, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 338–346 | Cite as

Comparative tolerances of riparian willows and cottonwoods to water-table decline

  • Nadine M. Amlin
  • Stewart B. Rood


Cottonwoods (Populus sp.) and willows (Salix sp.) generally dominate riparian landscapes across western North America. To investigate their relative tolerances to water-table decline, rooted shoot cuttings (saplings) of two willows, Salix exigua and S. drummondiana, and two cottonwoods, Populus angustifolia, and P. balsamifera, were grown in rhizopods, controlled growth devices that allow water-table manipulation. Water-table-decline rates of 0 to 12 cm/d were applied and plant growth and survival were monitored. In a second study, seedlings of S. exigua, S. lutea, P. balsamifera, and P. deltoides were grown in rhizopods and exposed to water-table-decline rates of 0 to 8 cm/d. For saplings and seedlings of both genera, gradual declines of 1 or 2 cm/d promoted root elongation and often promoted shoot growth relative to the constant water-table treatment (0 cm/d). More abrupt declines (> 2 cm/d) reduced growth and survival, and there were some differences in sensitivity within as well as across the two genera. Thus, the willow and cottonwood saplings were similarly affected by abrupt water-table decline, but willow seedlings were slightly more vulnerable than cottonwood seedlings. It is recommended that gradual stream stage recession along regulated rivers of about 2.5 cm/d in the late spring would encourage the recruitment of cottonwood seedlings, but subsequently, more gradual recession of about 1 cm/d through the lower elevational streamside zones would enable recruitment of S. exigua and other willows.

Key Words

drought growth mortality Populus recruitment Salix saplings seedlings survival water-table decline 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Amlin, N. A. and S. B. Rood. 2001. Inundation tolerances of riparian willows and cottonwoods. Jounral of the American Water Resources Association 37:1709–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barsoum, N. and F. M. R. Hughes. 1998. Regeneration response of black poplar to changing river levels. p. 111–119. In H. Wheater and C. Kirby (eds.). Hydrology in a Changing Environment. Volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, L. C. and J. E. Cantlon. 1957. Succession on river alluvium in northern Alaska. American Midland Naturalist 58:452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brayshaw, T. C. 1996. Catkin-bearing Plants of British Columbia. Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  5. Brunsfeld, S. J. and F. D. Johnson. 1985. Field guide to the willows of east central Idaho, Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA. Bulletin 39.Google Scholar
  6. Busch, D. E., N. L. Ingraham, and S. D. Smith. 1992. Water uptake in woody riparian phreatophytes of the southwestern United States: a stable isotope study. Ecological Applications 2:450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case, R. L. and J. B. Kauffman. 1997. Wild ungulate influences on the recovery of willows, black cottonwood and thin-leaf alder following cessation of cattle grazing in northeastern Oregon. Northwest Science 71:115–126.Google Scholar
  8. Cordes, L. D., F. M. R. Hughes, and M. Getty. 1997. Factors affecting the regeneration and distribution of riparian woodlands along a northern prairie river: the Red Deer River, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Biogeography 24:675–695.Google Scholar
  9. Dorn, R. D. 1995. A taxonomic study of Salix section cordate subsection lutea (Salicaceae). Brittonia 47:160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Everson, D. A. and D. H. Boucher. 1998. Tree species-richness and topographic complexity along the riparian edge of the Potomac River. Forest Ecology and Management 109:305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, J. M., M. L. Scott, and W. M. Lewis, Jr.. 1995. Restoration of riprian forest using irrigation, artificial disturbance and natural seedfall. Environmental Management 19:547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gom, L. A. and S. B. Rood. 1999. The discrimination of cottonwood clones in a mature grove along the Oldman River in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 77:1084–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon, N. D., T. A. McMahon, and B. L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley and Sons Inc. Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Horton, J. L. and J. L. Clark. 2001. Water table decline alters growth and survival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 140:239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hosner, J. F. 1957. Effects of water upon seed germination of bottomland trees. Forest Science 3:67–70.Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, F. M. R., T. Harris, K. Richards, G. Pautou, A. E. Hames, N. Barsoum, J. Girel, J. L. Peiry, and R. Foussadier. 1997. Woody riparian species responses to different soil moisture conditions: laboratory experiments on Alnus incana (L.) Moench. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6:247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, W. C. 1994. Woodland expansion in the Platte River, Nebraska: patterns and causes. Ecological Monographs 64:45–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johson, W. C. 2000. Tree recruitment and survival in rivers: influence of hydrological processes. Hydrological Processes 14:3051–3074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, W. C., R. L. Burgess, and W. R. Keammerer. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment of the Missouri River flood-plain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 46:59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kozlowski, T. T. and S. G. Pallardy. 1997. Physiology of Woody Plants. 2ed. Academic Press, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Dranjcec, J., J. M. Mahoney, and S. B. Rood. 1998. The responses of three riparian cottonwood species to water table decline. Forest Ecology and Management 110:77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krasny, M. E., K. A. Vogt, and J. C. Zasada. 1988. Establishment of four Salicaceae species on river bars in interior Alaska, Holarctic Ecology 11:210 219.Google Scholar
  23. Mahoney, J. M. and S. B. Rood. 1991. A device for studying the influence of declining water table on poplar growth and survival. Tree Physiology 8:305–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahoney, J. M. and S. B. Rood. 1992. Response of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates. Forest Ecology and Management 54:141 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahoney, J. M. and S. B. Rood. 1998. Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—an integrative model. Wetlands 18:634–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McBride, J. R. and J. Strahan. 1984. Fluvial processes and woodland succession along Dry Creek, Sonoma County, California. p. 111–119. In R. E. Warner and K. M. Hendrix (eds.) Californian Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation and Productive Management. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Ottenbreit, K. A. and R. J. Stanforth. 1992. Life cycle and age structure of ramets in an expanding population of Salix exigua (sandbar willow). Canadian Journal of Botany 70:1141–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rood, S. B. and S. Heinze-Milne. 1989. Abrupt downstream forest decline following river damming in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:1744–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rood, S. B., C. Hillman, T. Sanche, and J. M. Mahoney. 1994. Clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 72:1766–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rood, S. B., A. R. Kalischuk, and J. M. Mahoney. 1998. Initial cottonwood seedling recruitment following the flood of the century of the Oldman River, Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 18:557–570.Google Scholar
  31. Rood, S. B. and J. M. Mahoney. 1990. Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in western prairies: probable causes and prospects for mitigation. Environmental Management 14:451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rood, S. B. and J. M. Mahoney. 2000. Revised instream flow regulation enables cottonwood recruitment along the St. Mary River, Alberta, Canada. Rivers 7:109–125.Google Scholar
  33. Rood, S. B., J. M. Mahoney, D. E. Reid, and L. Zilm. 1995. Instream flows and the decline of riparian cottonwoods along the St. Mary River, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 73:1250–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott, M. L., J. M. Friedman, and G. T. Auble. 1996. Fluvial process and the establishment of bottomland trees. Geomorphology 14:327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Segelquist, C. A., M. L. Scott, and G. T. Auble. 1993. Establishment of Populus deltoides under simulated alluvial groundwater declines. American Midland Naturalist 130:274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shafroth, P. B., G. T. Auble, J. C. Stromberg, and D. T. Patten. 1998. Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow. Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18:577–590.Google Scholar
  37. Stromberg, J. C. and D. T. Patten. 1996. Instream flow and cottonwood growth in the eastern Sierra Nevada of California, USA. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stromberg, J. C., D. T. Patten, and B. D. Richter, 1991. Flood flows and dynamics of Sonoran riparian forests. Rivers 2:221–235.Google Scholar
  39. Stromberg, J. C., R. Tiller, and B. Richter. 1996. Effects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: the San Pedro, Arizona. Ecological Applications 64:113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, J. P., D. B. Wester, and L. M. Smith. 1999. Soil disturbance, flood management, and riparian establishment in the Rio Grande floodplain. Wetlands. 19:372–382.Google Scholar
  41. Tu, I. M. 2000. Vegetation patterns and processes of natural regeneration in periodically flooded riparian forests in the Central Valley of California. Ph.D. Thesis. University of California, Davis, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Tyree, M. T., K. J. Kolb, S. B. Rood, and S. Patino. 1994. Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation of riparian cottonwoods in Alberta: A possible factor in the decline of the ecosystem? Tree Physiology 14:455–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Splunder, I., L. A. C. J. Voesenek, H. Coops, X. J. A. De Vries, and C. W. P. M. Blom. 1996. Morphological responses of seedlings of four species of Salicaceae to drought. Canadian Journal of Botany 74:1988–1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Viereck, L. A., C. T. Dyrness, and M. J. Foote. 1993. An overview of the vegetation and soils of the floodplain ecosystems of the Tanana River, interior Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:889–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ware, G. H. and W. T. Penfound. 1949. The vegetation of the lower levels of the floodplain of the South Canadian River in central Oklahoma. Ecology 30:478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine M. Amlin
    • 1
  • Stewart B. Rood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations