, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 712–721 | Cite as

Nutrient retention and nutrient-use efficiency in Phragmites australis stands after wasterwater application

  • Arthur F. M. Meuleman
  • J. (Hans) Ph. Beekman
  • Jos T. A. Verhoeven


The capacity of Phragmites australis to extract nutrients from its environment and to store them in plant tissue was studied in an infiltration wetland used for wastewater treatment. The aims of the study were to estimate the contribution of plant uptake to the overall nutrient removal efficiency of the wastewater treatment system and to determine measures to enhance the nutrient removal efficiency. The functional response of Phragmites australis to nutrient addition was studied at two levels of nutrient availability by comparing a wetland used for wastewater treatment with a natural, undisturbed wetland. In the nutrient-rich wastewater wetland, biomass production, nutrient content of plant tissue, shoot/root ratios, and translocation rates were much greater than in the natural wetland. In contrast, plant nutrient-use efficiencies of both nitrogen and phosphorus were much lower in the wastewater wetland. The lower nutrient-use efficiencies were probably due to (1) lower nutrient productivity, which was probably due to self-shading resulting in a lower photosynthetic activity, and (2) lower mean nutrient residence time, which can be explained by a higher litter production (higher shoot and leaf turnover). In the wastewater wetland, harvesting during winter removed only 9% of the total nitrogen input and 6% of the total phosphorus input associated with the loading of wastewater. The low nutrient removal efficiency by aboveground plant harvesting is caused by translocation of nutrients from shoots and leaves to rhizomes and roots in autumn. Nutrient removal efficiency of the wastewater wetland could be enhanced by 40–50% by harvesting at peak nutrient storage levels in the aboveground plant parts in August or September.

Key Words

Phragmites australis primary production nutrient storage nitrogen phosphorus nutrient-use efficiency translocation seed dispersion wastewater treatment management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Aerts, R. 1989. Plant strategies and nutrient cycling in heathland ecosystems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 203 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Aerts, R. 1990. Nutrient-use efficiency in evergreen and deciduous species from heathlands. Oecologia 84:391–397.Google Scholar
  3. Aerts, R. and F. S. Chapin III. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30:1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aerts, R. and H. De Caluwe. 1994a. Nitrogen use efficiency of Carex species in relation to nitrogen supply. Ecology 75:2362–2372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aerts, R. and H. De Caluwe. 1994b. Effect of nitrogen supply on canopy structure and leaf nitrogen distribution in Carex species. Ecology 75:1482–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aerts, R. and H. De Caluwe. 1995. Interspecific and intraspecific differences in shoot and leaf life span of four Carex species which differ in maximum dry matter production. Oecologia 102:467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berendse, F. and R. Aerts. 1987. Nitrogen use efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? Functional Ecology 1:293–296.Google Scholar
  8. Birk, E. M. and P. M. Vitousek. 1986. Nitrogen availability and nitrogen use efficiency in Loblolly pine stands. Ecology 67:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boerner, R. E. J. 1984. Foliar nutrient dynamics and nitrogen use efficiency of four deciduous tree species in relation to site fertility. Journal of Applied Ecology 21:1029–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapin, F. S. III. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin, F. S. III, D. A. Johnson, and J. D. McKendrick. 1980. Seasonal nutrient allocation patterns in various tundra plant life forms in northern Alaska: implications for herbivory. Journal of Ecology 68:189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapin, F. S. III and R. A. Kedrowsk. 1983. Seasonal changes in nitrogen and phosphorus fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and taiga trees. Ecology 64:376–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, P. F. and B. C. Findlater (eds.). 1990. Constructed Wetlands in Water Pollution Control. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, C. B. and A. G. van der Valk. 1983. Uptake and release of nutrients by living and decomposing Typha glauca Godr. tissues at Eagle lake, Iowa. Aquatic Botany 16:75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denny, P. 1987. Mineral cycling by wetland plants—a review. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Beihefte 27:1–25.Google Scholar
  16. Dykyjova, D. and D. Hradecka. 1976. Production ecology of Pharagmites communis. 1. Relation of two ecotypes to the microclimate and nutrient conditions of the habitat. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 11:23–61.Google Scholar
  17. Graneli, W. 1990. Standing crop and mineral content of reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) trin. ex Steudel, in Sweden—management of reed stands to maximise harvestable biomass. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 25:291–302.Google Scholar
  18. Graneli, W. and D. Solander, 1988. Influence of aquatic macrophytes on phosphorus cycling in lakes. Hydrobiologia 170:245–266.Google Scholar
  19. Graneli, W., M. D. Sytsma, and S. E. B. Weisner. 1983. Changes in biomass, non-structural carbohydrates, nitrogen and phosphorus content of the rhizomes and shoots of Phragmites australis during spring growth. p. 78–83. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aquatic Macrophytes, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. Graneli, W., S. E. B. Weisner, and M. D. Sytsma. 1992. Rhizome dynamics and resource storage in Phragmites australis. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammer, D. A. 1989. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Hirose, T. and M. J. A. Werger. 1987. Nitrogen use efficiency in instantaneous and daily photosynthesis of leaves in the canopy of a Solidago altissima stand. Physiologia Plantarum 70:215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingestad, T. 1979. Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings. II N, P, Ca and Mg nutrition. Physiologia Plantarum 45:149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonasson, S. and G. R. Shaver. 1999. Within-stand nutrient cycling in arctic and boreal wetlands. Ecology 80:2139–2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kadlec, R. H. and R. L. Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, CRC, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Killingbeck, K. T. 1996. Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77:1716–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knops, J. M. H., W. D. Koenig, and T. H. Nash III. 1997. On the relationship between nutrient-use efficiency and fertility in forest ecosystems. Oecologia 110:550–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Köhler, B., P. Ryser, S. Güsewell, and A. Gigon. 2001. Nutrient availability and limitation in traditionally mown and in abandoned limestone grasslands: a bioassay experiment. Plant and Soil 230:323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ksenofontova, T. 1988. Morphology and mineral contents in Phragmites australis in different water bodies of the Estonian SSR. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 23:17–43.Google Scholar
  30. Lajtha, K. and M. Klein. 1988. The effect of varying nitrogen and phosphorus availability on nutrient use by Larrea tridentata, a desert evergreen shrub. Oecologia 50:109–112.Google Scholar
  31. Mason, C. F. and R. J. Bryant. 1975. Production, nutrient content and decomposition of Phragmites australis and Typha angustifolia. Journal of Ecology 63:71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McClaugherty, C. A., J. D. Aber, and J. M. Melillo. 1982. The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nutrient budget of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63:1481–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meuleman, A. F. M. 1999. Performance of treatment wetlands. Ph. D. Dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  34. Mook, J. H. and J. van der Toorn. 1982. The influence of environmental factors and management on stands of Phragmites australis. 2. Effects on yield and its relationship with shoot density. Journal of Applied Ecology 19:501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris, J. T. and K. Lajtha. 1986. Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of litter from four species of freshwater emergent macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 131:215–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Page, A. C., R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney. 1982. Methods of Soil Analyses, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  37. Pastor, J., J. D. Aber, C. A. McClaugherty, and J. M. Melillo. 1984. Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65:256–268.Google Scholar
  38. Pastor, J. and S. D. Bridgham. 1999. Nutrient efficiency along nutrient gradients. Oecologia 118:50–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Prentki, R. T., T. D. Gustafson, and M. S. Adams. 1978. Nutrient movements in lakeshore marshes. p. 169–194. In R. E. Good, D. F. Whigham, and R. L. Simpson (eds.). Freshwater Wetlands. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Reddy, K. R. and W. H. Smith (eds.). 1987. Aquatic Plants for Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery. Magnolia Publishing Inc., Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Richardson, C. J. 1979. Primary productivity values in freshwater wetlands. p. 131–145. In P. E. Greeson, J. R. Clark, and J. E. Clark (eds.) Wetland Functions and Values: The State of Our Understanding. American Water Resources Association, Minneapolis, MN, USA.Google Scholar
  42. SAS Institute Inc., 1985. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Shaver, G. R. and J. M. Melillo. 1984. Nutrient budgets of marsh plants: efficiency concepts and relation to availability. Ecology 65:1491–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ulrich, K. E. and T. M. Burton. 1985. The effects of nitrate, phosphate and potassium fertilisation on growth and nutrient uptake patterns of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. Aquatic Botany 21:53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van der Linden, M. J. H. A. 1980. Nitrogen economy of reed vegetation in the Zuidelijk Flevopolder. 1. Distribution of nitrogen among shoots and rhizomes during the growing season and loss of nitrogen due to fire management. Acta Oecologica/Oecologia Plantarum 1:219–230.Google Scholar
  46. Van der Linden, M. J. H. A. 1986. Phosphorus economy of reed vegetation in the Zuidelijk Flevoland polder (The Netherlands): seasonal distribution of phosphorus among shoots and rhizomes and availability of soil phosphorus. Acta Oecologica/Oecologia Plantarum 7:397–495.Google Scholar
  47. Van der Linden, M. J. H. A. 1990. Nitrogen and phosphorus economy of reed vegetation in the Zuidelijk Flevoland polder (The Netherlands). Directie Flevoland, Rijkswaterstaat, Flevobericht nr. 313, Lelystad, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  48. Van Vuuren, M. M. I. 1992. Effects of plant, species on nutrient cycling in heathlands. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  49. Verhoeven, J. T. A. and J. van der Toorn. 1990. Management of marshes with special reference to wastewater treatment. p. 571–585. In B. C. Patten (ed.) Wetlands and Shallow Continental Water Bodies. Volume 1. Academic Publishing. The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  50. Vitousek, P. 1982. Nutrient cycling and nutrient-use efficiency. American Naturalist 119:553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weisner, S. E. B. 1987. The relation between wave exposure and distribution of emergent vegetation in an eutrophic lake. Freshwater Biology 18:537–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Westlake, D. F. 1975. Primary production of freshwater wetlands. P. 189–206. In J. P. Cooper (ed.) Photosynthesis and Productivity in Different Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur F. M. Meuleman
    • 1
  • J. (Hans) Ph. Beekman
    • 1
  • Jos T. A. Verhoeven
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Landscape Ecology Department of GeobiologyUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations