Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 310–343 | Cite as

Seed-bank and vegetation development in a created tidal freshwater wetland on the Delaware River, Trenton, New Jersey, USA

  • Mary Allessio Leck
Article

Abstract

The initial stages of seed-bank and vegetation development were documented in a newly created tidal freshwater wetland where donor soils were not applied. The 32.3-ha site adjacent to the Delaware River in New Jersey, USA was completed in stages from November 1993 to November 1994. Objectives of the study were to determine characteristics of the seed bank and vegetation and to monitor spatial and temporal changes. The study was carried out from 1995 to 1999 using three sites (North, East, and South Marshes) and three elevation locations (1 m from a tidal channel, midpoint, and 1 m from the upland edge). Development of the seed bank and vegetation demonstrated tremendous colonization potential derived from regional and local sources. Colonization and complete plant cover occurred within one year, and subsequent changes were rapid. Individual species behaved uniquely regarding colonization time, duration, and decline in both the seed bank and vegetation. Large seed banks of some species were present even after decline in the vegetation. Overall, the seed bank was large, small-seeded and persistent, and diverse. A total of 177 species occurred in soil seed bank and 92 in field vegetation samples, with 72 contributing to cover. Seedbank densities (mean±SE/m2) ranged from 450±152 to 394,600±29,950. Species richness (species/ sample) ranged from 3.3±1.2 to 32.3±1.8. Density and species richness were clearly reduced by inundation and were lowest in channel edge samples and in the first year (1995). Cover species richness ranged from 1.6±0.2 to 7.3±0.6 per quadrat. Complexity of the vegetation increased over time, with lowest diversity along the channels. The 1995 site differences, with greatest densities and species richness in the East Marsh, could be related to site history (timing of construction). Species similarity between the seed bank and vegetation ranged from 11 to 53% and showed no site, location, or temporal pattern. However, similarity between sites of the seed bank and vegetation increased from 1995 to 1998. Several New Jersey State rare or threatened species, as well as invasive species, were present. Results indicated that it is ecologically feasible to create a wetland adjacent to a tidal freshwater river without use of donor soil and that transplantation had not been necessary.

Key words

seed bank seed persistence tidal freshwater marsh wetland mitigation wetland restoration wetland colonization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ambrose, A. W. I. and K. P. Ambrose. 1987. A Handbook of Biological Investigation. Hunter Textbooks, Inc., Winson-Salem, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, A. H. and E. F. DeRico. 1999. The seed bank of a restored tidal freshwater wetland in Washington, D.C. Urban Ecosystems 3:5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, A. H. and I. A. Mendelssohn. 1998. Response of two oligohaline marsh communities to lethal and nonlethal disturbance. Oecologia 116:543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, A. H., M. S. Egnotovich, and E. Clarke. 2001. Hydrologic change and vegetation of tidal freshwater marshes: field, green-house, and seed bank experiments. Wetlands 21:519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekker, R. M., G. L. Verweij, J. P. Bakker, and L. M. Fresco. 2000. Soil seed bank dynamics in hayfield succession. Journal of Ecology 88:594–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brock, M. A. and D. L. Britton. 1995. The role of seed banks in the revegetation of Australian temporary wetlands. p. 183–188. In B. Wheeler, S. Shaw, W. Fojt, and A. Robertson (eds.) The Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, London, England.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, S. C. and B. L. Bedford. 1997. Restoration of wetland vegetation with transplanted wetland soil: an experimental study. Wetlands 17:424–437.Google Scholar
  8. Bryson, C. T., R. Carter, L. B. McCarty, and F. H. Yelverton. 1997. Kyllinga, a genus of neglected weeds in the continental United States. Weed Technology 11:838–842.Google Scholar
  9. Cain, M. L., B. G. Milligan, and A. E. Strand. 2000. Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. American Journal of Botany 87:1217–1227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Combroux, I., G. Bornette, N. J. Willby, and C. Amoros. 2001. Regenerative strategies of aquatic plants in disturbed habitats: the role of the propagule bank. Archives Hydrobiologica 152:215–235.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, M. A. and K. Thompson. 2000. Eight ways to be a colonizer; two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. Bulletin Ecological Society of America 77:226–230.Google Scholar
  12. D’Antonio, C. and L. A. Meyerson. 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restoration Ecology 10:703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2000. Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology 8:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ervin, G. N. and R. G. Wetzel. 2000. Allelochemical autotoxicity in the emergent wetland macrophyte Juncus effusus (Juncaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:853–860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Galatowitsch, S. M., N. O. Anderson, and P. D. Ascher. 1999. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19:733–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galinato, M. and A. G. van der Valk. 1986. Seed germination traits of annuals and emergents recruited during drawdowns in Delta Marsh, Manitoba, Canada. Aquatic Botany 26:89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Grime, J. P. 1989. Seed banks in ecological perspective. p. xv-xxii. In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Grubb, P. J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Review 52:107–145.Google Scholar
  20. Huiskes, A. H. L., B. P. Koutstaal, P. M. J. Herman, W. G. Beeftink, M. M. Markusse, and W. de Munck. 1995. Seed dispersal of halophytes in tidal salt marshes. Journal of Ecology 83:559–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keddy, P. 1999. Wetland restoration: the potential for assembly rules in the service of conservation. Wetlands 19:716–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keddy, P. A. 2000. Wetland Ecology Principles and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  23. Keddy, P. A. and L. H. Fraser. 2000. Four general principles for the management and conservation of wetlands in large lakes: The role of water levels, nutrients, competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 5: 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keddy, P. A. and A. A. Reznicek. 1982. The role of seed banks in the persistence of Ontario’s coastal plain flora. American Journal of Botany 69:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keddy, P. A. and A. A. Reznicek. 1986. Great Lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. Journal of Great Lakes Research 12:25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keddy, P. A., L. H. Fraser, and I. C. Wisheu. 1998. A comparative approach to examine competitive responses of 48 wetland plant species. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:777–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellogg, C. H. and S. D. Bridgham. 2002. Colonization during early succession of restored freshwater marshes. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leck, M. A. 1989. Wetland seed banks. p. 283–305. In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Leck, M. A. 1996. Germination of macrophytes from a Delaware River tidal freshwater wetland. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123:48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leck, M. A. and M. A. Brock. 2000. Ecological and evolutionary trends in wetlands: evidence from seeds and seed banks in New South Wales, Australia and New Jersey, USA. Plant Species Biology 15:97–112. (Corrigendum 16: 183–184).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leck, M. A. and C. F. Leck. 1998. A ten-year seed bank study of old field succession in central New Jersey. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 125:11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leck, M. A. and R. L. Simpson. 1987. Seed bank of a freshwater tidal wetland: turnover and relationship to vegetation change. American Journal of Botany 74:360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leck, M. A. and R. L. Simpson. 1994. Tidal freshwater zonation: seed and seedling dynamics. Aquatic Botany 47:61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leck, M. A. and R. L. Simpson. 1995. Ten-year seed bank and vegetation dynamics of a tidal freshwater marsh. American Journal of Botany 82:1547–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leck, M. A., R. L. Simpson, D. F. Whigham, and C. F. Leck. 1988. Plants of the Hamilton Marshes: a Delaware River freshwater tidal wetland. Bartonia 54:1–17.Google Scholar
  36. Magee, T. K., T. L. Ernst, M. E. Kentula, and K. A. Dwire. 1999. Floristic comparison of freshwater wetlands in an urbanizing environment. Wetlands 19:517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McKnight, S. K. 1992. Transplanted seed bank response to draw-down time in a created wetland in east Texas. Wetlands 12:79–90.Google Scholar
  38. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Nathan, R. and H. C. Muller-Landau. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:278–285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nilsson, C., M. Gardfjell, and G. Grelsson. 1991. Importance of hydrochory in structuring plant communities along rivers. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:2631–2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. NJDOT. 1987. “Trenton Complex” I-195 295, 29 & 129. p. 1–53. In Wetland Mitigation Plan. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  42. NJDOT. 1996. Duck Island Wetlands Project—Trenton Complex I (195, 1295, NJ 29, NJ129). Fact sheet (distributed June). New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Odland, A. 1997. Development of vegetation in created wetlands in western Norway. Aquatic Botany 59:45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parker, V. T. and M. A. Leck. 1985. Relationships of seed banks to plant distribution patterns in a freshwater tidal wetland. American Journal of Botany 72:161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pederson, R. L. and A. G. van der Valk. 1984. Vegetation change and seed banks in marshes: ecological and management implications. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 49:271–280.Google Scholar
  46. Pickett, S. T. A. and P. S. White. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Reinartz, J. A. and E. L. Warne. 1993. Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern Wisconsin. Wetlands 13: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhoads, A. F. and W. M. Klein, Jr. 1993. The Vascular Flora of Pennsylvania, Annotated Checklist and Atlas. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  49. Sharp, J. H. 1988. Dynamics. p. 43–53. In T. L. Bryant and J. R. Pennock (eds.) The Delaware Estuary: Rediscovering a Forgotten Resource. The University of Delaware Sea Grant College Program, Newark, DE, USA.Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, R. L., R. E. Good, M. A. Leck, and D. F. Whigham. 1983. The ecology of freshwater tidal wetlands. BioScience 33:255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snyder, D. B. 1997. Special Plants of New Jersey. Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  52. ter Heerdt, G. N. J. and H. J. Drost. 1994. Potential for the development of marsh vegetation from the seed bank after a drawdown. Biological Conservation 67:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson, D. Q., R. L. Stuckey, and E. B. Thompson. 1987. Spread, impact, and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Fisheries and Wildlife Research 2.Google Scholar
  54. Thompson, K. 2000. The functional ecology of seed banks. p. 215–235. In M. Fenner (ed) Seeds: the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. CAB International Publishing, London, England.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, K. and J. P. Grime. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 67:893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thompson, K., J. Bakker, and R. Bekker. 1997. The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density, and Longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, K., R. M. Ceriani, J. P. Bakker, and R. M. Bekker. 2003. Are seed dormancy and persistence in soil related? Seed Science Research 13:(in press).Google Scholar
  58. Ungar, I. A. 1988. A significant seed bank for Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae). Ohio Journal of Science 88:200–202.Google Scholar
  59. van der Valk, A. G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1979. A reconstruction of the recent vegetational history of a prairie marsh, Eagle lake, Iowa, from its seed bank. Aquatic Botany 6:29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van der Valk, A. G. and R. L. Pederson. 1989. Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetation. p. 329–346. In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  63. van der Valk, A. G., R. L. Pederson, and C. B. Davis. 1992. Restoration and creation of freshwater wetlands using seed banks. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vivian-Smith, G. and H. N. Handel. 1996. Freshwater wetland restoration of an abandoned sand mine: seed bank recruitment dynamics and plant colonization. Wetlands 16:185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weiher, E. and P. A. Keddy. 1995. The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73:323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Welling, C. H. and R. L. Becker. 1990. Seed bank dynamics of Lythrum salicaria L.: implications for control of this species in North America. Aquatic Botany 38:303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Whigham, D. F. and R. L. Simpson. 1975. Ecological Studies of the Hamilton Marshes. Progress Report for the Period June 1974-January 1975, Rider College, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  68. Wisheu, I. C. and P. A. Keddy. 1991. Seed banks of a rare wetland plant community: distribution patterns and effects of human-induced disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  70. Zedler, J. B. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:402–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology DepartmentRider UniversityLawrencevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations