Skip to main content
Log in

Self-expressed patient preferences for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results from a non-interventional study based on a real-life setting in Spain

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
European Journal of Dermatology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ferrandiz C, Plazas MJ, Sabate M, Palomino R. Prevalence of actinic keratosis among dermatology outpatients in Spain. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2016; 107: 674–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldenberg G. Treatment considerations in actinic keratosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31: 12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Foley P, Stockfleth E, Peris K, et al. Adherence to topical therapies in actinic keratosis: a literature review. J Dermatol Treat 2016; 27: 538–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin LR, Williams SL, Haskard KB, Dimatteo MR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2005; 1: 189–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrandiz C, Malvehy J, Guillen C, Ferrandiz-Pulido C, Fernandez-Figueras M. Precancerous skin lesions. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2017; 108: 31–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubel DM, Spelman L, Murrell DF, et al. Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate cream as a convenient, similarly effective, nearly painless alternative to conventional photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171: 1164–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Genovese G, Fai D, Fai C, Mavilia L, Mercuri SR. Daylight methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus ingenol mebutate for the treatment of actinic keratoses: an intraindividual comparative analysis. Dermatol Ther 2016; 29: 191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moggio E, Arisi M, Zane C, Calzavara-Pinton I, Calzavara-Pinton P. A randomized split-face clinical trial analyzing daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate vs ingenol mebutate gel for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and the scalp. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2016; 16: 161–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Calzavara-Pinton P, Zane C, Pacou M, Szeimies RM. Bucher’s indirect comparison of daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate cream versus diclofenac plus hyaluronic acid gel for the treatment of multiple actinic keratosis. Eur J Dermatol 2016; 26: 487–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Julia García-Malinis.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Malinis, A.J., Gracia-Cazaña, T. & Gilaberte, Y. Self-expressed patient preferences for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results from a non-interventional study based on a real-life setting in Spain. Eur J Dermatol 28, 113–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2017.3214

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2017.3214

Navigation