Advertisement

Molecular Medicine

, Volume 14, Issue 7–8, pp 502–516 | Cite as

Renal Hypoxia and Dysoxia After Reperfusion of the Ischemic Kidney

  • Matthieu Legrand
  • Egbert G. Mik
  • Tanja Johannes
  • Didier Payen
  • Can Ince
Open Access
Review Article

Abstract

Ischemia is the most common cause of acute renal failure. Ischemic-induced renal tissue hypoxia is thought to be a major component in the development of acute renal failure in promoting the initial tubular damage. Renal oxygenation originates from a balance between oxygen supply and consumption. Recent investigations have provided new insights into alterations in oxygenation pathways in the ischemic kidney. These findings have identified a central role of microvascular dysfunction related to an imbalance between vasoconstrictors and vasodilators, endothelial damage and endothelium-leukocyte interactions, leading to decreased renal oxygen supply. Reduced microcirculatory oxygen supply may be associated with altered cellular oxygen consumption (dysoxia), because of mitochondrial dysfunction and activity of alternative oxygen-consuming pathways. Alterations in oxygen utilization and/or supply might therefore contribute to the occurrence of organ dysfunction. This view places oxygen pathways’ alterations as a potential central player in the pathogenesis of acute kidney injury. Both in regulation of oxygen supply and consumption, nitric oxide seems to play a pivotal role. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that, following acute ischemic renal injury, persistent tissue hypoxia contributes to the development of chronic renal dysfunction. Adaptative mechanisms to renal hypoxia may be ineffective in more severe cases and lead to the development of chronic renal failure following ischemia-reperfusion. This paper is aimed at reviewing the current insights into oxygen transport pathways, from oxygen supply to oxygen consumption in the kidney and from the adaptation mechanisms to renal hypoxia. Their role in the development of ischemia-induced renal damage and ischemic acute renal failure are discussed.

Introduction

Acute renal failure (ARF) is a common condition that develops in 5% of hospitalized patients. Of the patients who develop ARF, ∼10% eventually require renal replacement therapy (1). Among critical care patients who have acute renal failure and survive, 2% to 10% develop terminal renal failure and require long-term dialysis (2,3). There is clear evidence that the occurrence of acute renal failure is associated with excess early and late mortality, and also with high financial costs (2,4,5). The kidneys are particularly susceptible to ischemic injury in many clinical conditions such as renal transplantation (6), treatment of suprarenal aneurysms (7), renal artery reconstructions, contrast agent-induced nephropathy (8), cardiac arrest, and shock. One reason for renal sensitivity to ischemia is that the kidney microvasculature is highly complex and must meet a high energy demand. Under normal, steady-state conditions, the oxygen (O2) supply to the renal tissues is well in excess of oxygen demand. Under pathological conditions, however, the delicate balance of oxygen supply compared with demand is easily disturbed owing to the unique arrangement of the renal microvasculature and its increasing numbers of diffusive shunting pathways (9,10). The renal microvasculature is serially organized, with almost all descending vasa recta emerging from the efferent arterioles of the juxtamedullary glomeruli. Adequate tissue oxygenation thus partially depends on the maintenance of medullary perfusion by adequate cortical perfusion. This, combined with the low amount of medullary blood flow [∼10% of total renal blood flow (11)] in the U-shaped microvasculature of the medulla, allows O2 shunting between the descending and ascending vasa recta and contributes to the high sensitivity of the medulla and corticomedullary junction to decreased O2 supply (12, 13, 14, 15). The effects of limited O2 supply are aggravated by the high O2 demand associated with the high tubular O2 consumption necessary for solute exchange (16) and the high rate of aerobic glycolysis (17). It is these conditions, working in parallel, that make the kidney highly susceptible to hypoxic conditions (18,19).

Whereas past investigations have focused mainly on tubular injury as the main cause of ischemia-related acute renal failure, increasing evidence implicates alterations in the intrarenal microcirculation pathway (20, 21, 22) and O2 handling (23, 24, 25). Indeed, although acute tubular necrosis (ATN) has classically been believed to be the leading cause of ARF (6,26), data from biopsies in patients with ATN have shown few or no changes consistent with tubular necrosis (27). The role played by microvascular dysfunction, however, has generated increasing interest. The complex pathophysiology of ischemic ARF includes the inevitable reperfusion phase associated with oxidative stress (28,29), cellular dysfunction, and altered signal transduction (30). During this process, alterations in oxygen transport pathways can result in cellular hypoxia and/or dysoxia. In this context, the distinction between hypoxia and dysoxia is that cellular hypoxia refers to the condition of decreased availability of oxygen due to inadequate convective delivery from the microcirculation. Cellular dysoxia, in contrast, refers to a pathological condition where the ability of mitochondria to perform oxidative phosphorylation is limited, regardless of the amount of available oxygen. The latter condition is associated with mitochondrial failure and/or activation of alternative pathways for oxygen consumption (31). Thus, we would expect that an optimal balance between oxygen supply and demand is essential to reducing damage from renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury (Figure 1). As discussed below, many factors can lead to a reduced oxygen supply at the microvascular level (32), including endothelial damage and leukocyte plugging. The negative effects of reduced oxygen supply on tissue oxygen levels may be aggravated by altered cellular oxygen consumption (dysoxia), due possibly to mitochondrial dysfunction and activity of alternative oxygen-consuming pathways (factors are discussed below).
Figure 1

Synthetic representation of mechanisms involved in renal tissue hypoxia leading to acute and chronic renal failure after ischemia-reperfusion. Renal tissue hypoxia reflects an imbalance between oxygen supply and oxygen consumption. Renal tissue hypoxia participates to further tubular damage and acute renal failure. Recently the role of renal hypoxia has been proposed in development of chronic renal failure. HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; −, protect; +, promote.

Factors that disrupt this balance can be expected to contribute to the pathogenesis of ARF. This article provides an overview of how renal oxygenation pathways are affected by I/R in the kidney and how these processes affect organ failure. We will review the contribution of factors related to the pathogenesis of ischemic acute renal failure that involve imbalances between renal O2 supply and demand. We will also discuss the adaptive mechanisms that respond to acute renal ischemia and how imbalances in renal oxygenation imbalance contribute to the development of ischemia-induced acute renal failure. We will conclude with how our current understanding of the pathogenesis of ARF may affect future therapeutic strategies.

The No-Reflow Phenomenon Jeopardizes Renal O2 Supply

Reperfusion after ischemic injury results in a partial recovery of renal blood flow, with a reduction in renal blood flow of up to 50% after reperfusion (33). This persistent reduction in total and regional renal blood flow (34, 35, 36) was described several decades ago as the “no-reflow” phenomenon (37). Recent work using intravital microscopy techniques has provided new insights into the central role of microvascular alterations and tubular damage in ischemic kidney injury leading to renal dysfunction (21). Many factors have been proposed to explain this phenomenon, such as an imbalance between vasodilatory and vasoconstrictive mediators, endothelial congestion, increased endothelial permeability leading to interstitial edema that compresses the peritubular capillaries, increased leukocyte adherence, and the extravascular accumulation of leukocytes. Persistent reductions in renal tissue oxygenation due to reperfusion have been directly measured by O2 electrodes and phosphorescence measurements in animal models of reperfusion injury and sepsis (38,39). The persistence of depressed regional blood flow and consequent renal tissue oxygenation is thought to play a pivotal role in the occurrence of acute renal failure after an ischemic injury, especially in the corticomedullary junction and the outer medulla (9).

Endothelial dysfunction plays a central role in jeopardizing renal O2 delivery at the microcirculatory level. In the next section, we discuss the role of the endothelium in the development of (micro)vascular dysfunction and its contribution to ischemia-induced renal injury.

Microvascular Dysfunction and the Balance Between Vasoconstrictors and Vasodilators

Most of the descending vasa recta providing blood to the medulla arise from efferent arterioles of juxtacorticomedullary nephrons (13). Vascular smooth muscle cells (including pericytes) around these descending vasa recta have vasoconstrictive properties (40). Thus tonic modulation of afferent and efferent arterioles and the descending vasa recta contributes to the regulation of renal O2 supply and medullary blood flow, respectively. The endothelium plays a key role in flow regulation, permeability, cell trafficking, signaling, and immunologic functions (32). In this context, endothelial dysfunction is defined as impaired vasorelaxation in response to endothelium-dependent vasodilators, such as acetylcholine (ACh). Such endothelial dysfunction has been shown to participate in postischemic vasoconstriction following reperfusion (41). Although the mechanism behind this dysfunction remains unclear and various contributing factors have been suggested, the nitric oxide (NO) pathway is thought to be a main player (42,43). NO is well known for its role in vascular tone regulation by acting on vascular smooth muscle cells to induce vasodilation (40,44). NO is generated by the enzymatic transformation of L-arginine and O2 into L-citrulline and NO; this reaction is catalyzed by an enzyme called nitric oxide synthase (NOS), which exists in three different isoforms, all of which are found in the kidney (42,45). Whereas endothelial NOS (eNOS) is found in the vasa recta, inner medullary collecting duct, and glomeruli (46,47), inducible NOS (iNOS) can be expressed by vascular smooth muscle cells, renal tubular cells (39), and immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils (42,48, 49, 50). In the kidney, nNOS is expressed in cells of the macula densa and seems to participate in tubuloglomerular feedback, but has minimal effect on medullary perfusion (51,52), in contrast to eNOS (53). NOS inhibitors have been shown to induce hypoxic medullary damage in models of renal ischemia, highlighting the role of NO in maintaining regional renal blood flow under these conditions (54). Despite having a common end product (NO), activating different types of NOS can have very different effects on renal tissue, depending on both the temporal profile and topography of NO production by each NOS enzyme (42). iNOS-derived NO appears to participate in vascular dysfunction (55,56), and it is therefore thought that NO generated by iNOS is harmful, leading to tissue damage (43,55,57). Several in vivo and in vitro investigations have demonstrated that inhibiting the expression or activity of iNOS (58,59) or even the absence of iNOS itself (60) can prevent renal I/R injury. The two main pathways of iNOS-derived NO-induced damage are thought to be the generation of peroxynitrite, causing endothelial dysfunction (60,61), and the inhibition of eNOS-derived NO, resulting in the inability to buffer vasoconstrictive agents (45,58). Conversely, infusing nonselective NOS inhibitors that block eNOS activity has been shown to worsen both cortical and medullary blood flow and oxygenation (45,62). Indeed, eNOS-derived NO may act in a paracrine fashion, affecting surrounding cells and preventing vascular dysfunction by inhibiting platelet aggregation and preventing leukocyte activation (63), as well as having a direct vasodilatory effect (54). The inability of hypoxic endothelial cells to produce NO could thus have detrimental effects and participate in renal damage (64).

To highlight the role played by endothelial cell dysfunction after renal ischemia, Brodsky et al. (65) intravenously injected human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) into a rat kidney transiently exposed to ischemia. HUVEC injection improved blood flow in peritubular capillaries as well as renal function. In the same study, implanting cells expressing functional eNOS also improved renal function, suggesting a pivotal role for the dysfunction of both endothelial cells and eNOS in postischemic renal injury. Incomplete restoration of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, however, suggests that other pathways could be involved in this dysfunction, such as prostaglandins or endotheliumderived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) (66,67). Furthermore, during I/R, a lack of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4)—an essential cofactor of NOS—has also been implicated in endothelial dysfunction after I/R injury (56). Deficits in BH4 lead to eNOS uncoupling and the oxidation of O2, which causes the enzyme to produce superoxides and generate peroxynitrite instead of NO (68). The administration of BH4 before I/R has been shown to protect the kidney from damage following I/R (69).

O2 pressure can also interfere with NO bioavailability (55). For example, NO is generated in response to decreased arterial O2 partial pressure, thereby causing vasodilation and an increase in capillary recruitment and blood flow (70, 71, 72). In addition, medullary vasoconstriction induced by indomethacin and radiological contrast media causes hypoxia, and has been shown to increase NO availability (72). Hypoxia can increase NO release from red blood cells, possibly through modifying the allosteric and electronic properties of hemoglobin, such as by decreasing the amount of the S-nitrosylated form of hemoglobin (73). Another mechanism responsible for hypoxia-induced NO release by red blood cells occurs through the nitrites (74).

In addition to decreased vasodilation proprieties, arterioles can exhibit increased reactivity to vasoconstrictive agents (75). Many vasoconstrictive agents have been suggested to accompany the postischemic increase in vascular tone, including endothelin, angiotensin II (76), thromboxane A2 (77), leukotriene C4 (78), adenosine (14), endothelium-derived prostaglandin H2, and sympathetic nerve stimulation (13,18). These abnormalities in vascular reactivity have been associated with increases in cytosolic Ca2+ (79); such increases in intracellular Ca2+ may also cause cell death by inducing the activation of proteases, phospholipases, and pro-apoptotic pathways (80). Of all the vasoconstrictive agents, endothelin seems to be particularly important, because endothelin-1 levels have been found to increase after ischemia, and blockage of the endothelin pathway by endothelin A receptor antagonists (70,76) has been shown to protect against I/R injury. NO can counteract the effects of endothelin after I/R (81). It seems, however, that further blockage of endothelin B (ETB) receptors can be detrimental to the kidney by interfering with the recovery process (82). Eicosanoids are another class of mediators that exert complex effects on microcirculatory function after I/R. They are produced from arachidonic acid through three major enzymatic pathways: cyclooxygenase (COX), lipoxygenase (LO), and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (83). It has long been recognized that prostanoids (made by COX-1 and -2) play a critical role in modulating renal blood flow and glomerular hemodynamics (84,85). Besides regulating the vascular tone of the glomerular afferent arterioles, prostanoids with vasodilatory properties, such as prostaglandin E2 and prostacyclin (PGI2), can oppose the effects of vasoconstrictors (catecholamines, angiotensin, and vasopressin) in hypovolemic conditions or conditions of decreased cardiac output (86, 87, 88, 89, 90). Thus, these mediators can influence medullary blood flow by controlling the vascular tone of the descending vasa recta, which likely requires the activation of the prostanoid receptors EP2, EP4, or IP (91). Leukotriene A4-derived eicosanoids (from the LO pathway) have been shown to act on the microcirculation by enhancing vasoconstriction and vascular permeability (via LTC4 and LTD4), and by mediating the local inflammatory response to increase polymorphonuclear leukocyte aggregation and adhesion to the endothelium (LTB4) (92, 93, 94). Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HETEs) and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) from the P450 monooxygenase pathway can constrict renal vessels and glomerular mesangial cells and have been implicated in the tubuloglomerular feedback and renal blood flow autoregulation of the kidney (95,96). Further details on the complex renal pathophysiology of eicosanoids can be found in a recent dedicated review (83).

Endothelial Injury

Structural damage to both endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells occurs rapidly after an ischemic insult (97). Reorganization of F-actin in endothelial smooth cells occurs after renal I/R (98). Cytoskeletal modifications observed in vitro in endothelial cells undergoing ATP depletion (99,100) or exposure to oxidants (such as H2O2) may be responsible for increased endothelial permeability and interstitial edema (101, 102, 103). Furthermore, fluorescence microscopy studies have demonstrated that microvascular flow can be impaired in peritubular capillaries owing to endothelial cell rupture or aggregation, causing intravascular obstruction after renal I/R (32,41,104,105).

Sutton et al. (20) suggested another possible mechanism involved in increasing endothelial permeability. They observed a change in endothelial cell-cell junctions characterized by a rapid loss of adherens junctions (V-E cadherin) following I/R in an in vivo rat model. The disruption of adherens junctions can increase paracellular permeability and leakage from the vascular bed to the surrounding tissue (106). Endothelial cell swelling could also participate in the perfusion impairment by externally compressing capillaries and shrinking the vascular lumen (107,108), in addition to the interstitial edema (97). Indeed, endothelial cell swelling is a classic histological observation following I/R (109). Although the role of ion channel impairment in ischemia-induced ARF remains a matter of debate, such impairments have been suggested to take part in cellular volume dysregulation (110). I/R can induce membrane depolarization of endothelial cells by inactivating flow-sensitive K+ channels and hyperpolarization or depolarization through the inhibition of inwardly or outwardly rectifying K+ currents, respectively (111,112). How such changes cause volume dysregulation, however, remains to be determined. Furthermore, regional endothelial injury may activate endothelial cells in remote organs, such as the lungs, leading to acute lung injury, which further contributes to renal damage via systemic hypoxia (113). In addition, the injury of endothelial cells may induce a procoagulative response and thereby contribute to vascular obstruction and deficits in renal perfusion (114,115).

Our understanding of the exact pathways involved in renal ischemia and endothelial cell dysfunction following I/R remains largely incomplete and needs further investigation. It should be emphasized that even if it is often described as an organ, the endothelium cannot be seen as a homogeneous structure. Indeed, endothelial cells differ in structure and function at different sites of the vascular tree and demonstrate diverse responses to hypoxic stimuli (116). Because of this endothelial heterogeneity and the broad range of tissue O2 pressures throughout the kidney, endothelial cells in different regions of the kidney will likely show different levels of susceptibility to ischemic or hypoxic injury (117,118).

Activation of Inflammation and Endothelial-Leukocyte Interactions

Endothelial-leukocyte interactions have classically been associated with renal I/R injury (119). Although polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) have been implicated for many years in organ damage during I/R (120), research has also implicated monocytes, macrophages, and T cells (121,122). Previous studies assessed PMN activation/infiltration using enzymatic biomarkers, such as myeloperoxidase or chloroacetate esterase. Nevertheless, these assays are not specific for PMN activation (123). Using more direct staining methods, only a few infiltrating PMNs have been observed in the renal parenchyma after I/R, whereas the number of monocytes or macrophages seems to be much higher and occurs much earlier in the time course of reperfusion (121,124). This occurred notably in the outer medulla, which is known to be sensitive to ischemic injury (124). Additionally, some studies performed with PMN-depleted animals failed to show a protective effect on renal I/R injury compared with control animals (125,126). Similarly, ischemic acute renal failure has been reported in neutropenic patients, arguing against a key role for PMNs in postischemic renal damage (127). Therefore, the concept of a more prominent role for mononuclear leukocytes in this setting has recently emerged. For example, Takada et al. (128) showed that renal function could be improved by inhibiting the infiltration of mononuclear leukocytes via blockade of the B7-CD28 co-stimulation pathway, one of the costimulatory pathways necessary for T-cell activation (129). The B7-1 pathway was further implicated in human ischemic renal tissue by indirect immunohistochemical staining of endothelial cells from the ascending vasa recta in the outer medulla (130). Moreover, CD4/CD8 double-knockout mice exhibited decreased renal dysfunction following renal ischemia, with the CD4+ subtype appearing to be the major contributor to I/R injury (131). Nevertheless, the exact mechanism by which mononuclear leukocytes are activated in this setting remains largely unknown, especially given the absence of any defined antigen. Several detailed reviews can be found on this topic (121,123,127,132).

The activation of the inflammatory cascade can contribute to microcirculatory dysfunction by capillary plugging caused by the interaction between leukocytes, platelets, and red blood cells. Such plugging results in the so-called no-reflow phenomenon occurring after I/R (133). The adhesion of leukocytes to the vascular endothelium following upregulation of adhesion molecules may occur via a cytokine-release pathway (134). Modulation of the inflammatory response has been shown to improve renal function after I/R. For instance, the anti-inflammatory agent, α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), protects the kidney against ischemic injury but also inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis (135). Similarly, infusion of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α binding protein decreased neutrophil infiltration and preserved renal function, suggesting a deleterious role for the up-regulation of TNF-α in renal I/R (136). In addition, levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 in plasma have been found to predict mortality in patients with acute renal failure (137).

DNA repair processes such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activation may aggravate endothelial dysfunction and tubular damage (138,139). PARP-1 activation has been implicated in endothelial injury, as illustrated by finding a reduced number of adherent and rolling leukocyte as well as red blood cell trapping in PARP-1−/− mice after I/R (140). This mechanism is thought to involve inhibition of the PARP-1-induced inflammatory cascade. PARP-1 is involved in the regulation of inflammatory genes (141), such as nuclear factor (NF)-κB, which are implicated in leukocyte activation (134). Furthermore, overactivation of PARP-1 could lead to cell death by the activation of pro-apoptotic pathways or energy failure following the cellular depletion of its substrate, NAD+ (142).

Leukocyte activation may lead to further endothelial damage by sustaining the inflammatory response, releasing cytokines and proteases and inducing oxidative stress (32). Thus, targeting adhesion molecules may help prevent ischemic damage to the kidney. Intercellular cell adhesion molecule type A (ICAM-1) deficiency or blockage has been demonstrated to provide protection from moderate renal I/R injury (120,143). Systemic moderate hypoxia alone can induce an increase in leukocyte adhesion mediated by CD11/CD18 integrins, even in the absence of complete ischemia (133,144). L-, E-, and P-selectins, expressed on the surface of leukocytes, endothelial cells, and platelets, respectively, are involved in the infiltration of leukocytes via their interaction with the endothelium by inducing rolling and sticking of leukocytes to the endothelium (145,146). Inhibition of P-selectin has been found both to improve renal blood flow in the early stage of ischemic renal injury and to confer renoprotection (145,147). Interestingly, if the infiltration of T cells occurs within the first hours after ischemia, monocyte/macrophage and T-cell infiltration occurs days following the injury (123,148).

Complex interactions exist between tubular injury, microvascular injury, and inflammation after renal I/R. On the one hand, insults to the tubule cells promote the liberation of a number of inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-6, TGF-β, and chemotactic cytokines (RANTES, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, ENA-78, Gro-α, and IL-8) (132,148,149). On the other hand, chemokine production can promote leukocyte-endothelium interactions and leukocyte activation, resulting in renal blood flow impairment and the expansion of tubular damage.

In summary, renal ischemia triggers the activation of multiple mechanisms leading to (micro)vascular dysfunction. These mechanisms include functional endothelial dysfunction, probably involving NO as the central mediator. Endothelial dysfunction is correlated with direct endothelial injury and structural damage associated with increased vascular permeability, tissue congestion, vasomotor disorders, and inflammatory and hemostatic activation (see Figure 2). Together, these alterations compromise global and local renal perfusion, and decrease renal oxygen supply for extended periods of time after the initial ischemic insult has been effectively resolved.
Figure 2

Interaction between microvascular injury and tubular damage before (A) and after (B) renal ischemia-reperfusion. PMN, polymorphonuclear.

Changes in O2 Consumption and Utilization

Renal O2 Consumption Depends on Renal Hemodynamics and Electrolyte Reabsorption

Adequate medullary tissue oxygenation, in terms of balanced oxygen supply and demand, depends on the maintenance of medullary perfusion by adequate cortical perfusion and also on the high rate of O2 consumption required for active electrolyte transport (13). Furthermore, renal blood flow is closely associated with renal sodium transport [the primary O2-consuming function of the kidney (16)] by limiting/increasing solute delivery to the medullary nephrons, thus reducing/increasing metabolic demands (150).

As mentioned above, in addition to having a limited O2 supply due to the anatomy of the microcirculation, the sensitivity of the medulla to hypoxic conditions results from this high O2 consumption. Renal sodium transport is the main O2-consuming function of the kidney and is closely linked to renal blood flow for sodium transport, particularly in the thick ascending limbs of the loop of Henle and the S3 segments of the proximal tubules (19). Medullary renal blood flow is also highly dependent on cortical perfusion, with almost all descending vasa recta emerging from the efferent arteriole of juxtamedullary glomeruli (151). Thus, factors involved in the glomerular filtration rate strongly influence medullary oxygenation by modifying the amount of solute delivered to the tubules and local O2 consumption. Therefore, a slight decrease in renal perfusion pressure leads to decreased Na+ reabsorptive work and a subsequent increase in medullary pO2 due to a reduction in tubular O2 consumption (150). However, a profound reduction in cortical perfusion can disrupt medullary blood flow and lead to an imbalance between O2 supply and O2 consumption, if the decline in regional blood flow exceeds the decrease in tubular metabolic rate. Similarly, inhibition of tubular reabsorption by diuretics increases medullary pO2 by decreasing the activity of Na+/K+-ATPases and local O2 consumption (152). If cortical and medullary regional renal blood flow is interdependent, however, differential regulation and region-specific responses to vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory agents must exist (13). We previously showed that µpO2 in both the cortex and the outer medulla can vary independently, based on differences in O2 supply and consumption (38). This balance/imbalance in O2 renal consumption and delivery, and the components that affect this balance are illustrated in Figure 1. Dysoxia induced by I/R, in combination with impaired oxygen delivery due to microvascular dysfunction, may lead to the further deterioration of oxygen availability at the cellular level.

Mitochondrial Activity and NO-Mediated O2 Consumption

The medulla has been found to be the main site of production of NO in the kidney. In addition to the actions described above, NO appears to be a key regulator of renal tubule cell metabolism by inhibiting the activity of the Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter and reducing Na+/H+ exchange (153). Because superoxide (O2) is required to inhibit solute transport activity (154), it was assumed that these effects were mediated by peroxynitrite (OONO). Indeed, mitochondrial nNOS upregulation, together with an increase in NO production, has been shown to increase mitochondrial peroxynitrite generation, which in turn can induce cytochrome c release and promote apoptosis (155). NO has also been shown to directly compete with O2 at the mitochondrial level (156). These findings support the idea that NO acts as an endogenous regulator to match O2 supply to O2 consumption (157), especially in the renal medulla (158).

NO can bind cytochrome oxidase and cause reversible inhibition of mitochondrial respiration at nanomolar concentrations (159). Cytochrome c oxidase (cytochrome aa3, complex IV) is the terminal complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, which is responsible for about 90% of O2 consumption in mammals (23). NO reversibly binds to the O2 binding site of cytochrome oxidase and acts as a potent, rapid, and reversible inhibitor of cytochrome oxidase in competition with molecular O2 (160,161). This inhibition could be dependent on O2 level, because the IC50 (the concentration of NO that reduces the specified response by half) decreases with reduction in O2 concentration (156,162). The inhibition of electron flux at the cytochrome oxidase level switches the electron transport chain to a reduced state, and consequently leads to depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential and electron leakage. Together, these changes lead to the generation of superoxide anions (O2−•), especially by complexes I and III (156). Moncada and Erusalimsky (156) proposed that NO-induced cytochrome oxidase inhibition has a biphasic effect. A transient inhibition of cytochrome oxidase by NO can decrease the generation of O2−•, leading to potentially beneficial effects on hypoxic adaptation mechanisms. However, progression to a later phase presents a harmful response, generating a large amount of free O2 radicals. The reduction of superoxide dismutase (which converts O2−• into hydrogen peroxide [H2O2]) and the depletion of glutathione (the substrate of glutathione peroxidase, which converts H2O2 into water) result in the availability of even more O2−• that can react with NO to generate peroxynitrite (163). In addition, reactive O2 species are produced by infiltrating leukocytes, further disrupting the balance between oxidants and antioxidants. This leads to irreversible damage to the mitochondrial structures, causing downstream activation of apoptotic and other cell death pathways (25) (see Figure 3). Furthermore, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production can further impair arteriolar blood flow by inducing endothelial cell damage, leukocyte adhesion (164), and glycocalyx damage (165).
Figure 3

Influence of NO and O2 on mitochondria activity. The mitochondrial electron transport chain includes four multiple subunit enzyme complexes of proteins (complexes I–IV), ATP synthase (complex V), and the adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT). Electrons are collected at the complexes I (NADH dehydrogenase) and II (succinate dehydrogenase) after oxidation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and of succinate, respectively, is transferred to coenzyme Q (CoQ) to give reduced CoQ. Electrons from reduced CoQ are transferred first to complex III (cytochrome bc1), then to cytochrome c (cyt c) and followed by complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase, COX), and finally to oxygen (O2) to give water (H2O). An electrochemical gradient is generated between the mitochondrial matrix and the intermembrane space by pumping protons through the inner membrane using the energy generated by the electron flow. This electrochemical gradient is then used to reintroduce protons through the complex V (ATP synthase) and to convert inorganic phosphate and ADP to ATP. The ATP, generated in mitochondria, is then exchanged for cytosolic ADP by the ANT. With increase in NO/O2 ratio, NO competitively inhibits complex IV associated with an electron leakage of the complexes chain and finally favors the generation of superoxide anions (O2−•). Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) generated from O2−• by superoxide dismutase (SOD) contributes to hypoxia adaptation response via stabilization of HIF-α. If prolonged production of O2−• overwhelms capacity of the mitochondrial’s antioxidant system including the superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSHpx), formation of large amount of peroxynitrite (ONOO-) and H2O2, precursor of the hydroxyl radical (OH•), via the Fenton reaction occurs. Peroxynitrite further inhibits the mitochondrial Mn-superoxide dismutase by nitration. Cytosolic (xanthine oxydase and cytochrome P450 reductases, and NOS, myeloperoxidase) and membrane (NADPH oxidase, the cytochrome P450) intramitochondrial ROS overproduction leads to cell necrosis or apoptosis.

To summarize, whereas the NO/O2 ratio can act as a regulator of cellular O2 consumption by matching decreases in O2 delivery to decreases in cellular O2 cellular (166), the inhibitory effect of NO on mitochondrial respiration under hypoxic conditions further impairs cellular aerobic metabolism. This leads to a state of “cytopathic hypoxia,” as described in the sepsis literature (167). Several lines of evidence exist demonstrating impairments in mitochondria function following renal I/R (161). For example, Coremans et al. (25) used a NADH fluorescence technique to show that I/R directly affects mitochondrial activity in an isolated kidney. One area of current investigation focuses on unraveling the role of the site of NO production on the modulation of mitochondrial respiration. Indeed, the site of NO production seems to be of major importance. Stimulation of eNOS by bradykinin increases the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration, supporting the idea of a regulatory role for eNOS (168). Furthermore, Clementi et al. (169) found that only cell-secreted NO competes with O2 and to regulate mitochondrial respiration. In addition to the three isoforms mentioned above, an α-isoform of neuronal NOS, the mitochondrial isoform (mNOS) located in the inner mitochondrial membrane, has also been shown to regulate mitochondrial respiration (61). These data support a role for NO in the balanced regulation of renal O2 supply and O2 consumption after renal I/R. However, the relationships between the determinants of O2 supply, O2 consumption, and renal function, and their relation to renal damage, remain largely unknown. Future research should aim to elucidate the mechanisms that lead from decreased O2 supply to changes in O2 consumption, and to determine how adaptive or damaging their respective contributions are in the setting of renal I/R. Our group recently developed a method for measuring mitochondrial pO2 in living cells in vitro by the excitation of endogenous mitochondrial protoporphyrin IX and measurement of the decay of delayed fluorescence (170). If this method proves to be feasible in vivo, it will allow insight into the balance between oxygen supply and oxygen utilization at the intracellular level.

Mild and Long-Term Renal Response to Hypoxia

Sustained Endothelial Activation and Vascular Rarefaction

Ischemic renal failure leads to persistent endothelial activation, mainly in the form of endothelium-leukocyte interactions and the activation of adhesion molecules. This persistent activation can compromise renal blood flow, prevent the recovery of adequate tissue oxygenation, and jeopardize tubular cell survival despite the initial recovery of renal tubular function (22,171). A 30% to 50% reduction in microvascular density was seen 40 weeks after renal ischemic injury in a rat model (104). Vascular rarefaction has been proposed to induce chronic hypoxia, resulting in tubulointerstitial fibrosis via the molecular activation of fibrogenic factors such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, collagen, and fibronectin (172), all of which may play an important role in the progression of chronic renal disease. Responses to hypoxia may represent an important element that prevents the onset of chronic renal failure, postrecovery. This possibility has been suggested by studies in which therapeutics that improve renal oxygenation or capillary density were shown to prevent delayed renal dysfunction after I/R. Likewise, Basile et al. (173) have shown that treatment with L-arginine, starting 3 d after renal I/R, increased renal blood flow, decreased pimonidizole staining (a hypoxia-sensitive marker), and attenuated renal damage. Kang et al. (174) used VEGF administration to stimulate angiogenesis that had been impaired in a remnant kidney model. VEGF helped maintain capillary density, reduced renal interstitial fibrosis, and stabilized renal function, although tissue oxygenation was not measured in that study. Impairment of the regenerative capacity of endothelial cells, possibly due to low activity of the telomere-synthesizing enzyme, telomerase, may be involved in postischemic vascular rarefaction (175). Progenitor cells have been suggested to be involved in endothelial repair because inhibiting the apoptosis of progenitor cells has been shown to reduce the loss of peritubular capillaries and restore kidney function in an adriamycin-induced nephrosis model (176, 177, 178). However, whether deficiencies in progenitor cellmediated endothelial repair plays a role in delayed vascular rarefaction remains to be determined (179).

Rarefaction of peritubular capillaries and hypoxia precede the development of tubulointerstitial fibrosis in several animal models, supporting a link between decreased peritubular capillary density, renal hypoxia, and progression to chronic renal failure after acute injury. Additional studies are necessary to support this hypothesis, however.

Adaptation to Hypoxia

Oxygen deprivation is an important determinant of cellular function. Over the last decade, the role of hypoxiainducible factors (HIFs) in O2 supply and adaptation to hypoxic conditions has found increasing support. HIFs are O2-sensitive transcription factors involved in O2-dependent gene regulation that mediate cellular adaptation to O2 deprivation and tissue protection under hypoxic conditions in the kidney (180,181).

HIF is a heterodimer composed of an O2-regulated α-subunit (HIF-1α or HIF-2α) and a constitutive β-subunit. In the presence of O2, two critical prolines of the HIF-α are hydroxylated by prolyl hydroxylases, which require molecular O2 as a substrate (182). The hydroxylated prolyl residues are recognized by the von Hippel-Lindau protein as a component of a ubiquitin ligase, which targets HIFα for destruction through the ubiquitinproteasome pathway (183). Under hypoxic conditions, HIF is not degraded, but instead accumulates in the cell and induces transcription of target genes after binding to a hypoxia-response element (HRE) following translocation into the nucleus (184). ROS generated by mitochondria seem to be required for HIF-α stabilization and thus contribute an O2-sensoring function for the mitochondria (166,185).

The effect of NO on HIF stabilization is a matter of debate, with conflicting published results. NO generation can promote HIF-1α accumulation in a cGMP-independent manner (186). However, Hagen et al. (187) showed that NO may reduce the activation of HIF in hypoxia via the inhibitory effect of NO on cytochrome oxidase. Therefore, it seems that NO has pleiotropic effects on HIF expression, with various responses related to different pathways.

HIF-1α upregulates a number of factors implicated in cytoprotection, including angiogenic growth factors—such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endothelial progenitor cell recruitment via the endothelial expression of SDF-1, heme-oxygenase 1 (HO-1), and erythropoietin (EPO)—and vasomotor regulation (184). VEGF is known to act on the microcirculation through various mechanisms. VEGF can stimulate endothelial cell proliferation and differentiation, increase vascular permeability, and mediate endothelium-dependent vasodilation (188). Furthermore, VEGF promotes monocyte chemotaxis and the expression of adhesion molecules. Although expression of VEGF has been shown to increase in renal diseases states or during hypoxia (188), Kanellis et al. (189) did not find any increase in VEGF expression in a rat model of renal I/R, but did observe upregulation of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). Although it has been speculated that stimulation of VEGFR-2 by tubular cells could play a role in preventing the apoptosis of adjacent endothelial cells, this question remains to be addressed. VEGF administration has also been shown to accelerate the repair of injured capillaries, probably through nitric oxide generation, in an experimental model of thrombotic microangiopathy (190). HO-1 produces carbon monoxide (a potent vasodilator) while degrading heme, which may preserve tissue blood flow during reperfusion (191). Thus, it has been suggested that the induction of HO-1 can protect the kidney from ischemic damage by decreasing oxidative damage and NO generation (192,193). Finally, in addition to its anti-apoptotic properties, EPO may restore renal microcirculation, and thus protect the kidney from ischemic damage (176), by stimulating the mobilization and differentiation of progenitor cells toward an endothelial phenotype (194) and inducing NO release from eNOS (195).

HIF may also be involved in potentially deleterious responses to hypoxia, including the promotion of fibrosis. Metabolic regulation by HIF has been found to increase the expression of glucose transporter 1 and glycolytic enzymes, leading to a faster depletion of glucose resources (196). Although the precise role of HIF in hypoxia-induced cell death has yet to be determined, HIF has also been implicated in regulating apoptotic and cell death pathways. A detailed description of HIF pathway activation is beyond the scope of this review, but excellent reviews on this topic have been published (182,197).

Inter- and intracell type differences exist in the ability of cells to induce HIF activity in response to systemic hypoxia (184). In the kidney, HIF-1α is expressed in tubular cells, whereas HIF-2α is expressed in peritubular cells, renal interstitial fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. Differences in HIF expression among tubular cell types have been proposed to underlie their wide disparity in vulnerability to hypoxic injury. Rosenberger et al. (180) showed that cells from the collecting duct and medullary thick ascending limbs (mTALs) have markedly different HIF responses, which were correlated with their viability during hypoxic stress and inversely correlated with tissue damage. The authors showed that HIF expression does not increase continuously with increasing severity of cellular hypoxia, and they proposed that above a certain hypoxia threshold, responses to HIF expression fail and injury may become irreversible. Therefore, the induction of the HIF response may be effective only under conditions of slight to mild hypoxic injury and ineffective in more severe cases. Further investigations will be necessary to assess potentially beneficial therapeutic strategies that target the HIF pathway.

Therapeutic Implications and Perspectives

Correcting intravascular volume depletion with fluid administration and maintaining adequate renal perfusion pressure with vasopressors in vasoplegic states are both first-line strategies to preserve renal oxygen supply. There is a definite need for fluid administration during the early stages of sepsis (198,199), in dehydration states (200), or for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (8,201), however, the volume and choice of fluid remains a matter of debate. The main goal of fluid infusion is to reestablish adequate circulation and ultimately to restore tissue perfusion and oxygenation.

Correction of systemic hemodynamics does not necessarily result in the recovery of microcirculatory perfusion and oxygenation (202). Several lines of evidence show a difference in microcirculatory oxygenation and renal oxygen consumption between different fluid regimens (38). High-molecular-weight hydroxyethyl starch solutions (≥200 kDa) appear to be deleterious in terms of renal function (203,204); low-molecular-weight starch solutions, on the other hand, may improve renal tissue oxygenation by decreasing blood viscosity (205) and reducing vascular resistance, along with preventing starch molecule accumulation in the renal tubules and the disturbance of glomerular hemodynamics (206). Likewise, because low doses of dopamine are ineffective in terms of prevention or treatment of acute renal failure (201,207), norepinephrine (208) and vasopressin (209) are probably the drugs of choice for improving function in the renal macrocirculation and microcirculation. Because reaching supraphysiological hemodynamic values are at least doubtful (210) and may be harmful (211,212), the optimal fluid volume that should be given remains difficult to estimate. Indeed, based on the oxygen supply/consumption concept, maneuvers that systematically enhance the glomerular filtration rate in patients with acute renal failure may be harmful in increasing solute delivery to the tubules, and thereby the renal oxygen consumption (67). Thurau and Boylan (213) used the provocative term “acute renal success” to concisely describe the adaptive role of glomerular hemodynamics in matching oxygen supply to consumption with the ultimate goal of preventing tubular damage.

Use of pharmacological interventions that act at the microcirculatory level may be a successful strategy to overcome ischemia-induced vascular damage and prevent ARF. Activated protein C (APC), an endogenous vitamin K-dependent serine protease with multiple biological activities, may meet these criteria (207). Along with antithrombotic and profibrinolytic properties, APC can reduce the chemotaxis and interactions of leukocytes with activated endothelium (214). However, although APC has been shown to improve survival in septic shock and to shorten the time to resolution of cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction (215), renal dysfunction was not improved in the largest study published so far (215). Nevertheless, the criteria used for renal dysfunction in that study (that is, oliguria) are questionable, because oliguria cannot be considered a fully accurate marker of kidney damage. Furthermore, animal studies have suggested a protective effect of APC in sepsis-induced kidney injury (216,217).

Drugs with pleiotropic effects on the vasculature, such as EPO (194) and statins (218), have the potential to prevent ischemia-induced renal failure by enhancing endothelial NO synthase expression and/or improving vascular permeability, leading to improved microcirculatory function. Based on the mechanisms mentioned above, the use of immunosuppressive drugs and approaches to inhibit leukocyte adhesion warrant further investigation, and may yield promising renoprotective effects (219,220).

Finally, despite being an attractive pathophysiological model, neither drugs with renal vasodilatory effects (that is, dopamine, fenoldopam, endothelin receptor blockers, adenosine antagonists) nor agents that decrease renal oxygen consumption (that is, loop diuretics) have been shown to protect the kidney from ischemic damage (200,201). Recent common standards for the diagnosis and classification of acute kidney injury (221), and new tools for early diagnosis of renal injury (222), may reduce the striking gap between the plethora of drugs found to be efficient in animal models and their almost constant failure to improve outcome in the clinical setting.

We have to bear in mind that a magic bullet to treat the highly complex condition that is renal I/R is not in sight yet, and further research is needed. We can expect that understanding the balance between O2 delivery and O2 consumption, as well as the function of O2-consuming pathways (that is, mitochondrial function, ROS generation), will be central to this treatment strategy.

Conclusion

Growing evidence indicates that microvascular dysfunction occurs after acute renal ischemic injury, mainly through an imbalance between vasoconstrictors and vasodilators, with NO being the main mediator. These deleterious effects of NO are thought to be associated with the NO generated by the induction of iNOS and its contribution to oxidative stress, both resulting in vascular dysfunction and tissue damage. Ischemic injury also leads to structural damage to the endothelium and leukocyte infiltration. Consequently, renal tissue hypoxia is proposed to promote the initial tubular damage, leading to acute organ dysfunction. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that, after acute ischemic renal injury, persistent tissue hypoxia contributes to the development of chronic renal dysfunction. In addition to a decrease in renal O2 supply, O2-consuming pathways are affected over the course of renal I/R. Responses to the inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain during I/R may contribute to either hypoxia adaptation or cell death, depending on the length and magnitude of the process. Research is necessary to clarify the respective contributions of O2 supply (for example, to determine the precise pO2 threshold that leads to kidney damage) and O2 utilization changes to renal (dys)function in the context of I/R. These studies should aim to unravel the mechanisms leading from a decrease in O2 supply to changes in O2 consumption and determine the extent to which these responses are adaptive or damaging in the setting of renal I/R. The results of these studies will hopefully lead to the development of new treatment strategies to protect the kidney from I/R injury.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Richard Milstein from Skylab Industry for help with the illustration in Figure 2.

References

  1. 1.
    Brady HR, Singer GG. (1995) Acute renal failure. Lancet 346:1533–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagshaw SM. (2006) The long-term outcome after acute renal failure. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 12:561–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korkeila M, Ruokonen E, Takala J. (2000) Costs of care, long-term prognosis and quality of life in patients requiring renal replacement therapy during intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 26:1824–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manns B, et al. (2003) Cost of acute renal failure requiring dialysis in the intensive care unit: clinical and resource implications of renal recovery. Crit. Care Med. 31:449–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bell M, Martling CR. (2007) Long-term outcome after intensive care: can we protect the kidney? Crit. Care 11:147.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoste EA, Kellum JA. (2006) Acute kidney injury: epidemiology and diagnostic criteria. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 12:531–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellenberger C, et al. (2006) Incidence, risk factors and prognosis of changes in serum creatinine early after aortic abdominal surgery. Intensive Care Med. 32:1808–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wong GT, Irwin MG. (2007) Contrast-induced nephropathy. Br. J. Anaesth. 99:474–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eckardt KU, et al. (2005) Role of hypoxia in the pathogenesis of renal disease. Kidney Int. Suppl. S46–51.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leong CL, Anderson WP, O’Connor PM, Evans RG. (2007) Evidence that renal arterial-venous oxygen shunting contributes to dynamic regulation of renal oxygenation. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 292:F1726–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janssen WM, Beekhuis H, de Bruin R, de Jong PE, de Zeeuw D. (1995) Noninvasive measurement of intrarenal blood flow distribution: kinetic model of renal 123I-hippuran handling. Am. J. Physiol. 269:F571–80.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pallone TL, Robertson CR, Jamison RL. (1990) Renal medullary microcirculation. Physiol. Rev. 70:885–920.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pallone TL, Silldorff EP, Turner MR. (1998) Intrarenal blood flow: microvascular anatomy and the regulation of medullary perfusion. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 25:383–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joo JD, et al. (2007) Acute and delayed renal protection against renal ischemia and reperfusion injury with A1 adenosine receptors. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 293:F1847–57.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whitehouse T, Stotz M, Taylor V, Stidwill R, Singer M. (2006) Tissue oxygen and hemodynamics in renal medulla, cortex, and corticomedullary junction during hemorrhage-reperfusion. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 291:F647–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosen S, Epstein FH, Brezis M. (1992) Determinants of intrarenal oxygenation: factors in acute renal failure. Ren. Fail. 14:321–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen JJ. (1979) Is the function of the renal papilla coupled exclusively to an anaerobic pattern of metabolism? Am. J. Physiol. 236: F423–33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pallone TL, Zhang Z, Rhinehart K. (2003) Physiology of the renal medullary microcirculation. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 284:F253–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brezis M, Rosen S. (1995) Hypoxia of the renal medulla: its implications for disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 332:647–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sutton TA, Mang HE, Campos SB, Sandoval RM, Yoder MC, Molitoris BA. (2003) Injury of the renal microvascular endothelium alters barrier function after ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 285:F191–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yamamoto T, et al. (2002) Intravital videomicroscopy of peritubular capillaries in renal ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 282: F1150–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Horbelt M, et al. (2007) Acute and chronic microvascular alterations in a mouse model of ischemic acute kidney injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 293:F688–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jassem W, Fuggle SV, Rela M, Koo DD, Heaton ND. (2002) The role of mitochondria in ischemia/ reperfusion injury. Transplantation 73:493–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pan Y, et al. (2007) Multiple factors affecting cellular redox status and energy metabolism modulate hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase activity in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27: 912–25.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coremans JM, Van Aken M, Naus DC, Van Velthuysen ML, Bruining HA, Puppels GJ. (2000) Pretransplantation assessment of renal viability with NADH fluorimetry. Kidney Int. 57:671–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R. (2005) Acute renal failure. Lancet 365:417–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosen S, Heyman SN. (2001) Difficulties in understanding human “acute tubular necrosis”: limited data and flawed animal models. Kidney Int. 60:1220–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schnackenberg CG. (2002) Physiological and pathophysiological roles of oxygen radicals in the renal microvasculature. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 282:R335–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li C, Jackson RM. (2002) Reactive species mechanisms of cellular hypoxia-reoxygenation injury. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282:C227–41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schrier RW, Wang W, Poole B, Mitra A. (2004) Acute renal failure: definitions, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 114:5–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Connett RJ, Honig CR, Gayeski TE, Brooks GA. (1990) Defining hypoxia: a systems view of VO2, glycolysis, energetics, and intracellular PO2. J. Appl. Physiol. 68:833–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sutton TA, Fisher CJ, Molitoris BA. (2002) Microvascular endothelial injury and dysfunction during ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 62:1539–49.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Arendshorst WJ, Finn WF, Gottschalk CW. (1975) Pathogenesis of acute renal failure following temporary renal ischemia in the rat. Circ. Res. 37:558–68.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Olof P, Hellberg A, Kallskog O, Wolgast M. (1991) Red cell trapping and postischemic renal blood flow: differences between the cortex, outer and inner medulla. Kidney Int. 40:625–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mason J, Torhorst J, Welsch J. (1984) Role of the medullary perfusion defect in the pathogenesis of ischemic renal failure. Kidney Int. 26:283–93.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thiel G, de Rougemont D, Kriz W, Mason J, Torhorst J, Wolgast M. (1982) The role of reduced medullary perfusion in the genesis of acute ischemic renal failure: summary of a round-table discussion. Nephron 31:321–3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Summers WK, Jamison RL. (1971) The no reflow phenomenon in renal ischemia. Lab. Invest. 25: 635–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Johannes T, Mik EG, Nohe B, Raat NJ, Unertl KE, Ince C. (2006) Influence of fluid resuscitation on renal microvascular PO2 in a normotensive rat model of endotoxemia. Crit. Care 10:R88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johannes T, Mik EG, Ince C. (2008) Nonresuscitated endotoxemia induces microcirculatory hypoxic areas in the renal cortex in the rat. Shock. 2008, May 19 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pallone TL, Silldorff EP. (2001) Pericyte regulation of renal medullary blood flow. Exp. Nephrol. 9: 165–70.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Molitoris BA, Sandoval R, Sutton TA. (2002) Endothelial injury and dysfunction in ischemic acute renal failure. Crit. Care Med. 30:S235–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kone BC, Baylis C. (1997) Biosynthesis and homeostatic roles of nitric oxide in the normal kidney. Am. J. Physiol. 272:F561–78.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guan Z, Gobe G, Willgoss D, Endre ZH. (2006) Renal endothelial dysfunction and impaired autoregulation after ischemia-reperfusion injury result from excess nitric oxide. Am. J. Physiol Renal Physiol. 291:F619–28.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ito S, Abe K. (1997) Contractile properties of afferent and efferent arterioles. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol 24:532–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cowley AW Jr, Mori T, Mattson D, Zou AP. (2003) Role of renal NO production in the regulation of medullary blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 284:R1355–69.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wu F, Park F, Cowley AW Jr, Mattson DL. (1999) Quantification of nitric oxide synthase activity in microdissected segments of the rat kidney. Am. J. Physiol. 276:F874–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Arima S, Ito S. (2000) Isolated juxtaglomerular apparatus as a tool for exploring glomerular hemodynamics: application of microperfusion techniques. Exp. Nephrol. 8:304–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kone BC. (1999) Localization and regulation of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in the kidney. Semin. Nephrol. 19:230–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Buttery LD, Evans TJ, Springall DR, Carpenter A, Cohen J, Polak JM. (1994) Immunochemical localization of inducible nitric oxide synthase in endotoxin-treated rats. Lab. Invest. 71:755–64.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tojo A, et al. (1994) Immunocytochemical localization of distinct isoforms of nitric oxide synthase in the juxtaglomerular apparatus of normal rat kidney. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4:1438–47.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brown R, Ollerstam A, Persson AE. (2004) Neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibition sensitizes the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism after volume expansion. Kidney Int. 65:1349–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grzelec-Mojzesowicz M, Sadowski J. (2007) Renal tissue NO and intrarenal haemodynamics during experimental variations of NO content in anaesthetised rats. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 58:149–63.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ito S, Carretero OA, Abe K. (1997) Role of nitric oxide in the control of glomerular microcirculation. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 24:578–81.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Agmon Y, Peleg H, Greenfeld Z, Rosen S, Brezis M. (1994) Nitric oxide and prostanoids protect the renal outer medulla from radiocontrast toxicity in the rat. J. Clin. Invest. 94:1069–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Goligorsky MS, Brodsky SV, Noiri E. (2004) NO bioavailability, endothelial dysfunction, and acute renal failure: new insights into pathophysiology. Semin. Nephrol. 24:316–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gunnett CA, Lund DD, McDowell AK, Faraci FM, Heistad DD. (2005) Mechanisms of inducible nitric oxide synthase-mediated vascular dysfunction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25: 1617–22.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yu L, Gengaro PE, Niederberger M, Burke TJ, Schrier RW. (1994) Nitric oxide: a mediator in rat tubular hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:1691–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Noiri E, Peresleni T, Miller F, Goligorsky MS. (1996) In vivo targeting of inducible NO synthase with oligodeoxynucleotides protects rat kidney against ischemia. J. Clin. Invest. 97:2377–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chatterjee PK, et al. (2002) Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase reduces renal ischemia/ reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 61:862–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wangsiripaisan A, Gengaro PE, Nemenoff RA, Ling H, Edelstein CL, Schrier RW. (1999) Effect of nitric oxide donors on renal tubular epithelial cell-matrix adhesion. Kidney Int. 55:2281–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Schild L, Reinheckel T, Reiser M, Horn TF, Wolf G, Augustin W. (2003) Nitric oxide produced in rat liver mitochondria causes oxidative stress and impairment of respiration after transient hypoxia. FASEB J. 17:2194–201.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Brezis M, Heyman SN, Dinour D, Epstein FH, Rosen S. (1991) Role of nitric oxide in renal medullary oxygenation. Studies in isolated and intact rat kidneys. J. Clin. Invest. 88:390–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Chung AW, et al. (2004) Platelet-leukocyte aggregation induced by PAR agonists: regulation by nitric oxide and matrix metalloproteinases. Br. J. Pharmacol. 143:845–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Phelan MW, Faller DV. (1996) Hypoxia decreases constitutive nitric oxide synthase transcript and protein in cultured endothelial cells. J. Cell Physiol. 167:469–76.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Brodsky SV, et al. (2002) Endothelial dysfunction in ischemic acute renal failure: rescue by transplanted endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 282:F1140–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lieberthal W, Wolf EF, Rennke HG, Valeri CR, Levinsky NG. (1989) Renal ischemia and reperfusion impair endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation. Am. J. Physiol. 256:F894–900.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rosenberger C, Rosen S, Heyman SN. (2006) Renal parenchymal oxygenation and hypoxia adaptation in acute kidney injury. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 33:980–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rabelink TJ, van Zonneveld AJ. (2006) Coupling eNOS uncoupling to the innate immune response. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26:2585–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kakoki M, et al. (2000) Effects of tetrahydrobiopterin on endothelial dysfunction in rats with ischemic acute renal failure. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11:301–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bertuglia S, Giusti A. (2005) Role of nitric oxide in capillary perfusion and oxygen delivery regulation during systemic hypoxia. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 288:H525–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Crawford JH, et al. (2006) Hypoxia, red blood cells, and nitrite regulate NO-dependent hypoxic vasodilation. Blood 107:566–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Heyman SN, Goldfarb M, Darmon D, Brezis M. (1999) Tissue oxygenation modifies nitric oxide bioavailability. Microcirculation 6:199–203.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jia L, Bonaventura C, Bonaventura J, Stamler JS. (1996) S-nitrosohaemoglobin: a dynamic activity of blood involved in vascular control. Nature 380:221–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gladwin MT. (2006) Role of the red blood cell in nitric oxide homeostasis and hypoxic vasodilation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 588:189–205.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Conger J, Robinette J, Villar A, Raij L, Shultz P. (1995) Increased nitric oxide synthase activity despite lack of response to endothelium-dependent vasodilators in postischemic acute renal failure in rats. J. Clin. Invest. 