, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 396–406 | Cite as

Ecosystem effects of expanding populations of Avicennia germinans in a Louisiana salt marsh

  • Carey Lynn Perry
  • Irving A. Mendelssohn


The advancement of species poleward, due to global warming, has recently been documented worldwide. In Louisiana, Avicennia germinans (black mangrove) is moving northward into Spartina alterniflora salt marshes. Mangroves were historically restricted to southernmost islands and beaches by winter freezes; however, recently a noticeable expansion has occurred. The influence that mangroves have on ecosystem processes within Louisiana salt marshes has not been documented. Thus, this research examined the effects of mangrove expansion on sediment accretion, organic matter production and decomposition, and carbon assimilation, as well as edaphic parameters. Our results indicate that presently mangrove expansion has had no major effects on the ecosystem processes measured. Sediment accretion, belowground production, decomposition, and carbon assimilation were similar between Avicennia and Spartina. Where mangroves expanded into the surrounding salt marsh, elevation, redox potential, bulk density, and soil ammonium were slightly higher, while soil moisture and porewater salinity were somewhat lower. Because the mangroves are small in stature and areal extent, significant effects on ecosystem processes may presently be somewhat muted. However, if stands continue to grow, noted effects may occur in the future. Our research provides a baseline from which future ecosystem responses may be evaluated as mangroves in Louisiana continue to develop.

