Wetlands

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 130–142 | Cite as

A comparison of plant communities in mitigation and reference wetlands in the mid-appalachians

  • Collin K. Balcombe
  • James T. Anderson
  • Ronald H. Fortney
  • James S. Rentch
  • William N. Grafton
  • Walter S. Kordek
Article

Abstract

Wetland destruction has plagued the U.S. for decades, but the need to compensate for these losses has only been embraced within the last 20 years. Because so many compensatory mitigation wetlands have been created, there is a need to assess the function of these valuable ecosystems relative to natural wetlands. The goal of this study was to evaluate the functional equivalency of mitigation wetlands in West Virginia in supporting hydrophytic plant communities. A series of nested quadrats was used to compare plant community structure among eleven mitigation and four naturally occurring reference wetlands. For all species combined, mean total percent cover across all sampling quadrats per wetland was similar between mitigation and reference wetlands. Species richness, evenness, and diversity were greater in mitigation than in reference wetlands. Mean weighted averages of plant communities calculated using cover values and wetland indicator status were similar between mitigation and reference wetlands. There were, however, major differences in species composition. Mitigation sites tended to have more pioneer species, non-native dominants, and species with relatively lower conservation quality. Ordination analyses suggested that compositional differences become smaller as mitigation sites age. Both mitigation and natural wetlands met criteria for hydrophytic vegetation according to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. These data suggest that the mitigation wetlands investigated in this study adequately support hydrophytic vegetation and appear to be developing vegetation similar to reference standards.

Key Words

constructed wetland mitigation wetland man-made wetland reference wetland wetland mitigation wetland management hydrophytic vegetation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, A. M., D. A. Haukos, and J. T. Anderson. 1999. Habitat use by anurans emerging and breeding in playa wetlands. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:759–769.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. T. and L. M. Smith. 1998. Protein and energy production in playas: implications for migratory bird management. Wetlands 18:437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. T. and L. M. Smith. 1999. Carrying capacity and diel use of managed playa wetlands by nonbreeding waterbirds. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:281–291.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. T. and L. M. Smith. 2000. Invertebrate response to moist-soil management of playa wetlands. Ecological Applications 10:550–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreas, B. K. and R. W. Lichvar. 1995. Floristic index for establishing assessment standards: a case study for northern Ohio. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC., USA. Technical Report WRP-DE-8.Google Scholar
  6. Ashworth, S. M. 1997. Comparison between restored and reference sedge meadow wetlands in south-central Wisconsin. Wetlands 17:518–527.Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson, R. B. and J. Cairns, Jr. 2001. Plant decomposition and litter accumulation in depressional wetlands: functional performance of two wetland age classes that were created via excavation. Wetlands 21:354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkinson, R. B., J. E. Perry, E. Smith, and J. Cairns, Jr. 1993. Use of created wetland delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands 13:185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balcombe, C. K. 2003. An evaluation of vegetation and wildlife communities in mitigation and natural wetlands of West Virginia. M. S. Thesis. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Bishel-Machung, L., R. P. Brooks, S. S. Yates, and K. L. Hoover. 1996. Soil properties of reference wetlands and wetland creation projects in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 16:532–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boutin, C. and P. A. Keddy. 1993. A functional classification of wetland plants. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report WRP-DE-4.Google Scholar
  13. Brinson, M. M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, S. C. 1999. Vegetation similarity and avifaunal food value of restored and natural marshes in northern New York. Restoration Ecology 7:56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, S. C. and C. R. Smith. 1998. Breeding season bird use of recently restored versus natural wetlands in New York. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:1480–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, D. A., C. A. Cole, and R. P. Brooks. 2002. A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 10:41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, V., M. K. Garrett, and P. T. Gammon. 1988. Wetland boundary determination in the Great Dismal Swamp using weighted averages. Water Resources Bulletin 24:297–306.Google Scholar
  18. Castelli, R. M., J. C. Chambers, and R. J. Tausch. 2000. Soil-plant relations along a soil-water gradient in great basin riparian meadows. Wetlands 20:251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole, C. A. and R. P. Brooks. 2000. A comparison of the hydrologic characteristics of natural and created mainstem floodplain wetlands in Pennsylvania. Ecological Engineering 14:221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cole, C. A., R. P. Brooks, and D. H. Wardrop. 2001. Assessing the relationship between biomass and soil organic matter in created wetlands of central Pennsylvania, USA. Ecological Engineering 17:423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cole, C. A. and D. Shafer. 2002. Section 404 wetland mitigation and permit success criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999. Environmental Management 30:508–515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Confer, S. R. and W. A. Niering. 1992. Comparison of created and natural freshwater emergent wetlands in Connecticut, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-79/31.Google Scholar
  24. Dahl, T. E. 1990. Wetland losses in the United States, 1780s to 1980s. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Daubenmire, R. 1968. Plant Communities, first edition. Harper and Row Publishers, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Dennison, W. C., R. J. Orth, K. A. Moore, J. C. Stevenson, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P. Bergstrom, and R. Batiuk. 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation. BioScience 43: 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. deSzalay, F. A. and V. H. Resh. 1997. Responses of wetland invertebrates and plants important in waterfowl diets to burning and mowing of emergent vegetation. Wetlands 17:149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dix, R. L. and F. E. Semings, 1967. The prairie, meadow, and marsh vegetation of Nelson County, North Dakota. Canadian Journal of Botany 45:21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dowdy, S. and S. Wearden. 1991. Statistics for Research, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Eliot, W. 1985. Implementing Mitigation Policies in San Francisco Bay: a Critique. State Coastal Conservancy. Oakland, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Erwin, K. L. 1990. Freshwater marsh creation and restoration in the Southeast. p. 233–265. In J. A. Kusler and M. E. Kentula (eds.) Wetland Creation and Restoration: the Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Erwin, K. L. and G. R. Best. 1985. Marsh and forested wetland reclamation of a central Florida phosphate mine. Wetlands 4:87–104.Google Scholar
  33. Evans, J. and S. Wilson. 1982. Wildlife value of wetlands in West Virginia. p. 213–220. In B. R. McDonald (ed.) Symposium on Wetlands of the Unglaciated Appalachian Region, Morgantown, WV, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Frenkel, R. E. and J. C. Morlan. 1991. Can we restore our salt marshes? Lessons from the Salmon River, Oregon. Northwest Environmental Journal 7:119–135.Google Scholar
  35. Gleason, H. H. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Goslee, S. C., R. P. Brooks, and C. A. Cole. 1997. Plants as indicators of wetland water source. Plant Ecology 131:199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall, T. F. and W. T. Penfound. 1939. A phytosociological study of a Nyssa biflora consocies in southeastern Louisiana. American Midland Naturalist 22:369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harmon, P. J. and D. Ford-Werntz. 2002. Checklist and atlas of the vascular flora of West Virginia. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins, WV, USA. Wildlife Resources Technical Document 02–06.Google Scholar
  39. Havens, K. J., L. M. Varnell, and J. G. Bradshaw. 1995. An assessment of ecological conditions in a constructed tidal marsh and two natural reference tidal marshes in coastal Virginia. Ecological Engineering 4:117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hays, R. L., C. Summers, and W. Seitz. 1981. Estimating wildlife habitat variables. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report FWS/OBS-81/47.Google Scholar
  41. Holland, C. C. and M. E. Kentula. 1992. Impacts of Section 404 permits requiring compensatory mitigation on wetlands in California, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jarman, N. M., R. A. Doberteen, B. Windmiller, and P. R. Lelito. 1991. Evaluation of created freshwater wetlands in Massachusetts. Restoration and Management Notes 9:26–29.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, H. R. and M. Boyd. 2000. Evaluation of the effectiveness of within watershed compensation in response to permitted activities through the Norfolk District’s section 404 regulatory program. Wetlands 12:17–22.Google Scholar
  44. Jorgensen, S. E. 1994. Fundamentals of Ecological Modeling. second edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, D., T. Oron, and M. Gutman. 1998. Development of macrophytic vegetation in the Agmon wetland of Israel by spontaneous colonization and reintroduction. Wetlands Ecology and Management 6:143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kartesz, J. T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First Edition. In J. T. Kartesz, and C. A. Meachum. (eds.) Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  47. King, R. S., K. T. Nunnery, and C. J. Richardson. 2000. Macroinvertebrate assemblage response to highway crossings in forested wetlands: implications for biological assessment. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8:243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koch, E. W. 2001. Beyond light: physical, geological, and geochemical parameters as possible submersed aquatic vegetation habitat requirements. Estuaries 24:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levine, D. A. and D. E. Willard. 1990. Regional analysis of fringe wetlands in the Midwest: creation and restoration. p. 299–325. In J. A. Kusler and M. E. Kentula (eds.) Wetland Creation and Restoration: the Status of the Science. Island Press. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  50. Lewis, R. R. 1992. Why Florida needs mitigation banking. National Wetlands Newsletter 14:7.Google Scholar
  51. MacArthur R. H. and J. W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mager, A. 1990. National Marine Fisheries Service habitat conservation efforts related to federal regulatory programs in the southeastern United States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, USA. Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEC-260.Google Scholar
  53. Martin, A. C., N. Hotchkiss, F. M. Uhler, and W. S. Bourn.. 1953. Classification of wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Special Scientific Report 20.Google Scholar
  54. McConnell, D. L., and D. E. Samuel. 1985. Small mammal and avian populations utilizing cattail marshes on reclaimed surface mines in West Virginia. p. 329–336. In R. P. Brooks, D. E. Samuel, and J. B. Hill (eds.) Wetlands and Water Management on Mined Lands—Proceedings of a Conference. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  55. McCune, B. and J. B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.Google Scholar
  56. McCune, B. and R. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.Google Scholar
  57. McKnight, S. K. and G. R. Hepp. 1995. Potential effects of grass carp herbivory on waterfowl foods. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitsch, W. J., X. Wu, R. W. Nairn, P. E. Weithe, N. Wang, R. Deal, and C. E. Boucher. 1998. Creating and restoring wetlands: a whole ecosystem experiment in self-design. BioScience 48:1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, third edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  60. Moore, H. H., W. A. Nierieng, L. J. Marsicano, and M. Dowdell. 1999. Vegetation change in created emergent wetlands (1988–1996) in Connecticut, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 7:177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Murkin, E. J., H. R. Murkin, and R. D. Titman. 1992. Nektonic invertebrate abundance and distribution at the emergent vegetation-open water interface in the Delta Marsh, Manitoba, Canada. Wetlands 12:45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. National Research Council. 2001. Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press. Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  63. Naugle, D. E., R. R. Johnson, M. E. Estey, and K. F. Higgins. 2000. A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the prairie pothole region of eastern South Dakota. Wetlands 20:522–604.Google Scholar
  64. Niswander, S. F. and W. J. Mitsch. 1995. Functional analysis of a two-year-old created in-stream wetland: hydrology, phosphorus retention, and vegetation survival and growth. Wetlands 15:212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parikh, A. and N. Gale. 1998. Vegetation monitoring of created dune swale wetlands, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. Restoration Ecology 6:83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Penfound, W. T. 1952. Southern swamps and marshes. Botanical Review 18:413–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Perry, L. G. and S. M. Galatowitsch. 2003. A test of two annual cover crops for controlling Phalaris arundinacea invasion in restored sedge meadow wetlands. Restoration Ecology 11:297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Race, M. S. 1985. Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the United States based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environmental Management 9:71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, and C. R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of The Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  70. Reinartz, J. A. and E. L. Warne. 1993. Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeast Wisconsin. Wetlands 13: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robb, J. T. 2002. Assessing wetland compensatory mitigation sites to aid in establishing mitigation ratios. Wetlands 22:435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS Software Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  73. Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  74. Stephenson, S. L. and H. S. Adams. 1986. An ecological study of balsam fir communities in West Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 113:372–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stolt, M. H., M. H. Genthner, W. L. Daniels, V. A. Groover, S. Nagle, and K. C. Haering. 2000. Comparison of soil and other environmental conditions in constructed and adjacent palustrine reference wetlands. Wetlands 20:671–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Strausbaugh, P. D., and E. L. Core. 1977. Flora of West Virginia. Seneca Books, Inc., Morgantown, WV, USA.Google Scholar
  77. Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1999. Wetland Indicators: a Guide to Wetland Identification, Delineation, Classification and Mapping. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  78. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Wetland delineation manual. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report Y-87-1.Google Scholar
  79. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. National list of vascular plant species that occur in Wetlands: 1996 national summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  80. Wentworth, T. R., G. P. Johnson, and R. L. Kologiski. 1988. Designation of wetlands by weighted averages of vegetation data: a preliminary evaluation. Water Resources Bulletin 24:389–396.Google Scholar
  81. Wilson, R. F. and W. J. Mitsch. 1996. Functional assessment of five wetlands constructed to mitigate wetland loss in Ohio, USA. Wetlands 16:436–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zedler, J. B. and J. C. Callaway. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology 7:69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Collin K. Balcombe
    • 1
  • James T. Anderson
    • 1
  • Ronald H. Fortney
    • 2
  • James S. Rentch
    • 1
  • William N. Grafton
    • 1
  • Walter S. Kordek
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of ForestryWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  3. 3.West Virginia Division of Natural ResourcesElkinsUSA

Personalised recommendations