Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Sensitive Precolumn Derivatization Method for Determination of Piperazine in Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Using a C8 Column and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rapid and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method was established to determine the trace residues of piperazine in vortioxetine hydrobromide. The presence of piperazine was determined by precolumn derivatization with dansyl chloride. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters SunFire C8 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 μm) in gradient elution mode, using formic acid and acetonitrile as mobile phase. Detection was performed in a single quadrupole mass spectrometer in single ion monitoring mode using positive ionization. An m/z value of 553 was selected for monitoring disubstituted piperazine by DNS-Cl. Linearity, accuracy, and precision were found to be acceptable over the piperazine concentration range of 0.3525–2.35 ng mL−1. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of piperazine −1, respectively, which complied with the requirements of qualitative and quantitative analyses. The method was deemed sensitive and efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. P. Conners, J. Emerg. Med., 1995, 13, 341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Liu, N. Cao, X. Ma, K. Xiong, L. Sun, Q. Zou, and L. Yao, J. Pharm. Biomed., 2015, 117, 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. X. Ding, C. A. Leverett, R. E. Kyne, K. K.-C. Liu, S. J. Fink, A. C. Flick, and C. J. O’Donnell, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2015, 23, 1895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Mao, L. Jiang, T. Chen, H. He, G. Liu, and H. Wang, Synthesis, 2015, 47, 1387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gibb and E. D. Deeks, Drugs, 2014, 74, 135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Dhir, Drugs today (Barcelona, Spain, 1998), 2013, 49, 781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. C. Leiser, Y. Li, A. L. Pehrson, E. Dale, G. Smagin, and C. Sanchez, ACS. Chem. Neurosci., 2015, 6, 970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. I. H. T. Guideline, “Q3A (R2), Current Step”, 2006, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. Fda, Draft, December 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. H. T. Guideline, “International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH): Geneva”, Citeseer, 2014.

  11. M. Dousa, R. Klvana, J. Doubsky, J. Srbek, J. Richter, M. Exner, and P. Gibala, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2016, 54, 119.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Skarping, T. Bellander, and L. Mathiasson, J. Chromatogr. A, 1986, 370, 245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. A. Park, D. Zhang, D. S. Kim, S. K. Kim, S. H. Cho, D. Jeong, and H. C. Shin, Food. Chem., 2016, 196, 1331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. C. McClintic, D. M. Remick, J. A. Peterson, and D. S. Risley, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 2003, 26, 3093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. M. Denis and N. E. Baryla, J. Chromatogr. A, 2006, 1110, 268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. K. A. Fletcher, D. A. Evans, and J. A. Kelly, Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit., 1982, 76, 77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Gadzala-Kopciuch, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 2005, 28, 2211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Lin, Y. Tian, Z. Zhang, L. Wu, and Y. Chen, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2010, 664, 40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. V. V. Tolstikov and O. Fiehn, Anal. Biochem., 2002, 301, 298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Guo and S. Gaiki, J. Chromatogr. A, 2005, 1074, 71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Hemstrom and K. Irgum, J. Sep. Sci., 2006, 29, 1784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Godejohann, J. Chromatogr. A, 2007, 1156, 87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. D. V. McCalley, J. Chromatogr. A, 2007, 1171, 46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Apostolou, C. Kousoulos, Y. Dotsikas, and Y. L. Loukas, Biomed. Chromatogr., 2008, 22, 1393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Ibrahim, N. El-Enany, R. N. El-Shaheny, and I. E. Mikhail, Anal. Sci., 2015, 31, 943.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Okabe, S. P. Hui, H. Fuda, T. Furukawa, S. Takeda, R. Shrestha, and H. Chiba, Anal. Sci., 2015, 31, 1341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. I. H. T. Guideline, “Q2 (R1)”, 2005, 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jiangsu Deyuan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd for providing us with vortioxetine hydrobromide APIs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengyu Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, S., Yan, Z. & Yang, H. A Sensitive Precolumn Derivatization Method for Determination of Piperazine in Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Using a C8 Column and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. ANAL. SCI. 32, 1333–1338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.32.1333

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.32.1333

Keywords

Navigation