Abstract
The extensive local and regional market for traditional, handcrafted twig and grass brooms in the Bushbuckridge municipality, South Africa, provides an important means of livelihood security for several hundred poor households in the face of increasing economic hardship. Participants in this trade were a vulnerable group of middle-aged to elderly women with poor levels of education and few assets. Over half headed their own house-holds, and several came from households affected by AIDS. Entry into the broom trade was mainly a coping strategy in response to crisis, becoming long-term in the absence of alternatives. Average net annual incomes for producers and traders were modest at ZAR 2,000 and ZAR 1,000 respectively (ZAR=South African Rand), although some were earning considerably more. While unlikely to provide a way out of poverty, the trade was critical in allowing diversification and in providing a safety net, assisting poor households to overcome adversity, meet several basic needs, and educate their children.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Barany, M., C. Holding-Anyonge, D. Kayambazinthu, and A. Sitoe. 2005. Firewood, Food and Medicine: Interactions between Forests, Vulnerability and Rural Responses to HIV/AIDS. Proceedings from the IFPRI Conference: HIV/AIDS and Food and Nutritional Security, April 14–16, Durban, South Africa.
Belcher, B., M. Ruiz-Pérez, and R. Achdiawan. 2005. Global Patterns and Trends in the Use and Management of Commercial NTFPs: Implications for Livelihoods and Conservation. World Development 33(9):1435–1452.
Campbell, B., S. Jeffrey, W. Kozanayi, M. Luckert, M. Mutamba, and C. Zindi. 2002. Household Livelihoods in Semi-arid Regions. Options and Constraints. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Carter, M. R., and J. May. 1999. Poverty, Livelihood and Class in Rural South Africa. World Development 27(1):1–20.
Cocks, M. L., and A. P. Dold. 2004. A New Broom Sweeps Clean: The Economic and Cultural Value of Grass Brooms in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 13:33–42.
Dovie, B. D. K., C. M. Shackleton, and E. T. F. Witkowski. 2002. Direct-Use Values of Woodland Resources Consumed and Traded in a South African Village. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 9:269–283.
Fisher, M. 2004. Household Welfare and Forest Dependence in Southern Malawi. Environment and Development Economics 9:135–154.
Gelb, S. 2003. Inequality in South Africa: Nature, Cases and Responses. Section 2. An Overview of Inequality, Poverty and Growth in South Africa. DFID Policy Initiative in Addressing Inequality in Middle-Income Countries. The Edge Institute, Johannesburg. http://www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d000671/index.php.
Gibbs Russell, G. E., L. Watson, M. Koekemoer, L. Smook, N. P. Barker, H. M. Anderson, and M. J. Dallwitz. 1990. Grasses of Southern Africa. National Botanical Gardens, Pretoria, South Africa.
Gyan, C., and C. M. Shackleton. 2005. Abundance and Commercialization of Phoenix Reclinata in the King Williams Town Area, South Africa. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 17:325–336.
Hunter, L. M., and W. Twine. 2005. Adult Mortality, Natural Resources and Food Security: Evidence from the Agincourt Field Site in Rural South Africa. Working Paper EB2005-0001. Research Program on Environment and Behavior, Univerity of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder.
Kaimowitz, D. 2003. Not by Bread Alone...Forests and Rural Livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa. Pages 45–64 in T. Oksanen, B. Pajari. and T. Tuomasjukka, eds., Forestry in Poverty Reduction Strategies: Capturing the Potential. EFI Proceedings No. 47. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland.
Malepe, P. 2003. Abe Bailey Nature Reserve in Gauteng: An Example of a Community-Based Natural Resource Use System. Indigenous Plant Use Forum Newsletter 1(1):30–32.
Marshall, E., K. Schreckenberg, A. C. Newton, eds. 2006. Commercialization of Non-timber Forest Products: Factors Influencing Success. Lessons Learned from Mexico and Bolivia and Policy Implications for Decisionmakers. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K.
McSweeny, K. 2004. Tropical Forests Product Sale as Natural Insurance: The Effects of Household Characteristics and the Nature of Shock in Eastern Honduras. Society and Natural Resources 17: 39–56.
Monela, G. C., G. C. Kajembe, A. R. S. Kaoneka, and G. Kowera. 1999. Household Livelihood Strategies in the Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania: Emerging Trends. Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation 73:17–33.
Neumann, R. P., and E. Hirsch. 2000. Commercialization of Non-timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Pollard, S. R., J. C. Pérez de Mendiguren, C. Joubert, C. M. Shackleton, P. Walker, T. Poulter, and M. White. 1998. Save the Sand Phase 1. Feasibility Study: The Development of a Proposal for a Catchment Plan for the Sand River Catchment. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa.
Posel, D. R. 2001. Who Are the Heads of Household, What Do They Do, and Is the Concept of Headship Useful? An Analysis of Headship in South Africa. Development Southern Africa 18(5):651–670.
Rogerson, C. M., and P. M. Sithole. 2001. Rural Handicraft Production in Mpumalanga, South Africa: Organization, Problems and Support Needs. South African Geographic Journal 83(2):149–158.
Shackleton, C. M., and S. E. Shackleton. 2004. The Importance of Non-timber Forest Products in Rural Livelihood Security and as Safety Nets: A Review of Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100:658–664.
Shackleton, S. E. 2006. Forests as Safety Nets for Mitigating the Impacts of HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa. Forest Livelihood Briefs, No. 4. September 2006. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
—, and C. M. Shackleton. 2005. The Contribution of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea) Fruit and Fruit Products to Rural Livelihoods in the Bushbuckridge District, South Africa: Balancing Domestic Needs and Commercialization. Forest, Trees and Livelihoods 15(1):3–24.
—, C. M. Shackleton, T. R. Netshiluvhi, B. S. Geach, A. Balance, and D. H. K. Fairbanks. 2002. Use Patterns and Value of Savanna Resources in Three Rural Villages in South Africa. Economic Botany 56(2):130–146.
Shackleton, S. E., B. Campbell, H. Lotz-Sisitka, and C. M. Shackleton. n.d. Links Between the Local Trade in Natural Products, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation in a Semi-arid Region of South Africa. World Development (in press).
Statistics South Africa. 2003. Census 2001. Investigation into Appropriate Definitions of Urban and Rural Areas for South Africa. Discussion document. (Report no: 63-02-20 [2001]). StatsSA, Pretoria, South Africa.
Statistics South Africa. 2004. 2001 Census—Municipal Summaries. http://www.statssa.gov.sa.
Terry, E. M. 1999. The Economic and Social Significance of the Handicraft Industry in Botswana. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School for Oriental and African Studies, University of London, London.
Twine, W. C., D. Moshe, T. Netshiluvhi, and V. Siphugu. 2003. Consumption and Direct-Use Values of Savanna Bio-resources Used by Rural Households in Mametja, a Semi-arid Area of Limpopo Province, South Africa. South African Journal of Science 99:467–473.
Wells, M. J., A. A. Balsinhas, H. Joffe, V. M. Engelbrecht, G. Harding, and C. H. Stirton. 1986. A Catalogue of Problem Plants in Southern Africa. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, South Africa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shackleton, S.E., Campbell, B.M. The traditional broom trade in Bushbuckridge, South Africa: Helping poor women cope with adversity. Econ Bot 61, 256–268 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[256:TTBTIB]2.0.CO;2
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[256:TTBTIB]2.0.CO;2