Key Words

Avicennia germinans salt marsh/mangrove ecotone Spartina alterniflora 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Benner, R., M. L. Fogel, and E. K. Sprague. 1991. Diagenesis of belowground biomass of Spartina alterniflora in salt marsh sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 36: 1358–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum, L. K. 1993. Spartina alterniflora root dynamics in a Virginia marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 102: 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brannon, J. M. 1973. Seasonal variation of nutrients and physicochemical properties in the salt marsh soils of Barataria Bay. Louisiana. M.S. Thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Bremner, J. M. and D. R. Kenney. 1966. Determination and isotope-ratio analysis of different forms of nitrogen in soils: 3. Exchangeable ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite by extraction-distillation methods. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 30: 577–82.Google Scholar
  5. Buresh, R. J., R. D. DeLaune, and W. H. PatrickJr. 1980. Nitrogen and phosphorus distribution and utilization by Spartina alterniflora in a Louisiana Gulf Coast marsh. Estuaries 3: 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrnside, D. S. Jr. and M. B. Sturgis. 1958. Soil phosphorus and its fractions as related to response of sugarcane to fertilizer phosphorus. Louisiana Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin 513.Google Scholar
  7. Cahoon, D. R. and R. E. Turner. 1989. Accretion and canal impacts in a rapidly subsiding wetland II. Feldspar marker horizon technique. Estuaries 12: 260–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahoon, D. R., P. Hensel, J. Rybczyk, K. L. McKee, C. E. Proffitt, and B. C. Perez. 2003. Mass tree mortality leads to mangrove collapse at Bay Islands, Honduras after Hurricane Mitch. Journal of Ecology 91: 1093–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, G. N. and S. R. Spencer. 1989. Rapid leaf decay and nutrient release in a Chinese tallow forest. Oecologia 80: 222–28.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, X., Y. Luo, J. Chen, G. Lin, J. Chen, and B. Li. 2006. Short-term C4 plant Spartina alterniflora invasions change the soil carbon in C3 plant-dominated tidal wetlands on a growing estuarine island. Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 38: 3380–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, A. N. and J. T. Carlton. 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279: 555–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Day, F. P. 1982. Litter decomposition rates in the seasonally flooded Great Dismal Swamp. Ecology 63: 670–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis, R. L. H. 1993. Butterflies and Climate Change. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, K. R. and K. P. Mills. 2005. Aboveground and belowground productivity of Spartina alterniflora (smooth cordgrass) in natural and created Louisiana salt marshes. Estuaries 28: 252–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emery, S. L. and J. A. Perry. 1996. Decomposition rates and phosphorus concentrations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and cattail (Typha spp.) in fourteen Minnesota wetlands. Hydrobiologia 323: 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farnsworth, E. J. and L. A. Meyerson. 2003. Comparative ecophysiology of four wetland plant species along a continuum of invasiveness. Wetlands 23: 750–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher, J. L., P. L. Wolf, and W. J. Pfeiffer. 1984. Rhizome and root growth rates and cycles in protein and carbohydrate concentrations in Georgia Spartina alterniflora Loisel. plants. American Journal of Botany 71: 165–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giraldo-Sanchez, B. 2005. Belowground productivity of mangrove forests in southwest Florida. Ph.D. Dissertation. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Grout, J. A., C. D. Levins, and J. S. Richardson. 1997. Decomposition rates of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and Lyngbyei’s sedge (Carex lyngbyei) in the Fraser River Estuary. Estuaries 20: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hackney, C. T. and A. A. de la Cruz. 1980. In situ decomposition of roots and rhizomes of two tidal marsh plants. Ecology 61: 226–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hersteinsson, P. and D. W. MacDonald. 1992. Interspecific competition and the geographical distribution of red and artic foxes Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus. Oikos 64: 505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howes, B. L., J. W. H. Dacey, and D. D. Goering. 1986. Factors controlling the growth form of Spartina alterniflora: feedbacks between aboveground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen, and salinity. Journal of Ecology 74: 881–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller (eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Kullman, L. 2001. 20th century climate warming and tree-limit rise in the southern Scandes of Sweden. Ambio 30: 72–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lester, G. D., S. G. Sorensen, P. L. Faulkner, C. S. Reid, and I. E. Maxit. 2005. Louisiana comprehensive wildlife conservation strategy. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Lindsay, W. L. and W. A. Norvell. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America 42: 421–28.Google Scholar
  27. Maltby, E. 1988. Use of cotton strip assay in wetland and upland environmentsan international perspective. In Harrison, A. F., P. M. Latter, and D. W. H. Walton (eds.) Cotton strip assay: an index of decomposition in soils. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-Over-Sands, UK.Google Scholar
  28. McKee, K. L. 1993. Soil physicochemical patterns and mangrove species distribution: reciprocal effects? Journal of Ecology 81: 477–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKee, K. L. 1995. Interspecific variation in growth, biomass partitioning, and defensive characteristics of neotropical mangrove seedlings: response to light and nutrient availability. American Journal of Botany 82: 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKee, K. L. and P. L. Faulkner. 2000. Restoration of biogeochemical function in mangrove forests. Restoration Ecology 8: 247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKee, K. L., I. A. Mendelssohn, and M. W. Hester. 1988. Reexamination of pore water sulfide concentrations and redox potentials near the aerial roots of Rhizophora mangle and Avicennia germinans. American Journal of Botany 75: 1352–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendelssohn, I. A. and M. T. Postek. 1982. Elemental analysis of deposits on the roots of Spartina alterniflora, Loisel. American Journal of Botany 69: 904–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meshinev, T., I. Apostolova, and E. Koleva. 2000. Influences of warming on timberline rising: a case study on Pinus peuce Grisb. in Bulgaria. Phytocoenologia 30: 431–38.Google Scholar
  34. Nehring, S. 2006. Four arguments why so many alien species settle into estuaries, with special reference to the German river Elbe. Helgoland Marine Research 60: 127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson, D. W. and L. E. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In J. M. Bartels and J. M. Bigham (eds.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Olenin, S. and E. Leppakoski. 1999. Non-native animals in the Baltic Sea: alteration of benthic habitats in coastal inlets and lagoons. Hydrobiologia 393: 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Neil, T. 1949. The muskrat in the Louisiana coastal marshes. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, New Orleans, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  38. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 637–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parmesan, C., N. Ryrholm, C. Stefanescu, J. K. Hill, C. D. Thomas, H. Descimon, B. Huntley, L. Kaila, J. Kullberg, T. Tammaru, W. J. Tennent, J. A. Thomas, and M. Warren. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patrick, W. H., R. P. Gambrell, and S. P. Faulkner. 1996. Redox measurements of soils. p. 1255–73. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Patterson, C. S., K. L. McKee, and I. A. Mendelssohn. 1991. Effects of tidal inundation and predation on Avicennia germinans seedling establishment and survival in a sub-tropical mangal/salt marsh community. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 1: 103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patterson, C. S. and I. A. Mendelssohn. 1991. A comparison of physicochemical variables across plant zones in a mangal/salt marsh community in Louisiana. Wetlands 11: 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patterson, C. S., I. A. Mendelssohn, and E. M. Swenson. 1993. Growth and survival of Avicennia germinans seedlings in a mangal/salt marsh community in Louisiana, USA. Journal of Coastal Research 9: 801–10.Google Scholar
  44. Ravit, B., J. G. Ehrenfeld, and M. M. Haggblom. 2003. A comparison of sediment microbial communities associated with Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora in two brackish wetlands of New Jersey. Estuaries 26: 465–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reed, D. J. 1989. Patterns of sediment deposition in subsiding coastal salt marshes, Terrebonne Bay, Louisiana: the role of winter storms. Estuaries 12: 222–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reed, D. J. 1992. Effect of weirs on sediment deposition in Louisiana coastal marshes. Environmental Management 16: 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robertson, A. I. 1988. Decomposition of mangrove leaf litter in tropical Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 116: 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robertson, A. I. and P. A. Daniel. 1989. Decomposition and the annual flux of detritus from fallen timber in tropical mangrove forests. Limnology and Oceanography 34: 640–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruesink, J. L., B. E. Feist, C. J. Harvey, J. S. Hong, A. C. Trimble, and L. M. Wisehart. 2006. Changes in productivity associated with four introduced species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311: 203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scholander, P. F., L. van Dam, and S. I. Scholander. 1955. Gas exchange in the roots of mangroves. American Journal of Botany 42: 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soil Survey Laboratory Investigations Manual. 2004. In R. Burt (ed.) Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
  52. Stevens, P., S. Fox, and C. Montague. 2006. The interplay between mangroves and salt marshes at the transition between temperate and subtropical climate in Florida. Wetlands Ecology and Management 14: 435–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Templer, P., S. Findlay, and C. Wigand. 1998. Sediment chemistry associated with native and non-native emergent macrophytes of a Hudson River marsh ecosystem. Wetlands 18: 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thibodeau, F. R. and N. H. Nickerson. 1986. Differential oxidation of mangrove substrate by Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle. American Journal of Botany 73: 512–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas, C. D. and J. J. Lennon. 1999. Birds extend their range northward. Nature 399: 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas, G. W. 1982. Exchangeable cations. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 — Chemical and Microbiological Properties, second ed. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, USA.Google Scholar
  57. Turner, R. E., J. J. Baustian, E. M. Swenson, and J. S. Spicer. 2006. Wetland sedimentation from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Science 314: 449–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Twilley, R. R., A. E. Lugo, and C. Patterson-Zucca. 1986. Litter production and turnover in basin mangrove forests in southwest Florida. Ecology 67: 670–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Valiela, I. J., J. M. Teal, and N. Y. Persson. 1976. Production and dynamics of experimentally enriched salt marsh vegetation: belowground biomass. Limnology and Oceanography 21: 245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walther, G. R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T. J. C. Beebee, J. M. Fromentic, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, and F. Bairlein. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Weistein, M. P. and J. H. Balleto. 1999. Does the common reed, Phragmites australis, affect essential fish habitat? Estuaries 22: 793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White, D. A., T. E. Weiss, J. M. Trapani, and L. B. Thein. 1978. Productivity and decomposition of the dominant salt marsh plants in Louisiana. Ecology 59: 751–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wigand, C., J. C. Stevenson, and J. C. Cornwell. 1997. Effects of different submersed macrophytes on sediment biogeochemistry. Aquatic Botany 56: 233–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Windham, L. 2001. Comparison of biomass production and decomposition between Phragmites australis (common reed) and Spartina patens (salt hay) in brackish tidal marshes of New Jersey. Wetlands 21: 179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Windham, L. and R. G. Lathrop. 1999. Effects of Phragmites australis (common reed) invasion on aboveground biomass and soil properties in brackish tidal marsh on the Mullica River, New Jersey. Estuaries 22: 927–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Windham, L. and L. A. Meyerson. 2003. Effects of common reed (Phragmites australis) expansions on nitrogen dynamics of tidal marshes of the northeastern U.S. Estuaries 26: 452–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carey Lynn Perry
    • 1
  • Irving A. Mendelssohn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oceanography and Coastal SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations