References
Kwon WJ, Ko JY, Ro YS, et al. Comparison of allergen responses based on the TRUE test and IQ chamber system in Korean patients. Eur J Dermatol 2017; 27: 573–8.
Moffitt DL, Sharp LA, Sansom JE. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47: 334–6.
Rees JL, Friedmann PS, Matthews JN. The influence of area of application on sensitisation by dinitrochlorobenzene. Br J Dermatol 1990; 122: 29–31.
Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber results. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 843–6.
Wilkinson JD, Bruynzeel DP, Ducombs G, et al. European multicentre study of Finn Chambers and TRUE Test panel 2. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 22: 218–25.
Ale SI, Maibach HI. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 50: 304–12.
Ruhnek-Forsbeck M, Fischer T, Meding B, et al. Comparative multicenter study with TRUE TestTM and Finn Chambers® in eight Swedish hospitals. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1988; 68: 123–8.
Lazarov A, David M, Abraham D, Trainer A. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56: 140–5.
Suneja T, Belsito D. Comparative study of Finn chambers and TRUE Test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45: 836–9.
Lachapelle J-M, Antoine J-L. Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in Man. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 850–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Gawkrodger, D.J. Reliability, reproducibility and relevance of patch test results. Eur J Dermatol 28, 545–546 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3326
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3326