Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 105, Issue 3, pp e229–e229 | Cite as

A public health dilemma: Urban bicycle-sharing schemes

  • Andrew Nanapragasam
Letter to the Editor


  1. 1.
    Moore O. Toronto to take over struggling Bixi bike-share program. The Globe and Mail, 2014. Available at: (Accessed April 2, 2014).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heart and Stroke Foundation: Statistics. Available at: (Accessed April 2, 2014).
  3. 3.
    Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Tainio M, Nieuwenhuijsen, MJ. The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: Health impact assessment study. BMJ 2011;343:d4521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teschke K, Harris MA, Reynolds CC, Winters M, Babul S, Chipman M, et al. Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: A case-crossover study. Am J Public Health 2012;102:2336–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ipsos Reid. City of Toronto Cycling Study: Tracking Report, 2010. Available at: (Accessed April 2, 2014).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    City of Toronto: Bikeway Network, 2012. Available at: (Accessed April 2, 2014).
  7. 7.
    Gee M. London mayor’s ambitious bike plan a lesson for other cities–especially Toronto. The Globe and Mail, 2014. Available at: (Accessed April 2, 2014).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dennis J, Ramsay T, Turgeon AF, Zarychanski R. Helmet legislation and admissions to hospital for cycling related head injuries in Canadian provinces and territories: Interrupted time series analysis. BMJ 2013;346:f2674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Nanapragasam
    • 1
  1. 1.New York Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations