, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 529–537 | Cite as

Hydroperiod and seasonal effects on fish decomposition in an oligotrophic Everglades marsh

  • Chris StevensonEmail author
  • Daniel L. Childers


In the Everglades, the majority of fish detrital inputs occur during the dry scason, when waterlevel drawdown reduces aquatic habitat. While these mortality events are highly seasonal, the remineralization and recycling of fish detrital nutrients may represent an important stimulus to the ecosystem in the following wet season. The goal of this study was to quantify the rate of detrital fish decomposition during three periods of the year to determine seasonal variations in decomposition patterns in this ecosystem. A multiple regression analysis showed that hydroperiod and water depth both played a role in determining fish decomposition rates within this ecosystem. Decomposition rates ranged from a low of 13% day−1 in December 2000 to a high of 50% day−1 in April 2001, the height of the dry season. Phosphorus analysis showed that Gambusia holbrooki, the dominant small fish species in the Everglades, contains 7.169±1.46 mg P g−1 wet fish weight. Based on the observed decomposition rates and the average biomass added, the estimafed daily flux of phosphorus from the experimental detrital loading ranged from a low of 27.04 mg P day−1 to a high of 108.14 mg P day−1 during the decomposition period. We estimated that these inputs could represent an input of 43 μg P m−2 day−1 to the total temporal Everglades phosphorus budget. Although much of this phosphorus is likely incorporated into the macroinvertebrate pool, detrital inputs peak during the dry season when nutrients are most likely to be incorporated into the soil and occur when decomposition of vegetative material is moisture-limited. These inputs may therefore play an important role in stimulating vegetative production during the early wet season.

Key Words

Everglades detritus fish phosphorus decomposition dry season 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Acosta, C. A. and S. A. Perry. 2000. Differential growth of crayfish Procambarus alleni in relation to hydrological condition in marl prairie wetlands of the Everglades National Park. Aquatic Ecology 34:389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amador, J. A. and R. D. Jones. 1993. Nutrient limitations on microbial respiration in peat soils with different total P content. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25:791–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bärlocher, F. and B. Kendrick. 1975. Leaf-Conditioning by micro-organisms. Oecologia 20:359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulton, A. J. and P. I. Boon. 1991. A review of methodology used to measure leaf litter decomposition in lotic environments: Time to turnover an old leaf? Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 42:1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brazner, J. C., D. K. Tanner, and J. A. Morrice. 2001. Fish-mediated nutrient and energy exchange between a Lake Superior coastal wetland and its adjacent bay. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27:98–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busch, D. E., W. F. Loftus, and O. L. Bass. 1998. Long-term hydrologic effects on marsh plant community structure in the southern Everglades. Wetlands 18:230–241.Google Scholar
  7. Cederholm, C. J., M. D. Kunze, T. Murota, and A. Sibatani. 1999. Pacific salmon carcasses. Essential contributions of nutrients and energy to aquatic ecosystems. Fisheries. 24:6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Childers, D. L., R. F. Doren, R. Jones, G. B. Noe, and L. J. Scinto. 2003. Decadal changes in vegetation and soil phosphorus pattern across the Everglades landscape. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:344–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Corti, D., S. L. Kohler, and R. E. Sparks. 1997. Effects of hydroperiod and predation on a Mississippi River floodplain invertebrate community. Oecologia 109:154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coûteaux, M. M., P. Bottner, and B. Berg. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and litter Quality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daoust, R. J. and D. L. Childers. 1999. Controls on emergent macrophyte composition, abundance, and productivity in freshwater Everglades wetland communities. Wetlands 19:262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, S. M. 1994. Phosphorus Inputs and Vegetation Sensitivity in the Everglades. p. 357–378 In S. M. Davis and J. C. Ogden (eds.) Everglades: the Ecosystem and its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  13. DeAngelis, D. L., W. F. Loftus, J. C. Trexler, and R. E. Ulanowicz. 1997. Modeling fish dynamics and effects of stress in a hydrologically pulsed ecosystem. Journal of Aquatic Stress and Recovery 6:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deegan, L. A. 1993. Nutrient and energy transport between estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems by fish migration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denward, C. M. T. and L. J. Tranvik. 1998. Effects of solar radiation on aquatic macrophyte litter decomposition. Oikos 82:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duever, M. J., J. F. Meeder, L. C. Meeder, and J. M. McCollom. 1994. The climate of South Florida and its role in shaping the Everglades ecosystem. p. 225–248. In S. M. Davis and J. C. Ogden (eds.) Everglades: the Ecosystem and its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, M. S. 1981. Faunal Decomposition of salmon carcasses in terrestrial and aquatic sites in Central New York. M.S. Thesis. State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Gaff, H., D. L. DeAngelis, L. J. Gross, R. Salinas, and M. Shorrosh. 2000. A dynamic landscape model for fish in the Everglades and its application to restoration. Ecological Modelling 127:33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunderson, L. H. 1994. Vegetation of the Everglades: determinates of community composition. p. 323–340. In S. M. Davis and J. C. Ogden (eds.) Everglades: the Ecosystem and its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Harmon, M. E., J. F. Franklin, F. J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S. V. Gregory, J. D. Lattin, N. H. Anderson, S. P. Cline, N. G. Aumen, J. R. Sedell, G. W. Lienkaemper, K. Cromack, Jr., and K. W. Cummins. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15:133–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heulett, S. T., S. C. Weeks, and G. K. Meffe. 1995. Lipid dynamics and growth relative to resource level in juvenile Eastern Mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki: Poeciliidae). Copeia 1:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitchell, J. F., J. F. Koonce, and P. S. Tennis. 1975. Phosphorus flux through fish. Vereinigung Internationale fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 19:2478–2484.Google Scholar
  23. Kobza, R. M., J. C. Trexler, W. F. Loftus, and S. A. Perry. 2004. Community structure of fishes inhabiting aquatic refuges in a threatened karstic wetland and its implication for ecosystem management. Biological Conservation 116:153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kushlan, J. A., S. A. Voorhees, W. F. Loftus, and P. C. Frohring. 1986. Length, mass and calorific relationships of Everglades animals. Florida Scientist 49:65–79.Google Scholar
  25. Loftus, W. F., J. D. Chapman, and R. Conrow. 1990. Hydroperiod effects on Everglades marsh food webs, with relation to marsh restoration efforts. p. 1–22. In G. Larson and M. Soukup (eds.) Fisheries and Coastal Wetlands Research. Proceedings of 1986 Conference on Science in the National Parks, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Loftus, W. F. and A. Eklund. 1994. Long-term dynamics of an Everglades small-fish assemblage. p. 461–484. In S. M. Davis and J. C. Ogden (eds.) Everglades: the Ecosystem and its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Loftus, W. F. and J. A. Kushlan. 1987. Freshwater fishes of southern Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum Biological Sciences 31:147–344.Google Scholar
  28. Loftus, W. F. and J. W. Reid. 2000. Copepod (crustacea) emergence from soils from Everglades marshes with different hydroperiods. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15:515–523.Google Scholar
  29. Loveless, C. M. 1959. A study of the vegetation in the Florida Everglades. Ecology 40:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Magoulick, D. D. and R. Kobza. 2003. The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. Freshwater Biology 48:1186–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meffe, G. K. and F. F. Snelson, Jr. 1993. Annual Lipid cycle in Eastern Mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki: Poeciliidae) from South Carolina. Copeia 3:596–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naiman, R. J., R. E. Bilby, D. E. Schindler, and J. M. Helfield. 2002. Pacific salmon, nutrients and the dynamics of freshwater and riparian ecosystems. Ecosystems 5:399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noe, G. B., D. L. Childers, and R. D. Jones. 2001. Phosphorus biogeochemistry and the impact of phosphorus enrichment: why is the Everglades so unique? Ecosystems 4:603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parker, R. O. 2002. Aquaculture Science. Delmar Thomson Learning, Independence, KY, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Parmenter, R. R. and V. A. Lamarra. 1991. Nutrient cycling in a freshwater marsh: The decomposition of fish and waterfowl carrion. Limnology and Oceanography 36:976–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rader, R. B. and C. J. Richardson. 1994. Response of macroinvertebrates to nutrient enrichment in the Northern Everglades. Wetlands 14:134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider, J. C. 1998. Fate of dead fish in a small lake. American Midland Naturalist 140:192–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solorzano, L. and J. H. Sharp. 1980. Determination of total dissolved P and particulate P in natural waters. Limnology and Oceanography 25:754–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Swift, M. J., O. W. Heal, and J. M. Anderson. 1979. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Trexler, J. C., W. F. Loftus, F. Jordan, J. H. Chick, K. L. Kandl, T. C. Elroy, and O. L. Bass. 2002. Ecological scale and its implications for freshwater fishes in the Florida Everglades. p. 357–389. In J. W. Porter and K. G. Porter (eds.) The Everglades, Florida Bay and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys: an Ecosystem Source Book. St. Lucie Press, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, A. M., J. C. Trexler, C. F. Jordan, S. J. Slack, P. Geddes, J. H. Chick, and W. F. Loftus. Targeting, ecosystem, features for conservation: standing crops in the Florida Everglades. Conservation Biology 13:898–911.Google Scholar
  42. Vitousek, P. 1982. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. The American Naturalist 119:553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wieder, R. K. and G. E. Lang. 1982. A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63:1636–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wieder, R. K. and S. J. Wright. 1995. Tropical forest litter dynamics and dry season irrigation on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 76:1971–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.The Southeast Environmental Research CenterFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations