Wetlands

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 630–635 | Cite as

Terrestrial habitat: A vital component for herpetofauna of isolated wetlands

  • J. Whitfield Gibbons
Article
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

A wetland ecosystem, no matter how small or isolated, includes biotic and abiotic features that interact to promote biodiversity at larger landscape scales. Isolated wetlands, in particular, harbor a significant portion of regional fauna and are often critical habitats for maintaining herpetofaunal biodiversity in southern wetlands. Long-term research on isolated wetlands reveals that two terrestrial habitats contiguous with the wetland—the terrestrial periphery and terrestrial corridors that connect isolated wetlands—are vital for much of the animal community. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the SWANCC decision has severely threatened the continued existence of such wetlands and their associated animals. Recognition that terrestrial habitats associated with isolated wetlands are essential elements for enhancing biodiversity could garner support from regulators, resource managers, and the general public in strengthening wetlands protection.

Key Words

amphibian herpetofauna isolated wetland reptile SWANCC terrestrial corridor 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Brooks, R. T. and M Hayashi. 2002. Depth-area-volume and hydroperiod relationships of ephemeral (vernal) forest pools in southern New England. Wetlands 22:247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buhlmann, K. A. 1995. Habitat use, terrestrial movements, and conservation of the turtle, Deirochelys reticularia in Virginia. Journal of Herpetology 29:173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhlmann, K. A. 1998. Ecology, terrestrial habitat use, and conservation of a freshwater turtle assemblage inhabiting a seasonally fluctuating wetland with emphasis on the life history of Deirochelys reticularia. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Buhlmann, K. A. and J. W. Gibbons. 2001. Terrestrial habitat use by aquatic turtles from a seasonally fluctuating wetland: implications for wetland conservation. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4:115–127.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, V. J. and J. W. Gibbons. 1995. Terrestrial buffer zones and wetland conservation: a case study of freshwater turtles in a Carolina bay. Conservation Biology 9:1365–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, V. J., J. L. Greene, and J. W. Gibbons. 1995. The effect of sample size and study duration on metapopulation estimates for slider turtles (Trachemys scripta). Herpetologica 51:451–456.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, V. J., J. W. Gibbons, and J. L. Greene. 1993. Prolonged nesting forays by common mud turtles Kinosternon subrubrum. The American Midland Naturalist 131:190–195.Google Scholar
  8. Darby, P. C., R. E. Bennetts, S. J. Miller, and H. F. Percival. 2002. Movements of Florida apple snails in relation to water levels and drying events. Wetlands 22:489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Findlay, C. S., J. Lenton, and L. Zheng. 2001. Land-use correlates of anuran community richness and composition in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Ecoscience 8:336–343.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbons, J. W. 1970. Terrestrial activity and the population dynamics of aquatic turtles. The American Midland Naturalist 83:404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbons, J. W. 2003. Chapter 16. Societal values and attitudes: their history and sociological influences on amphibian conservation problems. p. 214–227. In R. D. Semlitsch (Ed.) Amphibian Conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Gibbons, J. W. and D. H. Bennett. 1974. Determination of anuran terrestrial activity patterns by a drift fence method. Copeia 1974: 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbons, J. W., J. L. Greene, and J. D. Congdon. 1983. Drought-related responses of aquatic turtle populations. Journal of Herpetology 17:242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbons, J. W., D. E. Scott, T. J. Ryan, K. A. Buhlmann, T. D. Tuberville, B. S. Metts, J. L. Greene, T. Mills, Y. Leiden, S. Poppy, and C. Winne. 2000. The global decline of reptiles, deja vu amphibians. BioScience 50:653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorham, L. E., S. L. King, B. D. Keeland, and S. Mopper. 2002. Effects of canopy gaps and flooding on homopterans in a bottomland hardwood forest. Wetlands 22:541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehtinen, R. M. and S. M. Galatowitsch. 2001. Colonization of restored wetlands by amphibians in Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 145:388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leibowitz, S. 2003. Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23:517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lovich, J. 1990. Spring movement patterns of two radio-tagged male spotted turtles. Brimleyana 16:67–71.Google Scholar
  19. Marsh, D. M. and P. C. Trenham. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology 15:40–49.Google Scholar
  20. Morreale, S. J., J. W. Gibbons, and J. D. Congdon. 1984. Significance of activity and movement in the yellow-bellied slider turtle (Pseudemys scripta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 62:1038–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newman, R. A. and T. Squire. 2001. Microsatellite variation and fine-scale population structure of wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Molecular Ecology 10:1087–1100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pechmann, J. H. K., D. E. Scott, R. D. Semlitsch, J. P. Caldwell, L. J. Vitt, and J. W. Gibbons. 1991. Declining amphibian populations: the problem of separating human impacts from natural fluctuations. Science 253:892–895.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Petranka, H, W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Reinert, H. E. and W. R. Kodrich. 1982. Movements and habitat utilization by the massasauga, Sistrurus catenatus catenatus. Journal of Herpetology 16:162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott, D. E. 1994. The effect of larval density on adult demographic traits in Ambystoma opacum. Ecology 75:1383–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scribner, K. T., J. E. Evans, S. J. Morreale, M. H. Smith, and J. W. Gibbons. 1986. Genetic divergence among populations of the yellow-bellied slider turtle (Pseudemys scripta) separated by aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Copeia 1986:691–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seigel, R. A. 1986. Ecology and conservation of an endangered rattlesnake, Sistrurus catenatus, in Missouri, USA. Biological Conservation 35:333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seigel, R. A., J. W. Gibbons, and T. K. Lynch. 1995. Temporal changes in reptile populations: effects of a severe drought on aquatic snakes. Herpetologica 51:424–434.Google Scholar
  29. Semlitsch, R. D. 1998. Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conservation Biology 5:1113–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Semlitsch, R. D. and J. R. Bodie. 1998. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12:1129–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharitz, R. R. 2003. Carolina bay wetlands: unique habitats of the southeastern United States. Wetlands 23:550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Snodgrass, J. W., M. J. Komoroski, A. L. Bryan Jr., and J. Burger. 2000. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14:414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tiner, R. W., H. C. Bergquist, G. P. DeAlessio, and M. J. Starr. 2002. Geographically isolated wetlands: a preliminary assessment of their characteristics and status in selected areas of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Tuberville, T. D., J. W. Gibbons, and J. L. Greene. 1996. Invasion of new habitats by male freshwater turtles. Copeia 3:713–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yeomans, S. R. 1995. Water-finding in adult turtles: random research or oriented behaviour? Animal Behaviour 49:977–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Whitfield Gibbons
    • 1
  1. 1.Savannah River Ecology LaboratoryUniversity of GeorgiaAikenUSA

Personalised recommendations