Skip to main content
Log in

Validating the diagnostic code for acne in a tertiary care dermatology centre

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Dermatology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Administrative databases provide valuable patient data and are used to conduct population-based studies. However, no studies have been conducted to validate the codes for dermatological conditions.

Objective

To evaluate the validity of ICD 9 code 706 for acne.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of patients seen in dermatology clinics at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre between March 1 and May 31, 2013. The billing code for a clinic visit was compared to the diagnosis documented in the medical chart.

Results

There were 4,248 participants; 201 with an ICD-9 code of acne. This code had a PPV and sensitivity with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 84.58% (78.67–89.13%) and 86.29% (80.51–90.62%), respectively. The specificity was 99.20% (98.86–99.45%).

Conclusions

We showed that ICD-9 code 706 can be used to accurately identify patients with acne in a dermatology setting. This information can be applied to future epidemiologic studies

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong AW. Do TNF inhibitors reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in psoriasis patients? JAMA 2013; 309: 2043–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanpowpong P, Broder-Fingert S, Obuch JC, et al. Multicenter study on the value of ICD-9-CM codes for case identification of celiac disease. Ann Epidemiol 2013; 23: 136–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan M, Lim PL, Chow A, Win MK, Barkbam TM. Surveillance for Clostridium difficile infection: ICD-9 coding has poor sensitivity compared to laboratory diagnosis in hospital patients, Singapore. PLoS One 2011; 6: e15603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Rothberg MB. Association of diagnostic coding with trends in hospitalizations and mortality of patients with pneumonia, 2003-2009. JAMA 2012; 307: 1405–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg DS, James D, Lewis JD, et al. Validation of a coding algorithm to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in an administrative database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2013; 22: 103–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Li X, King C, de Gara C, White C, Winget M. Validation of colorectal cancer surgery data from administrative data sources. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Liao KP, Cai T, Gainer V, et al. Electronic Medical Records for Discovery Research in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2010; 62: 1120–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thirumurthi S, Chowdhury R, Richardson P, Abraham NS. Validation of ICD-9-CM Diagnostic Codes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Veterans. Dig Sci 2010; 55: 2592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raed Alhusayen.

Additional information

Poster presented: Canadian Dermatology Association Meeting June 2014, Toronto, ON, Canada

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ejaz, A., Malaiyandi, V., Kim, W.B. et al. Validating the diagnostic code for acne in a tertiary care dermatology centre. Eur J Dermatol 25, 469–471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2015.2606

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2015.2606

Key words

Navigation