Wetlands

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 125–140 | Cite as

Recent sedimentation patterns within the central Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana

  • Cliff R. Hupp
  • Charles R. Demas
  • Daniel E. Kroes
  • Richard H. Day
  • Thomas W. Doyle
Article

Abstract

Sediment deposition and storage are important functions of forested bottomlands, yet documentation and interpretation of sedimentation processes in these systems remain incomplete. Our study was located in the central Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana, a distributary of the Mississippi River and contains the largest contiguously forested riparian wetland in North America, which suffers from high sedimentation in some areas and hypoxia in others. We established 20 floodplain transects reflecting the distribution of depositional environments within the central Basin and monitored general and local sediment deposition patterns over a three-year period (2000–2003). Deposition rate, sediment texture, bulk density, and loss on ignition (LOI, percent organic material) were determined near or just above artificial markers (clay pads) located at each station per transect. Transect mean sedimentation rates ranged from about 2 to 42 mm/yr, mean percent organic material ranged from about 7% to 28%, mean percent sand (> 63 μ) ranged from about 5% to 44%, and bulk density varied from about 0.4 to 1.3. The sites were categorized into five statistically different clusters based on sedimentation rate; most of these could be characterized by a suite of parameters that included hydroperiod, source(s) of sediment-laden water, hydraulic connectivity, flow stagnation, and local geomorphic setting along transect (levee versus backswamp), which lead to distinct spatial sedimentation patterns. Sites with low elevation (long hydroperiod), high hydraulic connectivity to multiple sources of sediment-laden water, and hydraulic damming (flow stagnation) featured the highest amounts of sediment trapping; the converse in any of these factors typically diminished sediment trapping. Based on aerial extent of clusters, the study area potentially traps 6,720,000 Mg of sediment annually, of which, 820,000 Mg represent organic materials. Thus, the Atchafalaya Basin plays a substantial role in lowland sediment (and associated contaminant) storage, including the sequestration of carbon. Findings on local sedimentation patterns may aid in management of flow to control sediment deposition and reduce hypoxia.

Key Words

floodplain connectivity forested wetlands hydroperiod sediment trapping 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Arcement, G. J., Jr. 1988. Discharge and suspended-sediment data for the lower Atchafalaya River, Atchafalaya Bay, and Wax Lake Outlet, Louisiana, 1980–82: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 87-553, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Baumann, R., J. W. Day, and C. Miller. 1984. Mississippi deltaic wetland survival: sedimentation versus coastal subsidence. Science 224: 1093–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedetti, M. M. 2003. Controls on overbank deposition in the Upper Mississippi River. Geomorphology 56: 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demas, C. R., S. T. Brazelton, and N. J. Powell. 2001. The Atchafalaya Basin — river of trees. U. S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 021-02, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Dunne, T., L. A. K. Mertes, R. H. Meade, J. E. Richey, and B. R. Forsberg. 1998. Exchanges of sediment between the floodplain and channel of the Amazon River, in Brazil. Geological Society of America Bulletin 110: 450–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisk, H. N. 1952. Geological investigation of the Atchafalaya Basin and the problem of Mississippi River diversion. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Guy, H. P. 1969. Laboratory Theory and Methods for Sediment Analysis. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water — Resources Investigations, Book 5, C1, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Horowitz, A. J. 1991. A Primer on Sediment-trace Element Chemistry. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Hunt, C. B. 1967. Physiography of the United States. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Hupp, C. R. 2000. Hydrology, geomorphology, and vegetation of Coastal Plain rivers in the southeastern United States. Hydrological Processes 14: 2991–3010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hupp, C. R. and D. E. Bazemore. 1993. Temporal and spatial patterns of wetland sedimentation, West Tennessee. Journal of Hydrology 141: 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hupp, C. R., C. R. Demas, R. H. Day, and D. E. Kroes. 2002. Sediment trapping and carbon sequestration in the Atchafalaya River Basin, Louisiana. Bulletin of the Society of Wetland Scientists Supplement. 19: S-40.Google Scholar
  13. Hupp, C. R., M. R. Walbridge, and B. G. Lockaby. 2005. Fluvial geomorphic processes and landforms, water quality and nutrients of bottomland hardwood forests of southeastern USA. p. 37–56. In L. H. Frederickson, S. L. King, and R. M. Kaminski (eds.) Ecology and Management of Bottomland Hardwood Systems. University of Missouri, Gaylord Laboratory Special Publication No. 10, Puxico, MO, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Hupp, C. R., M. D. Woodside, and T. M. Yanosky. 1993. Sediment and trace element trapping in a forested wetland, Chickahominy River, Virginia. Wetlands 13: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobson, R. B. and D. J. Coleman. 1986. Stratigraphy and recent evolution of Maryland Piedmont flood plains. American Journal of Science 286: 617–37.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobson, R. B. and K. A. Oberg. 1997. Geomorphic changes of the Mississippi River flood plain at Miller City, Illinois, as a result of the flood of 1993. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1120-J, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Kesel, R. H., K. C. Dunne, R. C. McDonald, K. R. Allison, and B. E. Spicer. 1974. Lateral erosion and deposition on the Mississippi River in Louisiana caused by 1973 flooding. Geology 2: 461–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King, S. L., J. P. Shepard, K. Ouchley, J. A. Neal, and K. Ouchley. 2005. Bottomland hardwood forests: past, present, and future. p. 1–17. In L. H. Frederickson, S. L. King, and R. M. Kaminski (eds.) Ecology and Management of Bottomland Hardwood Systems. University of Missouri, Gaylord Laboratory Special Publication No. 10, Puxico, MO, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Kleiss, B. A. 1996. Sediment retention in a bottomland hardwood wetland in eastern Arkansas. Wetlands 16: 321–33.Google Scholar
  20. Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Ludwig, J. A. and J. F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Ludwig, W. 2001. The age of river carbon. Nature 409: 466–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Majersky, S., H. H. Roberts, R. Cunningham, G. P. Kemp, and C. J. John. 1997. Facies development in the Wax Lake Outlet Delta: Present and future trends. BRI Bulletin 50: 50–64.Google Scholar
  24. McManus, J. 2002. The history of sediment flux to Atchafalaya Bay, Louisiana. p. 210–26. In S. J. Jones and L. E. Frostick (eds.) Sediment Flux to Basins: Causes, Controls, and Consequences. The Geological Society of London, London, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Meade, R. H. 1982. Sources, sinks, and storage of river sediments in the Atlantic drainage of the United States. Journal of Geology 90: 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Middelkoop, H. and M. Van der Perk. 1998. Modelling spatial patterns of overbank sedimentation on embanked floodplains. Geografiska Annaler 80A: 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Mossa, J. and H. H. Roberts. 1990. Synergism of riverine and winter storm-related sediment transport processes in Louisiana’s coastal wetlands. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions 40: 635–42.Google Scholar
  29. Nanson, G. C. and J. C. Croke. 1992. A genetic classification of floodplains. Geomorphology 4: 459–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, D. W. and L. E. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 1002–05. In D. L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods-SSSA Book Series 5. Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Noe, G. B. and C. R. Hupp. 2005. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation in floodplains of Atlantic Coastal Plain rivers, USA. Ecological Applications 15: 1178–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patterson, G. G., G. K. Speiran, and B. H. Whetstone. 1985. Hydrology and its effects on distribution of vegetation in Congaree National Monument, South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4256, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Pizzuto, J. E. 1987. Sediment diffusion during overbank flows. Sedimentology 34: 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raymond, P. A. and J. E. Bauer. 2001. Riverine export of aged terrestrial organic matter to the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 409: 497–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberts, H. H., R. D. Adams, R. Cunningham, G. P. Kemp, and S. Majersky. 1980. Evolution of sand-dominant sub-aerial phase, Atchafalaya Delta, Louisiana. AAPG Bulletin 64: 264–79.Google Scholar
  36. Ross, K. M., C. R. Hupp, and A. D. Howard. 2004. Sedimentation in floodplains of selected tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay. American Geophysical Union, Water Science and Application 8: 187–208.Google Scholar
  37. Saucier, R. T. 1994. Geomorphology and quaternary geologic history of the lower Mississippi Valley, Volume 1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, USA.Google Scholar
  38. Schalk, G. K. and R. B. Jacobson. 1997. Scour and sedimentation at six levee-break sites in Missouri from 1993 Missouri River flood. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4110, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Sharitz, R. R. and W. J. Mitsch. 1993. Southern floodplain forests. p. 311–72. In W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht (eds.) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States, Lowland Terrestrial Communities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Shlemon, R. J. 1972. Development of the Atchafalaya Delta, Louisiana — Hydrologic and Geologic Studies of Coastal Louisiana: Report 8, Center for Wetland Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Tye, R. S. and J. H. Coleman. 1989. Evolution of Atchafalaya lucustrine deltas, south-central Louisiana. Sedimentary Geology 65: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. USEPA. 1994. The quality of our nation’s water. Publication 841-S-94-002, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Walling, D. E. and Q. He. 1998. The spatial variability of overbank sedimentation on river floodplains. Geomorphology 24: 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walling, D. E., Q. He, and A. P. Nicholas. 1996. Floodplains as suspended sediment sinks. p. 399–439. In M. G. Anderson, D. E. Walling, and P. D. Bates (eds.) Floodplain Processes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  45. Wells, F. C. and C. R. Demas. 1977. Hydrology and water quality of the Atchafalaya River basin. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Office of Public Works, Water Resources Technical Report no. 14, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  46. Wolman, M. G. 1977. Changing needs and opportunities in the sediment field. Water Resources Research 13: 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cliff R. Hupp
    • 1
  • Charles R. Demas
    • 2
  • Daniel E. Kroes
    • 2
  • Richard H. Day
    • 3
  • Thomas W. Doyle
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyRestonUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations