, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Plant diversity, composition, and invasion of restored and natural prairie pothole wetlands: Implications for restoration



Hundreds of wetlands comprising thousands of hectares have been restored in the Midwestern United States. In nearly all cases, restoration consisted of simply restoring wetland hydrology. For this reason, the success of these restorations relies on natural colonization. We compared the structure and composition of the vegetation in two types of wetlands: 10 natural wetlands and 17 five-to-seven-year-old restored wetlands. The overall vegetative composition of restored wetlands was different from that of natural wetlands. Restored wetland flora was formed from a subset of species found in natural wetlands. The species restricted to natural wetlands tended to be native perennials and were evenly represented along the elevational gradient. The few species that were restricted to restored wetlands were largely mudflat annuals whose presence is more indicative of the presence of more unvegetated habitat in restored wetlands than of the presence of a distinctive restored wetlands flora. In addition, restored wetlands had lower vegetative cover and species richness than natural wetlands. Both wetland types had similar numbers of exotic species at the whole wetland (4.4 species per wetland) and quadrat scale (1.5 species m2), and dominance of exotics increased with elevation. The lower species richness, greater compositional variability, and lack of a distinctive flora support the hypothesis that dispersal limitation is the primary cause of the differences between the vegetation in restored and natural wetlands.

Key Words

wetland restoration prairie pothole community assembly succession spatial pattern 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Batt, B. D. J., M. G. Anderson, and C. D. Anderson. 1989. The use of prairie potholes by North American ducks. p. 204–227 In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands, 1st Edition. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  2. Calely, M. J. and D. Schluter. 1997. The relationship between local and regional diversity. Ecology 78:70–80.Google Scholar
  3. Clements, F. 1916. Plant Succession: an Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC, USA. Publication 242.Google Scholar
  4. Cornell, H. and J. Lawton. 1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical approach. Journal of Ecology 61:1–12.Google Scholar
  5. Dobson, A. P., A. D. Bradshaw, and A. J. M. Baker. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277:515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake, J. 1991. Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of and experimental species ensemble. The American Naturalist 137:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fairbaim, S. E. and J. J. Dinsmore. 2001. Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the Prairie Pothole Region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21:41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Findlay, C. S. and J. Houlahan. 1997. Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology 11:1000–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galatowitsch, S. M. 1993. Site selection, design criteria and performance assessment for wetland restorations in the prairie pothole region. Ph.D. Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Galatowitsch, S. and A. van der Valk. 1996a. Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galatowitsch, S. and A. van der Valk. 1996b. The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlands. Ecological Applications 6: 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gleason, H. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Society 53:7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, 2nd edition. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Godwin, H. 1923. Dispersal of pond flora. Journal of Ecology 11: 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grace, J. B. 1987. The impact of preemption on the zonation of two Typha species along lakeshores. Ecological Monographs 57:283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grubb, P. 1977. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews 52:107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, S. and W. Marshall. 1963. Ecology of water-level manipulations on a northern marsh. Ecology 44:331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inouye, R. S., N. J. Huntly, D. Tilman, J. R. Tester, M. A. Stillwell, and K. C. Zinnel. 1987. Old-field succession on a Minnesota sand plain. Ecology 68:12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnstone, I. 1986. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biological Reviews 61:369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kemmis, T. J. 1991. Glacial landforms, sedimentology, and depositional environments of the Des Moines lobe, northern Iowa. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Livshits, G., R. R. Sokal, and E. Kobyliansky. 1991. Genetic affinities of Jewish populations. American Journal of Americal Genetics 49:131–146.Google Scholar
  22. McCullagh, P. and J. Nelder. 1989. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edition. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol 37. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  23. McKee, K., I. Mendelssohn, and D. Burdick. 1989. Effects of longterm flooding on root metabolic response in five freshwater marsh plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:3446–3452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Millar, J. 1973. Vegetation changes in shallow marsh wetlands under improving moisture regime. Canadian Journal of Botany 51:1443–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitsch, W. J., X. Wu, R. W. Nairn, P. E. Weihe, N. Wang, R. Deal, and C. E. Boucher. 1998. Creating and restoring wetlands. Bioscience 48:1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Møller, T. R. and C. P. Rørdam. 1985. Species numbers of vascular plants in relation to area, isolation and age of ponds in Denmark. Oikos 45:8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naugle, D. E., R. R. Johnson, M. E. Estey, and K. F. Higgins. 2001. A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the Prairie Pothole Region of eastern South Dakota. Wetlands 21:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neely, R. K. and J. Baker. 1989. Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics and the fate of agricultural runoff. In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands, Iowa State University, 1st Edition. Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Pastor, J., A. Downing, and H. E. Erickson. 1996. Species-area curves and diversity-productivity relationships in beaver meadows of Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, USA. Oikos 77:399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pielou, E. C. 1984. The Interpretation of Ecological Data: a Primer on Classification and Ordination. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Platt, W. J. and I. M. Weiss. 1985. An experimental study of competition among fugitive prairie plants. Ecology 66:708–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson, J. V. and J. E. Dickerson. 1987. Does invasion sequence affect community structure? Ecology 68:587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shurin, J. B., J. E. Havel, M. A. Leibold, and B. Pinel-Alloul. 2000. Local and regional zooplankton species richness: A scale-independent test for saturation. Ecology 81:3062–3073.Google Scholar
  34. Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edition. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Squires, L. and A. van der Valk. 1992. Water-depth tolerances of the dominant emergent macrophytes of the Delta Marsh, Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Botany 70:1860–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart, R. E. and H. A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of natural ponds in the glaciated prairie region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Resource Publication 92.Google Scholar
  37. Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Valk, A. and C. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59:322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van der Valk, A. and C. Davis. 1980. The impact of a natural drawdown on the growth of four emergent species in a prairie glacial marsh. Aquatic Botany 9:301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Valk, A. and C. H. Welling. 1988. The development of zonation in freshwater wetlands: an experimental approach. p. 145–158. In H. During, M. Werger, and J. Willems (eds.) Diversity and Pattern in Plant Communities. Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  41. van der Valk, A. G., L. Squires, and C. Welling. 1994. Assessing the impacts of an increase in water level on wetland vegetation. Ecological Applications 4:525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vitousek, P., H. Mooney, J. Lubchenko, and J. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whittaker, R. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30:279–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whittaker, R. and W. Niering. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. biomass, production, and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56:771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zedler, J. B. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:402–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zobel, M. 1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: An alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 12:266–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Ecological Analysis and SynthesisSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Department of BotanyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations