Skip to main content
Log in

Reconstruction methods for and cosmetic evaluation of external nasal tumour resections: flap versus graft

  • Therapy
  • Published:
European Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background

Nose reconstruction is challenging given the three-dimensional structure and free edge, and various methods have been reported. In general, local flaps provide cosmetic outcomes that are better than those following skin grafts, but there are no published comparative studies on Asians.

Objectives

To determine whether local flaps or skin grafts may optimally be used to reconstruct external nasal defects among Asians.

Materials & Methods

We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent external nasal tumour resection and reconstruction by 14 plastic surgeons in eight Japanese institutes from 2009 to 2021. The cosmetic results were scored by 14 surgeons using anonymized preoperative and six-month postoperative photographs. Scores for each reconstruction method were statistically evaluated.

Results

In total, 86 cases were enrolled; 57 received local flaps and 29 received skin grafts. Most local flaps showed better outcomes compared to skin grafts, but this was not the case for nasolabial and forehead flaps. Notably, local flaps placed in the nasal ala tended to be less successful than flaps placed elsewhere; only the bilobed flap scored better than skin grafts. The defect site did not affect the results of skin grafts.

Conclusion

For Asians requiring nasal reconstruction, local flaps provide better cosmetic outcomes than skin grafts, except for those in the nasal ala. Skin grafts may be a good alternative when the bilobed flap is unavailable for the nasal ala.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 239–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yotsuyanagi T, Yamashita K, Urushidate S, Yokoi K, Sawada Y. Nasal reconstruction based on aesthetic subunits in Orientals. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 36–44; discussion 45–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cerci FB. Usefulness of the subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. An Bras Dermatol 2017; 92: 159–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs MA, Christenson LJ, Weaver AL. Clinical outcome of cutaneous flaps versus full-thickness skin grafts after Mohs surgery on the nose. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36: 23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebrahimi A, Ashayeri M, Rasouli HR. Comparison of local flaps and skin grafts to repair cheek skin defects. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2015; 8: 92–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KS, Kim JO, Kim NG, Lee YJ, Park YJ, Kim JS. A comparison of the local flap and skin graft by location of face in reconstruction after resection of facial skin cancer. Arch Craniofac Surg 2017; 18: 255–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sapthavee A, Munaretto N, Toriumi DM. Skin grafts vs local flaps for reconstruction of nasal defects: a retrospective cohort study. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17: 270–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soltani AM, Francis CS, Motamed A, et al. Hypertrophic scarring in cleft lip repair: a comparison of incidence among ethnic groups. Clin Epidemiol 2012; 4: 187–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon T, Benito-Ruiz J, García-Díez E, Serra-Renom JM. Our algorithm for nasal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 239–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo L, Pribaz JR, Pribaz JJ. Nasal reconstruction with local flaps: a simple algorithm for management of small defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 130e–9e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Onishi K, Maruyama Y, Okada E. Treatment strategies in cutaneous malignancies of the external nose. PEPARS 2010; 46: 31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Memar OM, Caughlin B. Nasal reconstruction of post-mohs defects >1.5 cm in a single cosmetic subunit under local anesthesia by a combination of plastic surgeon and mohs surgeon team: a cross-sectional study and review of algorithmic nasal defect closures. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7: e2277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Losco L, Bolletta A, Pierazzi DM, et al. Reconstruction of the nose: management of nasal cutaneous defects according to aesthetic subunit and defect size. A review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2020; 56.

  14. Sykes JM. Management of the aging face in the Asian patient. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2007; 15: 353–60, vi–vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

we thank Dr. Kiyoshi Yamada of Kousei Hospital and Dr. Aya Ohno of Okayama University for their help with protocol preparation, and Dr. Toshiharu Mitsuhashi of Okayama University for assistance with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asami Tozawa.

Ethics declarations

Research ethics: this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ehime University Hospital (approval number 1907008).

Conflicts of interest: none.

Additional information

Financial support: none.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tozawa, A., Mori, H., Ao, M. et al. Reconstruction methods for and cosmetic evaluation of external nasal tumour resections: flap versus graft. Eur J Dermatol 33, 524–529 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2023.4561

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2023.4561

Key words

Navigation