Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 108, Issue 1, pp e98–e100 | Cite as

Plain packaging policy: Preventing industry innovations

  • Mohammed Al-hamdaniEmail author
Commentary
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The pack is a marketing tool for the tobacco industry - its shape, colour, fonts, descriptors and logos attract and mislead smokers. Health warnings on cigarette packs serve as a knowledge reminder for smokers to quit smoking. Plain packaging eliminates brand imagery elements from cigarette packs and has many benefits, including the reduction of intention to smoke and the denormalization of smoking behaviour. The tobacco industry has devised pack and product marketing innovations that thwart the effectiveness of health warnings. Plain packaging policy needs to address these innovations by restricting their use and preventing them from undermining health warnings.

Résumé

Le paquet est un outil de commercialisation pour l’industrie du tabac - sa forme, sa couleur, ses polices de caractères, ses descripteurs et ses logos attirent et trompent les fumeurs. Les mises en garde sur les paquets de cigarettes servent à rappeler des connaissances aux fumeurs pour qu’ils cessent de fumer. La banalisation des emballages supprime les éléments d’image de marque des paquets de cigarettes et comporte de nombreux avantages, dont la baisse des intentions de fumer et la dénormalisation de l’usage du tabac. Or, l’industrie du tabac a imaginé des innovations dans la commercialisation des paquets et du produit qui déjouent l’efficacité des mises en garde. La politique de banalisation des emballages doit aborder ces innovations en limitant leur utilisation et en les empêchant de discréditer les mises en garde.

Key Words

Policy public health tobacco 

Mots Clés

politique (principe) santé publique tabac 

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Hamdani M. The effect of cigarette plain packaging on individuals’ health warning recall. Healthcare Policy 2013;8(3):68–77. PMID: 23968628. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2013.23210.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hammond D, Collishaw NE, Callard C. Secret science: Tobacco industry research on smoking behaviour and cigarette toxicity. Lancet 2006;367(9512):781–87. PMID: 16517278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68077-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: A review. Tob Control 2011;20(5):327–37. PMID: 21606180. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.037630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammond D. Standardized Packaging of Tobacco Products: Evidence Review. Prepared on Behalf of the Irish Department of Health. 2014. Available at: http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/2014-Ireland-Plain-Pack-Main-Report-Final-Report-July-26.pdf (Accessed November 21, 2016).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Hammond D, Navarro A, Corrigan JR. Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and “plain” cigarette packaging: Evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy 2011;102(1):41–48. PMID: 21763026. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011. 06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munafò MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, Leonards U. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction 2011;106(8):1505–10. PMID: 21401767. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03430.X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swift E, Borland R, Cummings KM, Fong GT, McNeill A, Hammond D, Yong HH. Australian smokers’ support for plain or standardised packs before and after implementation: Findings from the ITC Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2014;24(6):616–21. PMID: 25385449. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durkin S, Brennan E, Coomber K, Zacher M, Scollo M, Wakefield M. Short-term changes in quitting-related cognitions and behaviours after the implementation of plain packaging with larger health warnings: Findings from a national cohort study with Australian adult smokers. Tob Control 2015;24(Suppl 2):ii26–32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balmford J, Borland R, Yong HH. Impact of the introduction of standardised packaging on smokers’ brand awareness and identification in Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2016;35(1):102–9. PMID: 26369651. doi: 10.1111/dar.l2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moodie C, Stead M, Bauld L, McNeill A, Angus K, Hinds K, O’Mara-Eves A. Plain Tobacco Packaging: A Systematic Review. 2012. Available at: http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/papers/PHRC_006_Final_Report.pdf (Accessed February 29, 2016).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pletcher MJ, Hulley BJ, Houston T, Kiefe CI, Benowitz N, Sidney S. Menthol cigarettes, smoking cessation, atherosclerosis, and pulmonary function: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(17):1915–22. PMID: 17000950. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gandhi KK, Foulds J, Steinberg MB, Lu SE, Williams JM. Lower quit rates among African American and Latino menthol cigarette smokers at a tobacco treatment clinic. Int J Clin Pract 2009;63(3):360–67. PMID: 19222622. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01969.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moodie C, Ford A, Mackintosh A, Purves R. Are all cigarettes just the same? Female’s perceptions of slim, coloured, aromatized and capsule cigarettes. Health Educ Res 2015;30(1):1–12. PMID: 25341674. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thrasher JF, Abad-Vivero EN, Moodie C, O’Connor RJ, Hammond D, Cummings KM, Reynales-Shigematsu LM. Cigarette brands with flavour capsules in the filter: Trends in use and brand perceptions among smokers in the USA, Mexico and Australia, 2012–2014. Tob Control 2015;25(3):275–83. PMID: 25918129. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kotnowski K, Fong GT, Gallopel-Morvan K, Islam T, Hammond D. The impact of cigarette packaging design among young females in Canada: Findings from a discrete choice experiment. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18(5):1348–56. PMID: 26014454. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntvll4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySaint Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations