Applications of Mathematics

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 377–403

A penalty method for the time-dependent Stokes problem with the slip boundary condition and its finite element approximation

Article

Abstract

We consider the finite element method for the time-dependent Stokes problem with the slip boundary condition in a smooth domain. To avoid a variational crime of numerical computation, a penalty method is introduced, which also facilitates the numerical implementation. For the continuous problem, the convergence of the penalty method is investigated. Then we study the fully discretized finite element approximations for the penalty method with the P1/P1-stabilization or P1b/P1 element. For the discretization of the penalty term, we propose reduced and non-reduced integration schemes, and obtain an error estimate for velocity and pressure. The theoretical results are verified by numerical experiments.

Keywords

penalty method Stokes problem finite element method error estimate 

MSC 2010

65N30 35Q30 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E. Bänsch, K. Deckelnick: Optimal error estimates for the Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations with slip-boundary condition. M2AN, Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 33 (1999), 923–938.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    E. Bänsch, B. Höhn: Numerical treatment of the Navier-Stokes equations with slip boundary condition. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21 (2000), 2144–2162.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. C. Brenner, L. R. Scott: The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Texts in Applied Mathematics 15, Springer, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Çağlar: Weak imposition of boundary conditions for the Navier-Stokes equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 149 (2004), 119–145.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    I. Dione, C. Tibirna, J. Urquiza: Stokes equations with penalised slip boundary conditions. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 27 (2013), 283–296.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    I. Dione, J. M. Urquiza: Penalty: finite element approximation of Stokes equations with slip boundary conditions. Numer. Math. 129 (2015), 587–610.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Geuzaine, J.-F. Remacle: Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 79 (2009), 1309–1331.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    V. Girault, P.-A. Raviart: Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations. Theory and Algorithms. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics 5, Springer, Berlin, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    F. Hecht: New development in freefem++. J. Numer. Math. 20 (2012), 251–265.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. G. Heywood, R. Rannacher: Finite element approximation of the nonstationary Navier-Stokes problem. I. Regularity of solutions and second-order error estimates for spatial discretization. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19 (1982), 275–311.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    V. John: Slip with friction and penetration with resistance boundary conditions for the Navier-Stokes equations—numerical tests and aspects of the implementation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 147 (2002), 287–300.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    T. Kashiwabara, I. Oikawa, G. Zhou: Penalty method with P1/P1 finite element approximation for the Stokes equations under the slip boundary condition. Numer. Math. 134 (2016), 705–740.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Knobloch: Discrete Friedrich’s and Korn’s inequalities in two and three dimensions. East-West J. Numer. Math. 4 (1996), 35–51.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. Knobloch: Variational crimes in a finite element discretization of 3D Stokes equations with nonstandard boundary conditions. East-West J. Numer. Math. 7 (1999), 133–158.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    W. Layton: Weak imposition of “no-slip” conditions in finite element methods. Comput. Math. Appl. 38 (1999), 129–142.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Logg, K.-A. Mardal, G. Wells, Editors: Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method. The FEniCS Bbook. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 84, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. Saito, L. E. Scriven: Study of coating flow by the finite element method. J. Comput. Phys. 42 (1981), 53–76.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Y. Shibata, R. Shimada: On a generalized resolvent estimate for the Stokes system with Robin boundary condition. J. Math. Soc. Japan 59 (2007), 469–519.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Y. Stokes, G. Carey: On generalized penalty approaches for slip, free surface and related boundary conditions in viscous flow simulation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Heat and Fluid Flow 21 (2011), 668–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Tabata: Uniform solvability of finite element solutions in approximate domains. Japan J. Ind. Appl. Math. 18 (2001), 567–585.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. Tabata: Finite element approximation to infinite Prandtl number Boussinesq equations with temperature-dependent coefficients—Thermal convection problems in a spherical shell. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 22 (2006), 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Tabata, A. Suzuki: A stabilized finite element method for the Rayleigh-Bénard equations with infinite Prandtl number in a spherical shell. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190 (2000), 387–402.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Tabata, D. Tagami: Error estimates for finite element approximations of drag and lift in nonstationary Navier-Stokes flows. Japan J. Ind. Appl. Math. 17 (2000), 371–389.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    R. Temam: Navier-Stokes Equations. Theory and Numerical Analysis. AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, 2001.MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    R. Verfürth: Finite element approximation of steady Navier-Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions. RAIRO, Modélisation Math. Anal. Numér. 19 (1985), 461–475.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    R. Verfürth: Finite element approximation of incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with slip boundary condition. Numer. Math. 50 (1987), 697–721.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    R. Verfürth: Finite element approximation of incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with slip boundary condition. II. Numer. Math. 59 (1991), 615–636.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    G. Zhou, T. Kashiwabara, I. Oikawa: Penalty method for the stationary Navier-Stokes problems under the slip boundary condition. J. Sci. Comput. 68 (2016), 339–374.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha, Czech Republic 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guanyu Zhou
    • 1
  • Takahito Kashiwabara
    • 2
  • Issei Oikawa
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsThe Tokyo University of ScienceTokyoJapan
  2. 2.The Graduate School of Mathematical SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and EngineeringWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations