Résumé
Objectifs
Décrire les différentes dimensions de la participation parentale dans les interventions instaurées en milieu scolaire et identifier la relation entre chacune de ces dimensions et le développement des comportements alimentaires des enfants suite à leur exposition à un projet d’éducation nutritionnel mis en place dans huit écoles primaires de milieux défavorisés de Montréal, le projet Petits cuistots - Parents en réseaux (PC-PR).
Methode
Cette recherche descriptive est conduite grâce à une analyse secondaire de données d’un échantillon de 502 parents d’enfants fréquentant les écoles qui participent au projet PC-PR. La participation parentale est conceptualisée en quatre dimensions faisant référence à la notion du mésosystème proposée par Bronfenbrenner (1979). Les comportements alimentaires tels que rapportés par les parents incluent le fait de: parler des ateliers, demander d’acheter certains aliments, lire les étiquettes sur l’emballage des produits et aider à réaliser les repas. Des analyses descriptives, bivariées et multivariées sont effectuées.
Résultats
Les données recueillies auprès des parents montrent une association positive entre la participation parentale à la maison et l’ensemble des comportements alimentaires examinés chez les élèves. Toutefois, l’implication parentale à l’école n’est corrélée à aucun des comportements.
Conclusion
Cette recherche suggère l’importance de la participation parentale dans les interventions d’éducation nutritionnelle en milieu scolaire. Ces résultats contribuent à l’avancement des connaissances dans le domaine et servent de prémisses à une réflexion visant à mieux orienter les interventions en promotion de la santé.
Abstract
Coals
To describe the various dimensions of parental involvement in the interventions initiated in schools and to identify the relationship between each of these dimensions and the development of children’s food choices following their exposure to a nutrition-education project implemented in eight primary schools in underprivileged neighbourhoods in Montréal - the Junior Cooks - Parents Network project (Petits cuistots - Parents en réseaux (PC-PR)).
Method
This descriptive research was conducted thanks to a secondary analysis of data from a sample of 502 parents of children attending schools that participated in the PC-PR project. Parental participation is described in four aspects, making reference to the idea of a mesosystem, suggested by Bronfenbrenner (1979). Children’s eating-related behaviour, as reported by the parents, included: talking about workshops, asking to buy certain foods, reading labels on product wrapping and helping to prepare the meal. Bivariate and multivariate descriptive analyses were performed.
Results
The data gathered from the parents show a positive association between in-home parental involvement and overall food behaviour in the students. However, there is no association between parental involvement at school and any of the behaviours.
Conclusion
This research suggests the importance of parental participation in nutrition education interventions in schools. The results contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field and serve as impetus for reflection on how to better direct health promotion interventions.
Références
Soubhi H, Potvin L. Homes and families as health promotion setting. Dans: Settings for Health Promotion: Linking Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000;44–85.
St Leger L, Nutbeam D. A model for mapping linkages between health and education agencies to improve school health. J Sch Health Feb 2000;70(2):45–50.
Nader PR, Sellers DE, Johnson CC, Perry CL, Stone EJ, Cook KC, et al. The effect of adult participation in a school-based family intervention to improve children’s diet and physical activity: The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. Prev Med 1996;25(4):455–64.
Perry CL, Luepker RV, Murray DM, Kurth C, Mullis R, Crockett S, Jacobs DR, Jr. Parent involvement with children’s health promotion: The Minnesota Home Team. Am J Public Health 1988;78(9):1156–60.
Ransley JK, Taylor EF, Radwan Y, Kitchen MS, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Does nutrition education in primary schools make a difference to children’s fruit and vegetable consumption? Public Health Nutr 2010;1–7.
Te Velde SJ, Wind M, Perez-Rodrigo C, Klepp KI, Brug J. Mothers’ involvement in a school-based fruit and vegetable promotion intervention is associated with increased fruit and vegetable intakes - The Pro Children study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008;5:48.
Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Perry CL, Bishop DB, Taylor G, Murray DM, Mays RW, Dudovitz BS, et al. Changing fruit and vegetable consumption among children: The 5-a-Day Power Plus program in St. Paul, Minnesota. Am J Public Health 1998;88(4):603–9.
Parker FL, Boak AY, Griffin KW, Ripple C, Peay L. Parent-child relationship, home learning environment and school readiness. School Psychol Rev 1999;28:413–25.
Singh K, Bickley PG, Trivette P, Keith TZ, Keith PB, Anderson E. The effects of four components of parental involvement on eighth-grade student achievement: Structural analysis of NELS-88 data. School Psychol Rev 1995;24(2):299–317.
Hill NE, Taylor LC. Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2004;13:161–64.
Deslandes R, Cloutier R. Pratiques parentales et réussite scolaire en fonction de la structure familiale et du genre des adolescents. Revue française de pédagogie 2005;151:61–74.
Epstein JL. School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan 1995;76:701–12.
Epstein JL. School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators, and Improving Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001.
Bronfenbrenner U. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Dev Psychol 1986;22(6):723–42.
Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. Dans: Wozniak RH, Fischer KW (Eds.), Development in Context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum, 1993;3–44.
Les atéliers cinq épices. Bilan d’activité du projet Petits cuistots - Parents en réseaux (2007-2008). 2008.
Collectif Quartier. Atlas des quartiers. 2008; Sur internet: https://doi.org/www.collectifquartier.org/latlas-des-quartiers/ (consulté le 1 décembre 2014).
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York; Toronto: Wiley, 2000.
Cohen DA, Scribner RA, Farley TA. A structural model of health behavior: A pragmatic approach to explain and influence health behaviors at the population level. Prev Med 2000;30(2):146–54.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988;15(4):351–77.
Groves A. Children’s Food: Market Forces and Industry Responses. British Nutrition Foundation Nutrition Bulletin, 2002;27:187–90.
Marcon RA. Positive relationships between parent school involvement and public school inner-city preschoolers’ development and academic performance. School Psychol Rev 1999;28:395–412.
Sheldon SB, Epstein JL. Improving student behavior and school discipline with family and community involvement. Education and Urban Society 2002;35(1):4–26.
Oyserman D, Brickman D, Rhodes M. School success, possible selves, and parent school involvement. Family Relations 2007;56:479–89.
Jeynes WH. A Meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society 2003;35(2):202–18.
Davis-Kean PE. The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. J Family Psychology 2005;19(2):294–304.
Larose F, Terrisse B, Lenoir Y, Bédard J. Approches écosystémiques et fondements de l’intervention éducative précoce en milieux socioéconomiques faibles. Les conditions de la resilience scolaire. Brock Education: A journal of Educational Research and Practice 2004;13(2):56–80.
Cooke LJ, Wardle J. Age and gender differences in children’s food preferences. Br J Nutr 2005;93(5):741–46.
Rasmussen M, Krolner R, Klepp KI, Lytle L, Brug J, Bere E, Due P. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: A review of the literature. Part I: Quantitative studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006;3:22.
Xie B, Gilliland FD, Li YF, Rockett HR. Effects of ethnicity, family income, and education on dietary intake among adolescents. Prev Med 2003;36(1):30–40.
Pitt MM, Khandker SR, Mickernan SM, Latif MA. Credit programs for the poor and reproductive behavior in low-income countries: Are the reported causal relationships the result of heterogeneity bias? Demography 1999;36(1):1–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflit d’intérêts: Aucun à déclarer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diallo, F.B., Potvin, L., Bédard, J. et al. Participation des parents à un programme d’éducation nutritionnel implanté en milieu scolaire et développement de comportements alimentaires des enfants. Can J Public Health 105, e425–e430 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.105.4144
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.105.4144