Advertisement

Minerals & Metallurgical Processing

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 77–86 | Cite as

Development of a new fine particle dry separator

  • H. Akbari
  • L. A. Ackah
  • M. K. Mohanty
Article

Abstract

Dry coal cleaning has generated renewed interest in scientific and coal mining communities alike due to water scarcity in many parts of the world and the numerous tailings ponds that have resulted from traditional wet coal preparation methods. Commercially available dry separation technologies such as air tables and air jigs are mostly effective in cleaning coarse coal with particle size larger than 6.35 mm. The smaller-than-6.35 mm fraction, which might be up to 20 to 40 percent of raw coal, is sent to the clean coal or tailings streams in a dry separation plant without any cleaning. The main objective of this study is to develop, design and fabricate a new density-based dry separator to effectively clean fine coal in the size range of smaller than 6.35 mm to larger than 1 mm.

A difficult-to-clean coal sample with particle size smaller than 6.35 mm and flat-shaped shales as main rocks were used in this study. Using a laboratory-scale fluidization bed, the optimum air flow rate for fluidization of fine particles in air tables was found, which was much less than that for coarse coal. The perforations diameter and open area of the separating deck of the air table were also found to be critical for fine particle separation. These findings led to the development of a new air table named SIU Airtable for cleaning fine coal sized smaller than 6.35 mm and larger than 1 mm. The new air table has a unique air distribution and fluidization system for fine particles, along with adjustable vibration frequency and direction. It also has an optional extended section to lower the moisture content of high-moisture fine coal using part of the fluidization air. The experiments showed that an ash rejection of about 49 percent could be achieved with a combustible recovery of around 89 percent, indicating suitable separation. Furthermore, increasing ash rejection to 70 percent gives a combustible recovery of 72 percent, indicating that the separation performance of the new air table is close to the fine coal washability data.

Key words

Fine particle Dry separation Density-based separation Air table Fine coal cleaning Fluidization bed 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akbari, H., Zhang, B., Sayeh, M., Mohanty, M.K., and Rahimi, Sh., 2012, “Application of neural network for modeling the coal cleaning performance of the fgx dry separator,” Separation Technologies for Minerals, Coal, and Earth Resources, C.A. Young and G.H. Luttrell, eds., Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Englewood, CO, pp 189–197.Google Scholar
  2. Akbari, H., Zhang, B., Yang, F., Mohanty, M.K., and Hirschi, J., 2012, “Development of a Dry Preparation Plant Flowsheet for Cleaning High Sulfur Coal,” 141st SME Annual Conference & Expo, Seattle, WA, February 2012, Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Englewood, CO.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, B.J., Hervol, J.D., and Leonard III, J.W., 1991, “Dry particle concentration” Coal Preparation, 5th Ed., Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Englewood, CO, pp. 486–498.Google Scholar
  4. Bratton, R., Luttrell, G., Kasindorf, H., McGraw, G., and Robbins, R., 2010, “Evaluation of a novel fine coal dry cleaning process at Greenfields Coal Company,” International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, Vol. 30, No. 2–5, pp. 145–153, https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2010.497098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callen, A., Moghtaderi, B., and Galvin, K.P., 2007, “Use of parallel inclined plates to control elutriation from a gas fluidized bed,” Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 62, No. 1–2, pp. 356–370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Q., and Yang, Y., 2003, “Development of dry beneficiation of coal in China,” Coal Preparation, Vol. 23, No. 1–2, pp. 3–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/07349340302266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choung, J., Mak, C., and Xu, Z., 2006, “Fine coal beneficiation using an air dense medium fluidized bed” Coal Preparation, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/07349340600619345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dwari, R.K., and Rao, K. H., 2009, “Fine coal preparation using novel triboelectrostatic separator” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 119–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2008.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esmaeeli, A., 2012, “Computational Work-bench for Dry Beneficiation of Coal by Tribo-Electrostatic Separation” Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunities/Illinois Clean Coal Institute, Final Technical Report, Project No. 11/4A-2, November.Google Scholar
  10. Feng, Y., Oder, R.R., DeSollar, R.W., Stephens, E.A., Teacher, G.F., and Banfield, T.L., 1997, “Dry coal cleaning in a Magmill” Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems, March 16–19, 1997, Clearwater, FL.Google Scholar
  11. Galvin, K.P., 2004, “Reflux Classifier” The University of Newcastle Research Associates Limited, US6814241 B1.Google Scholar
  12. Honaker, R.Q., Luttrell, G.H., and Bethell, P.J., 2007, “Status of current coal preparation research” Designing the Coal Preparation Plant of the Future, Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Englewood, CO, pp. 181–198.Google Scholar
  13. Luo, Z., Zhao, Y., Tao, X., Fan, M., Chen, Q., and Wei, L., 2003, “Progress in dry coal cleaning using air-dense medium fluidized beds” Coal Preparation, Vol. 23, No. 1–2, pp. 13–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/07349340302267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Macpherson, S.A., 2011, “Dry Beneficiation in a Reflux Classifier” Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Newcastle, Australia, 267 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Macpherson, S.A., Iveson, S.M., and Galvin, K.P., 2010, “Density based separations in the reflux classifier with an air-sand dense-medium and vibration” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 74–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2009.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, B.G., 2011, Clean Coal Engineering Technology, Butterworth-Heinemann, 696 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Mohanty, M., Esmaeeli, A., and Akbari, H., 2012, “Development of a Dry Preparation Plant Flowsheet for Cleaning Illinois Coal,” Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunities/Illinois Clean Coal Institute, Final Technical Report, Project No. 11/4A-1, August.Google Scholar
  18. Mohanty, M.K., Zhang, B., and Akbari, H., 2010, “Evaluation of the FGX Dry Separator for Cleaning Illinois Coal,” Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunities/Illinois Clean Coal Institute, Final Technical Report, Project No. 08-1/4.1A-4, February.Google Scholar
  19. Oder, R.R., 2002, “An evaluation of the alpha prototype MagMill™ for dry coal cleaning,” Coal Preparation, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 323–341, https://doi.org/10.1080/07349340216018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oder, R.R., 2005, “The Use of Magnetic Forces to Upgrade Low Rank Coals,” Upgrading Low Rank Coals Symposium, Coal & Aggregate Processing Exhibition and Conference, Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
  21. Oder, R.R., 2012, “The MagMill: Innovation in Dry Coal Cleaning Technology Enhancing Environmental Compatibility and Resource Sustainability” BIT 1st International Symposium of Clean Coal Technology, Taiyuan, China.Google Scholar
  22. Oder, R.R., and Feng, Y., 1997, “Dry Coal Cleaning in a MagMill” Coal Liquefaction & Solid Fuels Contractors Review Conference, U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Technology Center, Sept. 3–4, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  23. Oder, R.R., Hurst, R., and Ralston, J.N., 2008, “MagMill Processing of Coals at the DTEES Vicksburg Facility,” Slide Presentation, Coal-Gen, Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
  24. Oder, R.R., Weinstein, R.S., and Snoby, R.J., 2003, “Combined air jig and dry magnetic separator for cleaning coal,” Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  25. Parekh, B.K., 2012, personal communication.Google Scholar
  26. Patil, D.P., and Parekh B.K., 2011, “Beneficiation of fine coal using the air table” International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, Vol. 31, pp. 203–222, https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2011.574948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ram, D.K, 2013, “The determination of minimum bubbling velocity, minimum fluidization velocity and fluidization index of fine powders (hematite) using gas-solid tapered beds,” International Journal of Science and Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 287–293.Google Scholar
  28. Rubarth, W., Steinberg M., Wotruba, H., and Weitkämper, D., 2009, “Evolution in dry separation for environmentally friendly mining AKAFLOW” Proceedings of Physical Separation, Falmouth, Cornwall, UK.Google Scholar
  29. Singh, R.K., Suryanarayana, A., and Roy, G.K., 1995, “Prediction of minimum fluidization velocity and bed pressure drop in non-circular gas-solid fluidized bed” Indian Chemical Engineer, Section A, Vol. 37, No. 1–2, pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  30. Stotts, W.F., Bland, A.E., and Kuhn, J.K., 1987, “Performance Evaluation of the Federal Mines Air Separation Plant at Elkhorn City, Kentucky” Kentucky Energy Cabinet Laboratory, Technical Report KECL/87-161, February, Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
  31. Tao, D., and Honaker, R., 2010, “Development of Novel Rotary Triboelectrostatic Separator for Dry Cleaning of Pulverized Fine Coal at Power Plants,” Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunities/Illinois Clean Coal Institute, Final Technical Report, Project No. 08-1/4.1A-1, April.Google Scholar
  32. Weinstein, R., and Snoby, R., 2007, “Advances in dry jigging improves coal quality,” Mining Engineering, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
  33. Weitkaemper, L., and Wotruba, H., 2008, “Development and performance of a new separator for the dry gravity separation of fines” Proceedings of XXIV International Mineral Processing Congress, Vol. 1, pp. 679–687.Google Scholar
  34. Weitkaemper, L., Wotruba, H., and Sampaio, C.H., 2010, “Effective dry density beneficiation of fine coal using a new developed fluidized bed separator” Proceedings of 16th International Coal Preparation Congress, Lexington, KY, pp. 587–595.Google Scholar
  35. Wright, A, 1985, “Air-table preparation plant adds,” Coal Age, May, pp. 70–73.Google Scholar
  36. Xin-xi, Z., Dai-yong, D., Bing, T., Jin-song, W., Feng, D., Hai-sheng, L., and Rui-xin, R., 2009, “Research on the triboelectrostatic separation of minerals from coal” Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 845–850, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2009.09.132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang, X., Zhao, Y., Luo, Z., Song, S., Duan, C., and Dong, L., 2013, “Fine coal dry cleaning using a vibrated gas-fluidized bed” Fuel Processing Technology, Vol. 106, pp. 338–343, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.08.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, B., Akbari, H., Yang, F., Mohanty, M.K., and Hirschi, J., 2011, “Performance optimization of the FGX dry separator for cleaning high-sulfur coal,” International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, Vol. 31, No. 3–4, pp. 161–186, https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2011.574943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Akbari
    • 1
  • L. A. Ackah
    • 2
  • M. K. Mohanty
    • 3
  1. 1.Minerals Research LaboratoryNorth Carolina State UniversityAshevilleUSA
  2. 2.Mining and Mineral Resources Engineering DepartmentSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.Mining and Metallurgical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations