A collective voice for advancing public health: why public health associations matter today

Abstract

We reflect on why public health matters today from the perspective of Canada’s provincial, territorial, and national public health associations. As independent, non-profit organizations that transcend professional roles and sectors, public health associations are positioned to play an essential role in strengthening public health, broadly speaking, across Canada. We outline three reasons why public health associations matter today. First, public health associations are uniquely positioned to champion a public health perspective. Second, they represent and connect a diverse range of roles, professions, and stakeholders involved in public health. Finally, they are positioned for advocacy, providing a platform for participation to those who may not otherwise be able to engage but who understand the importance of a collective voice. These reasons why public health associations are important are not new, but arguably carry renewed importance in the context of a contemporary public health landscape characterized by, among other things, weakened formal public health infrastructure, neoliberal agendas and individualism, and public health imperatives such as growing economic and social inequity and ecological determinants of health that require intersectoral responses.

Résumé

En réponse à la question Pourquoi la santé publique aujourd’hui?, nous réfléchissons à l’importance de notre association nationale pour la santé publique et de ses pendants provinciaux et territoriaux. Comme ce sont des organismes indépendants et sans but lucratif qui transcendent les rôles et les secteurs professionnels, les associations pour la santé publique sont en position de jouer un rôle essentiel dans le renforcement de la santé publique au sens large partout au Canada. Nous présentons trois raisons pour lesquelles ces associations importent aujourd’hui. La première est qu’elles sont particulièrement bien placées pour faire valoir une perspective de santé publique. La deuxième est qu’elles représentent et rapprochent une grande diversité de rôles, de professions et d’acteurs de la santé publique. La troisième est qu’elles sont bien placées pour faire de la sensibilisation en offrant une plateforme de participation à des personnes qui sinon n’en auraient aucune, mais qui reconnaissent l’importance de parler d’une même voix. Ces raisons de l’importance des associations pour la santé publique ne sont pas nouvelles, mais elles ont sans doute gagné en importance depuis que le paysage de la santé publique se caractérise, entre autres, par l’affaiblissement des infrastructures officielles, par l’individualisme et les visées néolibérales et par des impératifs comme la croissance des inégalités sociales et économiques et les déterminants écologiques de la santé, qui exigent des interventions intersectorielles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Civil society refers to “the wide array of non-governmental and not-for-profit organizations that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests and values of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, political, scientific, religious, or philanthropic considerations.” They may include community groups, NGOs, labour unions, and other service agencies (http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/partners/civil-society).

  2. 2.

    NTNUPHA website: https://www.cpha.ca/northwest-territories-and-nunavut-public-health-association

  3. 3.

    PHABC website: https://phabc.org

  4. 4.

    The notion of “wicked problems” was developed in the planning literature but has extended to public policy more generally to describe problems that, among other things, are difficult to define, have multiple explanations, have no clear solution, and may be a symptom of other problems.

  5. 5.

    Examples include (but are not limited to) speech language pathologists, dental hygienists, audiologists, health information scientists, and community nutritionists.

  6. 6.

    http://bcpovertyreduction.ca/about/members/

  7. 7.

    http://abpolicycoalitionforprevention.ca/who-we-are/

  8. 8.

    http://www.cqct.qc.ca/Documents_docs/DOCU_2011/DOCU_11_11_28_Flyer_CQCT.pdf

  9. 9.

    http://www.cqpp.qc.ca/en/

  10. 10.

    This benefit of PHAs may be particularly important in jurisdictions with small populations, where many members are employed by formal institutions such as government ministries.

  11. 11.

    PHABC website: https://phabc.org

  12. 12.

    OPHA website: http://opha.on.ca/Home.aspx

  13. 13.

    ASPQ website: http://www.aspq.org

References

  1. Acheson, D. (1988). Report of the committee of inquiry into the future development of the public health function. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association pour la santé publique du Québec (ASPQ) (2016). Building sustainable health in the 21st century – position statement. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec.

  3. Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE). (2016). Health highlights: Pembina Institute report - out with the coal, in with the new. Toronto: CAPE.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Canadian Network of Public Health Associations (CNPHA). (2017). An open letter to the New Brunswick Minister of Health. [cited 2018 May 31]; Available from: https://www.cpha.ca/nb_openletter. Accessed 21 Feb 2019.

  5. Canadian Public Health Association. (2015). Global change and public health: addressing the ecological determinants of health: discussion document.

  6. Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA). (2017). Canadian Public Health Association working paper. Public health: a conceptual framework. Ottawa: CPHA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guyon, A., Hancock, T., Kirk, M., MacDonald, J., Neudorf, C., Sutcliffe, P., Talbot, J., & Watson-Creed, G. (2017). The weakening of public health: a threat to population health and health care system sustainability. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 108(1–6). https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.108.6143.

  8. Hancock, T. (2015). Advocacy: it’s not a dirty word, it’s a duty [editorial]. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 106(3), e86–e88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horton, R., Beaglehole, R., & Bonita, R. (2014). From public to planetary health: a manifesto. Lancet, 383(9920), 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Labonté, R., & Stuckler, D. (2016). The rise of neoliberalism: how bad economics imperils health and what to do about it. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70, 312–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policing and Society, 36(3), 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Public Health Agency of Canada. (2008). Core competencies for public health in Canada - Release 1.0 2008 [cited 2018 May 31]; Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/php-psp/ccph-cesp/pdfs/cc-manual-eng090407.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2019.

  13. Rutty, C., & Sullivan, S. C. (2010). This is public health: a Canadian history. Ottawa: Canadian Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schrecker, T. (2016). ‘Neoliberal epidemics’ and public health: sometimes the world is less complicated than it appears. Critical Public Health, 26(5), 477–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Valaitis, R. K., O’Mara, L., Wong, S. T., MacDonald, M., Murray, N., Martin-Misener, R., & Meagher Stewart, D. (2018). Strengthening primary health care through primary care and public health collaboration: the influence of intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423617000895.

  16. Velez Mendoza, R., Lucyk, K., Ciok, I., McLaren, L., & Stahnisch, F. (2017). The history of the Alberta Public Health Association. Edmonton: APHA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Watts, N., Adger, N., Agnolucci, P., et al. (2015). Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. The Lancet, 386, 1861–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., et al. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on Planetary Health. Lancet, 386(1007), 1973–2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ian Culbert and Frank Welsh, Executive Director and Director of Policy, respectively, at the Canadian Public Health Association, for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Affiliations

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wade, D., Holland, A., Langille, L. et al. A collective voice for advancing public health: why public health associations matter today. Can J Public Health 110, 335–339 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-019-00197-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public health
  • Public health association
  • Intersectoral
  • Advocacy
  • Partnerships

Mots-clés

  • Santé publique
  • Association pour la santé publique
  • Intersectoriel
  • Défense des droits
  • Partenariats