Wetlands

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 487–501 | Cite as

The effects of water-level fluctuations on vegetation in a Lake Huron wetland

Article

Abstract

The diversity and resultant habitat value of wetland plant communities in the Laurentian Great Lakes are dependent on water-level fluctuations of varying frequency and amplitude. Conceptual models have described the response of vegetation to alternating high and low lake levels, but few quantitative studies have documented the changes that occur. In response to recent concerns over shoreline management activities during an ongoing period of low lake levels in lakes Superior, Michigan, and Huron that began in 1999, we analyzed a quantitative data set from Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron collected from 1988 to 1993 during a previous lake-level decline to provide the needed information on vegetation responses. Transects were established that followed topographic contours with water-level histories that differed across a six-year period, ranging from barely flooded to dewatered for varying numbers of years to never dewatered. Percent cover data from randomly placed quadrats along those transects were analyzed to assess floristic changes over time, document development of distinct plant assemblages, and relate the results to lake-level changes. Ordinations showed that plant assemblages sorted out by transects that reflect differing water-level histories. Distinction of assemblages was maintained for at least three years, although the composition and positioning of those assemblages changed as lake levels changed. We present a model that uses orthogonal axes to plot transects by years out of water against distance above water and sorted those transects in a manner that matched ordination results. The model suggests that vegetation response following dewatering is dependent on both position along the water level/soil moisture gradient and length of time since dewatering. This study provided quantitative evidence that lake-level fluctuations drive vegetative change in Great Lakes wetlands, and it may assist in making decisions regarding shoreline management in areas that historically supported wetlands.

Key Words

drawdown Great Lakes hydrodynamic model plant communities Schoenoplectus pungens Typha angustifolia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Albert, D. 2005. The impacts of various types of vegetation removal on Great Lakes wetlands of Saginaw Bay and Grand Traverse Bay. Michigan Natural Features Inventory Report to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Amsberry, L., M. A. Baker, P. J. Ewanchuk, and M. D. Bertness. 2000. Clonal integration and the expansion of Phragmites australis. Ecological Applications 4: 1110–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baedke, S. J. and T. A. Thompson. 2000. A 4,700-year record of lake level and isostasy for Lake Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research 26: 416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkett, V. R., D. A. Wilcox, R. Stottlemyer, W. Barrow, D. B. Fagre, J. Baron, J. Price, J. L. Nielson, C. Allen, D. L. Peterson, G. Ruggerone, and T. Doyle. 2005. Nonlinear dynamics in ecosystem response to climatic change: case studies and management implications. Ecological Complexity 2: 357–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Day, R. T., P. A. Keddy, and J. McNeill. 1988. Fertility and disturbance gradients: a summary model for riverine marsh vegetation. Ecology 69: 1044–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Environment Canada (D. A. Wilcox, N. Patterson, T. A. Thompson, D. Albert, R. Weeber, J. McCracken, T. Whillans, and J. Gannon, contributors). 2002. Where Land Meets Water: Understanding Wetlands of the Great Lakes. Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Fraser, G. S., C. E. Larsen, and N. C. Hester. 1990. Climatic control of lake levels in Lake Michigan and Lake Huron basins. Geological Society of America Special Paper 251: 75–89.Google Scholar
  8. Grace, J. B. 1987. The impact of preemption on competitive displacement between two Typha species along a water-depth gradient. Ecological Monographs 57: 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, H. J., G. Fewless, M. Milligan, and W. Jownson. 1981. Recovery processes and habitat quality in a freshwater coastal marsh following a natural disturbance. p. 363–79. In B. Richardson (ed.) Selected Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management. Freshwater Society, Navarre, MN, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Haslam, S. M. 1972. Biological flora of the British Isles, no. 128, Phragmites communis Trinidad. Journal of Ecology 60: 585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hejny, S. and Z. Hourodova. 1987. Plant adaptations to shallow water habitats. p. 157–66. In J. Pokorny, O. Lhotsky, and P. Denny (eds.) Waterplants and Wetland Processes. Archive fur Hydrobiologie, Beiheft 27. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, N. M., P. A. Keddy, and I. C. Wisheu. 1998. A hydrological model for predicting the effects of dams on the shoreline vegetation of lakes and reservoirs. Environmental Management 22: 723–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaworski, E., C. N. Raphael, P. J. Mansfield, and B. B. Williamson. 1979. Impact of Great Lakes water level fluctuations on coastal wetlands. Department of Geography-Geology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Keddy, P. A. 1984a. Plant zonation on lakeshores in Nova Scotia: a test of the resource specialization hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 72: 797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keddy, P. A. 1984b. Quantifying a within-lake gradient of wave energy in Gillfillan Lake, Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 301–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keddy, P. A. 2000. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Keddy, P. A. and L. H. Fraser. 2000. Four general principles for the management and conservation of wetlands in large lakes: the role of water levels, nutrients, competitive hierarchies, and centrifugal organization. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 5: 177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keddy, P. A. and A. A. Reznicek. 1982. The role of seed banks in the persistence of Ontario’s coastal plain flora. American Journal of Botany 69: 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keddy, P. A. and A. A. Reznicek. 1986. Great Lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. Journal of Great Lakes Research 12: 25–36.Google Scholar
  20. Kozlowski, T. T. (ed.). Flooding and Plant Growth. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Maynard, L. and D. A. Wilcox. 1997. Coastal Wetlands. State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference Proceedings. Environment Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada.and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL, USA. Report EPA 905-R-97-015b.Google Scholar
  22. McCune, B. and J. Grace. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. Mjm Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.Google Scholar
  23. MDEQ. 2006. Report on the impacts of beach maintenance and removal of vegetation under Act 14 of 2003. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  24. NOAA. 2007a. Historic Great Lakes water-level data, monthly means, station 9075035, Essexville, Lake Huron, MI, USA. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA, http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/data_menu_. shtml?bdate=19600101&bdate_Month=0&edate=19941231& edate_Month= 11&wl_sensor_hist=W5&relative=&datum=0& unit=0&shift=s&stn=9075035+Essexville%2C+MI&type=Historic +Great+Lakes+Water+Level+Data&format=View+Data . Accessed 9 April 2007.Google Scholar
  25. NOAA. 2007b. Historic Great Lakes water-level data, hourly, station 9075035, Essexville, Lake Huron, MI, USA. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA, http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/data_menu.shtml?bdate= 19880830&bdate_Month=7&edate=19880830&edate_Month=7&wl_ sensor_hist=W2&relative=&datum=0&unit=0&shift=s&stn=9075035+ Essexville%2C+MI&type=Historic+Great+Lakes+Water+Level+Data& format=View+Data. Accessed 9 April 2007.Google Scholar
  26. Odland, A. and R. del Moral. 2002. Thirteen years of wetland vegetation succession following a permanent drawdown, Myrkdalen Lake, Norway. Plant Ecology 162: 185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Painter, S. and P. A. Keddy. 1992. Effects of water-level regulation on shoreline marshes: a predictive model applied to the Great Lakes Environment Canada. National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Poiani, K. A. and W. C. Johnson. 1993. A spatial simulation model of hydrology and vegetation dynamics in semi-permanent prairie wetlands. Ecological Applications 3: 279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quinlan, C. and G. Mulamoottil. 1987. The effects of water-level fluctuations on three Lake Ontario shoreline marshes. Canadian Water Resources Journal 12: 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 2445–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sculthorpe, C. D. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants (reprinted in 1985). Edward Arnold, London, UK.Google Scholar
  32. Seabloom, E. W., K. A. Maloney, and A. G. van der Valk. 2001. Constraints on the establishment of plants along a fluctuating water-depth gradient. Ecology 82: 2216–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seabloom, E. W., A. G. van der Valk, and K. A. Moloney. 1998. The role of water depth and soil temperature in determining initial composition of prairie wetland coenoclines. Plant Ecology 138: 203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spence, D. H. N. 1982. The zonation of plants in freshwater lakes. Advances in Ecological Research 12: 37–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson, T. A. 1992. Beach-ridge development and lake-level variation in southern Lake Michigan. Sedimentary Geology 80: 305–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uzarski, D. G. and T. M. Burton. 2005. The effects of coastal wetland fragmentation on fish and invertebrate communities. Grand Valley State University and Michigan State University Report to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  37. van der Valk, A. G. 2000. Vegetation dynamics and models. p. 125–61. In H. R. Murkin, A. G. van der Valk, and W. R. Clark (eds.) Prairie Wetland Ecology: The Contribution of the Marsh Ecology Research Program. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  38. van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1980. The impact of a natural drawdown on the growth of four emergent species in a prairie glacial marsh. Aquatic Botany 9: 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Welling, C. H., R. L. Pederson, and A. G. van der Valk. 1988. Recruitment from the seed bank and the development of zonation of emergent vegetation during a drawdown in a prairie wetland. Journal of Ecology 76: 483–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilcox, D. A. 1995. The role of wetlands as nearshore habitat in Lake Huron. p. 223–45. In M. Munawar, T. Edsall, and J. Leach (eds.) The Lake Huron Ecosystem: Ecology, Fisheries and Management. Ecovision World Monograph Series, S.P.B. Academic Publishing, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  42. Wilcox, D. A., K. P. Kowalski, H. L. Hoare, M. L. Carlson, and H. N. Morgan. 2008. Cattail invasion of sedge/grass meadows in Lake Ontario: photointerpretation analysis of sixteen wetlands over five decades. Journal of Great Lakes Research 34:(in press).Google Scholar
  43. Wilcox, D. A. and E. Krygier, Jr. 2002. Private beach or emerging wetland? The controversy over grooming beaches exposed by low water. Great Lakes Advisor Sept./Oct.:8–9.Google Scholar
  44. Wilcox, D. A., N. B. Pavlovic, and M. L. Mueggler. 1985. Selected ecological characteristics of Scirpus cyperinus and its role as an invader of disturbed wetlands. Wetlands 5: 87–98.Google Scholar
  45. Wilcox, D. A. and Y. Xie. 2007. Predicting wetland plant community responses to proposed water-level-regulation plans for Lake Ontario: GIS-based modeling. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33: 751–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wooten, J. W. 1986. Variations in leaf characteristics of six species of Sagittaria (Alismataceae) caused by various water levels. Aquatic Botany 23: 321–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Wetland Scientists 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological Survey-Great Lakes Science CenterAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations