Advertisement

Minerals & Metallurgical Processing

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 149–154 | Cite as

Molybdenite polytypism and its implications for processing and recovery: A geometallurgical-based case study from Bingham Canyon Mine, Utah

  • C. R. McClung
Article

Abstract

Molybdenum, in the form of molybdenite, is a common byproduct of many copper mining and concentrating operations. While the recovery of most copper sulfide minerals is principally liberation controlled, the recovery of molybdenite is much more complex, with fully liberated particles commonly lost to tailings.

A geometallurgical investigation was undertaken of molybdenite from the Bingham Canyon deposit with the aim of determining what effects, if any, mineralogy and the mineralogical attributes of morphology, angularity, liberation and size have on molybdenite recovery in the processing circuit. A set of samples was collected from the ores and products of Rio Tinto Kennecott’s Copperton Concentrator. The samples were analyzed by normal polarized reflected light microscopy, X-ray diffractometry, and scanning electron microscopy using a Mineral Liberation Analyzer, revealing the presence of two distinct types of molybdenite, which are the two polytypes: hexagonal (2H) and rhombohedral (3R). The 2H polytype occurs as textbook-shaped particles in quartz-molybdenite veins located in the core of the deposit, while the 3R polytype occurs as disseminated, ball-shaped particles with a dull or frosted appearance along the margins of the mineralized intrusive body or central core. Each polytype exhibited metallurgical properties consistent with those reported in the literature. The 2H polytype is easily ground, kinetically “faster” floating and displays surface attributes that are amenable to higher rates of recovery. This commonly results in the production of a high-quality molybdenum concentrate under normal operating conditions at most copper concentration operations. The 3R polytype is difficult to grind, kinetically “slower” floating and displays surface attributes that are less amenable to recovery. Therefore, in deposits with higher concentrations of the 3R polytype, modifications to operating parameters may be necessary to improve the recovery of molybdenite.

A preliminary investigation into the metal budget of porphyry copper and molybdenum deposits indicated a possible positive correlation between total economic metal budget and polytype content. Higher concentrations of the 3R polytype appear to be more prevalent in gold-enriched porphyries than in molybdenum-enriched porphyries. This may help explain why it is easier to obtain higher rates of recovery in molybdenum ± tungsten-rich deposits, which contain little to none of the 3R polytype. There is a potential for the metal budget of a porphyry deposit to be used as an indication of the molybdenite polytype present as well as its impact on the economics, in terms of exploration, and the processing circuit, in terms of plant design.

Key words

Molybdenite Porphyry ores Geometallurgy Ore handling Mineral processing Ore mineralogy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayres, D., 1974, “Distribution and occurrence of some naturally-occurring polytypes of molybdenite in Australia and Papua New Guinea,” Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, Vol. 21, pp. 273–278,  https://doi.org/10.1080/00167617408728850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babcock, R.C., Ballantyne, G., and Phillips, C., 1997, “Summary of the Geology of the Bingham District, Utah”, in Geology and Ore Deposits of the Oquirrh and Wasatch Mountains, Utah, Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, CO,  https://doi.org/10.5382/gb.29.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, R.E. and Herfert, R.E., 1957, “Preparation and characterization of a new crystalline form of molybdenum disulfide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 79, pp. 3351–3354,  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01570a012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chander, S. and Fuerstenau, D.W., 1974, “The effect of potassium diethyldithiophosphate on the interfacial properties of molybdenite,” Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 83, pp. 180–185.Google Scholar
  5. Crozier, R.D. and Ottley, D., 1978, “Processing of copper sulphide ores: froth flotation reagents–a review,” Mining Magazine, pp. 332.Google Scholar
  6. Da Silva, T.P., Figueiredo, M.-O., de Oliveira, D., Veiga, J.P., and Batista, M.J., 2013, “Molybdenite as a rhenium carrier: First results of a spectroscopic approach using synchrotron radiation,” Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 207–211,  https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2013.15032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickinson, R.G. and Pauling, L., 1923, “The crystal structure of molybdenite,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 45, pp. 1466–1471,  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01659a020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forbes, G. and Bradshaw, D., 2007, “Aspect Ratio Analysis of Liberated Molybdenite”, internal Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation Company report, pp. 12.Google Scholar
  9. Frondel, J.W. and Wickman, F.E., 1970, “Molybdenite polytypes in theory and occurrence, II. Some naturally-occurring polytypes of molybdenite,” American Mineralogist, Vol. 55, pp. 1857–1875.Google Scholar
  10. Gerson, A.R., Smart, R.St.C., Li, J., Kawashima, N., Weedon, D., Triffett, B., and Bradshaw, D., 2012, “Diagnosis of the surface chemical influences on flotation performance: copper sulfides and molybdenite,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 16, pp. 106–109,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2012.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giles, D.L. and Schilling, J.M., 1972, “Variation in rhenium content of molybdenite,” Twenty-fourth International Geological Congress Section 10, pp. 145–152.Google Scholar
  12. Hernlund, R.W., 1961, “Extraction of molybdenite from copper flotation product”, Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines, Vol. 56, pp. 177–195.Google Scholar
  13. Nakhaei, F. and Irannajad, M., 2014, “Investigation of effective parameters for molybdenite recovery from porphyry copper ores in industrial flotation circuit”, Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, Vol. 50, pp. 477–491.Google Scholar
  14. Lopez-Valdivieso, A., Madrid-Ortega, I., Valdez-Perez, D., Yang, B., and Song, S., 2012, “The heterogeneity of the basal plane of molybdenite: Its effect on molybdenite floatability and calcium ion adsorption,” 9th International Mineral Processing Conference, PROCEMIN, Santiago, pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
  15. Nelson, S., 2007, personal communication.Google Scholar
  16. Newberry, R.J.J., 1979a, “Polytypism in molybdenite (I): a non-equilibrium impurity-induced phenomenon”, American Mineralogist, Vol. 64, pp. 758–767.Google Scholar
  17. Newberry, R.J.J., 1979b, “Polytypism in molybdenite (II): relationships between polytypism, ore deposition/alteration stages and rhenium contents,” American Mineralogist, Vol. 64, pp.768–775.Google Scholar
  18. Ornelas Tabares, J., Madrid Ortega, I., Reyes Bahena, J. L., Sánchez López, A. A., Valdez Pérez, D., López Valdivieso, A. (2006) “Surface properties and floatability of molybdenite”, in Proceedings of 2006 China-Mexico Workshop on Minerals Particle Technology, San Luis Potosí, Mexico, pp. 115–124.Google Scholar
  19. Seedorf, E., Dilles, J.H., Proffett, Jr., J.M., Einaudi, M.T., Zurcher, L., Stavast, W.J.A., Johnson, D.A., and Barton, M.D., 2005, “Porphyry deposits: Characteristics and origin of Hypogene features”, in J.W. Hedenquist, J.F.H. Thompson, R.J. Goldfarb and J.P. Richards, eds., Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, CO, pp. 251–298.Google Scholar
  20. Shirley, J.F., 1980, “Byproduct molybdenite plant design,” Canadian Mining Journal, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
  21. Sorensen, R., 2015, personal communication.Google Scholar
  22. Sutulov, A., 1977, “Flotation recovery of molybdenum,” Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, Vol. 16, pp. 37–47,  https://doi.org/10.1179/cmq.1977.16.1.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Takéuchi, Y. and Nowacki, W., 1964, “Detailed crystal structure of rhombohedral MoS2 and systematic deduction of possible polytypes of molybdenite”, Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt., Vol. 44, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
  24. Traill, R.J., 1963, “A rhombohed polytype of molybdenite”, Canadian Mineralogist, Vol. 7, pp. 524–526.Google Scholar
  25. Triffett, B., and Bradshaw, D., 2008, “The role of morphology and host rock lithology on the flotation behavior of molybdenite at Kennecott Utah Copper,” Proceedings of 9th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy: ICAM 2008, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 465–473.Google Scholar
  26. Triffett, B., Veloo, C., Adair, B.J.I., and Bradshaw, D., 2008, “An investigation of the factors affecting the recovery of molybdenite in the Kennecott Utah Copper bulk flotation circuit,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 21, pp. 832–840,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2008.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wanhainen, C., Nigatu, W., Selby, D., McLeod, C.L., Nordin, R., and Bolin, N.-J., 2014, “The distribution, character, and rhenium content of molybdenite in the Aitik Cu-Au-Ag-(Mo) deposit and its southern extension in the northern Norrbotten ore district, northern Sweden,” Minerals, Vol. 4, pp. 788–814,  https://doi.org/10.3390/min4040788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wickman, F. E., and Smith, D.K., 1970, “Molybdenite polytypes in theory and occurrence. I. theoretical considerations of polytypism in molybdenite,” The American Mineralogist, Vol. 55, pp. 1843–1856.Google Scholar
  29. Zanin, M., Ametov, I., Grano, S., Zhou, L., and Skinner, W. (2009) “A study of mechanisms affecting molybdenite recovery in a bulk copper/molybdenum flotation circuit,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 93, pp. 256,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2009.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Integrated OperationsRio Tinto Kennecott CopperSouth JordanUSA

Personalised recommendations