Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 520–530 | Cite as

A comparative assessment of seedling survival and biomass accumulation for fourteen wetland plant species grown under minor water-depth differences

  • Lauchlan H. FraserEmail author
  • Jason P. Karnezis

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the survival and biomass accumulation of wetland plant species under different water depths in controlled microcosms. In the greenhouse, two-weekold seedlings were randomly assigned to one of seven water-depth treatments (−6, −4, −2, 0, +2, +4, and +6 cm relative to the soil surface) and allowed to grow for six months. Species included five perennial sedges, four perennial and one annual grasses, and two perennial and two annual forbs. Twelve of the species had their lowest biomass and lowest survivorship at water depths greater than 0 cm. The root:shoot ratio, however, did not change across water-depth treatments. Biomass accumulation differed by plant form (sedges>forbs>grasses). Annuals had the greatest biomass values across the widest range of water depths compared to perennials. Of the fourteen plants tested, Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife), one of the two invasive, non-native species tested, had the greatest biomass at water depths from −6 to +2, whereas Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass), the other invasive, had comparatively small mean biomass values. Ranking of biomass between species was highly concordant between non-flooded treatments but not significantly concordant between flooded treatments indicating that plant species have distinct responses to flooding. This research suggests that newly established plant seedlings in wetland restorations should not be submerged, or if submergence is unavoidable, annuals and sedges may be more tolerant of prolonged flooding.

Key Words

wetland restoration flooding hydrology fundamental niche hydrophyte 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Apfelbaum, S. I. and C. E. Sams. 1987. Ecology and control of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Natural Areas Journal 7: 63–69.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, W., R. Brandle, and M. B. Jackson. 1994. Mechanisms of flood tolerance in plants. Acta Botanica Neerlandia 43:307–358.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, A. H., M. S. Egnotovich, and E. Clarke. 2001. Hydrologic change and vegetation of tidal freshwater marshes: field, green-house, and seed-bank experiments. Wetlands 21:519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barendregt, A., M. J. Wassen, and P. P. Schot. 1995. Hydrological systems beyond a nature reserve, the major problem in wetland conservation of Naardermeer. Biological Conservation 72:393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budelsky, R. A. and S. M. Galatowitsch. 1999. Effects of moisture, temperature, and time on seed germination of five wetland Carices: Implications for restoration. Restoration Ecology 7:86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Budelsky, R. and S. M. Galatowitsch. 2000. Effects of water regime and competition on the establishment of a native sedge, Carex lacustris, in restored wetlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 971–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busch, D. E., W. F. Loftus, and O. L. Bass, Jr. 1998. Long-term hydrological effects on marsh plant community structure in the southern everglades. Wetlands 18:230–241.Google Scholar
  8. Casanova, M. T. and M. A. Brock. 2000. How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? Plant Ecology 147:237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, C. A. and R. P. Brooks. 2000. A comparison of the hydrologic characteristics of natural and created mainstem floodplain wetlands in Pennsylvania. Ecological Engineering 14:221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coops, H., F. W. B. van der Brink, and G. van der Velde. 1996. Growth and morphological responses of four helophyte species in an experimental water-depth gradient. Aquatic Botany 54:11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crow, G. E. and C. B. Hellquist. 2000. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Northeastern North America, a Revised and Enlarged Edition of Norman C. Fassett’s A Manual of Aquatic Plants. Vols. 1 and 2. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  12. De Steven, D. and M. M. Toner. 2004. Vegetation of upper coastal plain depression wetlands: environmental templates and wetland dynamics within a landscape framework. Wetlands 24:23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards, A. L., D. W. Lee, and J. H. Richards. 2003. Responses to a fluctuating environment: effects of water depth on growth and biomass allocation in Eleocharis cellulosa Torr. (Cyperaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 81:964–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellison, A. M. and B. L. Bedford. 1995. Response of a wetland vascular plant community to disturbance: a simulation study. Ecological Applications 5:109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Figiel, C. R., B. Collins, and G. Wein. 1995. Variation in survival and biomass of two wetland grasses at different nutrient and water levels over a six week period. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 122:24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser, L. H. and P. A. Keddy. 1997. The role of experimental microcosms in ecological research. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:478–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerritsen, J. and H. S. Greening. 1989. Marsh seed banks of the Okefenokee swamp: effects of hydrologic regime and nutrients. Ecology 70:750–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grace, J. B. 1987. The impact of preemption on the zonation of two Typha species along lakeshores. Ecological Monographs 57:283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111:1169–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammer, D. A. 1997. Creating Freshwater Wetlands, second edition. Lewis Publishers, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Hendry, G. A. F. and J. P. Grime. 1993. Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology: a Laboratory Manual. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Jensen, K. 2004. Dormancy patterns, germination ecology, and seedbank types of twenty temperate fen grassland species. Wetlands 24:152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, W. C., S. E. Boettcher, K. A. Poiani, and G. Guntenspergen. 2004. Influence of weather extremes on the water levels of glaciated prairie wetlands. Wetlands 24:385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keddy, P. A. 1984. Plant zonation on lakeshores in Nova Scotia: a test of the resource specialization hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 72:797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keddy, P. A. 2000. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Keddy, P. A. and T. H. Ellis. 1985. Seedling recruitment of 11 wetland plant species along a water level gradient: shared or distinct responses? Canadian Journal of Botany 63:1876–1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keddy, P. and L. H. Fraser. 2000. Four general principles for the management and conservation of wetlands in large lakes: the role of water levels, nutrients, competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management 5: 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kercher, S. M. and J. B. Zedler. 2004. Flood tolerance in wetland angiosperms: a comparison of invasive and noninvasive species. Aquatic Botany 80:89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lambers, H., F. S. Chapin III, and T. L. Pons. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer-Verlag New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Leck, M. A. 2003. Seed-bank and vegetation development in a created tidal freshwater wetland on the Delaware River, Trenton, New Jersey, USA. Wetlands 23:310–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lempe, J., K. J. Stevens, and R. L. Peterson. 2001. Shoot responses of six Lythraceae species to flooding. Plant Biology 2:186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lenssen, J. P. M., F. B. J. Menting, W. H. van der Putten, and C. W. P. M. Blom. 1999. Effects of sediment type and water level on biomass production of wetland plant species. Aquatic Botany 64:151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lentz, K. A. and W. A. Dunson. 1998. Water level affects growth of endangered northeastern bulrush, Scirpus ancistrochaetus Schuyler. Aquatic Botany 60:213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, R. C. and J. B. Zedler. 2003. Responses of native and invasive wetland plants to hydroperiod and water depth. Plant Ecology 167:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore, H. H., W. A. Niering, L. J. Marasicano, and M. A. Dowdell. 1999. Vegetation change in created emergent wetlands (1988–1996) in Connecticut, U.S.A. Wetlands Ecology and Management 7:177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman, S., J. B. Grace, and J. W. Koebel. 1996. Effects of nutrients and hydroperiod on Typha, Cladium and Eleocharis: Implications for everglades restoration. Ecological Applications 6:774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Otte, M. L. 2001. What is stress to a wetland plant? Environmental and Experimental Botany 46:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Owen, C. R. 1995. Water budget and flow patterns in an urban wetland. Journal of Hydrology 169:171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pezeshki, S. R. 2001. Wetland plant responses to soil flooding. Environmental and Experimental Botany 46:299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, R. L. and R. R. Sharitz. 1986. Seed bank dynamics in a southeastern riverine swamp. American Journal of Botany 73: 1022–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheldon, S. P. 1987. The effects of herbivorous snails on submerged macrophyte communities in Minnesota lakes. Ecology 68:1920–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Spence, D. H. N. 1982. The zonation of freshwater plants. Advances in Ecological Research 12:37–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SPSS. 1998. Systat 8.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, D. Q., R. L. Stuckey, and E. B. Thompson. 1987. Spread and impact and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Research 2:1–55.Google Scholar
  46. Tiner, R. W. 1999. Wetland Indicators: a Guide to Wetland Identification, Delineation, Classification, and Mapping. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  47. van den Brink, F. W. B., G. van der Velde, W. W. Bosman, and H. Coops. 1995. Effects of substrate parameters on growth responses of eight helophyte species in relation to flooding. Aquatic Botany 50:79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van der Valk, A. G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van der Valk, A. G. and C. H. Welling. 1988. The development of zonation in freshwater wetlands: an experimental approach. p. 145–158. In J. H. During, M. J. A. Werger, and H. J. Willems (eds.). Diversity and Pattern in Plant Communities. Academic Publisher. The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  50. van der Valk, A. G., L. Squires, and C. H. Welling. 1994. Assessing the impacts of an increase in water level on wetland vegetation. Ecological Applications 4:535–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van der Valk, A. G., T. L. Bremholm, and E. Gordon. 1999. The restoration of sedge meadows. Seed viability, seed germination requirements, and seedling growth of Carex species. Wetlands 19: 756–764.Google Scholar
  52. Waters, I. and J. M. Shay. 1992. Effect of water depth on population parameters of Typha glauca shoots to a water depth gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:2339–2343.Google Scholar
  53. Weiher, E. and P. A. Keddy. 1995. The assembly of experimental wetland plant-communities. Oikos 73:323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weiher, E., I. C. Wisheu, P. A. Keddy, and D. R. J. Moore. 1996. Establishment, persistence, and management implications of experimental wetland plant communities. Wetlands 16:208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of AkronAkronUSA

Personalised recommendations