96:631–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Jerkic M, et al. (2004) Relative roles of endothelin-1 and angiotensin II in experimental post-ischaemic acute renal failure. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19:83–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Masumura H, Kunitada S, Irie K, Ashida S, Abe Y. (1991) A thromboxane A2 synthase inhibitor, DP-1904, prevents rat renal injury. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 193:321–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Klausner JM, et al. (1989) Postischemic renal injury is mediated by neutrophils and leukotrienes. Am. J. Physiol. 256:F794–802.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Conger JD, Robinette JB, Schrier RW. (1988) Smooth muscle calcium and endothelium-derived relaxing factor in the abnormal vascular responses of acute renal failure. J. Clin. Invest. 82:532–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Harriman JF, Liu XL, Aleo MD, Machaca K, Schnellmann RG. (2002) Endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) signaling and calpains mediate renal cell death. Cell Death Differ. 9:734–41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kurata H, et al. (2005) Protective effect of nitric oxide on ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal injury and endothelin-1 overproduction. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 517:232–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Forbes JM, Hewitson TD, Becker GJ, Jones CL. (2001) Simultaneous blockade of endothelin A and B receptors in ischemic acute renal failure is detrimental to long-term kidney function. Kidney Int. 59:1333–41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hao CM, Breyer MD. (2007) Physiologic and pathophysiologic roles of lipid mediators in the kidney. Kidney Int. 71:1105–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    DiBona GF. (1986) Prostaglandins and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: effects on renal hemodynamics. Am. J. Med. 80:12–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Catella-Lawson F, et al. (1999) Effects of specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 on sodium balance, hemodynamics, and vasoactive eicosanoids. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 289:735–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Llinas MT, Lopez R, Rodriguez F, Roig F, Salazar FJ. (2001) Role of COX-2-derived metabolites in regulation of the renal hemodynamic response to norepinephrine. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 281:F975–82.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Rodriguez F, Llinas MT, Gonzalez JD, Rivera J, Salazar FJ. (2000) Renal changes induced by a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor during normal and low sodium intake. Hypertension 36:276–81.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ling H, et al. (1998) Effect of hypoxia on proximal tubules isolated from nitric oxide synthase knockout mice. Kidney Int. 53:1642–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Farge D, De la Coussaye JE, Beloucif S, Fratacci MD, Payen DM. (1995) Interactions between hemodynamic and hormonal modifications during PEEP-induced antidiuresis and antinatriuresis. Chest 107:1095–100.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Payen DM, et al. (1987) Hemodynamic, gas exchange, and hormonal consequences of LBPP during PEEP ventilation. J. Appl. Physiol. 62: 61–70.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Imig JD. (2006) Eicosanoids and renal vascular function in diseases. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 111:21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Lewis RA, Austen KF, Soberman RJ. (1990) Leukotrienes and other products of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway. Biochemistry and relation to pathobiology in human diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 323:645–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Pace-Asciak CR, Asotra S. (1989) Biosynthesis, catabolism, and biological properties of HPETEs, hydroperoxide derivatives of arachidonic acid. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 7:409–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Samuelsson B, Dahlen SE, Lindgren JA, Rouzer CA, Serhan CN. (1987) Leukotrienes and lipoxins: structures, biosynthesis, and biological effects. Science 237:1171–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Yiu SS, Zhao X, Inscho EW, Imig JD. (2003) 12-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid participates in angiotensin II afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction by activating L-type calcium channels. J. Lipid Res. 44:2391–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Katoh T, Takahashi K, DeBoer DK, Serhan CN, Badr KF. (1992) Renal hemodynamic actions of lipoxins in rats: a comparative physiological study. Am. J. Physiol. 263:F436–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kwon O, et al. (1998) Backleak, tight junctions, and cell-cell adhesion in postischemic injury to the renal allograft. J. Clin. Invest. 101:2054–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Leemreis JR, Versteilen AM, Sipkema P, Groeneveld AB, Musters RJ. (2006) Digital image analysis of cytoskeletal F-actin disintegration in renal microvascular endothelium following ischemia/reperfusion. Cytometry A 69:973–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Genesca M, Sola A, Hotter G. (2006) Actin cytoskeleton derangement induces apoptosis in renal ischemia/reperfusion. Apoptosis 11:563–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Noll T, Muhs A, Besselmann M, Watanabe H, Piper HM. (1995) Initiation of hyperpermeability in energy-depleted coronary endothelial monolayers. Am. J. Physiol. 268:H1462–70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kevil CG, Oshima T, Alexander B, Coe LL, Alexander JS. (2000) H(2)O(2)-mediated permeability: role of MAPK and occludin. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 279:C21–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Kevil CG, Oshima T, Alexander JS. (2001) The role of p38 MAP kinase in hydrogen peroxide mediated endothelial solute permeability. Endothelium 8:107–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ochoa L, Waypa G, Mahoney JR Jr, Rodriguez L, Minnear FL. (1997) Contrasting effects of hypochlorous acid and hydrogen peroxide on endothelial permeability: prevention with cAMP drugs. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 156:1247–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Basile DP, Donohoe D, Roethe K, Osborn JL. (2001) Renal ischemic injury results in permanent damage to peritubular capillaries and influences long-term function. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 281:F887–99.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sutton TA, Horbelt M, Sandoval RM. (2006) Imaging vascular pathology. Nephron Physiol. 103:p82–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Dejana E. (2004) Endothelial cell-cell junctions: happy together. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5: 261–70.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Soullier S, Gayrard N, Méjean C, Swarcz I, Mourad G, Argilés A. (2005) Molecular mechanisms involved in kidney ischemia-reperfusion [in French]. Nephrol. Ther. 1:315–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Johnston WH, Latta H. (1977) Glomerular mesangial and endothelial cell swelling following temporary renal ischemia and its role in the no-reflow phenomenon. Am. J. Pathol. 89: 153–66.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Flores J, DiBona DR, Beck CH, Leaf A. (1972) The role of cell swelling in ischemic renal damage and the protective effect of hypertonic solute. J. Clin. Invest. 51:118–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Nilius B, Droogmans G. (2001) Ion channels and their functional role in vascular endothelium. Physiol. Rev. 81:1415–59.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Orie NN, Fry CH, Clapp LH. (2006) Evidence that inward rectifier K+ channels mediate relaxation by the PGI2 receptor agonist cicaprost via a cyclic AMP-independent mechanism. Cardiovasc. Res. 69:107–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Bychkov R, et al. (1999) Hydrogen peroxide, potassium currents, and membrane potential in human endothelial cells. Circulation 99:1719–25.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kramer AA, Postler G, Salhab KF, Mendez C, Carey LC, Rabb H. (1999) Renal ischemia/ reperfusion leads to macrophage-mediated increase in pulmonary vascular permeability. Kidney Int. 55:2362–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Okajima K. (2004) Prevention of endothelial cell injury by activated protein C: the molecular mechanism(s) and therapeutic implications. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2:125–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Peek GJ, Firmin RK. (1999) The inflammatory and coagulative response to prolonged extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 45:250–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Xu XP, Pollock JS, Tanner MA, Myers PR. (1995) Hypoxia activates nitric oxide synthase and stimulates nitric oxide production in porcine coronary resistance arteriolar endothelial cells. Cardiovasc. Res. 30:841–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Aird WC. (2003) Endothelial cell heterogeneity. Crit. Care Med. 31:S221–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Stevens T, et al. (2001) NHLBI workshop report: endothelial cell phenotypes in heart, lung, and blood diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 281: C1422–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Sheridan AM, Bonventre JV. (2000) Cell biology and molecular mechanisms of injury in ischemic acute renal failure. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 9:427–34.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Dragun D, Haller H. (1999) Diapedesis of leukocytes: antisense oligonucleotides for rescue. Exp. Nephrol. 7:185–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Burne-Taney MJ, Rabb H. (2003) The role of adhesion molecules and T cells in ischemic renal injury. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 12:85–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Savransky V, Molls RR, Burne-Taney M, Chien CC, Racusen L, Rabb H. (2006) Role of the T-cell receptor in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 69:233–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Ysebaert DK, et al. (2004) T cells as mediators in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 66:491–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Friedewald JJ, Rabb H. (2004) Inflammatory cells in ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 66:486–91.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Thornton MA, Winn R, Alpers CE, Zager RA. (1989) An evaluation of the neutrophil as a mediator of in vivo renal ischemic-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Pathol. 135:509–15.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Paller MS. (1989) Effect of neutrophil depletion on ischemic renal injury in the rat. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 113:379–86.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Rabb H, O’Meara YM, Maderna P, Coleman P, Brady HR. (1997) Leukocytes, cell adhesion molecules and ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 51:1463–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Takada M, Chandraker A, Nadeau KC, Sayegh MH, Tilney NL. (1997) The role of the B7 costimulatory pathway in experimental cold ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Clin. Invest. 100:1199–203.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    De Greef KE, et al. (2001) Anti-B7-1 blocks mononuclear cell adherence in vasa recta after ischemia. Kidney Int. 60:1415–27.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Chandraker A, Takada M, Nadeau KC, Peach R, Tilney NL, Sayegh MH. (1997) CD28-b7 blockade in organ dysfunction secondary to cold ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 52:1678–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Rabb H, et al. (2000) Pathophysiological role of T lymphocytes in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 279:F525–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Bonventre JV, Weinberg JM. (2003) Recent advances in the pathophysiology of ischemic acute renal failure. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14: 2199–210.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Rabb H, et al. (1994) Role of CD11a and CD11b in ischemic acute renal failure in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 267:F1052–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Rao RM, Yang L, Garcia-Cardena G, Luscinskas FW. (2007) Endothelial-dependent mechanisms of leukocyte recruitment to the vascular wall. Circ. Res. 101:234–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Chiao H, Kohda Y, McLeroy P, Craig L, Housini I, Star RA. (1997) Alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone protects against renal injury after ischemia in mice and rats. J. Clin. Invest. 99:1165–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Donnahoo KK, Meng X, Ayala A, Cain MP, Harken AH, Meldrum DR. (1999) Early kidney TNF-alpha expression mediates neutrophil infiltration and injury after renal ischemia-reperfusion. Am. J. Physiol. 277:R922–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Simmons EM, et al. (2004) Plasma cytokine levels predict mortality in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 65:1357–65.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Martin DR, Lewington AJ, Hammerman MR, Padanilam BJ. (2000) Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase attenuates ischemic renal injury in rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 279:R1834–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Chatterjee PK, Zacharowski K, Cuzzocrea S, Otto M, Thiemermann C. (2000) Inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase reduce renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the anesthetized rat in vivo. FASEB J. 14:641–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Zheng J, Devalaraja-Narashimha K, Singaravelu K, Padanilam BJ. (2005) Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 gene ablation protects mice from ischemic renal injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 288:F387–98.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Kota BP, Huang TH, Roufogalis BD. (2005) An overview on biological mechanisms of PPARs. Pharmacol. Res. 51:85–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Devalaraja-Narashimha K, Singaravelu K, Padanilam BJ. (2005) Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-mediated cell injury in acute renal failure. Pharmacol. Res. 52:44–59.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Kelly KJ, Williams WW Jr, Colvin RB, Bonventre JV. (1994) Antibody to intercellular adhesion molecule 1 protects the kidney against ischemic injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:812–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Molitoris BA, Marrs J. (1999) The role of cell adhesion molecules in ischemic acute renal failure. Am. J. Med. 106:583–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Takada M, Nadeau KC, Shaw GD, Marquette KA, Tilney NL. (1997) The cytokine-adhesion molecule cascade in ischemia/reperfusion injury of the rat kidney: inhibition by a soluble P-selectin ligand. J. Clin. Invest. 99:2682–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Singbartl K, Forlow SB, Ley K. (2001) Platelet, but not endothelial, P-selectin is critical for neutrophil-mediated acute postischemic renal failure. FASEB J. 15:2337–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Jayle C, et al. (2006) Protective role of selectin ligand inhibition in a large animal model of kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 69:1749–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Burne-Taney MJ, Kofler J, Yokota N, Weisfeldt M, Traystman RJ, Rabb H. (2003) Acute renal failure after whole body ischemia is characterized by inflammation and T cell-mediated injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 285:F87–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Lieberthal W. (1998) Biology of ischemic and toxic renal tubular cell injury: role of nitric oxide and the inflammatory response. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 7:289–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Brezis M, Heyman SN, Epstein FH. (1994) Determinants of intrarenal oxygenation. II. Hemodynamic effects. Am. J. Physiol. 267:F1063–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    O’Connor PM, Kett MM, Anderson WP, Evans RG. (2006) Renal medullary tissue oxygenation is dependent on both cortical and medullary blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 290: F688–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Brezis M, Agmon Y, Epstein FH. (1994) Determinants of intrarenal oxygenation. I. Effects of diuretics. Am. J. Physiol. 267:F1059–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Koivisto A, Pittner J, Froelich M, Persson AE. (1999) Oxygen-dependent inhibition of respiration in isolated renal tubules by nitric oxide. Kidney Int. 55:2368–75.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Varela M, Herrera M, Garvin JL. (2004) Inhibition of Na-K-ATPase in thick ascending limbs by NO depends on O2 and is diminished by a high-salt diet. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 287: F224–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Vinas JL, Sola A, Hotter G. (2006) Mitochondrial NOS upregulation during renal I/R causes apoptosis in a peroxynitrite-dependent manner. Kidney Int. 69:1403–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Moncada S, Erusalimsky JD. (2002) Does nitric oxide modulate mitochondrial energy generation and apoptosis? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:214–20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Laycock SK, et al. (1998) Role of nitric oxide in the control of renal oxygen consumption and the regulation of chemical work in the kidney. Circ. Res. 82:1263–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Gladwin MT, et al. (2006) Nitrite as a vascular endocrine nitric oxide reservoir that contributes to hypoxic signaling, cytoprotection, and vasodilation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 291:H2026–35.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Brown GC. (1995) Nitric oxide regulates mitochondrial respiration and cell functions by inhibiting cytochrome oxidase. FEBS Lett. 369: 136–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Davidson SM, Duchen MR. (2006) Effects of NO on mitochondrial function in cardiomyocytes: pathophysiological relevance. Cardiovasc. Res. 71:10–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Boveris A, Costa LE, Poderoso JJ, Carreras MC, Cadenas E. (2000) Regulation of mitochondrial respiration by oxygen and nitric oxide. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 899:121–35.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Takehara Y, et al. (1996) Oxygen-dependent reversible inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by nitric oxide. Cell Struct. Funct. 21:251–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Toledo-Pereyra LH, Lopez-Neblina F, Toledo AH. (2004) Reactive oxygen species and molecular biology of ischemia/reperfusion. Ann. Transplant. 9:81–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Bertuglia S, Giusti A. (2005) Microvascular oxygenation and oxidative stress during postischemic reperfusion: PO2, ROS, and NO during reperfusion. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 566:23–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    RubioGayosso I, Platts SH, Duling BR. (2006) Reactive oxygen species mediate modification of glycocalyx during ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290: H2247–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Chandel NS, Budinger GR, Choe SH, Schumacker PT. (1997) Cellular respiration during hypoxia: role of cytochrome oxidase as the oxygen sensor in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 18808–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Brealey D, et al. (2004) Mitochondrial dysfunction in a long-term rodent model of sepsis and organ failure. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 286:R491–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Adler S, et al. (2001) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase plays an essential role in regulation of renal oxygen consumption by NO. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 280:F838–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Clementi E, Brown GC, Foxwell N, Moncada S. (1999) On the mechanism by which vascular endothelial cells regulate their oxygen consumption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1559–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Mik EG, et al. (2006) Mitochondrial PO2 measured by delayed fluorescence of endogenous protoporphyrin IX. Nat. Methods 3:939–45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Rabelink TJ, Wijewickrama DC, de Koning EJ. (2007) Peritubular endothelium: the Achilles heel of the kidney? Kidney Int. 72:926–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Norman JT, Fine LG. (2006) Intrarenal oxygenation in chronic renal failure. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 33:989–96.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Basile DP, Donohoe DL, Roethe K, Mattson DL. (2003) Chronic renal hypoxia after acute ischemic injury: effects of L-arginine on hypoxia and secondary damage. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 284:F338–48.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Kang DH, Hughes J, Mazzali M, Schreiner GF, Johnson RJ. (2001) Impaired angiogenesis in the remnant kidney model: II. Vascular endothelial growth factor administration reduces renal fibrosis and stabilizes renal function. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12:1448–57.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Yang J, et al. (2001) Telomerized human microvasculature is functional in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:219–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Sharples EJ, et al. (2004) Erythropoietin protects the kidney against the injury and dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15:2115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Ribatti D, Nico B, Crivellato E, Vacca A. (2005) Endothelial progenitor cells in health and disease. Histol. Histopathol. 20:1351–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Basile DP. (2007) The endothelial cell in ischemic acute kidney injury: implications for acute and chronic function. Kidney Int. 72:151–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Li J, Deane JA, Campanale NV, Bertram JF, Ricardo SD. (2007) The contribution of bone marrow-derived cells to the development of renal interstitial fibrosis. Stem Cells 25:697–706.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Rosenberger C, et al. (2006) Hypoxia-inducible factors and tubular cell survival in isolated perfused kidneys. Kidney Int. 70:60–70.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Rosenberger C, et al. (2005) Up-regulation of HIF in experimental acute renal failure: evidence for a protective transcriptional response to hypoxia. Kidney Int. 67:531–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Safran M, Kaelin WG Jr. (2003) HIF hydroxylation and the mammalian oxygen-sensing pathway. J. Clin. Invest. 111:779–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Haase VH. (2006) The VHL/HIF oxygen-sensing pathway and its relevance to kidney disease. Kidney Int. 69:1302–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Haase VH. (2006) Hypoxia-inducible factors in the kidney. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 291: F271–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Mansfield KD, et al. (2005) Mitochondrial dysfunction resulting from loss of cytochrome c impairs cellular oxygen sensing and hypoxic HIF-alpha activation. Cell Metab. 1:393–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Sandau KB, Fandrey J, Brune B. (2001) Accumulation of HIF-1alpha under the influence of nitric oxide. Blood 97:1009–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Hagen T, Taylor CT, Lam F, Moncada S. (2003) Redistribution of intracellular oxygen in hypoxia by nitric oxide: effect on HIF1alpha. Science 302:1975–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Schrijvers BF, Flyvbjerg A, De Vriese AS. (2004) The role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in renal pathophysiology. Kidney Int. 65:2003–17.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Kanellis J, et al. (2002) Renal ischemia-reperfusion increases endothelial VEGFR-2 without increasing VEGF or VEGFR-1 expression. Kidney Int. 61: 1696–706.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Kim YG, et al. (2000) Vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates renal recovery in experimental thrombotic microangiopathy. Kidney Int. 58:2390–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Takahashi T, Morita K, Akagi R, Sassa S. (2004) Protective role of heme oxygenase-1 in renal ischemia. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 6:867–77.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Shimizu H, et al. (2000) Protective effect of heme oxygenase induction in ischemic acute renal failure. Crit. Care Med. 28:809–17.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Salom MG, et al. (2007) Heme oxygenase-1 induction improves ischemic renal failure: role of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 293:H3542–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Aydin Z, Duijs J, Bajema IM, van Zonneveld AJ, Rabelink TJ. (2007) Erythropoietin, progenitors, and repair. Kidney Int. 72 Suppl:S16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Beleslin-Cokic BB, Cokic VP, Yu X, Weksler BB, Schechter AN, Noguchi CT. (2004) Erythropoietin and hypoxia stimulate erythropoietin receptor and nitric oxide production by endothelial cells. Blood 104:2073–80.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Biju MP, Akai Y, Shrimanker N, Haase VH. (2005) Protection of HIF-1-deficient primary renal tubular epithelial cells from hypoxiainduced cell death is glucose dependent. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 289:F1217–26.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ. (2004) Oxygen sensing by HIF hydroxylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5: 343–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Rivers E, et al. (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 345:1368–77.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Rivers EP, et al. (2007) The influence of early hemodynamic optimization on biomarker patterns of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 35:2016–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Lameire NH, De Vriese AS, Vanholder R. (2003) Prevention and nondialytic treatment of acute renal failure. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 9:481–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Venkataraman R, Kellum JA. (2007) Prevention of acute renal failure. Chest 131:300–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    De Backer D, et al. (2006) The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects. Crit. Care Med. 34:403–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Schortgen F, et al. (2001) Effects of hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin on renal function in severe sepsis: a multicentre randomised study. Lancet 357:911–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Brunkhorst FM, et al. (2008) Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 358:125–39.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Yuruk K, Almac E, Ince C. (2007) Hydroxyethyl starch solutions and their effect on the microcirculation and tissue oxygenation. Transfus. Altern. Transfus. Med. 9:164–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Blasco V, Leone M, Antonini F, Geissler A, Albanese J, Martin C. (2008) Comparison of the novel hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 and hydroxyethylstarch 200/0.6 in brain-dead donor resuscitation on renal function after transplantation. Br. J. Anaesth. 100:504–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Sakr Y, et al. (2006) Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit. Care Med. 34:589–97.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Faivre V, et al. (2005) Cardiac and renal effects of levosimendan, arginine vasopressin, and norepinephrine in lipopolysaccharide-treated rabbits. Anesthesiology 103:514–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Albert M, Losser MR, Hayon D, Faivre V, Payen D. (2004) Systemic and renal macro- and micro-circulatory responses to arginine vasopressin in endotoxic rabbits. Crit. Care Med. 32:1891–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Gattinoni L, et al. (1995) Atrial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 333: 1025–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EH, Palazzo M, Hinds CJ, Watson D. (1994) Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 330:1717–22.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Durairaj L, Schmidt GA. (2008) Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: less is more. Chest 133: 252–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Thurau K, Boylan JW. (1976) Acute renal success: the unexpected logic of oliguria in acute renal failure. Am. J. Med. 61:308–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Macias WL, et al. (2005) New insights into the protein C pathway: potential implications for the biological activities of drotrecogin alfa (activated). Crit. Care 9 Suppl 4:S38–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Bernard GR, et al. (2001) Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 344:699–709.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Gupta A, Rhodes GJ, Berg DT, Gerlitz B, Molitoris BA, Grinnell BW. (2007) Activated protein C ameliorates LPS-induced acute kidney injury and downregulates renal INOS and angiotensin 2. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 293: F245–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Gupta A, et al. (2007) Role of protein C in renal dysfunction after polymicrobial sepsis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18:860–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Dear JW, et al. (2006) Sepsis-induced organ failure is mediated by different pathways in the kidney and liver: acute renal failure is dependent on MyD88 but not renal cell apoptosis. Kidney Int. 69:832–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Ventura CG, Coimbra TM, de Campos SB, de Castro I, Yu L, Seguro AC. (2002) Mycophenolate mofetil attenuates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13:2524–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Ysebaert DK, et al. (2003) Effect of immunosuppression on damage, leukocyte infiltration, and regeneration after severe warm ischemia/ reperfusion renal injury. Kidney Int. 64:864–73.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Ricci Z, Cruz D, Ronco C. (2008) The RIFLE criteria and mortality in acute kidney injury: A systematic review. Kidney Int. 73:538–46.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Bonventre JV. (2007) Diagnosis of acute kidney injury: from classic parameters to new biomarkers. Contrib. Nephrol. 156:213–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Feinstein Institute for Medical Research 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthieu Legrand
    • 1
    • 2
  • Egbert G. Mik
    • 3
  • Tanja Johannes
    • 4
  • Didier Payen
    • 2
  • Can Ince
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology, Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lariboisière HospitalUniversity of Paris VIIParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity of RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical CareUniversity Hospital TuebingenTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations