden and vascularization in Lkb1(+/−) mice. J. Pathol. 219:35–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Harrison, DE et al. (2009) Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature. 460:392–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research 2011
www.feinsteininstitute.org

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saman Eghtesad
    • 1
  • Siddharth Jhunjhunwala
    • 2
  • Steven R. Little
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Paula R. Clemens
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of ImmunologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  5. 5.McGowan Institute for Regenerative MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  6. 6.Department of Veterans Affairs Medical CenterNeurology ServicePittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations