Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Avian assemblages in the lower Missouri River floodplain

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floodplain habitat provides important migration and breeding habitat for birds in the midwestern United States. However, few studies have examined how the avian assemblage changes with different stages of floodplain forest succession in the midwestern United States. In spring and summer from 2002 to 2004, we conducted 839 point counts in wet prairie/forbs fields, 547 point counts in early successional forests, and 434 point counts in mature forests to describe the migrating and breeding bird assemblage in the lower Missouri River floodplain. We recorded 131, 121, and 141 species in the three respective habitats, a number higher than most locations in the midwestern United States and comprising > 15% of all avian species in North America. Avian species diversity generally increased from west to east along the river, differed among land cover classes, but overlapped between seasons (migration and breeding) and years. Wet prairies were particularly important for conservation as there were 20 species of high conservation concern observed, including Dickcissels (Spiza americana). Important species for monitoring biotic integrity included the Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) and Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) in wet prairie, Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii) in early successional forest, and Northern Parula (Parula americana) and Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea) in mature forest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Best, L. B., K. E. Freemark, B. S. Steiner, and T. M. Bergin. 1996. Life history and status classifications of birds breeding in Iowa. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 103: 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier, T., J. D. Nichols, J. R. Sauer, J. E. Hines, and K. H. Pollock. 1998. Estimating species richness to make inference in community ecology: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability as shown from capture-recapture analyses of North American Breeding Bird Survey Data. Ecology 79: 1018–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. T. 1993. Bell’s Vireo. In A. Poole, P. Stettenheim, and F. Gill (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 35. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. C., E. A. Ehrhardt, J. F. Fairchild, R. B. Jacobson, B. C. Poulton, L. C. Sappington, B. P. Kelly, and W. R. Mabee. 2004. Ecological dynamics of wetlands at Lisbon Bottom, Big Muddy National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, Missouri. U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 2004-1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. and R. N. Gorley. 2001. PRIMER v5: Users Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. and R. M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, Second edition. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufréne, M. and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monograph 67: 345–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R., D. W. Sample, and R. E. Warner. 1996. Management of midwestern grassland landscapes for the conservation of migratory birds. p. 89–116. In F. R. Thompson III (ed.) Management of Midwestern Landscapes for the Conservation of neotropical migratory Birds. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-187. USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M. G., J. P. Hoover, and E. E. Klaas. 1996. The importance of floodplain forests in the conservation and management of neotropical migratory birds in the Midwest. p. 168–88. In F. R. Thompson III (ed.) Management of Midwestern Landscapes for the Conservation of Neotropical Migratory Birds. General Technical Report NC-187. U.S. Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M. G. and E. E. Klaas. 1998. Floodplain forest loss and changes in forest community composition and structure in the Upper Mississippi River: a wildlife habitat at risk. Natural Areas Journal 18: 138–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M. G., L. E. McColl, and S. A. Timm. 2005. Breeding bird assemblages associated with stages of forest succession in large river floodplains. Natural Areas Journal 25: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Second English edition. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, G. M., R. A. Dolbeer, J. J. Hanzel, and L. E. Huffman. 1993. Controlling blackbird damage to sunflower and grain crops in the Northern Great Plains. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Information Bulletin 679, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. 2003. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, T. D., M. R. Ryan, E. W. Kurzejeski, and L. W. Burger, Jr. 1999. Conservation reserve program: source or sink habitat for grassland birds in Missouri? Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 530–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. and M. J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4.0 for Windows. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B., J. B. Grace, and D. L. McCune. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Ecological Assessment Team. 2006. Strategic Habitat Conservation handbook: a report from the National Ecological Assessent Team — 29 June 2006. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington, VA, USA, and U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, L. J. 1999. Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). In A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 408. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R. 1966. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. American Naturalist 100: 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, A. S. and T. M. Knight. 2003. Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. Journal of Nature Conservation 11: 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, C. J., G. R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. E. Martin, and D. F. DeSante. 1993. Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds. United States Department of Agriculture General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144.

  • Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2005. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–2004. Version 2005.2. United States Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA. URL: <http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/atlasa99.pl?06040&1&04> (accessed 3 June 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, R. M., T. S. Baskett, and M. D. Blenden. 1984. Bird habitat on Missouri prairies. Terrestrial Series #14. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W. J., A. S. Pullin, P. M. Dolman, and T. M. Knight. 2004. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 305–08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thogmartin, W. E., M. Gallagher, N. Young, J. J. Rohweder, and M. G. Knutson. 2009. Factors associated with succession of abandoned agricultural lands along the lower Missouri River. Restoration Ecology, 17: 290–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thogmartin, W. E., B. R. Gray, M. Gallagher, N. Young, J. J. Rohweder, and M. G. Knutson. 2007. Power to detect trend in short-term time series of bird abundance. Condor 109: 943–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thogmartin, W. E., M. G. Knutson, J. J. Rohweder, and B. R. Gray. 2005. Bird habitat associations in the lower Missouri River floodplain: a final report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Big Muddy National Wildlife and Fish Refuge. United States Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson III, F. R., S. J. Lewis, J. Green, and D. Ewert. 1993. Status of Neotropical migrant landbirds in the Midwest: Identifying species of management concern. p. 145–158. In D. M. Finch and P. W. Stangel (eds.) Status and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report RM-229.

  • Tramer, E. J. 1974. On latitudinal gradients in avian diversity. Condor 76: 123–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twedt, D. J. and J. Portwood. 1997. Bottomland hardwood reforestation for neotropical migratory birds: are we missing the forest for the trees? Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 647–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twedt, D. J., R. R. Wilson, J. L. Henne-Kerr, and R. B. Hamilton. 1999. Impact of forest type and management strategy on avian densities in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 123: 261–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Missouri River bank stabilization and navigation project, fish and wildlife mitigation project, annual implementation report. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Omaha, Nebraska, and Kansas City District, Kansas City, MO, USA. URL: <http://www. nwd.usace.army.mil> (accessed Sept. 13, 2005).

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Big Muddy National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Final Environmental Impacts Statement, Puxico, MO, USA.

  • Winter, M. and J. Faaborg. 1999. Patterns of area sensitivity in grassland-nesting birds. Conservation Biology 13: 1424–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, N. B., M. A. Gallagher, and S. G. Papon. 2004. Distribution and abundance of migrant and breeding songbirds in floodplain habitats of the lower Missouri River watershed — 2003 Annual Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Big Muddy National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, Columbia, MO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. L. and J. L. Tatschel. 1975. Floodplain birds of Weston Bend, Missouri River. Wilson Bulletin 87: 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne E. Thogmartin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thogmartin, W.E., Gallagher, M., Young, N. et al. Avian assemblages in the lower Missouri River floodplain. Wetlands 29, 552–562 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1672/08-65.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/08-65.1

Key Words

Navigation