Abstract
Uncertainty about the effects of ongoing natural and anthropogenic changes to Great Lakes ecosystems, such as managed stabilized water levels, coupled with widespread public interest regarding status of wetland birds prompted us to evaluate sensitivity of regional wetland birds to hydrologic changes. We reviewed published literature to determine preferred habitat of 30 wetland birds in the region, emphasizing vegetation required for foraging and nesting during the breeding season. Species were subsequently assigned to one of three risk categories based on association with vegetation types sensitive to water-level stabilization, as well as nesting height above water. Notably, of the bird species designated as low, moderate, and high risk, 25%, 33%, and 63%, respectively, have been regionally declining based on Bird Studies Canada’s Marsh Monitoring Program. This evaluation may be useful to regional biologists, planners, and managers concerned with predicting how particular species might be affected by future hydrologic changes in this and related systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Bedford, B. 1990. Increasing the scale of analysis: the challenge of cumulative impact assessment for Great Lakes wetlands. Proceedings: International Symposium on Wetlands of the Great Lakes, Niagara Falls, NY, USA.
Beland, M. 2003. Holocene vegetation dynamics of an upper St. Lawrence River coastal wetland and surrounding uplands: Effects of climate change and anthropogenic disturbance. M.S. Thesis. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Brown, M. and J. J. Dinsmore. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for wetland birds management. Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 392–397.
Collett, D. 1994. Modelling Binary Data. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Conway, C. J. and W. R. Eddleman. 1994. Virginia rail. p. 193–206. In T. C. Tacha and C. E. Braun (eds.) Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Management in North America. International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Washington, DC, USA.
Eddleman, W. R., F. L. Knopf, B. Meanley, F. A. Reid, and R. Zembal. 1988. Conservation of North American rallids. Wilson Bulletin 100: 458–475.
Fairbairn, S. E. and J. J. Dinsmore. 2001. Local and landscape-level influences on wetland birdcommunities on the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21: 41–47.
Farrell, J., J. Toner, A. Halpern, M. Beland, B. Murry, A. Cushing, K. Hawley, and D. Leopold. 2004. Restoration of coastal wetlands in the St. Lawrence River through the re-establishment of natural hydrologic regimes. Final report to the Great Lakes Protection Fund, Chicago, IL, USA.
Findlay, C. S. and J. Houlahan. 1997. Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology 11: 1000–1009.
Gibbs, J. P., J. R. Longcore, D. G. McAuley, and J. K. Ringelman. 1991. Use of wetland habitats by selected nongame water birds in Maine. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 9, Washington, DC.
Hudon, C. 1997. Impact of water-level fluctuations on St. Lawrence River aquatic vegetation. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Science 54: 2853–2865.
Mamo, L. B. and E. G. Bolen. 1999. Effects of area, isolation, and landscape on the avifauna of Carolina Bays. Journal of Field Ornithology 70: 310–320.
Naugle, D. E., K. F. Higgins, S. M. Nusser, and W. C. Johnson. 1999. Scale-dependent habitat use in three species of prairie wetland birds. Landscape Ecology 14: 267–276.
Riffell, S. K., B. E. Keas, and T. M. Burton. 2001. Area and habitat relationships of birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows. Wetlands 21: 492–507.
Riffell, S. K., B. E. Keas, and T. M. Burton. 2003. Birds in North American Great Lakes coastal wet meadows: is landscape context important. Landscape Ecology 18: 95–111.
SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 6, fourth edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Timmermans, S. T. A., S. S. Badzinski, and K. E. Jones. 2004. The Marsh Monitoring Program annual report, 1995–2002: Annual indices and trends in bird abundance and amphibian occurrence in the Great Lakes basin. Bird Studies Canada, Port Rowan, ON, Canada.
Weeber, R. C. and M. Vallianatos. 2000. The Marsh Monitoring Program 1995–1999: monitoring Great Lakes wetlands and their amphibian and bird inhabitants. Bird Studies Canada, Port Rowan, ON, Canada.
Wilcox, D. A. 1990. Water-level fluctuations and Great Lakes wetlands. Great Lakes Wetlands 1: 1–3.
Wilcox, D. A. 1993. Effects of water-level regulation on wetlands of the Great Lakes. Great Lakes Wetlands 4: 1–2, 11
Wilcox, D. A., J. H. Meeker, and J. Elias. 1993. Impacts of waterlevel regulation on wetlands of the Great Lakes. Phase 2 Report to Working Committee 2, International Joint Commission Water-Levels Reference Study, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Washington, DC, USA.
Wilcox, D. A. and T. H. Whillans. 1999. Techniques for restoration of disturbed coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes. Wetlands 19: 835–857.
Wires, L. R. and F. J. Cuthbert. 2001. Prioritization of waterbird colony sites for conservation in the U.S. Great Lakes. Final Report to United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Fort Snelling, MN, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steen, D.A., Gibbs, J.P. & Timmermans, S.T.A. Assessing the sensitivity of wetland bird communities to hydrologic change in the eastern Great Lakes region. Wetlands 26, 605–611 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[605:ATSOWB]2.0.CO;2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[605:ATSOWB]2.0.CO;2