Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Area and habitat relationships of birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although relationships of birds to patch area and habitat characteristics have been dominant themes in avian ecology over the past few decades, relatively little is known about these relationships in wetland-dominated landscapes of the Great Lakes coastline. During 1997 and 1998, we surveyed birds and measured habitat characteristics along transects in wet meadows associated with the northern Lake Huron shoreline (NLHS) in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Using a suite of multivariate techniques, we related abundance and presence/absence of individual species to wet meadow area and habitat characteristics. Nine species were positively associated with increasing wet meadow area, which underscores the importance of large wetlands to avian conservation in the region. Bird variables also were related to habitat characteristies. Higher values of bird variables were generally associated with a suite of characteristics: more robust and dense grass/sedge vegetation, structural diversity in the horizontal and vertical planes, and increased frequency of willow shrubs. Individual species that require particular aspects of these characteristics for nesting or foraging were associated with principal components containing those aspects. In the NLHS, large wet meadows that possess these characteristics would support the greatest diversity and benefit the majority of species. However, conservation efforts that focus only on these traits will not be sufficient for all species because habitat requirements for some species are very specific (e. g., open water for mallard), and for others, habitat preferences may change from year to year in response to lake-level changes. While our results provide important insights, continued research is needed to further the successful conservation and management of birds in Great Lakes coastal wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Literature Cited

  • Andren, H. 1992. Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: a landscape perspective. Ecology 73:794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andren, H. 1995. Effects of landscape composition on predation rates at habitat edges. p. 225–255. In L. Hansson, L. Farhig, and G. Merriam (eds.) Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. G. and J. R. Karr 1987. Breeding birds of isolated woodlots: area and habitat relationships. Ecology 68: 1724–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, R., G. A. McPeek, and R. J. Adams. 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M and J. J. Dinsmore. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 392–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. and J. J. Dinsmore. 1991. Area-dependent changes in bird densities in Iowa marshes. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Sciences 98: 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L. 1985. Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R. and H. Smith. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estades, C. F. and S. A. Temple. 1999. Deciduous-forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations. Ecological Applications 9: 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. and Alexander, L. E. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freemark, K. E., J. B. Dunning, S. J. Hejl, and J. R. Probst. 1995. A landscape ecology perspective for research, conservation, and management. p. 381–427. In T. E. Martin and D. M. Finch (eds.) Ecology and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, L. E., P. F. Eagles, and R. J. MacKay. 1995. Effects of residential development on forest-dwelling Neotropical migrant songbirds. Conservation Biology 9: 1408–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, A. E., C. F. Leck, and R. T. T. Forman. 1976. Avian distribution patterns in forest islands of different sizes in central New Jersey. Auk 93: 356–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. and S. M. Melvin. 1993. Call-response surveys for monitoring breeding waterbirds. Journal of Wildlife Management 57: 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götmark, F. 1992. The effects of investigator disturbance on nester birds. Current Ornithology 9: 63–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller, K. J. and S. H. Anderson. 1987. Multi-scale associations between cavity-nester birds and features of Wyoming streamside woodlands. Condor 89: 534–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller, K. J. and W. C. Barrow, Jr. 2001. Bird-landscape relations in the Chihauhaun Desert: coping with uncertainties about predictive models. Ecological Applications 11: 1517–1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller, K. J., R. T. Wiedenmann, K. L. Clements, and S. H. Anderson. 1994. Effects of human intrusion on song occurrence and singing consistency in subalpine birds. Auk 103: 593–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helzer, C. J. and D. E. Jelinski. 1999. The relative importance of patch area and perimeter-area ratio to grassland breeding birds. Ecological Applications 9: 1448–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. 1994. The effects of habitat fragmentation on midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecological Applications 4: 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandanavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak, G. J. 1970. A comparative study of the foods of the Sora and Virginia Rail. Wilson Bulletin 82:206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W. and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, H. A., and K. F. Higgins. 1992. Nest and nest site characteristics of some ground-nester, non-passerine birds of northern grasslands. Prairie Naturalist 24: 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, K. P. and D. A. Wilcox. 1999. Use of historical and geospatial data to guide the restoration of a Lake Erie coastal marsh. Wetlands 19:858–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and J. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mine, L. D. and D. A. Albert. 1998. Great Lakes coastal wetlands: abiotic and floristic characterization. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. G., Jr. 1981. Simultaneous Statistical Inference, second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. H. 1989. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naugle, D. E., K. F. Higgins, S. M. Nusser, and W. C. Johnson. 1999. Scale-dependent habitat use in three species of prairie wetland birds. Landscape Ecology 14:267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naugle, D. E., R. R. Johnson, M. E. Estey, and K. F. Higgins. 2000. A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the prairie pothole region of eastern South Dakota. Wetlands 20:588–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, L. 1988. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, third edition. PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, L. J. and D. R. Petit. 1999. Factors governing habitat selection by Prothonotary Warblers: field tests of Fretwell-Lucas models. Ecological Monographs 66:367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, H. H. and C. S. Flegel. 1995. Breeding avifauna of Lake Huron. p. 247–272. In M. Munawar, T. Edsall, and J. Leach (eds.) The Lake Huron Ecosystem: Ecology, Fisheries and Management. SPB Academic Publishing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, H. H., P. I. Padding, and R. W. Knapton. 1992. Waterfowl use of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research 18:673–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, D. J. and R. P. Brooks. 1998. A verified habitat suitability index for the Louisiana Waterthrush. Journal of Field Ornithology 69:288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, C. J., J. R. Sauer, and S. Droege (tech. eds.). 1995. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, USA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149

    Google Scholar 

  • Rencher, A. C. 1992. Interpretation of canonical discriminant functions, canonical variates, and principal components. The American Statistician 46:217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing table of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffell, S. K., K. J. Gutzwiller, and S. H. Anderson. 1996. Does repeated human intrusion cause cumulative declines in avian richness and abundance? Ecological Applications 6: 492–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffell, S. K. 2000. Effects of landscape context and coastline complexity on birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows. Ph. D. Dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffell, S. K., B. E. Keas, and T. M. Burton. Birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows: is landscape context important? Landscape Ecology, in press.

  • Robbins, C. S. 1981. Bird activity levels related to weather. Studies in Avian Biology 6:301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C. S., D. K. Dawson, and B. A. Dowell. 1989. Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic States. Wildlife Monographs 103.

  • Rotenberry, J. T. and J. A. Wiens. 1980. Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61:1228–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, 4th edition, volume 2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiegelow, F. K., C. S. Machtans, and S. j. Hannon. 1997. Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. Ecology 78: 1914–1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, B. L., J. S. Larson, and R. M. DeGraaf. 1984. Relationship of breeding bird density and diversity to habitat variables in forested wetlands. Wilson Bulletin 96:48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society Encyclopedia of North American Birds. Alfred A. Knopf. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, J. J., S. J. Hejl, and T. E. Martin. 1998. Breeding productivity does not decline with increasing fragmentation in a western landscape. Ecology 79: 2890–2903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F. R. and M. J. Schwalbach. 1995. Analysis of sample size, counting time, and plot size from an avian point count survey on Hoosier National Forest, Indiana p. 45–48. In C. J. Ralph, J. R. Sauer, and S. Droege (Technical eds.) Monitoring bird populations by point counts. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, USA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trexler, J. C. and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analysis. Ecology 74:1629–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyser, R. W. 1983. Species-area relations of cattail marsh avifauna. Passenger Pigeon 45:125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J. 1985. Assessment of counting techniques. p. 247–302. In R. F. Johnston (ed.) Current Ornithology, Volume 2. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, P. D., M. L. Hunter, and S. M. Melvin. 1994. Effects of habitat area on the distribution of grassland birds in Maine. Conservation Biology 8: 1087–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, P. D., P. L. Tubaro, J. M. Cardoso da Silva, B. G. Peter-john, J. R. Herkert, and R. B. Cavalcanti. 1999. Conservation of grassland birds in the western hemishpere. Studies in Avian Biology 19: 2–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villard, M. A., M. K. Trzcinski, and G. Merriam. 1999. Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conservation Biology 13:774–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1981. Single-sample surveys of communities: are the revealed patterns real? American Naturalist 117:90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. W. 1999. Wetland Birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, P. H., R. D. Tobias, R. D. Wolfinger, and Y. Hochberg. 1999. Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, M. B., H. H. Prince, and R. R. Cox. 1999. Avian use of purple loosestrife dominated habitat relative to other vegetation types in a Lake Huron wetland complex. Wilson Bulletin 111:104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. A. 1993. Effects of water level regulation on wetlands of the Great Lakes. Great Lakes Wetlands 4: 1–2 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. A. 1995. The role of wetlands as nearshore habitat in Lake Huron. p. 223–245. In M. Munawar, T. Edsall, and J. Leach (eds.) The Lake Huron Ecosystem: Ecology, Fisheries and Management. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. F. 1974. Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55: 1017–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M. and J. Faaborg. 1999. Patterns of area sensitivity in grassland birds. Conservation Biology 13: 1424–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Samuel K. Riffell

    Present address: Center for Integrative Studies-General Science, Michigan State University, 48824, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

  2. Brian E. Keas

    Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio Northern University, 45810, Ada, Ohio, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, 48824, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

    Samuel K. Riffell, Brian E. Keas & Thomas M. Burton

  2. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 48824, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

    Thomas M. Burton

Authors
  1. Samuel K. Riffell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian E. Keas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas M. Burton
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel K. Riffell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riffell, S.K., Keas, B.E. & Burton, T.M. Area and habitat relationships of birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows. Wetlands 21, 492–507 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0492:AAHROB]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0492:AAHROB]2.0.CO;2

Key Words