, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 1153–1165 | Cite as

Microbial and geochemical responses to organic matter amendments in a created wetland

  • Gregory L. Bruland
  • Curtis J. Richardson
  • W. Lee Daniels


Soil organic matter (OM) is an important feature of natural wetlands (NWs) often lacking in created wetlands (CWs). Some have suggested that OM amendments be used to accelerate development of edaphic conditions in CWs. Our objective was to investigate microbial and geochemical responses to compost amendments at a CW. Five levels of amendments were incorporated into drier and wetter zones of the CW to test two hypotheses: 1) microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and denitrification potential will increase with increasing levels of amendments; and 2) phosphorus (P) sorption will decrease with increasing levels of amendments. Regression indicated that pH, MBC, and P sorption had linear relationships, while bulk density (BD) had an exponential relationship with amendment level. Denitrification enzyme assay (DEA) had highest values at intermediate amendment levels. Analysis of variance indicated amendment effects for BD, MBC, DEA, and P sorption, and wetness effects for pH and MBC. Amendment levels between 60-180 Mg ha1 were ideal for microbial development and denitrification, while not sacrificing P sorption, and would be more logistically and economically feasible than levels of 200–300 Mg ha−1. However, responses to amendments were complex and optimizing amendments for certain functions may detrimentally affect other functions.

Key Words

compost denitrification enzyme assay microbial biomass carbon mitigation organic amendments P sorption soil properties 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, A. S. 1999. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on soil nitrogen availability. Ph.D. Dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Axt, J. R. and M. R. Walbridge. 1999. Phosphate removal capacity of palustrine forested wetlands and adjacent uplands in Virginia. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63:1019–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, D. A., J. E. Perry, and W. L. Daniels 2007. Vegetation dynamics in response to organic matter loading rates in a created freshwater wetland in southeastern Virginia. Wetlands 27:936–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrington, S., D. Chiniere, M. Trigui, and W. Knight. 2002. Compost airflow resistance. Biosystems Engineering 81:433–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishel-Machung, L., R. P. Brooks, S. S. Yates, and K. L. Hoover. 1996. Soil properties of reference wetlands and wetland creation projects in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 16:532–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendfeldt, E. S., J. A. Burger, and W. L. Daniels. 2001. Quality of amended mine soils after 16 years. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:1736–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruland et al., MICROBIAL AND GEOCHEMICAL RESPONSE TO AMENDMENTS 1163 Bergschneider, C. R. 2005. Determining an appropriate organic matter loading rate for a created coastal plain forested wetland. M.S. Thesis. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. http://www. lib.vt.edu/find/etds.php.Google Scholar
  8. Brady, N. C. and R. R. Weil. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soil, 14th Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Bridgham, S. D., Johnston, C. A., and J. P. Schubaurer-Berigan. 2001. P sorption dynamics in soils and coupling with surface and pore water in riverine wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:577–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brookes, P. C., A. Landman, G. Pruden, and D. S. Jenkinson. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid and direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 17:837–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruland, G. L. and C. J. Richardson. 2004a. Hydrologic gradients and topsoil additions affect soil properties of Virginia created wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:2069–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruland, G. L. and C. J. Richardson. 2004b. A Spatially explicit investigation of phosphorus sorption and related soil properties in two riparian forested wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:785–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruland, G. L. and C. J. Richardson. 2005. Spatial variability of soil properties in created, restored and paired natural wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:273–84.Google Scholar
  14. Bruland, G. L. and C. J. Richardson. 2006a. Comparison of soil organic matter in created, restored, and paired natural wetlands in North Carolina. Wetlands Ecology and Management 14:245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruland, G. L. and C. J. Richardson. 2006b. An Assessment of the phosphorus sorption capacity of wetlands in the Painter Creek Watershed, Minnesota, USA. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 171:169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruland, G. L., C. J. Richardson, and S. C. Whalen. 2006. Spatial variability of denitrification potential and related soil properties in created, restored and paired natural wetlands. Wetlands 26:1042–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cogger, C. G. 2005. Potential compost benefits for restoration of soils disturbed by urban development. Compost Science and Utilization 13:243–51.Google Scholar
  18. Cummings, A. R. 1999. An analysis of palustrine mitigation wetlands in the Virginia Coastal Plain. MS, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Daniels, W. L., G. Fajardo, C. R. Bergschneider, J. E. Perry, R. G. Whittecar, A. D. Despres, and G. M. Fitch. 2005. Effects of soil amendments and other practices upon the success of the Virginia Department of Transportation’s non-tidal wetland mitigation efforts. Virginia Department of Transportation, Virginia TransportationResearchCouncil, Charlottesville,VA,USA,VTRC05-CR25. http://www.cses.vt.edu/revegetation/Papers%20PDF/ 2005%20VDOT%20Wetland%20Study%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  20. Darke, A. K. and M. R. Walbridge. 2000. Al and Fe biogeochemistry in a floodplain forest: Implication for P retention. Biogeochemistry 51:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan, C. P. and P. M. Groffman. 1994. Comparing microbial parameters in natural and constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Egelkraut, T. M., D. E. Kissel, and M. L. Cabrera. 2000. Effect of soil texture on nitrogen mineralized from cotton residues and compost. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:1518–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fang, M., J. W. C. Wong, K. K. Ma, and M. H. Wong. 1999. Cocomposting of sewage sludge and coal fly ash: nutrient transformations. Bioresource Technology 67:19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fox, T. R., N. B. Comerford, and W. W. McFee. Phosphorus and aluminum release from a spodic horizon mediated by organic acids. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54:1441–47.Google Scholar
  25. Gibson, K. D., J. B. Zedler, and R. Langis. 1994. Limited response of cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) to soil amendments in a constructed marsh. Ecological Applications 4:757–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hendershot, W. H., H. Lalande, and M. Duquette. 1993. Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. p. 141–145.In M. R. Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Hunter, R. G. and S. P. Faulkner. 2001. Denitrification potential in restored and natural bottomland hardwood wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:1865–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyman, M. R. and D. J. Arp. 1987. Quantification and removal of some contaminating gases from acetylene used to study gasutilizing enzymes and microorganisms. Applied Environmental Microbiology 53:298–303.Google Scholar
  29. Kaiser, K. and W. Zech. 1996. Nitrate, sulfate, and biophosphate retention in acid forest soils affected by natural dissolved organic carbon. Journal of Environmental Quality 25:1325–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khaleel, R., K. R. Reddy, and M. R. Overcash. 1981. Changes in soil physical properties due to organic waste applications: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 10:133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang, Y., J. J. Leonard, J. J. R. Feddes, and W. B. McGill. 1999. Nitrogen dynamics of composting. p. 357.In P. R. Warman and B. R. Taylor (eds.) Proceedings of the International Composting Symposium, Volume 1. Halifax/Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Martinez, J. M. A. and L. Otten. 1999. Co-composting of municipal solid waste manures, and sugar cane waste using a static pile system. p. 71.In P. R. Warman and B. R. Taylor (eds.) Proceedings of the International Composting Symposium, Volume 1. Halifax/Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. McGuckin, R. L., M. A. Eitman, and K. Das. 1999. Pressure drop through raw food waste compost containing synthetic bulking agents. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 72:375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noon, K. F. 1996. A model of created wetland primary succession. Landscape and Urban Planning 34:97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Halloran, I. P. O. 1993. Total and organic phosphorus. p. 216–217.In M. R. Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Ohno, T. and B. S. Crannell. 1996. Green and animal manurederived dissolved organic matter effects on phosphorus sorption. Journal of Environmental Quality 25:1137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohno, T. and M. S. Erich. 1997. Inhibitory effects of crop residues-derived organic ligands on phosphate adsorption kinetics. Journal of Environmental Quality 26:889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richardson, C. J. 1985. Mechanisms controlling phosphorus retention capacity in freshwater wetlands. Science 228:1424–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson, C. J. and P. Vaithiyanathan. 1995. Phosphorus sorption characteristics of Everglades soils along a eutrophication gradient. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59:1782–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaffer, P. W. and T. L. Ernst. 1999. Distribution of SOM in freshwater wetlands in the Portland, Oregon area. Wetlands 19:505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shapiro, S. S. and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete set). Biometrika 52:591–611.Google Scholar
  42. Sheldrick, B. H. and H. L. Wang. 1993. Particle size distribution. p. 499–511.In M. R. Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, S. M., S. Newman, P. B. Garrett, and J. A. Leeds. 2001. Differential effects of surface and peat fire on soil constituents in a degraded wetland of the northern Florida Everglades. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:1998–2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stauffer, A. L. and R. P. Brooks. 1997. Plant and soil responses to salvaged marsh surface and organic matter amendments at a created wetland in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 17:90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stolt, M. H., M. H. Genthner, W. L. Daniels, V. A. Groover, S. Nagle, and K. C. Haering. 2000. Comparison of soil and other environmental conditions in constructed and adjacent palustrine reference wetlands. Wetlands 20:671–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tejada, M. and J. L. Gonzalez. 2008. Influence of two organic amendments on the soil physical properties, soil losses, sediments, and runoff water quality. Geoderma 145:325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tiedje, J. M. 1982. Denitrification. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Underwood, A. J. 1997. Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  49. Walbridge, M. R. and J. P. Struthers. 1993. Phosphorus retention in non-tidal palustrine forested wetlands of the Mid-Atlantic region. Wetlands 13:84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker, C. W. and R. D. Shannon. 2006. Nitrate and phosphate removal effects of compost amendments in wetland mesocosms. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 49:1773–78.Google Scholar
  51. Whalen, S. C. 2000. Nitrous oxide emission from an agricultural soil fertilized with liquid swine water or constituents. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:781–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Whittecar, G. R. and W. L. Daniels. 1999. Use of hydrogeomorphic concepts to design created wetlands in southeastern Virginia. Geomorphology 31:355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu, K. and W. H. Patrick. 2003. Redox range with minimum nitrous oxide and methane production in a rice soil under different pH. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67:1952–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zedler, J. B. and J. C. Calloway. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology 7:69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory L. Bruland
    • 1
  • Curtis J. Richardson
    • 2
  • W. Lee Daniels
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management College of Tropical Agriculture and Human ResourcesUniversity of Hawai’i MānoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Duke University Wetland Center Nicholas School of the EnvironmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences 0404Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations