Skip to main content
Log in

A new dermoscopic algorithm for the differential diagnosis of facial lentigo maligna and pigmented actinic keratosis

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background

The clinical and dermoscopic diagnosis of facial lentigo maligna (LM) and pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK) remains challenging, particularly at the early disease stages.

Objectives

To identify dermoscopic criteria that might be useful to differentiate LM from PAK, and to elaborate and validate an automated diagnostic algorithm for facial LM/PAK.

Materials & Methods

We performed a retrospective multicentre study to evaluate dermoscopic images of histologically-proven LM and PAK, and assess previously described dermoscopic criteria.

Results

In the first part of the study, 61 cases of LM and 74 PAK were examined and a parsimonious algorithm was elaborated using stepwise discriminant analysis. The following eight dermoscopic criteria achieved the greatest discriminative power: (1) light brown colour; (2) a structureless zone, varying in colour from brown to brown/tan, to black; (3) in-focus, discontinuous brown lines; (4) incomplete brown or grey circles; (5) a structureless brown or black zone, obscuring the hair follicles; (6) a brown (tan), eccentric, structureless zone; (7) a blue structureless zone; and (8) scales. The newly developed algorithm was subsequently validated using an additional series of 110LMand 75 PAKcases. Diagnostic accuracy was 86.5% (k: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.83). For the diagnosis of LM vs PAK, sensitivity was 82.7% (95% CI: 75.7-89.8%), specificity was 92.0% (95% CI: 85.9-98.1%), positive predictive value was 93.8% (95% CI: 89.0-98.6%), and negative predictive value was 78.4% (95% CI: 68.4-86.5%).

Conclusions

This algorithm may represent an additional tool for clinicians to distinguish between facial LM and PAK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Vogt T, et al. Improvement of early recognition of lentigo maligna using dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 25–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stante M, Giorgi V, Stanganelli I, Alfaioli B, Carli P. Dermoscopy for early detection of facial lentigo maligna. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152: 361–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciudad-Blanco C, Avilés-Izquierdo JA, Lázaro-Ochaita P, Suárez-Fernández R. Dermoscopic findings for the early detection of melanoma: an analysis of 200 Cases. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2014; 105: 683–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ackerman AB, Mones JM. Solar (actinic) keratosis is squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 9–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Werner RN, Stockfleth E, Connolly SM, et al. Evidence-and consensus-based (S3) Guidelines for the treatment of actinic keratosis -International League of Dermatological Societies in cooperation with the European Dermatology Forum -Short Version. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29: 2069–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka M, Sawada M, Kobayashi K. Key points in dermoscopic differentiation between lentigo maligna and solar lentigo. J Dermatol 2011; 38: 53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lallas A, Argenziano G, Moscarella E, Longo C, Simonetti V, Zalaudek I. Diagnosis and management of facial pigmented macules. Clin Dermatol 2014; 32: 94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tiodorovic-Zivkovic D, Argenziano G, Lallas A, et al. Age, gender, and topography influence the clinical and dermoscopic appearance of lentigo maligna. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72: 801–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smalberger GJ, Siegel DM, Khachemoune A. Lentigo maligna. Dermatol Ther 2008; 21: 439–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kasprzak J, Xu Y. Diagnosis and management of lentigo maligna: a review. Drugs Context 2015; 4: 212281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Leinweber B, Mercogliano A, D’Ambrosio A, Argenziano G. Pitfalls in the clinical and dermoscopic diagnosis of pigmented actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53: 1071–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zalaudek I, Giacomel J, Argenziano G, et al. Dermoscopy of facial non pigmented actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 951–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peris K, Micantonio T, Piccolo D, Fargnoli MC. Dermoscopic features of actinic keratosis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2007; 5: 970–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rigel DS, Stein Gold LF. The importance of early diagnosis and treatment of actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 68: S20–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Kittler H. Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29: 120–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akay BN, Kocyigit P, Heper AO, Erdem C. Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions: diagnostic challenge between pigmented actinic keratosis and lentigo maligna. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163: 1212–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nachbar F, Stolz W, Merkle T, et al. The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30: 551–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Sammarco E, Delfino M. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 1563–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. de Carvalho N, Farnetani F, Ciardo S, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy correlates of dermoscopic patterns of facial lesions help to discriminate lentigo maligna from pigmented nonmelanocytic macules. Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 128–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cognetta AB Jr., Stoltz W, Katz B, Tullos J, Gossain S. Dermatoscopy of lentigo maligna. Dermatol Clin 2001; 19: 307–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stolz W, Schiffner R, Burgdorf WH. Dermatoscopy for facial pigmented skin lesions. Clin Dermatol 2002; 20: 276–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Slutsky JB, Marghoob AA. The zig-zag pattern of lentigo maligna. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 1444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pralong P, Bathelier E, Dalle S, Poulalhon N, Debarbieux S, Thomas L. Dermoscopy of lentigo maligna melanoma: report of 125 cases. Br J Dermatol 2012; 167: 280–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tiodorovic-Zivkovic D, Zalaudek I, Lallas A, Stratigos AJ, Piana S, Argenziano G. The importance of gray color as a dermoscopic clue in facial pigmented lesion evaluation: a case report. Dermatol Pract Concept 2013; 3: 37–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nascimento MM, Shitara D, Enokihara MM, Yamada S, Pellacani G, Rezze GG. Inner gray halo, a novel dermoscopic feature for the diagnosis of pigmented actinic keratosis: clues for the differential diagnosis with lentigo maligna. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71: 708–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kittler H, Marhoob AA, Argenziano G, et al. Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74: 1093–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Moscarella E, Rabinovitz H, Zalaudek I, et al. Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy of pigmented actinic keratoses: a morphological study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29: 307–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lallas A, Tschandl P, Kyrgidis A, et al. Dermoscopic clues to differentiate facial lentigo maligna from pigmented actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 1079–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Giacomel J, Lallas A, Argenziano G, Bombonato C, Zalaudek I. Dermoscopic “signature” pattern of pigmented and nonpigmented facial actinic keratoses. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72: e57–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pizzichetta M, Talamini R, Piccolo D, et al. The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy does not apply to small melanocytic skin lesions. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 1376–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ketty Peris.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Micantonio, T., Neri, L., Longo, C. et al. A new dermoscopic algorithm for the differential diagnosis of facial lentigo maligna and pigmented actinic keratosis. Eur J Dermatol 28, 162–168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3246

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3246

Key words

Navigation