Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Anionic Surfactants by Capillary Electrophoresis Using 2-Naphthalenemethanol as a Marker for Micelle Formation

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method for the determination of the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic surfactants by capillary elec-trophoresis (CE) has been developed. The method is based on the measurement of migration time of 2-naphthalene-methanol as a marker compound in CE, using varying concentrations of a desired surfactant in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) as electrolyte solution. When the migration time of 2-naphthalenemethanol was plotted against the surfactant concentration, an inflection point appeared which corresponded to the CMC. By the CE method, the CMC values of seven anionic surfactants including sodium salts of alkyl sulfate, alkylsulfonic acid, fatty acid and bile acid were successfully determined; the CMC of sodium dodecyl sulfate determined by the CE method was 3.92 mM, which agreed closely with those measured by a dye solubilization method (3.53 mM) and a conductometric method (4.02 mM). The present CE method enabled the determination of CMC, if required, using as little as 300 μl or smaller volumes each of varying concentrations of surfactant solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Terabe, K. Otsuka and T. Ando, Anal. Chem., 57, 834 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Terabe, Tr. Anal. Chem., 8, 129 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Terabe, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 10, 705 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Zulauf, U. Fürstenberger, M. Grabo, P. Jäggi, M. Regenass and J. P. Rosenbusch, “Methods in Enzymology”, ed. S. Fleischer and B. Fleischer, Vol. 172, p. 528, Academic Press, San Diego, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. D. Goddard and G. C. Benson, Can. J. Chem., 35, 986 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Schott, J. Phys. Chem., 70, 2966 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. K. Goette, J. Colloid Sci., 4, 459 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Lichtenberg, R. J. Robson and E. A. Dennis, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 737, 285 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Helenius, D. R. McCaslin, E. Fries and C. Tanford, “Methods in Enzymology”, ed. S. Fleischer and L. Packer, Vol. 56, p. 734, Academic Press, New York, 1979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Jacquier and P. L. Desbēne, J. Chromatogr. A, 718, 167 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamura, H., Sano, A. & Matsuura, K. Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Anionic Surfactants by Capillary Electrophoresis Using 2-Naphthalenemethanol as a Marker for Micelle Formation. ANAL. SCI. 14, 379–382 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.14.379

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.14.379

Keywords

Navigation