Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 109, Issue 5–6, pp 622–632 | Cite as

HPV vaccination discourses and the construction of “at-risk” girls

  • Geneviève RailEmail author
  • Luisa Molino
  • Caroline Fusco
  • Moss Edward Norman
  • LeAnne Petherick
  • Jessica Polzer
  • Fiona Moola
  • Mary Bryson
Special Section on Qualitative Research

Résumé

Objectif

L’objectif était d’étudier le déploiement des discours sur la vaccination contre les VPH (VVPH) et leur impact sur les filles, les parents, les infirmiers/infirmières et les médecins canadiens.

Méthodes

Des entrevues ont été réalisées avec des participant(e)s (n = 146) de quatre provinces canadiennes. Une analyse poststructuraliste du discours a permis d’examiner les campagnes de VVPH et les transcriptions d’entrevues pour documenter la façon dont les participant(e)s interprètent les VVPH et se positionnent comme sujets au sein des discours de l’industrie ou des agences de santé publique.

Résultats

Les campagnes de VVPH sont sexistes, hétéro-normatives et trompeuses. Émergeant de l’analyse des entrevues est le manque d’information des filles et des parents en ce qui a trait à la VVPH. Les mères se construisent en tant que bio-citoyennes responsables, mais au prix de l’impuissance, de l’anxiété et de la peur ressenties parallèlement à l’impératif d’agir pour minimiser le risque de cancer de leur fille. Quant aux professionnel(le)s de la santé, ils s’approprient les discours dominants sur la VVPH et utilisent la peur comme stratégie pour fabriquer le consentement pour la VVPH. Les occasions de dialogue sur la VVPH et la santé sexuelle des filles sont perdues et les positions en tant que sujets sont problématiques pour tous les types de participant.

Conclusions

Nous nous questionnons à savoir si la santé publique est bien servie quand les discours sur la VVPH transforment des corps en santé en corps « à risque » et quand la peur du cancer est instrumentalisée pour la pharmacologisation de la santé publique.

Keywords

HPV Vaccination Girls Cancer Consent Medicalization 

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the deployment of HPV vaccination (HPVV) discourses and their impact on Canadian girls, parents, nurses and physicians.

Methods

Qualitative methods were favoured and included interviews with participants (n = 146) from four Canadian provinces and diverse socio-cultural locations. Using a poststructuralist discourse analysis, we examined HPVV campaigns as well as interview transcripts to document how girls, parents and health professionals make sense of HPVV as well as how they position themselves within and/or resist discourses coming from industry and public health sources.

Results

The results speak to HPVV campaigns as morally laden, gendered, heteronormative and factually misleading. Emerging from the analysis of interviews is the girls’ and parents’ lack of information regarding HPVV. For mothers, results show how they construct themselves as responsible biocitizens at the cost of the powerlessness, uncertainty, anxiety and fear they feel alongside the perceived imperative to act upon their daughter’s cancer risk. As for health professionals, they generally appropriate dominant HPVV discourses and use fear of HPV infection as a strategy to manufacture consent for HPVV among girls and parents. We discuss the ways in which opportunities for broader dialogue about HPVV and girls’ sexual health are foreclosed and how subject positions for all types of participants are problematic.

Conclusions

We ask whether public health is advanced when HPVV discourses transform healthy bodies into “at-risk” bodies and when the fear of cancer is instrumentalized in the pharmaceuticalization of public health.

Mots-clés

VPH Vaccination Filles Cancer Consentement Médicalisation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is part of a broader project on HPV vaccination discourses, practices, and spaces (Rail, G., Fusco, C., Burns, K., Russel, K., Bryson, M., MacDonald, M., Moola, F., Norman, M.E., Petherick, L., and Polzer, J., 2012–2017). The authors dedicate this article to the memory of Dr. Abby Lippman, who inspired them and provided assistance throughout this project.

Funding information

The authors acknowledge the generous financial support of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for this project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdelmutti, N., & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2009). Risk messages about HPV, cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccine Gardasil: a content analysis of Canadian and US national newspaper articles. Women’s Health, 49, 422–490.Google Scholar
  2. Batt, S., & Lippman, A. (2010). Preventing disease: are pills the answer? In A. Rochon Ford & D. Saibil (Eds.), The push to prescribe: women and Canadian drug policy (pp. 47–66). Toronto: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blitshteyn, S. (2014). Postural tachycardia syndrome following human papillomavirus vaccination. European Journal of Neurology, 21(1), 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bramadat, P., Guay, M., Bettinger, J. A., & Roy, R. (2017). Public health in the age of anxiety: religious and cultural roots of vaccine hesitancy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinth, L. S., Pors, K., Theibel, A. C., & Mehlsen, J. (2015). Orthostatic intolerance and postural tachycardia syndrome as suspected adverse effects of vaccination against human papilloma virus. Vaccine, 33(22), 2602–2605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B., Gabra, M. I., & Pellman, H. (2017). Reasons for acceptance or refusal of human papillomavirus vaccine in a California pediatric practice. Papillomavirus Research, 3, 42–45.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, K., & Davies, C. (2013). Producing responsible girl citizens: an analysis of media discourses around the HPV vaccination programs. In V. Lopez, Y. Katsulis, G. Gillis, & K. Harper (Eds.), Girls sexualities and the media (pp. 139–154). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burns, K., & Davies, C. (2015). Constructions of young women’s health and wellbeing in neoliberal times: a case study of the HPV vaccination program in Australia. In K. Wright & J. McLeod (Eds.), Rethinking youth wellbeing: critical perspectives (pp. 71–89). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Canadian Cancer Society. (2017). Canadian cancer statistics 2017. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society.Google Scholar
  10. Cayen, L., Polzer, J., & Knabe, S. (2016). Tween girls, sexuality and the biopolitics of HPV vaccination in English-speaking Canadian magazines. In J. Polzer & E. Power (Eds.), Neoliberal governance and health: duties, risks and vulnerabilities. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Charles, N. (2014). Injecting and rejecting, framing and failing: the HPV vaccine and the subjectification of citizens’ identities. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1071–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chow, E. (2015). Factors influencing parental decision making for the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: a literature review. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health, 8(3), 265–276.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, E., & Hunt, A. (2010). The HPV vaccination campaign: a project of moral regulation in an era of biopolitics. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 35(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
  14. Cutts, S., Fanceschi, S., Goldie, S., Castellsague, X., Sanjose, S., Garnett, G., et al. (2007). Human papillomavirus and HPV vaccines: a review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(9), 719–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, C., & Burns, K. (2013). Mediating healthy female citizenship in the HPV vaccination campaigns. Feminist Media Studies, 14(5), 711–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickinson, J. A., Stankiewicz, A., Popadiuk, C., Pogany, L., Onysko, J., & Miller, A.B. (2012). Reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada: national data from 1932 to 2006. BMC Public Health, 12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-992. Accessed June 12, 2018.
  17. Ferrer, H. B., Trotter, C., Hickman, M., & Audrey, S. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination of young women in high-income countries: a qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis. BioMed Central (BMC) Public Health, 14(1), 700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimar.Google Scholar
  19. Grabiel, M., Reutzel, T. J., Wang, S., Rubin, R., Leung, V., Ordonez, A., Wong, M., & Jordan, E. (2013). HPV and HPV vaccines: the knowledge levels, opinions, and behavior of parents. Journal of Community Health, 38(6), 1015–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendry, M., Lewis, R., Clements, A., Damery, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2013). “HPV? Never heard of it!”: a systematic review of girls’ and parents’ information needs, views and preferences about human papillomavirus vaccination. Vaccine, 31(45), 5152–5167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herzog, T., Huh, W., Downs, L., Smith, J., & Monk, B. (2008). Initial lessons learned in HPV vaccination. Gynecologic Oncology, 109, S4–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilton, S., Hunt, K., Langan, M., Bedford, H., & Petticrew, M. (2010). Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005–2008). Social Science and Medicine, 70, 942–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lippman, A., Melnychuk, R., Shimmin, C., & Boscoe, M. (2007). Human papillomavirus, vaccines and women’s health: questions and cautions. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 177(5), 484–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mancuso, F., & Polzer, J. (2010). “It’s your body but…”: young women’s narratives of declining human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Canadian Woman Studies, 28(2–3), 77–81.Google Scholar
  25. Mara, M. (2010). Spreading the (dis)ease: Gardasil and the gendering of HPV. Feminist Formations, 22(2), 124–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishra, A., & Graham, J. (2012). Risk, choice, and the ‘girl’ vaccine: unpacking human papillomavirus immunization. Health, Risk, and Society, 14(1), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicol, A. F., Andrade, C. V., Russomano, F. B., Rodrigues, L. L. S., Oliveira, N. S., & Provance, D. W. (2016). HPV vaccines: a controversial issue? Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 49(5), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paavonen, J., Jenkins, D., Bosch, F. X., Naud, P., Salmeron, J., Wheeler, C. M., et al. (2007). Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim analysis of a phase III double-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 369(9589), 2161–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petherick, L., Norman, M. E., & Rail, G. (2016). Manufacturing (parental) consent: a critical analysis of the HPVV informed consent process in Ontario, Canada. In S. Dagkas & L. Burrows (Eds.), Families, young people, physical activity and health: critical perspectives (pp. 96–113). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Piedimonte, S., Leung, A., Zakhari, A., Giordano, C., Tellier, P. P., & Lau, S. (2017). Impact of an HPV education and vaccination campaign among Canadian university students. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.028. Accessed 28 January 2018.
  31. Polzer, J., & Knabe, S. (2009). “Good girls do... get vaccinated”: HPV, mass marketing and moral dilemmas for sexually active young women. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63(11), 869–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Polzer, J. C., & Knabe, S. M. (2012). From desire to disease: human papillomavirus (HPV) and the medicalization of nascent female sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 49(4), 344–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rail, G., Molino, L., Fusco, C., Norman, M.E., Petherick, L., Polzer, J., Moola, F., & Bryson, M. (2017). Overdiagnosis and the construction of “at-risk” girls: HPV vaccination campaigns as rescue missions. Preventing Overdiagnosis conference, Québec, Québec. https://www.preventingoverdiagnosis.net/?page_id=1545. Accessed 28 January 2018.
  34. Remes, O., Whitten, A., Sabarre, K.A., & Phillips, K.P. (2013). Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and vaccines: Ottawa University students’ knowledge, awareness and vaccine intentions. Journal of Genital System Disorders, S1.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9728.S1-006. Accessed 28 January 2018.
  35. Riva, C., & Spinosa, J. P. (2013). Prescrire en questions: vaccin papillomavirus: quelle efficacité, quel risque? La Revue Prescrire, 33(357), 552–556.Google Scholar
  36. Roberts, J., & Mitchell, L. M. (2017). “It’s your body, your decision”: An anthropological exploration of HPV vaccine hesitancy. In P. Bramadat, M. Guay, J. A. Bettinger, & R. Roy (Eds.), Public health in the age of anxiety: religious and cultural roots of vaccine hesitancy in Canada (pp. 293–320). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott, K., & Batty, M. L. (2016). HPV vaccine uptake among Canadian youth and the role of the nurse practitioner. Journal of Community Health, 41(1), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sellors, J., Karwalajtys, T., Kaczorowski, J., Mahony, J., Lytwyn, A., Sparrow, J., et al. (2003). Incidence, clearance and predictors of human papillomavirus infection in women. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168(4), 421–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Statistics Canada (2017). Leading causes of death, by sex, 2014. Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/hlth36c-eng.htm. Accessed 27 January 2018.
  40. Steben, M., Blake, J., Durand, N., Guichon, J., Mcfaul, S., Ogilvie, G. (2017). A national survey of Canadians on HPV: comparing knowledge, barriers and preventive practices of physicians to those of consumers. Sexually Transmitted Infections (British Medical Journals), 93(S2).  https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053264.43. Accessed 28 January 2018.
  41. Stewart, B., & Wild, C.P. (Eds.) (2014). International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO. World Cancer Report 2014. http://www.thehealthwell.info/node/725845. Accessed: 27 January 2018.
  42. Thompson, M. (2010). Whose guarding what? A post structural feminist analysis of Gardasil discourses. Health Communication, 25, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Todorova, I., Alexandrova-Karamanova, A., Panayotova, Y., Dimitrova, E., & Kotzeva, T. (2014). Managing uncertainty: healthcare professionals’ meanings regarding the HPV vaccine. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waller, J., Marlow, L., & Wardle, J. (2006). Mothers’ attitudes towards preventing cervical cancer through human papillomavirus vaccination. A qualitative study. Cancer Epidemiological Biomarkers Prevention, 15(7), 1257–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ward, J. K., Crépin, L., Bauquier, C., Vergelys, C., Bocquier, A., Verger, P., & Peretti-Watel, P. (2017). ‘I don’t know if I’m making the right decision’: French mothers and HPV vaccination in a context of controversy. Health, Risk and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2017.1299856. Accessed 27 January 2018.
  46. Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. World Health Organization (2015). Estimates for 2000–2015, cause-specific mortality. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.html. Accessed 27 January 2018.

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simone de Beauvoir InstituteConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  5. 5.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations