Skip to main content
Log in

Retention Characteristics in Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Comparison with Gas Chromatography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A practical method for the characterization of the retention behavior in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) was proposed, based on the retention index. Taking easier comparison with gas chromatography (GC) into consideration, a set of six test compounds were chosen: napthalene, 1-pentadecanol, 2-pentadecanone, n-pentadecanonitrile, isoquinoline and cyclododecane. Dimethylsilicone and carbon dioxide were selected as the standard stationary phase and the standard mobile phase, respectively. Thus, the differences in retention indexes for the test compounds between the SFC conditions in question and the standard SFC conditions, i.e., the ΔI values, were used for the expression of the retention characteris-tics, similarly to use of the McReynolds constants in GC. The difference or similarity of retention behavior could be evaluated by the angle between two vectors having six elements, which corresponded to two SFC conditions. This method could detect the small difference in the retention behavior on a slightly polar stationary phase: 50% methyl, 50% phenylsilicone between GC and SFC. This difference was attributed to the different behavior of cyclic compounds from that of non-cyclic compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Whatly, J. Chromatogr. A, 697, 251 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Yaku, K. Aoe, N. Nishimura, T. Sato and F. Morishita, J. Chromatogr. A, 785, 185 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. D. Bartle, “Supercritical Fluid Chromatography”, ed. R. M. Smith, Chap. 1, p. 1, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1988.

  4. P. J. Schoenmakers and C. C. J. G. Verhoeven, Tr. Anal. Chem., 6, 1 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Wehli and E. Kovats, Helv. Chim. Acta, 42, 2709 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Morishita, S. Morimoto and T. Kojima, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun., 9, 688 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Rohrschneider, J. Chromatogr., 22, 6 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. O. McReynolds, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 8, 685 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Morishita, K. Yaku, H. Hasegawa, M. Ichise and T. Kojima, Anal. Sci., 7 (supplement), 239 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. R. Roth and A. Ausorgova, J. Chromatogr., 465, 169 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (ed.), “Thermophysical Properties of Fluids”, p. 199, The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. S. Ettre, Chromatographia, 7, 261 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. A. Eckert, D. H. Ziger, K. P. Johnston and S. Kim, J. Phys. Chem., 90, 2738 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Wada, M. Saito, D. Kitada, R. L. Smith, Jr., H. Inomata, K. Arai and S. Saito, J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 10918 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaku, K., Hasegawa, H., Morishita, F. et al. Retention Characteristics in Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Comparison with Gas Chromatography. ANAL. SCI. 15, 1065–1069 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.15.1065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.15.1065

Keywords

Navigation