Advertisement

Molecular Medicine

, Volume 14, Issue 5–6, pp 346–352 | Cite as

Functional Consequences of Toll-like Receptor 4 Polymorphisms

  • Bart Ferwerda
  • Matthew B. B. McCall
  • Karlijn Verheijen
  • Bart-Jan Kullberg
  • André J. A. M. van der Ven
  • Jos W. M. Van der Meer
  • Mihai G. Netea
Open Access
Review Article

Abstract

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is an important pathogen recognition receptor that recognizes mainly lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Gram-negative bacteria, but also structures from fungal and mycobacterial pathogens, as well as endogenous ligands. Two nonsynonymous polymorphisms of TLR4, Asp299Gly and Thr399lle, have been suggested to alter the function of the receptor. Some, but not all, studies have proposed that these polymorphisms lead to reduced cytokine response and increased susceptibility to Gram-negative infections. In this review, we compare studies that assessed the effect of the Asp299Gly and Thr399lle polymorphisms on susceptibility to Gram-negative infections and examine the phenotypic consequences of these polymorphisms. In addition, we review the geographical distribution of TLR4 polymorphisms and present a model for evolutionary pressures on the TLR4 genetic make-up.

Introduction

The innate immune system recognizes a broad range of pathogens and initiates protective responses. Recognition of pathogenic microorganisms by the innate immune system relies on pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that detect preserved structures of bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and fungi, so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (1).

Amajor group of PPRs are the Toll-like receptors (TLRs). After PAMP recognition, TLRs activate cellular signaling pathways to induce immune-response genes, including inflammatory cytokines (2). Ten different human TLRs have been identified (3). TLR11, which binds and recognizes uropathogenic bacteria and profilin in mice, has been shown to be nonfunctional in humans owing to a premature stop codon (4,5). Each TLR recognizes specific PAMPs, including recognition of lipoproteins, lipoteichoic acid, and zymosan by TLR2; dsRNA by TLR3; lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by TLR4; flagellin by TLR5; ssRNA by TLR7/8; and CpG DNA by TLR9 (1,6). TLR4, considered one of the most important PRRs, recognizes LPS of Gramnegative bacteria; mannans from fungal pathogens, a soluble component of Mycobacterium tuberculosis; and endogenous ligands, such as fibronectin and several heat shock proteins.

Role and Signaling Mechanism of TLR4

We owe the elucidation of the function and genetic structure of TLR4 to the discovery of Toll, a transmembrane protein, initially discovered for its role in the embryonic dorsal-ventral development of Drosophila (7). Drosophila with a loss-of-function mutation for Toll exhibited a high susceptibility to fungal infection, demonstrating the importance of Toll in the antifungal response in the insect (8,9). After this discovery, work by Rock et al. (10) and Medzhitov et al. (11) independently led to the discovery of several human homolog genes for Toll, the so-called Toll-like receptors (TLRs).

Structure analysis of TLR4 revealed that the receptor consists of 3 domains: an extracellular leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular Toll-interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain. The extracellular LRR part of the receptor is involved in the binding of LPS. The discovery that LPS is a ligand for TLR4 came from studies in mice. Mice challenged with high doses of LPS normally develop a shock-like state similar to Gram-negative septic shock. More than 30 years ago two mouse strains, C3H/HeJ and C57Bl/10ScCr, were discovered that were resistant to LPS (12). The phenotype was thought to be caused by a mutation in a hypothetical lps gene, but the location and function of this gene remained elusive for a long period (13). The groundbreaking studies of Poltorak and colleagues (14,15) in 1998 identified TLR4 as the lps gene and demonstrated that TLR4 is the LPS sensor in both mice and humans.

Overall, recognition of LPS and initiation of signaling by TLR4 is a complex process, which involves several accessory proteins. LPS is first bound by circulating lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), which functions as an opsonin for CD14 (16). CD14 then acts as a catalyst for the binding of LPS to MD-2 (17, 18, 19). After the LPS is transferred to MD-2, the LPS/MD-2 complex interacts with TLR4. Recent MD-2/TLR4 crystallography studies have elucidated the structures of this complex (20). Formation of the LPS/MD-2/TLR4 complex eventually results in the dimerization of the TLR4 TIR domain, initiating downstream signaling transduction (21).

Downstream signaling by the TLR4 receptor involves several intercellular TIR domain-containing adaptors mediating proinflammatory gene expression (22,23). Two pathways that initiate downstream TLR4 signaling are known, namely the MyD88- and TRIF-dependent pathways (see Figure 1). One pathway is mediated by myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and the TIR domain-containing adaptor protein, also called MyD88 adapter-like protein (TIRAP/MAL). Initiation of MyD88-dependent pathway activation leads to the activation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and the transcription of proinflammatory genes (24). A second pathway is mediated by the TIR-containing protein, also called TRIF-related adapter molecule (TIRP/TRAM), and TIR domain-containing adapter inducing interferon-β (TRIF). Initiation of the TRIF-dependent pathway leads to the activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), and the expression of interferon (IFN)-β and IFN-inducible genes (21).
Figure 1

Schematic overview of the LPS TLR4 signaling pathway. Recognition of LPS is established by the interplay between lipopolysaccharide-binding proteins (LBPs) and CD14 that transfer the LPS to the MD-2/TLR4 complex. Dimerization of TLR4 then initiates downstream intracellular signaling transduction through Toll-interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domains and several adaptor molecules. Eventually, the intracellular signaling results in the activation of specific pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles by the MYD88-dependent or TRIF-dependent pathway.

Much research has been performed to understand the signaling pathways and innate immune response against Gramnegative infections mediated by TLR4, which is therefore one of the best-understood Toll-like receptors. Because of this, TLR4 also provides an ideal model to study the consequences of genetic variation and their relation to the function of the receptor, and their susceptibility to diseases. Here we review several genetic polymorphisms of the TLR4 receptor. Also, we try to understand if there are any TLR4 genotypes that result in phenotypic consequences.

Genetic Variation in Human TLR4

Recognition of pathogens and downstream signaling through innate pathways involving the TIR domain show high conservation between organisms (19). This is in line with the finding that the innate immune system shows a high degree of homology between mammals, insects, and plants, and apparently has been highly preserved during evolution (25). Genetic variation between the TLR4s of different mammals is the highest in the extracellular LRR region (26). The stronger variation in this region, which is involved in the recognition of PAMPs, is probably the result of the evolutionary pressure by pathogens on the host.

Sequencing of the human TLR4 revealed that most of the variation in non-synonymous polymorphisms is located in the third exon, coding for the LRR domain (27). Despite this greater variation in the TLR4 LRR domain, the frequency of most nonsynonymous polymorphisms is low in human populations (<1%). Exceptions are 2 nonsynonymous polymorphisms (SNPs) that have been described with population frequencies >5%. These are an A/G transition causing an aspartic acid/glycine substitution at amino acid location Asp299Gly (rs4986790), and a C/T transition causing a threonine/isoleucine switch at amino acid location Thr399Ile (rs4986791). Arbour et al. (28) were the first to report that individuals with either the Asp299Gly and/or Thr399Ile polymorphisms had a blunted response toward inhaled LPS.

The finding that TLR4 polymorphisms Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile had an effect on the responsiveness to bacterial endotoxin initiated many genetic association studies. The results of these studies led to contradictory conclusions about the role of the Asp299Gly polymorphism and its effect on susceptibility to Gramnegative bacterial infections (29). This raises the question of the source of these discrepancies. One possible explanation may be that these studies looked at the Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms separately. Most studies either deal with the Asp299Gly or the Thr399Ile polymorphism, but neglect the fact that these polymorphisms also exist in a cosegregated (Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile) way (27). This cosegregated state of TLR4 implies that 4 haplotypes, namely wt/wt, Asp299Gly/wt, Thr399Ile/wt, and Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile, are represented in the population. Our results on cytokine profiles in LPS-stimulated whole blood cultures demonstrated that only the Asp299Gly haplotype differs in phenotype, showing an increased, rather than a blunted, pro-inflammatory tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α response (30). Interestingly, the LPS-induced cytokine response in the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype does not differ from the wild-type TLR4 cytokine response (30). Because the single Thr399Ile haplotype is rare, its phenotype is still unknown. Therefore, the TLR4 haplotype that alters the cytokine response to LPS (and thus could affect the susceptibility to Gram-negative infection) contains the single TLR4 Asp299Gly mutation (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Distribution of TLR4 haplotypes and associated cytokine phenotypes across the 3 continents of the Old World. It shows that Africa, Asia, and Europe each have their own distinct haplotype, based on the alleles found, shown in white. The phenotypic end point is shown on the top of the figure, where the expected cytokine production following TLR4 stimulations is presented. When the geographic distribution of Asp299Gly and Thr399lle polymorphisms is taken into account, it illustrates that research preformed in Europe has looked at the cosegregated Asp299Gly/Thr399lle haplotype, whose cytokine phenotype does not differ from the wild-type TLR4 cytokine response. This also explains the large number of studies, performed in Europe, that did not find any association between TLR4 polymorphisms and susceptibility to disease. In contrast, the Asp299Gly/WT haplotype, that is found almost exclusively in Africa, has a stronger pro-inflammatory cytokine response compared with wild-type TLR4.

Population studies also revealed a specific geographical distribution of the TLR4 haplotypes (27). All haplotypes trace their origin to before the out-of-Africa migration approximately 55,000 to 60,000 years ago. Nowadays, human populations from Africa have a 10- to 20-fold higher frequency of the Asp299Gly haplotype than those from the other continents. In contrast, white populations show an almost complete absence of the Asp299Gly haplotype, but have a higher frequency of the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype. Asian populations lack all three of the Asp299Gly, Thr399Ile, and Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotypes (Figure 2). This pattern of TLR4 haplotypes has been the result of differences in environmental pathogenic pressure on the human population during the migration into Eurasia, Europe, Asia, and the New World (30). As a consequence of this specific geographical distribution, most published studies performed in populations with a European genetic background have analyzed the Asp299Gly/399 haplotype, with no distinct phenotype, instead of the Asp299Gly haplotype. To a certain extent, the genetic background of the studied populations could explain the lack of agreement between published TLR4 polymorphism studies. We have therefore reanalyzed published data on the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile and Asp299Gly haplotypes separately, and tested whether the presented Asp299Gly and Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotypes correlate with the presented phenotypes.

Functional Consequences of the Cosegregated ASP299GLY/THR399ILE Polymorphisms

Terms used for a PubMed search were TLR4 polymorphisms, Asp299Gly, and Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms, which resulted in 164 articles after exclusion of all reviews. These articles studied the relationship between TLR4 polymorphisms and susceptibility to sepsis, atherosclerotic disease, asthma, Candida infections, chronic periodontitis, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), transplantation, and Crohn’s disease (31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51). The pathogenic ligand in most of these studies is based on the Gramnegative bacterial LPS, with the exception of the Candida and RSV studies. The strongest association to date between TLR4 polymorphisms and disease susceptibility has been reported in RVS infections (52), but the functional relationship between TLR4 polymorphisms and RSV virus remains to be elucidated. Because specific parts of the LRR involved in the recognition of various ligands can differ, only the LPS studies were included. This resulted in 157 research articles about the effect of the TLR4 Asp299Gly and Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile SNPs. Of these articles, 62% reported no association between the susceptibility to disease and TLR4 polymorphisms (see Figure 3). The majority of articles included European populations (90%), and the rest screened Asian (6%) or African (4%) populations. The consequence of the studies involving European populations is in agreement with the suspicion that these studies did not look at the Asp299Gly haplotype, as they state, but reported de facto on the effect of the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype. Besides the population origin, study methodology can also influence results. For the TLR4 studies, three types of methodology can be distinguished: genetic association studies, functional stimulation experiments, and cloning and transfections of the mutated TLR4. Figure 3 shows that the majority of published articles are studies of genetic associations. Most of the association studies on TLR4 polymorphisms are small and underpowered, whereas larger studies tend to be negative and find no correlation between the TLR4 Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype and disease susceptibility (53).
Figure 3

Circle diagrams with the frequency of the study results and outcomes (below) of TLR4 polymorphism from the PubMed search. This search revealed that more than half of the studies do not find any association between susceptibility to infection and TLR4 polymorphisms (n = 157). In the top diagrams, the frequencies of the methodologies used are presented in the studies that showed a positive effect or no association of the investigated TLR4 polymorphisms. This figure shows that the majority of studies are based on genetic association studies, and a minority measured cytokine production following LPS stimulation of either whole blood or PBMCs. Overall, the contrast between study outcomes measuring the functional effects of TLR4 polymorphisms and of those looking at the role these have in susceptibility is revealed.

Although genetic association studies find no correlation between haplotypes and disease strictly, they do not give insight into the direct functional consequences of TLR4 mutation. Several studies have investigated the functional consequence of TLR4 SNPs, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The studies of Arbour et al. (28) and Schwartz (54, 55, 56) show that transfected cells with any of the TLR4 haplotypes have a decreased NF-κB activity compared with normal TLR4. This suggest that the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype should have an effect on phenotype, leading to reduced cytokine production by the innate immune response. The question then is: why are the consequences of such a functional effect not observed in genetic association studies?
Table 1

TLR4 polymorphisms and their impact.

 

Association

Stimulation

Transfection

Effect of polymorphism

Calvano et al. (57)

Systemic endotoxemia

Whole blood in vivo

 

No

Kumpf et al. (65)

Pre- and postoperative cytokines

Whole blood

 

No

Schippers et al. (59,60)

In vivo and ex vivo response

Whole blood

 

No

Newport et al. (62)

Pulmonary tuberculosis

Whole blood

 

No

Heesen et al. (66)

Cytokine synthesis

Whole blood

 

No

Von Aulock et al. (67)

LPS-induced cytokine release

Whole blood

 

No

Chang et al. (68)

TLR4 in peripheral neutrophils and monotypes

Whole blood

 

No

Marsik et al. (58)

Endotoxemia

Whole blood in vivo

 

Yes

Tiberio et al. (69)

Innate response to candidate adjuvants RC529 and monophosphoryl lipid A

Whole blood

 

No

Kroner et al. (70)

Multiple sclerosis

PBMCs

 

No

Van der Graaf et al. (71)

Stimulations with different TLR4 ligands

PBMCs

 

No

Peeters et al. (51)

Impact of polymorphisms on monocytes in patients with Crohn’s disease

PBMCs

 

No

Fagerås et al. (72)

Asthma

PBMCs

 

Yes

Erridge et al. (73)

LPS-induced monocytes signaling (monocytes)

PBMCs

 

Yes

Schmitt et al. (74)

Response to LPS

PBMCs

 

Yes

Norata et al. (75)

Intima-media thickness and LPS monocyte-derived macrophage response

PBMCs

 

No

Montes et al. (76)

Hematogeneous osteomyelitis

Neutrophils

 

Yes

Kinane et al. (77)

Porphyromonas gingivalis

Epithelial

 

Yes

Schwartz (54, 55, 56)

Inhaled LPS

Airway epithelia

THP-1

Yes

Arbour et al. (28)

Inhaled LPS

Airway epithelia

THP-1

Yes

Rallabhandi et al. (64)

Insights in stoichiometry, structure, and signaling

 

HEK-239T

Yes

One reason is that the use of transfection to investigate the phenotypic effect of certain mutations meets with several complications. Transfections represent a stripped-down model performed in altered cell lines. As a result, transfection measurements do not give the ideal end point of phenotypic difference representing the whole system. Transfections only represent the homozygous state. Most population studies of genetic association and function include TLR4 haplotypes in heterozygous state, whereas the homozygous state of these polymorphisms is rare. Disruptions of the receptor transport can influence results by overfeeding the system (28). Therefore, determination of the association between the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype and the phenotype, and its impact on the susceptibility to Gram-negative infection (based on transfection experiments), is difficult and prone to artifacts.

Besides transfection experiments, most functional studies are based on in vitro stimulation of either whole blood or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) stimulated with LPS. After stimulation, cytokine release by the cells is measured. The whole blood cultures and experiments using isolated PBMCs are in agreement with the association studies, as they find little difference between Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile and the wild-type haplotype (Table 1). Besides the in vitro experiments, three in vivo studies investigated the effects of LPS in human volunteers. Two of these in vivo experiments injected 2 ng/kg LPS (57,58). Neither of them found a difference in the TNF-α serum concentration between individuals with different TLR4 haplotypes. However, one study found decreased IL-6 levels after 6 h in volunteers with TLR4 polymorphisms, whereas the other did not find any differences (57,58). The former study also reported strongly decreased IL-1β production after 24-h stimulation, suggesting an effect on the late TRIF-dependent pathway (58). A third paper measuring ex vivo and in vivo cytokine production of the different TLR4 haplotypes also did not find differences between Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile and the wild-type haplotypes (57,59,60). Thus, most studies of stimulated whole blood and PBMCs do not find a distinct phenotype of the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotypes.

Functional Consequences of the ASP299GLY Polymorphism

As mentioned above, studies that include or define the Asp299Gly haplotype are scarce. The best studies of the Asp299Gly haplotype are those performed in Africa. Unfortunately, no association studies performed in Africa have focused specifically on the response to TLR4 ligands. The study by Mockenhaupt et al. (61) focused on malaria, whereas that of Newport et al. (62) looked at susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Neither study included stimulated cytokine production, and therefore it is impossible to say anything about the LPS responses in the Asp299Gly haplotypes. Although these studies indicate a role for the Asp299Gly haplotype in susceptibility to malaria and tuberculosis, they do not reveal the role of the haplotype in the recognition of Gram-negative bacteria and LPS.

In contrast, Lorenz et al. (63) looked at sepsis patients versus healthy controls in France and specifically defined the Asp299Gly haplotype. The Asp299Gly haplotype was found only in the group of patients with septic shock, whereas the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype was found equally in both patients and controls. This suggests that the Asp299Gly haplotype has an effect on phenotype, although cytokine measurements are lacking. Until now, only one study reported cytokine production by individuals with the Asp299Gly haplotype—it found a stronger, rather than a blunted, TNF-α cytokine response (30). Although more research has to be performed to settle the functional consequences of the Asp299Gly haplotype, the evidence so far indicates that the TLR4 wild-type haplotype and the Asp299Gly haplotype have different phenotypes.

Effects of the ASP299GLY on the 3-Dimensional Structure of TLR4

Crystallography of the TLR4-LPS/MD-2 complex reveals that there are two highly preserved regions of TLR4 involved in the binding of the LPS/MD-2 complex (20). These preserved domains are located at the N-terminal and central domain of the receptor (20). The crystallography shows that the Asp299Gly is not directly involved in the binding of MD-2, but the mutation is located close to the TLR4-MD-2 binding area. Although there is no direct alteration of the binding location of the LPS/MD-2 complex, it has been suggested using an ectodomain model of TLR4 that Asp299Gly polymorphism increases the rotational freedom of the peptide bond (64). Interestingly, the same model also shows that the wild-type TLR4 has a negatively charged area at position 299, and this is lost in the Asp299Gly (64). The modified response of cells of Asp299Gly polymorphism individuals could therefore be the result of the increased rotation and change of charge that may modulate the interaction of LPS with the TLR4 receptor.

Conclusion

It is tempting to conclude that TLR4 polymorphisms have an effect on the susceptibility to infections, especially because of their location in the ligand recognition area of the receptor.

Despite the tempting theoretical considerations and a number of reports based on in vitro experiments, most if not all of the studies using primary cells isolated from individuals bearing the mutation reveal that the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype has little or no effect on responsiveness to LPS, and the susceptibility to infections of the bearer is unchanged. Therefore, we tend to conclude that the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype has no distinct phenotype. In contrast, the Asp299Gly haplotype exhibits a stronger pro-inflammatory TNF-α cytokine response after stimulation with LPS. In addition, this phenotype seems to predispose to septic shock. The effect of the rare Thr399Ile haplotype on function and susceptibility remains unclear due to its scarcity in the population.

References

  1. 1.
    Akira S, Hemmi H. (2003) Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by TLR family. Immunol. Lett. 85:85–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Medzhitov R, Janeway C Jr. (2000) Innate immunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 343:338–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kawai T, Akira S. (2006) TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ. 13:816–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yarovinsky F, et al. (2005) TLR11 activation of dendritic cells by a protozoan profilin-like protein. Science 308:1626–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang D, et al. (2004) A toll-like receptor that prevents infection by uropathogenic bacteria. Science 303:1522–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takeda K, Kaisho T, Akira S. (2003) Toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21:335–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hashimoto C, Hudson KL, Anderson KV. (1988) The Toll gene of Drosophila, required for dorsalventral embryonic polarity, appears to encode a transmembrane protein. Cell 52:269–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffmann JA. (2003) The immune response of Drosophila. Nature 426:33–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA. (1996) The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 86:973–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rock FL, Hardiman G, Timans JC, Kastelein RA, Bazan JF. (1998) A family of human receptors structurally related to Drosophila Toll. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:588–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medzhitov R, Preston-Hurlburt P, Janeway CA Jr. (1997) A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 388:394–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sultzer BM. (1969) Genetic factors in leucocyte responses to endotoxin: further studies in mice. J Immunol 103:32–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sultzer BM. (1968) Genetic control of leucocyte responses to endotoxin. Nature 219:1253–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poltorak A, et al. (1998) Genetic and physical mapping of the Lps locus: identification of the toll-4 receptor as a candidate gene in the critical region. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 24:340–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poltorak A, et al. (1998) Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science 282:2085–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schumann RR, et al. (1990) Structure and function of lipopolysaccharide binding protein. Science 249:1429–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wright SD, Ramos RA, Tobias PS, Ulevitch RJ, Mathison JC. (1990) CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 249:1431–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fenton MJ, Golenbock DT. (1998) LPS-binding proteins and receptors. J. Leukoc. Biol. 64:25–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Neill LA, Greene C. (1998) Signal transduction pathways activated by the IL-1 receptor family: ancient signaling machinery in mammals, insects, and plants. J. Leukoc. Biol. 63:650–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim HM, et al. (2007) Crystal structure of the TLR4-MD-2 complex with bound endotoxin antagonist Eritoran. Cell 130:906–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Akira S, Takeda K. (2004) Toll-like receptor signaling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:499–511.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Neill LA, Bowie AG. (2007) The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signaling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7:353–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vogel SN, Fitzgerald KA, Fenton MJ. (2003) TLRs: differential adapter utilization by toll-like receptors mediates TLR-specific patterns of gene expression. Mol. Interv. 3:466–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miggin SM, O’Neill LA. (2006) New insights into the regulation of TLR signaling. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80: 220–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mushegian A, Medzhitov R. (2001) Evolutionary perspective on innate immune recognition. J. Cell Biol. 155:705–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smirnova I, Poltorak A, Chan EK, McBride C, Beutler B. (2000) Phylogenetic variation and polymorphism at the toll-like receptor 4 locus (TLR4). Genome Biol. 1:RESEARCH002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smirnova I, Hamblin MT, McBride C, Beutler B, Di RA. (2001) Excess of rare amino acid polymorphisms in the Toll-like receptor 4 in humans. Genetics 158:1657–64.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arbour NC, et al. (2000) TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nat. Genet. 25:187–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schröder NW, Schumann RR. (2005) Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptors and susceptibility to infectious disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5:156–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferwerda B, et al. (2007) TLR4 polymorphisms, infectious diseases, and evolutionary pressure during migration of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:16645–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dahmer MK, Randolph A, Vitali S, Quasney MW. (2005) Genetic polymorphisms in sepsis. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 6:S61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Read RC, Wyllie DH. (2001) Toll receptors and sepsis. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 7:371–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pasterkamp G, van Keulen JK, de Kleijn DP. (2004) Role of Toll-like receptor 4 in the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic disease. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 34:328–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vink A, de Kleijn DP, Pasterkamp G. (2004) Functional role for Toll-like receptors in atherosclerosis and arterial remodeling. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 15:515–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang IA, Fong KM, Holgate ST, Holloway JW. (2006) The role of Toll-like receptors and related receptors of the innate immune system in asthma. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 6:23–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van der Graaf CA, Netea MG, Drenth IP, te Morsche RH, Van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ. (2003) Candida-specific interferon-gamma deficiency and Toll-like receptor polymorphisms in patients with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. Neth. J. Med. 61:365–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Van der Graaf CA, et al. (2006) Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile polymorphisms are a risk factor for Candida bloodstream infection. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 17:29–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brett PM, et al. (2005) Functional gene polymorphisms in aggressive and chronic periodontitis. J. Dent. Res. 84:1149–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Folwaczny M, Glas J, Torok HP, Limbersky O, Folwaczny C. (2004) Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and 4 mutations in periodontal disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 135:330–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schröder NW, et al. (2005) Chronic periodontal disease is associated with single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the human TLR-4 gene. Genes Immun. 6:448–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Inoue Y, et al. (2007) CD14-550 C/T, which is related to the serum level of soluble CD14, is associated with the development of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in the Japanese population. J. Infect. Dis. 195:1618–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paulus SC, Hirschfeld AF, Victor RE, Brunstein J, Thomas E, Turvey SE. (2007) Common human Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms: role in susceptibility to respiratory syncytial virus infection and functional immunological relevance. Clin. Immunol. 123:252–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Puthothu B, Forster J, Heinzmann A, Krueger M. (2006) TLR-4 and CD14 polymorphisms in respiratory syncytial virus associated disease. Dis. Markers 22:303–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cervera C, et al. (2007) The influence of innate immunity gene receptors polymorphisms in renal transplant infections. Transplantation 83:1493–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ducloux D, et al. (2005) Relevance of Toll-like receptor-4 polymorphisms in renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 67:2454–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lorenz E, et al. (2001) Association of TLR4 mutations and the risk for acute GVHD after HLA-matched-sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 7:384–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Palmer SM, et al. (2006) Donor polymorphisms in Toll-like receptor-4 influence the development of rejection after renal transplantation. Clin. Transplant. 20:30–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    de Ridder L, et al. (2007) Genetic susceptibility has a more important role in pediatric-onset Crohn’s disease than in adult-onset Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 13:1083–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Figueroa C, et al. (2006) NOD2/CARD15 and Toll-like 4 receptor gene polymorphism in Chilean patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 17:125–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ouburg S, et al. (2005) The Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) Asp299Gly polymorphism is associated with colonic localisation of Crohn’s disease without a major role for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan-LBP-CD14-TLR4 pathway. Gut 54:439–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Peeters H, et al. (2007) CARD15 variants determine a disturbed early response of monocytes to adherent-invasive Escherichia coli strain LF82 in Crohn’s disease. Int. J. Immunogenet. 34:181–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Awomoyi AA, et al. (2007) Association of TLR4 polymorphisms with symptomatic respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants and young children. J. Immunol. 179:3171–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chanock SJ, et al. (2007) Replicating genotype-phenotype associations. Nature 447:655–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schwartz DA. (2001) The role of TLR4 in endotoxin responsiveness in humans. J. Endotoxin Res. 7:389–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schwartz DA. (2001) Inhaled endotoxin, a risk for airway disease in some people. Respir. Physiol. 128:47–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schwartz DA. (2002) The genetics of innate immunity. Chest 121:62S–8S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Calvano JE, et al. (2006) Response to systemic endotoxemia among humans bearing polymorphisms of the Toll-like receptor 4 (hTLR4). Clin. Immunol. 121:186–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Marsik C, Jilma B, Joukhadar C, Mannhalter C, Wagner O, Endler G. (2005) The Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms influence the late inflammatory response in human endotoxemia. Clin. Chem. 51:2178–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schippers EF, van’t Veer C, van Voorden S, Martina CA, le Cessie S, van Dissel JT. (2004) TNF-alpha promoter, Nod2 and Toll-like receptor-4 polymorphisms and the in vivo and ex vivo response to endotoxin. Cytokine 26:16–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schippers EF, et al. (2005) IL-10 and toll-like receptor-4 polymorphisms and the in vivo and ex vivo response to endotoxin. Cytokine 29:215–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mockenhaupt FP, et al. (2006) Toll-like receptor (TLR) polymorphisms in African children: common TLR-4 variants predispose to severe malaria. J. Commun. Dis. 38:230–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Newport MJ, et al. (2004) The toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly variant: no influence on LPS responsiveness or susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis in The Gambia. Tuberculosis (Edinb.) 84:347–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lorenz E, Mira JP, Frees KL, Schwartz DA. (2002) Relevance of mutations in the TLR4 receptor in patients with gram-negative septic shock. Arch. Intern. Med. 162:1028–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rallabhandi P, et al. (2006) Analysis of TLR4 polymorphic variants: new insights into TLR4/MD-2/CD14 stoichiometry, structure, and signaling. J. Immunol. 177:322–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kumpf O, Hamann L, Schlag PM, Schumann RR. (2006) Pre- and postoperative cytokine release after in vitro whole blood lipopolysaccharide stimulation and frequent Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms. Shock 25:123–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Heesen M, Bloemeke B, Kunz D. (2003) The cytokine synthesis by heterozygous carriers of the Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly polymorphism does not differ from that of wild type homozygotes. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 14:234–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    von Aulock S, et al. (2003) Heterozygous toll-like receptor 4 polymorphism does not influence lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine release in human whole blood. J. Infect. Dis. 188:938–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chang JH, Hampartzoumian T, Everett B, Lloyd A, McCluskey PJ, Wakefield D. (2007) Changes in Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 and TLR4 expression and function but not polymorphisms are associated with acute anterior uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci 48:1711–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tiberio L, Fletcher L, Eldridge JH, Duncan DD. (2004) Host factors impacting the innate response in humans to the candidate adjuvants RC529 and monophosphoryl lipid A. Vaccine 22:1515–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kroner A, et al. (2005) Impact of the Asp299Gly polymorphism in the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) gene on disease course of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 165:161–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    van der Graaf C, et al. (2005) Functional consequences of the Asp299Gly Toll-like receptor-4 polymorphism. Cytokine 30:264–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Fagerås BM, et al. (2004) A TLR4 polymorphism is associated with asthma and reduced lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-12(p70) responses in Swedish children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114:561–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Erridge C, Stewart J, Poxton IR. (2003) Monocytes heterozygous for the Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile mutations in the Toll-like receptor 4 gene show no deficit in lipopolysaccharide signaling. J. Exp. Med. 197:1787–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Schmitt C, Humeny A, Becker CM, Brune K, Pahl A. (2002) Polymorphisms of TLR4: rapid genotyping and reduced response to lipopolysaccharide of TLR4 mutant alleles. Clin. Chem. 48:1661–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Norata GD, et al. (2005) Effect of the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) variants on intima-media thickness and monocyte-derived macrophage response to LPS. J. Intern. Med. 258:21–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Montes AH, et al. (2006) The Toll-like receptor 4 (Asp299Gly) polymorphism is a risk factor for Gram-negative and haematogenous osteomyelitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 143:404–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kinane DF, et al. (2006) Gingival epithelial cells heterozygous for Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms Asp299Gly and Thr399ile are hypo-responsive to Porphyromonas gingivalis. Genes Immun. 7:190–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Feinstein Institute for Medical Research 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bart Ferwerda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Matthew B. B. McCall
    • 1
    • 3
  • Karlijn Verheijen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bart-Jan Kullberg
    • 1
    • 2
  • André J. A. M. van der Ven
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jos W. M. Van der Meer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mihai G. Netea
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Nijmegen University Center for Infectious DiseasesNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of ParasitologyNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations