Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 109, Issue 5–6, pp 791–799 | Cite as

Awareness of, interest in, and willingness to pay for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among Canadian gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men

  • Jeffrey Morgan
  • Olivier Ferlatte
  • Travis Salway
  • James Wilton
  • Mark Hull
Quantitative Research

Abstract

Objectives

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective, HIV prevention strategy increasingly being accessed by gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). GBMSM face structural and individual-level barriers accessing PrEP, including awareness and cost. This paper assesses socio-demographic factors associated with awareness, interest, and willingness to pay for PrEP in a sample of Canadian GBMSM.

Methods

Data were derived from the 2015 Sex Now survey, a cross-sectional, online survey of GBMSM. Respondents were recruited through social media, sex-seeking “apps,” and by word of mouth. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate associations between socio-demographic factors and three primary outcomes.

Results

Our sample consisted of 7176 HIV-negative Canadian GBMSM. Of respondents, 54.7% were aware of PrEP, 47.4% were interested in PrEP, and 27.9% of PrEP-interested respondents reported they would pay for PrEP out-of-pocket. Awareness and interest varied between provinces, while GBMSM outside urban areas were less likely to be PrEP aware. Bisexual-identified men, and men over 50, were less likely to be aware and interested in PrEP in multivariable models. Only annual income and educational attainment were associated with willingness to pay for PrEP.

Conclusion

This study identifies important disparities in awareness, interest, and willingness to pay for PrEP. Future interventions and educational efforts should target non-gay-identified and older GBMSM, as well as GBMSM outside urban areas. PrEP implementation may risk further perpetuating existing health inequities based on socio-economic status if PrEP continues to be accessed primarily through private insurance or paid for out-of-pocket.

Keywords

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Canada Men who have sex with men 

Résumé

Objectif

La prophylaxie préexposition (PrEP) est. une stratégie de prévention du VIH très efficace, de plus en plus utilisée par les hommes gais et bisexuels et les hommes ayant des relations sexuelles avec d’autres hommes (GBHARSAH). Par contre, les GBHARSAH sont confrontés à des obstacles structurels et individuels face à l’accès à la PrEP, y compris la connaissance de la PrEP et les coûts. Cet article évalue les facteurs sociodémographiques associés à la connaissance, l’intérêt et la volonté de payer pour la PrEP dans un échantillon de GBHARSAH canadiens.

Méthode

Les données proviennent de l’enquête Sexe au présent 2015, un sondage en ligne de GBHARSAH. Les répondants ont été recrutés par le biais des médias sociaux, des applications de rencontre et du bouche-à-oreille. Nous avons utilisé des modèles de régression logistique univariée et multivariée pour mesurer les associations entre les facteurs sociodémographiques et les trois principales variables de résultats.

Résultats

Notre échantillon comprenait 7176 GBHARSAH canadiens séronégatifs. En tout, 54,7% des répondants étaient au courant de la PrEP, 47,4% des répondants étaient intéressés par la PrEP, et 27,9% des répondants intéressés par la PrEP ont indiqué qu’ils seraient prêts à payer pour la PrEP. La connaissance et l’intérêt envers la PrEP variaient d’une province à l’autre, tandis que les GBHARSAH en dehors des zones urbaines étaient moins susceptibles de connaitre la PrEP. Les hommes bisexuels et les hommes de plus de 50 ans étaient moins susceptibles de connaître et d’être intéressés par la PrEP dans les modèles multivariés. Seul le revenu annuel et le niveau de scolarité étaient associés à la volonté de payer pour la PrEP.

Conclusion

Cette étude a identifié des disparités importantes dans la connaissance, l’intérêt et la volonté de payer pour la PrEP. Les interventions et les efforts d’éducation devraient cibler les GBHARSAH qui ne s’identifient pas comme gai, les GBHARSAH plus âgés, ainsi que les GBHARSAH en dehors des zones urbaines. De plus, la mise en œuvre de la PrEP risque de perpétuer davantage les inégalités existantes en matière de santé en fonction du statut socioéconomique si la PrEP continue d’être accessible principalement par le biais d’une assurance privée ou si les GBHARSAH doivent payer pour celle-ci.

Mots-clés

Prophylaxie préexposition (PrEP) Virus de l’immunodéficience humaine (VIH) Canada Hommes ayant des relations sexuelles avec d’autres hommes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the respondents who participated in the 2015 Sex Now survey; Rick Marchand and Terry Trussler for their mentorship; and the Investigaytors other staff and volunteers of the Community-Based Research Centre for Gay Men’s Health who helped with survey design and recruitment.

