Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 109, Issue 5–6, pp 613–621 | Cite as

Beyond bare bones: critical, theoretically engaged qualitative research in public health

  • Eric MykhalovskiyEmail author
  • Joan Eakin
  • Brenda Beagan
  • Natalie Beausoleil
  • Barbara E. Gibson
  • Mary Ellen Macdonald
  • Melanie J. Rock
Special Section on Qualitative Research: Invited Commentary/Commentaire invité

Abstract

While qualitative inquiry has been a part of the Canadian Journal of Public Health (CJPH) for many years, CJPH does not yet have the reputation as a home for qualitative research that has a critical focus and that is cqqqonversant with contemporary developments in social theory and qualitative methodology. This paper describes efforts to establish CJPH as a welcoming home for critical, theoretically engaged qualitative research in public health. The paper introduces the Special Section that heralds the forward vision for qualitative research at CJPH. We specify what we mean by critical, theoretically engaged qualitative research and make the case for its significance for public health research and practice. We describe changes made in how qualitative manuscript submissions are handled at CJPH and highlight the contribution to public health scholarship made by the articles that comprise the Special Section. We issue an invitation to the public health community to support and participate in our vision to enhance critical, theoretically informed qualitative research in public health.

Keywords

Qualitative research Public health Social theory Critical 

Au-delà du minimalisme : pour une recherche qualitative critique et théorique en santé publique

Résumé

La Revue canadienne de santé publique (RCSP) a beau publier des études qualitatives depuis de nombreuses années, elle n’a pas encore la réputation d’attirer de la recherche qualitative d’orientation critique, au fait de l’évolution contemporaine de la théorie sociale et des méthodes qualitatives. Nous décrivons ici les efforts déployés pour faire de la RCSP un lieu d’accueil pour la recherche qualitative critique et théorique en santé publique. Nous présentons la Section spéciale qui annonce une vision prospective pour la recherche qualitative à la RCSP. Nous précisons ce que nous voulons dire par « la recherche qualitative critique et théorique » et nous faisons valoir son importance pour la recherche et la pratique en santé publique. Nous décrivons les changements apportés au traitement des envois de manuscrits qualitatifs à la RCSP et soulignons la contribution des articles de la Section spéciale au savoir en santé publique. Nous invitons la communauté de la santé publique à épouser notre vision et à se joindre à nos efforts pour améliorer la recherche qualitative critique et théorique en santé publique.

Mots-clés

Recherche qualitative Santé publique Théorie sociale Critique 

Notes

References/Références bibliographiques

  1. Baum, F. (1995). Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Social Science & Medicine, 40(4), 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biehl, J. (2009). Will to live: AIDS therapies and the politics of survival. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Black, N. (1994). Why we need qualitative research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 48(5), 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson, K. R., & Davidson, E. (1969). Healthways in Seaward, a Nova Scotian fishing community. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 60(5), 187–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eakin, J. (2016). Educating critical qualitative health researchers in the land of the randomized controlled trial. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eakin, J., & Mykhalovskiy, E. (2003). Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9(2), 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faltermaier, T. (1997). Why public health research needs qualitative approaches: subjects and methods in change. The European Journal of Public Health, 7(4), 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Greenhalgh, T., Annandale, E., Ashcroft, R., Barlow, J., Black, N., Bleakley, A., et al. (2016). An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research. BMJ, 352(i563).Google Scholar
  11. Hagaman, A. K., Wagenaar, B. H., McLean, K. E., Kaiser, B. N., Winskell, K., & Kohrt, B. A. (2013). Suicide in rural Haiti: Clinical and community perceptions of prevalence, etiology, and prevention. Social Science & Medicine, 83, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hills, M. (2000). Human science research in public health: The contribution and assessment of a qualitative approach. Can J Public Health, 91(6), 4–7.Google Scholar
  13. Kontos, P., & Grigorovich, A. (2018). “ Sleight of hand” or“ selling our soul”? Surviving and thriving as critical qualitative health researchers in a positivist world. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 19, No. 2).Google Scholar
  14. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Loptson, K., Muhajarine, N., Ridalls, T., the Smart Cities, & Healthy Kids Research Team. (2012). Walkable for whom? Examining the role of the built environment on the neighbourhood-based physical activity of children. Can J Public Health, 103(9), 29–34.Google Scholar
  16. McPhail, D. (2013). Resisting biopedagogies of obesity in a problem population: understandings of healthy eating and healthy weight in a Newfoundland and Labrador community. Critical Public Health, 23(3), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mykhalovskiy, E., Frohlich, K. L., Poland, B., Di Ruggiero, E., Rock, M. J., & Comer, L. (2018). Critical social science with public health: Agonism, critique and engagement. Critical Public Health.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1474174.
  18. Poland, B. D., Stockton, L., Ashley, M. J., Pederson, L., Cohen, J., Ferrence, R., & Bull, S. (1999). Interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places: a qualitative study. Can J Public Health, 90(5), 330–333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods. BMJ, 311(6996), 42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roy, B., & De Koninck, M. (2013). La recherche qualitative sur les inégalités sociales de santé: le parcours de vie. Can J Public Health, 104(2), 154–158.Google Scholar
  21. Shortell, S. M. (1999). The emergence of qualitative methods in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1083.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Sofaer, S. (1999). Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1101–1118.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Mykhalovskiy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joan Eakin
    • 2
  • Brenda Beagan
    • 3
  • Natalie Beausoleil
    • 4
  • Barbara E. Gibson
    • 5
  • Mary Ellen Macdonald
    • 6
  • Melanie J. Rock
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of SociologyYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.School of Occupational HealthDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  4. 4.Division of Community Health and HumanitiesMemorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada
  5. 5.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Faculty of DentistryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  7. 7.Department of Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations