Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The use of soil parameters as indicators of quality in forested depressional wetlands

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current methods of wetland assessment rely on the use of ecological indicators such as vegetation and amphibians, but often lack an in-depth analysis of soil parameters. The objective of this study was to determine whether the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method (ORAM) can be used to predict soil quality in forested wetlands. Soil cores were taken from six wetlands ranging in ORAM scores. The soil samples were analyzed for key soil parameters (aggregate stability, bulk density, organic matter, C, N, S, P, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity). Some of these soil parameters (i.e., microbial biomass, soil C, N and S, bulk density, soil moisture) were correlated with the ORAM scores, while others (i.e., P, pH, aggregate stability) showed no correlation. Enzyme activity was correlated with the ORAM score for one of the four sampling events. When analyzed together by a principal component analysis, the soil parameters did not separate the wetland sites along a gradient of ORAM scores. Our results indicate that the ORAM reflects some of the key soil quality conditions, but not all. We further discuss whether some of the soil parameters we selected are appropriate indicators of the quality of wetland soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Balota, E. L., A. Colozzi-Filho, D. S. Andrade, and R. P. Dick. 2003. Microbial biomass in soils under different tillage and crop rotation systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils 38: 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbhuiya, A. R., A. Arunachalan, H. N. Pandey, K. Arunachalan, M. L. Khan, and P. C. Nath. 2004. Dynamics of soil microbial biomass C, N, and P in disturbed and undisturbed stands of a tropical wet-evergreen forest. European Journal of Soil Science 40: 113–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bending, G. D., M. K. Turner, F. Ryans, M. Marie-Claude, and M. Woods. 2004. Microbial and biochemical quality indicators and their potential for differentiating areas under contrasting agriculture management regimes. Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 36: 1785–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, G. R. 1965. Bulk density. p. 374–90. In C. A. Black (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckenridge, R. D., W. G. Kepner, and D. A. Mouat. 1995. A process for selecting indicators for monitoring conditions of rangeland health. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 36: 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphoc classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. P., D. H. Wardrop, and J. A. Bishop. 2002. Watershed-based protection for wetlands in Pennsylvania: Levels 1&2: Synoptic maps and rapid field assessments. Final Report to Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

  • Brown, M. T. and M. B. Vivas. 2004. A landscape development intensity index. Ecological Monitoring and Assessment 101: 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, R. P. 1994. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. p. 107–24. In J. W. Doran, D. C. Coleman, D. F. Bezdicek, and B. A. Stewart (eds.) Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 33, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinesh, R., S. G. Chaudhuri, A. N. Ganeshamurthy, and S. C. Pramanik. 2004. Biochemical properties of soils of undisturbed and disturbed mangrove forests of South Andaman (India). Wetlands Ecology and Management 12: 309–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J. W. and M. Safley. 1997. Defining and assessing soil health and sustainable productivity. p. 1–28. In C. Pankhurst, B. M. Doube, and V. V. S. R. Gupta (eds.) Biological Indicators of Soil Health. CAB International, WallingfordOxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennessy, M. S., M. Gernes, J. J. Mack, and D. H. Wardrop. 2001. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using vegetation to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. EPA-822-R-02-020. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennessy, S., A. Jacobs, and M. Kentula. 2007. An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands. Wetlands 27: 504–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filip, Z. 2002. International approach to assessing soil quality by ecologically-related biological parameters. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 88: 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, J. A., J. L. Richardson, and L. A. Foss. 1999. Soil indicators of agricultural impacts on Northern prairie pothole wetlands: Cottonwood Lake Research Area, North Dakota, USA. Wetlands 19: 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., G. Liska, M. A. Lock, B. Reynolds, and J. Hudson. 1996. Microbial activity and enzymatic decomposition followingpeatland water table drawdown. Plant and Soil 180: 121–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gernes, M. C. and J. C. Helgen. 1999. Index of biological integrity (IBI) for large depressional wetlands in Minnesota. Final Report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency Assistance Number CD995525-01, April 1999. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Sotres, F., C. Trasar-Cepeda, M. C. Leiros, and S. Seoane. 2005. Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 37: 877–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A. L. and B. K. Carlisle. 1998. Rapid habitat assessment of wetlands, macro-invertebrate survey version: brief description and methodology. Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Assessment Program, Amherst, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, K. 2005. Accumulation of carbon in created wetland soils and the potential to mitigate loss of natural wetland carbon-mediated functions. MS Thesis, Ohio State University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, S. A., R. J. Naiman, and S. R. Elliott. 2000. Indicators and assessment for measuring the ecological integrity of semi-aquatic terrestrial environments. Hydrobiologia 422/433: 111–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo, I. F., M. Caravaca, M. Alguacil, G. Hernandez, and A. Roldan. 2005. Use of microbiological indicators for evaluating success in soil restoration after revegetation of a mining area under subtropical conditions. Applied Soil Ecology 30: 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T. E., M. P. Andrews, R. P. Szuch, D. F. Whigham, D. E. Weiler, and A. D. Jacobs. 2007. Comparing functional assessment of wetlands to measurements of soil characteristics and nitrogen processing. Wetlands 27: 479–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., C. Freeman, D. Lee, and W. J. Mitsch. 1998. Enzyme activities in constructed wetlands: implications for water quality amelioration. Hydrobiologia 386: 231–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H. and C. Freeman. 1999. Phosphatase and arylsulphatase activities in wetland soils: annual variation and controlling factors. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31: 449–454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, W. D. and W. S. Chepil. 1965. Size distribution of aggregates. p. 499–510. In C. A. Black, C.A. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, No. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. R. and R. P. Dick. 2004. Differentiating microbial and stabilized Betaglucosidase activity relative to soil quality. Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 36: 2089–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperman, R. G. and M. M. Carreiro. 1997. Soil heavy metal concentrations, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a contaminated grassland ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 29: 179–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. J. 2001a. Ohio rapid assessment method for wetlands v.5.0, users manual and scoring score. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetlands Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. J. 2001b. Vegetation index of biological integrity (VIBI) for wetlands. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetlands Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. J. 2004. Integrated wetland assessment program. Part 4: a vegetation index of biotic integrity (VIBI) and tiered aquatic life uses (TALUs) for Ohio Wetlands. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2004-4. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetlands Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. J. 2006. Landscape as a predictor of wetland condition: an evaluation of the landscape development index (LDI) with a large reference wetland dataset from Ohio. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 120: 221–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Micacchion, M. 2004. Integrated wetland assessment program. Part 7: amphibian index of biotic integrity for Ohio Wetlands. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2004-7. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetlands Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, J. and K. Perkins. 2002. Aggregate stability and size distribution. p. 317–28. In J. H. Dane and G. C. Topp (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5: Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, S. C., V. Dan Wall, D. J. Moore, M. Pattanayek, T. L. Buck, and J. J. Alberts. 2002. Assessing salt marsh health: a test of the utility of five potential indicators. Wetlands 22: 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, K. C. 2006. Florida wetland condition index for forested wetlands. Ecological Indicators 6: 337–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan, A., J. R. Salinas-Garcia, M. M. Alguacil, and F. Caravaca. 2005a. Changes in soil enzyme activity, fertility, aggregation and C sequestration mediated by conservation tillage practices and water regime management in a maize field. Applied Soil Ecology 30: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan, A., J. R. Salinas-Garcia, M. M. Alguacil, E. Diaz, and F. Caravaca. 2005b. Soil enzyme activities suggest advantages of conservation tillage practices in sorghum cultivation under subtropical conditions. Geoderma 129: 178–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schloter, M., J. C. O’Dilly, and J. C. Munch. 2003. Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 98: 255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicardi, M., F. Garcia-Prechac, and L. Frioni. 2004. Soil microbial indicators sensitive to land use conversion from pastures to commercial Eucalyptus grandis (Hill ex Maiden) plantations in Uruguay. Applied Soil Ecology 27: 125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling, G. P. 1997. Soil microbial biomass, activity, and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health. p. 97–119. In C. Pankhurst, B. M. Doube, and V. V. S. R. Gupta (eds.) Biological Indicators of Soil Health. CAB International, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C., A. I. Robertson, and A. Curtis. 1998. Development and testing of a rapid appraisal wetland condition index in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 54: 143–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai, M. A. 1994. Soil enzymes. p. 775–833. In R. W. Weaver, J. S. Angle, and P. S. Bottomley (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5: Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dam, R. A., C. Camilleri, and C. M. Finlayson. 1998. The potential of rapid assessment techniques as early warning indicators of wetland degradation: a review. Environmental Toxicology and Water Quality 13: 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, E. D., P. C. Brookes, and D. S. Jenkinson. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 19: 703–07.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villar, M. C., V. Petrikova, M. Diaz-Ravina, and T. Carballas. 2004. Changes in soil microbial biomass and aggregate stability following burning and soil rehabilitation. Geoderma 122: 73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Abby E. Rokosch

    Present address: Brown and Caldwell, 5410 Trinity Road, Palisades II, Suite 320, 27607, Raleigh, NC, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, 43210, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Abby E. Rokosch, Virginie Bouchard & Richard Dick

  2. Department of Biology, Kenyon College, 43022, Gambier, Ohio, USA

    Siobhan Fennessy

Authors
  1. Abby E. Rokosch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Virginie Bouchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siobhan Fennessy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard Dick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rokosch, A.E., Bouchard, V., Fennessy, S. et al. The use of soil parameters as indicators of quality in forested depressional wetlands. Wetlands 29, 666–677 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1672/08-150.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/08-150.1

Key Words

Search

Navigation