Advertisement

Supervised inhalation is an important part of supervised consumption services

  • Stacey BourqueEmail author
  • Em M. Pijl
  • Erin Mason
  • Jill Manning
  • Takara Motz
Innovations in Policy and Practice
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Setting

The first regulated supervised inhalation site (safer smoking room) in North America has opened in Lethbridge, Alberta, as part of a supervised consumption site addressing all routes of consumption. When designing the service, we felt it was important to accommodate not just injection drug use but also inhalation because (1) it is not the method of drug use that kills but the drug itself, (2) all people who use drugs deserve service regardless of their mode of use, and (3) people who use drugs should have the opportunity to use the method with the lowest risk.

Intervention

We received approval from Health Canada to offer supervised inhalation services in addition to supervised injection services. Based on a European model, we worked with a local commercial heating, cooling, and ventilation (HVAC) company to create rooms with ventilation systems that complied with Canadian health and safety regulations.

Outcome

People who use drugs by inhalation have repeatedly told us that they want to use indoors and will do so given the option. Since opening the supervised consumption service at the end of February 2018, the response has been overwhelming and both of the inhalation rooms are constantly in use.

Implications

Supervised inhalation services provide an alternative to public drug use and an opportunity for people who use drugs to engage with harm reduction services. Other supervised consumption services in Canada may also wish to pursue exemptions for this service.

Keywords

Supervised consumption Drug consumption rooms Harm reduction Inhalation Supervised injection Opioids Crystal meth Street drugs Illicit drugs 

Résumé

Lieu

Le premier site réglementé d’inhalation sous supervision (fumerie à moindre risque) en Amérique du Nord a ouvert à Lethbridge, en Alberta; il fait partie d’un site de consommation sous supervision pour tous les modes de consommation. En concevant ce service, nous avons jugé important de permettre non seulement l’utilisation de drogue par injection, mais aussi par inhalation car : 1) ce n’est pas la méthode de consommation qui tue, mais la drogue; 2) les personnes qui consomment de la drogue ont le droit d’être servies peu importe leur mode de consommation; et 3) ces personnes devraient pouvoir utiliser le mode de consommation le moins dangereux.

Intervention

Nous avons obtenu l’accord de Santé Canada pour offrir des services d’inhalation sous supervision en plus de services d’injection sous supervision. En nous inspirant d’un modèle européen, nous avons travaillé avec une entreprise locale de chauffage, ventilation et climatisation (CVC) à créer des salles dotées de systèmes de ventilation conformes à la réglementation canadienne de santé-sécurité.

Résultats

Les consommateurs de drogue par inhalation nous ont dit à plusieurs reprises qu’ils veulent consommer à l’intérieur et qu’ils le font s’ils en ont la possibilité. Depuis l’ouverture de notre site de consommation sous supervision la fin de février 2018, la demande est massive, et nos deux salles d’inhalation sont constamment utilisées.

Conséquences

Les services d’inhalation sous supervision constituent une solution de rechange à la consommation de drogue en public et permettent aux consommateurs de drogue de bénéficier de services de réduction des méfaits. D’autres sites de consommation sous supervision au Canada devraient songer à demander une exemption pour ce type de service.

Mots-clés

Consommation sous supervision Salles de consommation de drogue Réduction des méfaits Inhalation Injection sous supervision Opioïdes Méthamphétamine en cristaux Drogues des rues Drogues illicites 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the professional expertise of Mr. Richard Altvater at 4 Seasons Home Comfort.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ASHRAE. (2016). Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. Atlanta: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, C. L., Kerr, T., Kuyper, L. M., Li, K., Tyndall, M. W., Marsh, D. C., … Wood, E. (2005). Potential uptake and correlates of willingness to use a supervised smoking facility for noninjection illicit drug use. J Urban Health, 82(2), 276–284.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti051.
  3. DeBeck, K., Buxton, J., Kerr, T., Qi, J., Montaner, J., & Wood, E. (2011). Public crack cocaine smoking and willingness to use a supervised inhalation facility: Implications for street disorder. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 6, 4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597x-6-4.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Dietrich, J. B. (2009). Alteration of blood-brain barrier function by methamphetamine and cocaine. Cell & Tissue Research, 336(3), 385–392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-009-0777-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hyshka, E. E., Anderson, J., Wong, Z.-W., & Wild, T. C. (2016). Risk behaviours and service needs of marginalized people who use drugs in edmonton’s inner city: Results from the Edmonton Drug Use and Health Survey. Edmonton: University of Alberta School of Public Health.Google Scholar
  6. Jozaghi, E., Lampkin, H., & Andresen, M. A. (2016). Peer-engagement and its role in reducing the risky behavior among crack and methamphetamine smokers of the Downtown Eastside community of Vancouver, Canada. Harm Reduction Journal, 13(19), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-016-0108-z.Google Scholar
  7. Leonard, L., DeRubeis, E., Pelude, L., Medd, E., Birkett, N., & Seto, J. (2008). “I inject less as I have easier access to pipes”: Injecting, and sharing of crack-smoking materials, decline as safer crack-smoking resources are distributed. Int J Drug Policy, 19(3), 255–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Malchy, L., Bungay, V., & Johnson, J. (2008). Documenting practices and perceptions of 'safer' crack use: A Canadian pilot study. Int J Drug Policy, 19(4), 339–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McNeil, R., Kerr, T., Lampkin, H., & Small, W. (2015). "We need somewhere to smoke crack": An ethnographic study of an unsanctioned safer smoking room in Vancouver, Canada. Int J Drug Policy, 26(7), 645–652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.015.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Pijl, E. M., Bourque, S., May, J., Manning, J., & Lethbridge, A. R. C. H. E. S. (2017). Risk behaviours and service needs of marginalized people who use drugs in lethbridge: Results from the Alberta Drug Use and Health Survey. Lethbridge: University of Lethbridge.Google Scholar
  11. Riley, A. L., Kearns, D., Hargrave, S., & Davidson, T. (2017). Cocaine increases permeability of blood-brain-barrier in the hippocampus and striatum: Implications for drug use and abuse. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 171, e177–e177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sajja, R. K., Rahman, S., & Cucullo, L. (2016). Drugs of abuse and blood-brain barrier endothelial dysfunction: A focus on the role of oxidative stress. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 36(3), 539–554.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X15616978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shannon, K., Ishida, T., Morgan, R., Bear, A., Oleson, M., Kerr, T., & Tyndall, M. W. (2006). Potential community and public health impacts of medically supervised safer smoking facilities for crack cocaine users. Harm Reduct J, 3, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-3-1.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Strike, C., Rotondi, N. K., Watson, T. M., Kolla, G., & Bayoumi, A. M. (2016). Public opinions about supervised smoking facilities for crack cocaine and other stimulants. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 11, 8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-016-0052-7.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Voon, P., Ti, L., Dong, H., Milloy, M.-J., Wood, E., Kerr, T., & Hayashi, K. (2016). Risky and rushed public crack cocaine smoking: The potential for supervised inhalation facilities. BMC Public Health, 16, 476.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3137-3.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Watson, T. M., Strike, C., Kolla, G., Penn, R., Jairam, J., Hopkins, S., . . . Bayoumi, A. M. (2013). Design considerations for supervised consumption facilities (SCFs): Preferences for facilities where people can inject and smoke drugs. Int J Drug Policy, 24(2), 156–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARCHESLethbridgeCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations