Advertisement

Wetlands

, 23:475 | Cite as

Navigating through clean water act jurisdiction: A legal review

  • Donna M. Downing
  • Cathy Winer
  • Lance D. Wood

Abstract

The 2001 U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) held that isolated intrastate non-navigable waters could not be protected under the Clean Water Act (CWA) based on the presence of migratory birds. SWANCC represented a major reinterpretation of the CWA by re-emphasizing the importance of navigability in the definition of “waters of the United States” protected by the statute. The decision also implied that isolated waters might be “waters of the United States” where they had a “significant nexus” to navigable waters. Understanding the significance of SWANCC requires a historical look at the geographic scope of federal laws and regulations protecting surface waters. The concept of navigability had been prominent in the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, but the principal implementation focus for the CWA after its enactment in 1972 and prior to SWANCC had been on the hydrologic cycle and the relevance of links to interstate commerce for determining what waters were protected under the CWA. In upcoming years and months, the geographic jurisdiction of the CWA will continue to be debated in the courts, within Federal agencies, and by the public. Aquatic resource science will play a key role in helping ensure that the CWA is implemented in a scientifically defensible manner, consistent with SWANCC. One area in need of particular emphasis is additional research on the ways in which isolated waters help ensure the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of navigable waters and their tributaries. It is this question—the “significant nexus” between an intrastate non-navigable isolated water and the rest of the aquatic ecosystem—that will likely determine whether the water will be protected by the CWA.

Key Words

Clean Water Act isolated waters navigable waters waters of the United States environmental law SWANCC 

Literature Cited

  1. Blake, Francis, Letter to Richard Sanderson, September 12, 1985Google Scholar
  2. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Diablo Grande, Inc., 209 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (E.D. Cal. 2002)Google Scholar
  3. Cargill, Inc. v. United States, 516 U.S. 955 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. Civiletti Memorandum, 43 Op. Att’y Gen. 197 (1979)Google Scholar
  5. Clean Water Act, 33 USC § 1251 et seq. Google Scholar
  6. A Digest of Opinions of the Judge Advocates General of the Army, 1912 (Washington, D.C. 1912).Google Scholar
  7. Economy Light and Power Company v. United States, 256 U.S. 113 (1921)Google Scholar
  8. EPA and the Corps of Engineers, “Geographic Jurisdiction of the Section 404 Program,” memorandum of understanding, April 14, 1980. (available at: http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands)Google Scholar
  9. EPA and the Corps of Engineers, “Guidance Regarding CWA Section 404 Jurisdiction Over Isolated Waters in Light of United States v. James J. Wilson,” July 1998.Google Scholar
  10. EPA and the Corps of Engineers, “Clean Water Act Jurisdiction in Light of SWANCC,” legal memorandum, January 19, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. Executive Order 11574 (December 23, 1970)Google Scholar
  12. Federal Power Act (16 USC 791a et seq. Google Scholar
  13. Funk, The Court, the Constitution, and the Clean Water Act: SWANCC and Beyond, 31 ELR 10741 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824)Google Scholar
  15. Headwaters Inc., v. Talent Irrigation District. 243 F. 3d 526 (9th Cir. 2001)Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman Homes v. Administrator, 961 F. 2d 1310, 1316 (7th Cir. 1992) (Hoffman I)Google Scholar
  17. Hoffman Homes v. Administrator, 999 F. 2d 256 (7th Cir. 1993) (Hoffman II)Google Scholar
  18. House Conservation and Natural Resources Subcommittee, Hearings on Mercury Pollution and Enforcement of the Refuse Act of 1899, 92 Cong, 1 Sess (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Idaho Rural Council v. Bosma, 143 F. Supp 2d 1169 (D. Idaho 2001)Google Scholar
  20. In re: Needham, No. 99-50242 (Bankr. W.D. La. 2002), aff’d United States v. Needham, 01-1897, 2002 WL 1162790 (W.D. La. 2002), appeal pending, 5th Cir. No. 02-30217Google Scholar
  21. Leslie Salt Co. v. United States, 700 F. Supp. 476 (N.D. Cal. 1980) (Leslie Salt I)Google Scholar
  22. Leslie Salt Co. v. United States, 896 F. 2d 354 (9th Cir. 1990) (Leslie Salt II)Google Scholar
  23. Leslie Salt v. United States, 820 F. Supp. 478 (N.D. Cal. 1992) (Leslie Salt III)Google Scholar
  24. Leslie Salt v. United States, 55 F.3d 1388 (9th Cir. 1995) (Leslie Salt IV)Google Scholar
  25. National Ass’n of Homebuilders, Jan. 9, 2001, press release (available at: http://www.nahb.org/news/wetlandcourt.htm)Google Scholar
  26. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Callaway, 392 F. Supp. 685 (D.D.C. 1975)Google Scholar
  27. Rice v. Harken Exploration Co., 250 F.3d 264 (5th Cir. 2001)Google Scholar
  28. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 USC 401 et. seq Google Scholar
  29. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001); 121 S.Ct. 675 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. The Steamer Daniel Ball v. the United States, 77 U.S. 557 (1871)Google Scholar
  31. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Company, 311 U.S. 377 (1940)Google Scholar
  32. United States v. Buday, 138 F. Supp 2d 1282 (D. Mont. 2001)Google Scholar
  33. United States v. Byrd, 609 F.2d 1204 (7th Cir. 1979)Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Congress, “A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972,” Serial No. 93-1 (1973)Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Congress, “A Legislative History of the Clean Water Act of 1977,” Serial No. 95-14, Vol. 4, 9th Cong. 903 (1978)Google Scholar
  36. United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8Google Scholar
  37. United States Constitution, Article III, Section 2Google Scholar
  38. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, “National Wetlands Inventory,” (available at: http://wetlands.fws.gov/)Google Scholar
  39. U.S. House of Representatives, H.R. Rep. No. 92-911 (1972)Google Scholar
  40. U.S. House of Representatives, H.R. 6935, 94th Cong. (1975)Google Scholar
  41. United States v. Lamplight Equestrian Center, 2002 WL 360652 (N.D. Ill. 2002)Google Scholar
  42. United States v. Newdunn, 195 F. Supp 751 (E.D. Va. 2002), appeal pending, Nos. 02-1480, 02-1594 (4th Cir)Google Scholar
  43. United States v. Rapanos, 190 F. Supp 2d 1011 (E.D. Mich. 2002)Google Scholar
  44. United States v. RGM Corporation, 222 F. Supp 2d 780 (E.D. Va. 2002), appeal pending, No. 02-2093 (4th Cir.) (stayed pending decision in Newdunn)Google Scholar
  45. United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (1985)Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Senate, S. Rep. No. 92-1236, 144 (1971)Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Senate, S. 1878, 94th Cong. (1975)Google Scholar
  48. U.S. Senate, S. Rep. No. 92-414 (1977)Google Scholar
  49. United States v. the Steamer Montello, 87 U.S. 430 (1874)Google Scholar
  50. United States v. Wilson, 133 F.3d 251 (4th Cir. 1997)Google Scholar
  51. Zabel v. Tabb, 430 F. 2d 199 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 910 (1971)Google Scholar
  52. 33 CFR § 209.120(d)Google Scholar
  53. 33 CFR § 328.3(a)Google Scholar
  54. 33 CFR § 329.4Google Scholar
  55. 33 CFR § 330.2(d)Google Scholar
  56. 40 CFR Part 230Google Scholar
  57. 40 CFR § 230.3(s)Google Scholar
  58. 30 Fed. Reg. 12115 (April 3, 1974)Google Scholar
  59. 33 Fed. Reg. 18669 (December 18, 1968)Google Scholar
  60. 38 Fed. Reg. 13528 (May 22, 1973)Google Scholar
  61. 30 Fed. Reg. 12115 (April 3, 1974)Google Scholar
  62. 40 Fed. Reg. 31320 (July 25, 1975)Google Scholar
  63. 42 Fed. Reg. 37122 (July 19, 1977)Google Scholar
  64. 44 Fed. Reg. 32854 (June 7, 1979)Google Scholar
  65. 48 Fed. Reg. 21466 (May 12, 1983)Google Scholar
  66. 51 Fed. Reg. 41206 (November 13, 1986)Google Scholar
  67. 53 Fed. Reg. 20764 (June 6, 1988)Google Scholar
  68. 68 Fed. Reg. 1991 (January 15, 2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna M. Downing
    • 1
  • Cathy Winer
    • 1
  • Lance D. Wood
    • 2
  1. 1.Office of WaterU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Office of the Chief CounselU.S. Army Corps of EngineersWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations