, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 81–91 | Cite as

Effects of plant community and phosphorus loading rate on constructed wetland performance in Florida, USA



We evaluated the effectiveness of constructed wetlands with varying plant communities for phosphorus (P) reduction from the Everglades Agricultural Area runoff in south Florida. Weekly or biweekly water samples from the inflow and outflow regions of 11 test cells (2,000 m2) were analyzed for various forms of P and other selected water quality variables between January 2002 and August 2004. Test cells located at the north site received water with a high average total P (TP) concentration (72 μg L−1), while test cells located at the south site received water with a lower average TP concentration (43 μg L−1). These test cells were dominated by an emergent vascular plant-cattail (Typha latifolia), submerged aquatic vegetation or SAV (Najas guadalupensis, Chara sp., Ceratophyllum demersum, and Hydrilla verticillata), or algal periphyton (mixed with Eleocharis cellulosa and Utricularia spp. in the south site only). Under a constant hydraulic loading rate (9.27 m yr−1), these test cells removed P effectively, with removal efficiencies of 56%–65% at the north site and 35%–62% at the south site. The mass removal rate and rate constant at the north site were also higher than at the south site. Soluble reactive P (SRP) and particulate P were the major forms at inflow and were removed effectively by all of the test cells. The removal of dissolved organic P was significant (∼60%) in the cattail and periphyton test cells, but no removal was detected in the SAV test cells. At the north site, P removal efficiency of the cattail test cells was slightly higher than that of the SAV test cells. At the south site, periphyton test cells were the best performers. The removal of SRP was positively correlated with the removal of calcium in the majority of the test cells, pointing to the potential importance of co-precipitation of calcium carbonate and SRP. Direct plant uptake, wetland filtering, microbial degradation, and co-precipitation with calcium carbonate were mechanisms thought to be responsible for P removal in these wetlands. Outflow TP concentration, an important measure for restoration performance, increased continuously with the increases in the TP mass loading rate at the north site, but peaked at approximately 30 μg L−1 when the TP mass loading rate reached 0.5 g m−2 yr−1 at the south site.

Key Words

calcium cattail hydraulic loading rate periphyton-based stormwater treatment area removal efficiency submerged aquatic vegetation test cells total phosphorus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, twentieth edition. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Barko, J. W. and W. F. James. 1997. Effects of submerged macrophytes on nutrient dynamics, sedimentation, and resuspension. p. 197–214. In E. Jeppesen, M. Søndergaard, M. Søndergaard, and K. Christoffersen (eds.) The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, Ecological Studies, Volume 131. Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Bays, J. S., R. L. Knight, L. Wenkert, R. Clarke, and S. Gong. 2001. Progress in the research and demonstration of Everglades periphyton-based stormwater treatment areas. Water Science and Technology 44: 123–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beman, J. M., K. R. Arrigo, and P. A. Matson. 2005. Agricultural runoff fuels large phytoplankton blooms in vulnerable areas of the ocean. Science 434: 211–14.Google Scholar
  5. Boavida, M. J. and R. G. Wetzel. 1998. Inhibition of phosphatase activity by dissolved humic substances and hydrolytic reactivation by natural ultraviolet light. Freshwater Biology 40: 285–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brix, H. 1994. Function of macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology 29: 71–78.Google Scholar
  7. Brix, H. and H.-H. Schierup. 1989. The use of aquatic macrophytes in water-pollution control. Ambio 18: 100–07.Google Scholar
  8. Carignan, R. and J. Kalf. 1980. Phosphorus sources for aquatic weeds: water or sediments? Science 207: 987–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, S. R., N. F. Caraco, D. L. Correll, R. W. Howarth, A. N. Sharpley, and V. H. Smith. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8: 559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chimney, M. J. and G. Goforth. 2001. Environmental impacts to the Everglades ecosystem: a historical perspective and restoration strategies. Water Science and Technology 44: 93–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chimney, M. J. and G. Goforth. 2006. History and description of the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project, a subtropical constructed wetland in south Florida (USA). Ecological Engineering 27: 268–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coveney, M. F., D. L. Stites, E. F. Lowe, L. E. Battoe, and R. Conrow. 2002. Nutrient removal from eutrophic lake water by wetland filtration. Ecological Engineering 19: 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeBusk, T. A., K. A. Grace, F. E. Dierberg, S. D. Jackson, M. J. Chimney, and B. Gu. 2004. An investigation of the lower limits of phosphorus removal in treatment wetlands: mesocosm testing of shallow, limerock-substrate wetland. Ecological Engineering 23: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dierberg, F. E., T. A. DeBusk, S. D. Jackson, M. J. Chimney, and K. Pietro. 2001. Submerged aquatic vegetation-based treatment wetlands for removing phosphorus from agricultural runoff: response to hydraulic and nutrient loading. Water Research 36: 1409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dierberg, F. E., T. A. DeBusk, J. Potts, and B. Gu. 2002. Biological uptake vs. coprecipitation of soluble reactive phosphorus by ‘P-enriched’ and ‘P-deficient’ Najas guadalupensis in hard and soft waters. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 28: 1865–70.Google Scholar
  16. Dodds, W. K. 2003. The role of periphyton in phosphorus retention in shallow freshwater aquatic systems. Journal of Phycology 39: 840–49.Google Scholar
  17. Gaiser, E. E., L. J. Scinto, J. H. Richards, K. Jayachandran, D. L. Childers, J. C. Trexler, and R. D. Jones. 2004. Phosphorus in periphyton mats provides the best metric for detecting low-level P enrichment in an oligotrophic wetland. Water Research 38: 507–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gersberg, R. M., B. V. Elkins, S. R. Lyon, and C. R. Goldman. 1986. Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands. Water Research 20: 363–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gu, B., T. A. DeBusk, F. E. Dierberg, M. J. Chimney, K. C. Pietro, and T. Aziz. 2001. Phosphorus removal from Everglades agricultural area runoff by submerged aquatic vegetation/limerock treatment technology: an overview of research. Water Science and Technology 44: 101–08.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Juston, J. and T. A. DeBusk. 2006. Phosphorus mass load and outflow concentration relationships in stormwater treatment areas for Everglades restoration. Ecological Engineering 26: 206–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kadlec, R. H. 2005. Phosphorus removal in emergent free surface wetlands. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 40: 293–306.Google Scholar
  22. Kadlec, R. H. and R. L. Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Kao, J. T., J. E. Titus, and W. X. Zhu. 2003. Differential nitrogen and phosphorus retention by five wetland plant species. Wetlands 23: 979–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleiner, J. 1988. Coprecipitation of phosphorus with calcite in lake water: a laboratory experiment modeling phosphorus removal with calcite in Lake Constance. Water Research 22: 1259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuhn, N. L., I. A. Mendelssohn, K. L. McKee, B. Lorenzen, H. Brix, and S. Miao. 2002. Root phosphatase activity in Cladium jamaicense and Typha domingensis grown in Everglades soil at ambient and elevated phosphorus levels. Wetlands 22: 794–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCormick, P. V., P. S. Rawlik, K. Lurding, E. P. Smith, and F. H. Sklar. 1996. Periphyton-water quality relationships along a nutrient gradient in the northern Florida Everglades. Journal of North American Benthological Society 15: 433–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCormick, P. V., R. B. E. Shuford, III, and M. J. Chimney. 2006. Periphyton as a potential phosphorus sink in the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project. Ecological Engineering 27: 279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitsch, W. J., J. K. Cronk, X. Wu, and R. W. Nairn. 1995. Phosphorus retention in constructed freshwater riparian marshes. Ecological Applications 5: 830–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moran, M. A. and R. G. Zepp. 1997. Role of photoreactions in the formation of biologically labile compounds from dissolved organic matter. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 1307–16.Google Scholar
  30. Murphy, T. P., K. J. Halland, and I. Yesaki. 1983. Coprecipitation of phosphate with calcite in a naturally eutrophic lake. Limnology and Oceanography 28: 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neal, C. 2001. The potential for phosphorus pollution remediation by calcite precipitation in UK fresh waters. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 5: 119–31.Google Scholar
  32. Newman, J. M. and T. Lynch. 2001. The Everglades Nutrient Removal Project test cells: STA optimization—status of the research at the north site. Water Science and Technology 44: 117–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Newman, S., P. V. McCormick, and J. G. Backus. 2003. Phosphatase activity as an early warning indicator of wetland eutrophication: problems and prospects. Journal of Applied Phycology 15: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman, S. and K. Pietro. 2001. Phosphorus storage and release in response to flooding: implications for Everglades stormwater treatment areas. Ecological Engineering 18: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nungesser, M. K. and M. J. Chimney. 2001. Evaluation of phosphorus reduction in a south Florida treatment wetland. Water Science and Technology 44: 109–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Otsuki, A. and R. G. Wetzel. 1972. Coprecipitation of phosphate with carbonates in a marl lake. Limnology and Oceanography 17: 763–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perniel, M., R. Ruan, and B. Martinez. 1998. Nutrient removal from a stormwater detention pond using duck weed. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 14: 605–09.Google Scholar
  38. Rattray, M. R., C. Howard-Williams, and J. M. A. Brown. 1991. Sediment and water as sources of nitrogen and phosphorus for submerged rooted aquatic macrophytes. Aquatic Botany 40: 225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson, C. J., S. Qian, C. B. Craft, and R. G. Quails. 1997. Predictive models for phosphorus retention in wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 4: 159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scholz, M., R. Harrington, P. Carroll, and A. Mustafa. 2007. The integrated constructed wetlands (ICW) concept. Wetlands 27: 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scholz, M. and B.-H. Lee. 2005. Constructed wetlands: a review. International Journal of Environmental Studies 62: 421–47. <http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713642046~db=all~tab=issueslist~branches=62-v62>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sklar, F. H., M. J. Chimney, S. Newman, P. McCormick, D. Gawlik, S. Miao, C. McVoy, S. Said, J. Newman, C. Coronado, G. Cozier, M. Korvela, and K. Rutchey. 2005. The ecological-societal underpinnings of Everglades restoration. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 3: 161–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stumm, W. and J. J. Morgan. 1981. Aquatic Chemistry: An Introduction Emphasizing Chemical Equilibria and Natural Waters, second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, S., E. E. Gaiser, M. Gantar, A. Pinowska, L. J. Scinto, and R. D. Jones. 2002. Growth of calcareous epilithic mats in the margin of natural and polluted hydrosystems: phosphorus removal implications in the C-111 Basin, Florida Everglades, USA. Lake and Reservoir Management 18: 324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vermaat, J. E. and M. K. Hanif. 1995. Performance of common duckweed species (Lemnaceae) and the waterfern Azolla filiculoldes on different types of waste water. Water Resources 29: 27–34.Google Scholar
  46. Vymazal, J. 1988. The use of periphyton communities for nutrient removal from polluted streams. Hydrobiologia 166: 225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weidemann, A. D., T. T. Bannister, S. W. Efler, and D. L. Johnson. 1985. Particulate and optical properties during CaCO3 precipitation in Otisco Lake. Limnology and Oceanography 30: 1078–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White, J. R., K. R. Reddy, and J. Majer-Newman. 2006. Hydrologic and vegetation effects on water column phosphorus in wetland mesocosms. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70: 1242–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Everglades DivisionSouth Florida Water Management DistrictWest Palm BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations