Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydration Effect on the Ion-pair Extraction of Lithium Picrate by Hydrophobic Benzo-15-crown-5 Ether into Various Less-polar Diluents

  • Notes
  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ion-pair formation constant (KMLA0 in mol–1 dm3) for Li(B15C5)+ with a picrate ion (Pic–) in water was determined by potentiometry with a K+-selective electrode at 25˚C and an ionic strength of 0, where B15C5 denotes benzo-15-crown-5 ether. Using the concentration equilibrium constants, KMLA, estimated from this value, the extraction constants (mol–2 dm6 unit) of about ten diluents were re-calculated from previously reported extraction data. Also, the distribution constants of an ion-pair complex, Li(B15C5)Pic, between water and the diluents were re-estimated. A disagreement in the determined KMLA value between a solvent-extraction method and potentiometry was explained in terms of the Scatchard–Hildebrand equation; it came from the fact that the hydration of Li(I) in Li(B15C5)Pic was larger than that of free B15C5 in water. Then, the previously determined value by the former method was re-estimated using the potentiometric KMLA value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Notes

  1. Y. Takeda, R. Taguchi, and S. Katsuta, J. Mol. Liq., 2004, 115, 139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Takeda, K. Hashimoto, D. Yoshiyama, and S. Katsuta, J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem., 2002, 42, 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Kudo, M. Wakasa, T. Ito, J. Usami, S. Katsuta, and Y. Takeda, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2005, 381, 381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Kudo, J. Usami, S. Katsuta, and Y. Takeda, J. Mol. Liq., 2006, 123, 29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. For example, see J. Kirchenervá and G. C. B. Cave, Can. J. Chem., 1976, 54, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Kudo, J. Usami, S. Katsuta, and Y. Takeda, Talanta., 2004, 62, 701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Takeda, M. Tanaka, H. Yamada, and S. Katsuta, J. Coord. Chem., 2002, 55, 55. We tried to determining the KLi15C5 value in water, requested for a KLi(15C5)Pic computation, by conductometry and ion-transfer polarography at a nitrobenzene/w-solution interface. However, its value has not been determined, because less change of the molar conductivity vs. [15C5]t/[Li+]t plot was observed in the former method and also meaningful intercept in the FAvs. 1/[Li+]t plot was not obtained in the latter one. Here, the symbol FA is a function of a half-wave potential for the facilitated ion-transfer at the interface. Therefore, re-estimated data of the LiPic-15C5 extraction system could not be obtained for comparison with that of the present system.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes, in “Electrolyte Solutions”, 2nd ed., 2002, Dover, New York, 392.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Kudo, R. Fujihara, T. Ohtake, M. Wakasa, S. Katsuta, and Y. Takeda, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 2006, 51, 604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. The log Kex values for the NaPic-B15C5 system were revised by correcting activity coefficients in the data of Ref. 4. Then, the log KD,MLA values were estimated from the relation in the text. Their log Kex (I of the w-phase) and log KD,MLA values were: 3.637 ± 0.008 (0.022 mol dm–3) and 3.02 for DCM; 3.312 ± 0.012 (0.022) and 2.68 for CF; 3.760 ± 0.024 (0.021) and 2.63 for DCE; 3.089 ± 0.005 (0.022) and 0.67 for CBu; 3.204 ± 0.009 (0.022) and 1.32, 3.308 ± 0.015 (0.0063) and 1.37 for Bz; 3.179 ± 0.013 (0.022) and 1.06 for TE; 3.151 ± 0.005 (0.022) and 0.81 for mX; 3.629 ± 0.016 (0.022) and 1.93 for CB; 3.646 ± 0.008 (0.022) and 1.97 for BB; 3.738 ± 0.009 (0.022) and 2.06 for oDCB, respectively. Accordingly, the regression line was re¬calculated: log KD,MLA = (1.387 ± 0.114)log KD,L–(0.110 ± 0.158) with R = 0.97.

  11. D. R. Rosseinsky, Chem. Rev., 1965, 65, 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. This finding may come from the fact that the interaction of H2O with Na(15C5)Pic is somewhat smaller than that with K(15C5)Pic. See Ref. 4.

  13. T. Iwachido, M. Minami, M. Kimura, A. Sadakane, M. Kawasaki, and K. Tôei, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 53, 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan

    Yoshihiro Kudo, Shoichi Katsuta & Yasuyuki Takeda

  2. Graduate School of Science and Technology, Chiba University, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan

    Ryo Fujihara

Authors
  1. Yoshihiro Kudo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryo Fujihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shoichi Katsuta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yasuyuki Takeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiro Kudo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kudo, Y., Fujihara, R., Katsuta, S. et al. Hydration Effect on the Ion-pair Extraction of Lithium Picrate by Hydrophobic Benzo-15-crown-5 Ether into Various Less-polar Diluents. ANAL. SCI. 23, 1003–1006 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.23.1003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.23.1003

Search

Navigation