Funding information

The 2015 Sex Now survey was funded by the Vancouver Foundation. The opinions, results, and conclusions are those of the authors and no endorsement by the Ontario HIV Treatment Network or its funder is intended or should be inferred.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allgood, K. L., Hunt, B., & Rucker, M. G. (2016). Black:white disparities in HIV mortality in the United States: 1990-2009. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 3(1), 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, N. (2016). Why a BC insurance company is backtracking on PrEP. Daily Xtra. May 5, 2016. Available at: https://www.dailyxtra.com/why-a-bc-insurance-company-is-backtracking-on-prep-70891. (Accessed 1 Oct 2017).
  3. Bradford, W. D., Kleit, A. N., Krousel-Wood, M. A., & Re, R. M. (2004). Willingness to pay for telemedicine assessed by the double-bounded dichotomous choice method. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 10(6), 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CATIE (2017). Generic tenofovir + FTC coming to Canada. CATIE. July 27, 2017. Available at: http://www.catie.ca/en/catienews/2017-07-27/generic-tenofovir-ftc-coming-canada. (Accessed 25 Oct 2017).
  5. Connif, J., & Evensen, A. (2016). Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention: the primary care perspective. Journal of American Board of Family Medicine, 29(1), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Golub, S. A., Gamarel, K. E., Renina, H. J., Surace, A., & Lelutiu-Weinberger, C. L. (2013). From efficacy to effectiveness: facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 27(4), 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hibbard S. (2017) B.C. residents at risk of contracting HIV turn to online buyer’s club to afford pricey lifesaving drug. CBC. June 9, 2017. Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-residents-at-risk-of-contracting-hiv-turn-to-online-buyer-s-club-to-afford-pricey-lifesaving-drug-1.4150345. (Accessed 25 Oct 2017).
  8. Himpe J. Insurance coverage inconsistent for HIV prevention drug Truvada in Alberta. Global News. August 1, 2017. Available at: https://globalnews.ca/news/3604477/insurance-coverage-inconsistent-for-hiv-prevention-drug-truvada-in-alberta/. (Accessed 1 Oct 2017).
  9. Holloway, I. W., Dougherty, R., Gildner, J., Beougher, S. C., Pulsipher, C., Montoya, J. A., et al. (2017). PrEP uptake, adherence, and discontinuation among California YMSM using geosocial networking applications. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 74(1), 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, H. L., Keller, S. B., Giancola, M. A., Rodriguez, D. A., Chau, J. J., Young, J. A., et al. (2014). Pre-exposure prophylaxis accessibility research and evaluation (PrEPARE Study). AIDS and Behavior, 18(9), 1722–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klose, T. (1999). The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy, 47, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight, R., Small, W., Carson, A., & Shoveller, J. (2016). Complex and conflicting social norms: Implications for implementation of future HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) interventions in Vancouver, Canada. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ko, N. Y., Chen, B. J., Li, C. W., Ku, W. W., & Hsu, S. T. (2016). Willingness to self-pay for pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: a national online survey in Taiwan. AIDS Education and Prevention, 28(2), 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lachowsky, N. J., Lin, S. Y., Hull, M. W., Cui, Z., Sereda, P., Jollimore, J., et al. (2016). Pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness among gay and other men who have sex with men in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. AIDS and Behavior, 20(7), 1408–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lebouché, B., Engler, K., Machouf, N., Lessard, D., & Thomas, R. (2016). Predictors of interest in taking pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men who used a rapid-HIV-testing site in Montreal (Actuel sur Rue). HIV Medicine, 17(2), 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leonardi, M., Lee, E., & Tan, D. H. S. (2011). Awareness of, usage of and willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men in downtown Toronto, Canada. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 22(12), 738–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Link, B. G., Phelan J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. Spec No:80–94.Google Scholar
  18. MacFadden, D. R., Tan, D. H., & Mishra, S. (2016). Optimizing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation among men who have sex with men in a large urban centre: a dynamic modelling study. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 19, 20791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayer, K. H., Hosek, S., Cohen, S., Liu, A., Pickett, J., Warren, M., et al. (2015). Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation in the United States: a work in progress. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(4 Suppl 3), 19980.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Oldenburg, C. E., Mitty, J. A., Biello, K. B., Closson, E. F., Safren, S. A., Mayer, K. H., et al. (2016). Differences in attitudes about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among stimulant versus alcohol using men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 20(7), 1451–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons, J. T., Rendina, H. J., Lassiter, J. M., Whitfield, T. H., Starks, T. J., & Grov, C. (2017). Uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in a national cohort of gay and bisexual men in the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 74(3), 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Public Health Agency of Canada (2014). HIV and AIDS in Canada: surveillance report to December 31, 2014. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. 2014. Available at: http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/diseases-conditions-maladies-affections/hiv-aids-surveillance-2014-vih-sida/alt/hiv-aids-surveillance-2014-vih-sida-eng.pdf. (N).
  23. Rubin, M. S., Colen, C. G., & Link, B. G. (2010). Examinations of inequalities in HIV/AIDS mortality in the United States from a fundamental cause perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 100(6), 1053–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rucinski, K. B., Mensah, N. P., Sepkowitz, K. A., Cutler, B. H., Sweeney, M. M., & Myers, J. E. (2013). Knowledge and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis among an online sample of young men who have sex with men in New York City. AIDS and Behavior, 17(6), 2180–2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, D. K., Mendoza, M. C. B., Stryker, J. E., & Rose, C. E. (2016). PrEP awareness and attitudes in a national survey of primary care clinicians in the United States, 2009-2015. PLoS One, 11(6), e0156592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snowden, J. M., Chen, Y.-H., McFarland, W., & Raymond, H. F. (2017). Prevalence and characteristics of users of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men, San Francisco, 2014 in a cross-sectional survey: implications for disparities. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 93(1), 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stahlman, S., Lyons, C., Sullivan, P. S., Mayer, K. H., Hosein, S., Beyrer, C., et al. (2017). HIV incidence among gay men and other men who have sex with men in 2020: where is the epidemic heading? Sexual Health, 14(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Underhill, K., Morrow, K. M., Colleran, C., Calabrese, S. K., Operario, D., Salovey, P., et al. (2016). Explaining the efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention: a qualitative study of message framing and message preferences among US men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 20(7), 1514–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Veinot, T. C., & Harris, R. (2011). Talking about, knowing about HIV/AIDS in Canada: a rural-urban comparison. The Journal of Rural Health, 27(3), 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Young, I., Flowers, P., & McDaid, L. M. (2014). Barriers to uptake and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among communities most affected by HIV in the UK: findings from a qualitative study in Scotland. BMJ Open, 4(11), e005717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Community-Based Research Centre for Gay Men’s HealthVancouverCanada
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.British Columbia Centre for Disease ControlVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Ontario HIV Treatment NetworkTorontoCanada
  5. 5.British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDSVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations