Economic Botany

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 62–74 | Cite as

Cultural, practical, and economic value of wild plants: A quantitative study in the Bolivian Amazon

  • Victoria Reyes-García
  • Tomás Huanca
  • Vincent Vadez
  • William Leonard
  • David Wilkie
Article

Abstract

Researchers have developed several indices to estimate the significance of plant species for humans. We build on previous methods in ethnobotany and anthropology to develop a new way to value plant species along three dimensions: cultural, practical, and economic. We used interview and observational data on the use of wild plants by the Tsimane’, a foraging-horticultural society in the Bolivian Amazon. We calculated the cultural, practical, economic, and total values of 114 plant species from 46 families. We found a low correlation between the practical and the cultural values of species: some species rarely used were frequently mentioned in interviews, whereas some species frequently used were rarely mentioned in interviews. Indices of cultural, practical, and economic value measure different dimensions of the importance of plant species to society. The combination of the three indices offers a more comprehensive valuation of the significance of plants for humans than the use of only one index.

Key Words

Ethnobotanical knowledge uses of plant Tsimane’ indigenous peoples Bolivia indices of cultural significance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Begossi, A. 1996. Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: Diversity indices. Economic Botany 50:280–289.Google Scholar
  2. —, N. Hanazaki, and J. Tamashiro. 2002. Medicinal plants in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil): Knowledge, use, and conservation. Human Ecology 30:281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benz, B.F., J. Cevallos, F. Santana, J. Rosales, and S. Graf. 2000. Losing knowledge about plant use in the sierra de Manantlan Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany 54:183–191.Google Scholar
  4. Byg, A., and H. Balslev. 2001. Traditional knowledge ofDypsis fibrosa (Aracaceae) in Eastern Madagascar. Economic Botany 55:263–275.Google Scholar
  5. Byron, E. 2003. Market integration and health: The impact of markets on the nutritional status, morbidity, and diet of the Tsimane’ Amerindians of lowland Bolivia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  6. Figueiredo, G. M., H. Leitao-Filho, and A. Begossi. 1997. Ethnobotany of Atlantic forest coastal communities: Diversity of plant uses at Sepetiba Bay (SE Brazil). Human Ecology 25:353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Godoy, R., H. Overman, J. Demmer, L. Apaza, E. Byron, T. Huanca, W. Leonard, E. Perez, V. Reyes-García, V. Vadez, D. Wilkie, A. Cubas, K. Mc-Sweeny, and N. Brokaw. 2002. Local financial benefits of rain forests: Evidence from Amerindian societies in Bolivia and Honduras. Ecological Economics 40:397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gullison, E. 1995. Conservation of tropical forests through the sustainable production of forest products: The case of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) in the Chimanes Forest, Beni, Bolivia. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  9. —, S.N. Panfil, J. Strouse, and S. Hubbell. 1996. Ecology and management of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) in the Chimanes Forest, Beni, Bolivia. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 122(l):9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hecht, S., A. Anderson, and P. May. 1988. The subsidy from nature: Shifting cultivation, successional palm forests and rural development. Human Organization 47:25–35.Google Scholar
  11. Huanca, T. 1999. Tsimane’ indigenous knowledge. Swidden Fallow Management and Conservation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  12. Hunn, E. S. 2002. Evidence for the precocious acquisition of plant knowledge by Zapotec children. Pages 604–613 in J.R. Stepp, F.S. Wyndham, and R. Zarger, eds. Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity. International Society of Ethnobiology, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
  13. Killeen, T., E. García, and S. Beck. 1993. Guía de Arboles de Bolivia. Herbario Nacional de Bolivia y Missouri Botanical Gardens, La Paz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
  14. Ladio, A., and M. Lozada. 2004. Patterns of use and knowledge of wild edible plants in distinct ecological environments: A case study of a Mapuche community from northwestern Patagonia. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1153–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nate, A., D. Ista, and V. Reyes-García. 2000. Plantas útiles y su aprovechamiento en la comunidad Tsimane’ de Yaranda. CIDOB-DFID, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
  16. Ohmagari, K., and F. Berkes. 1997. Transmission of indigenous knowledge and bush skills among the Western James Bay Cree women of Subarctic Canada. Human Ecology 25:197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peters, C. M., A.H. Gentry, and R. Mendelsohn. 1989. Valuation of a tropical forest in Peruvian Amazonia. Nature 339: 655–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Phillips, O. 1996. Some quantitative methods for analyzing ethnobotanical knowledge. Pages 171–197 in M. Alexiades, ed. Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: A field manual. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  19. —, and A.H. Gentry. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47:15–32.Google Scholar
  20. Pieroni, A. 2001. Evaluation of the cultural significance of wild food botanicals consumed in northwestern Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Ethnobiology 21:89–104.Google Scholar
  21. Pimentel, D., M. McNair, L. Buck, M. Pimentel, and J. Kamil. 1997. The value of forests to world food security. Human Ecology 25:91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reyes-García, V. 2001. Indigenous people, ethnobotanical knowledge, and market economy. A case study of the Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  23. —, R. Godoy, V. Vadez, L. Apaza, E. Byron, E. Pérez, W. Leonard, and D. Wilkie. 2003. Ethnobotanical knowledge shared widely among Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia. Science 299:1707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. —, V. Vadez, T. Huanca, W. Leonard, D. Wilkie. 2005. Knowledge and consumption of wild plants: A comparative study in two Tsimane’ villages in the Bolivian Amazon. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 3:201–207.Google Scholar
  25. Rossato, S.V.C., H. Leitao-Filho, and A. Begossi. 1999. Ethnobotany of Caicaras of the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brazil). Economic Botany 53:387- 395.Google Scholar
  26. Ruddle, K., and R. Chesterfield. 1977. Education for traditional food procurement in the Orinoco Delta. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  27. Stoffle, R.W., D.B. Halmo, M.J. Evans, and J.E. Olmsted. 1990. Calculating the cultural significance of American Indian plants: Paiute and Shoshone ethnobotany at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. American Anthropologist 92:416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Turner, N.J., 1988. The importance of a rose: Evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. American Anthropologist 90:272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vadez, V., V. Reyes-García, L. Apaza, E. Byron, T. Huanca, W. Leonard, E. Pérez, and D. Wilkie. 2004. Does integration to the market threaten agricultural diversity? Panel and cross-sectional evidence from a horticultural-foraging society in the Bolivian Amazon. Human Ecology 32:635–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zarger, R. 2002. Acquisition and transmission of subsistence knowledge by Q’eqchi’ Maya in Belize. Pages 592–603 in J.R. Stepp, F.S. Wyndham, and R. Zarger, eds. Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity. International Society of Ethnobiology, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden Press 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Reyes-García
    • 1
  • Tomás Huanca
    • 2
  • Vincent Vadez
    • 2
  • William Leonard
    • 3
  • David Wilkie
    • 4
  1. 1.ICREA-ICTAUniversitat Autónoma de BarcelonaBellaterra, BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Sustainable International Development Program, Heller School for Social Policy and ManagementBrandeis UniversityWaltham
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston
  4. 4.Wildlife Conservation SocietyWaltham

Personalised recommendations