Abstract
Ethnobotanical studies often assume plant knowledge is shared by all members of an arbitrarily bounded human group. By describing the uses and local categorization of plants in one village in rural Panama in a heteroglossic approach, the different knowledges within a village are presented in one article. Plants used in the daily work of women and men, and the work of village spe-cialists are described. Villagers negotiate changing realities by adapting plant use and knowl-edge; this is reflected in local categorization of plant names into antes and hoy dia. Unlike the established ethnobotanical assumption that bounded units of plant knowledge are dying, the younger generations of villagers, who work both within and outside the village, know more plants useful to their changing economic opportunities. Subsistence agriculturalists possess the adaptive plant knowledge skills to be stewards of the environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Alcorn, J. 1990. Indigenous agroforestry strategies meeting farmers' needs. Pages 141–148 in A. Anderson, ed., Alternatives to deforestation: Steps toward sustainable use of the amazon rain forest. Columbia University Press, New York.
ANAM and Cuerpo de Paz. 1982. Desarrollo Forestal de Panamá: Caracteristicas y Usos de 19 Especies con Valor Commercial en Panamá. Panama City.
Anderson, E. 1996. Ecologies of the heart: Emotion, belief and the environment. Oxford University Press, New York.
Balée, W. 2000. Antiquity of traditional ethnobiological knowledge in amazonia: The Tupí-Guaraní family and time. Ethnohistory 47(2):399–422.
— 1994. Footprints of the forest. Columbia University Press, New York.
Barth, F. 1987. Cosmologies in the making: A generative view approach to cultural variation in inner New Guinea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (England) and Melbourne (Australia).
Berlin, B., D.E. Breedlove, P.H. Raven. 1974. Principles of Tzeltzal plant classification. Academic Press, New York and London.
Camargo, M. 1984. La Migración Azuereña en el Regimiento de Tambo, Distrito de Penonomé. Pages 119–131 in S. Heckadon-Moreno and A. McKay, A., eds., Colonización y Destrucción de Bosques en Panama. Asociación Paname#x00F1;a de Antropolog#x00Ed;a, Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Case, R., G. Pauli, and D. Doel Sojarto. 2005. Factors in maintaining indigenous knowledge among ethnic communities of Manus Island. Economic Botany 59(4):356–365.
Clifford, J. 1988. The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachuetts.
Comaroff, J. and J. Comaroff. 1992. Ethnography and the historical imagination. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
Condit, R., N. Pitman, and G. Edgert. 2002. Betadiversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–668.
Conklin, H. 1961. The study of shifting agriculture. Current Anthropology 2:27–61.
Dalle, S. and C. Potvin. 2004. Conservation of useful plants: An evaluation of local priorities from two indigenous communities in eastern Panama. Economic Botany 58(l):38–57.
de Leon, P.M. 1904. On the Panama hat. Page 494 in O. Mason, American Indian Basketry. Republished in 1988 by Dover Publications, New York.
Denevan, W. 2001. Cultivated landscapes of native amazonia and the Andes: Triumph over the soil. Oxford University Press, Oxford (England) and New York.
Etkin, N. 2002. Local knowledge of biotic diversity and its conservation in rural Hausaland, northern Nigeria. Economic Botany 56(l):73–88.
Freilich, M. 1991. Smart rules and proper rules: A journey through deviance. Pages 27–50 in M. Freilich, D. Raybeck, and J. Savishinsky, J., eds., Deviance: Anthropological perspectives. Bergin and GarveyNew York.
Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New York.
Gudeman, S. 1976. Relationships, residence and the individual: A rural Panamanian community. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Halbwachs, M. 1950. La Mémoire Collective. Presses Universitaire de France, Paris.
Hays, T. 1974. Mauna: Explorations in Ndumba Ethnobotany. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington.
Heckadon-Moreno, S. 1983. Cuando Se Acaban Los Montes: Los Campesinos Sante#x00F1;os y la Colonizaci#x00F3;n de Tonos#x00ED;. Panam#x00E1;: Editorial Universitaria Panam#x00E1; and Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
Heider, K. G. 2004. Seeing anthropology: Cultural anthropology through film. Pearson Education, Boston.
Hunn, E. 1982. The utilitarian in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist 84:830–47.
Kane, S. 1995. Emberá medicinal plant use. Jahrbuch für Ethnomedizin und Bewusstseinsforschung 4:185–206.
— 1994. The phantom gringo boat: Shamanic discourse and development in Panama. The Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
Kirke, C. 1980. Prehistoric agriculture in the Belize River valley. World Archaeology 11(3):281–286.
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966 [1962]. The savage mind. Weidenfield and Nicholson, London.
Linares, O. 1979. What is lower central American archaeology? Annual Review of Anthropology 8:21–43.
Little, S. 2003. Emberá women’s cooperative: Basket art helping resist the impacts of war. Women and Environments Magazine 58/59:50.
Lothrop, S. 1946. The archaeology of Panama. Pages 140–155 in J. Steward, ed., The handbook of South American Indians, Volume 4. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 143. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Müller-Schwarze, N. 2003. Knowing when to clear the fields: Manacus vitellinus and swidden farming in northern Codé province, Panamá. Human Mosaic 34(l-2):25–30.
Peters, C. M. 2000. Precolumbian silviculture and indigenous management of neotropical forests. Pages 203–223 in David Lentz, ed., Imperfect balance: Landscape transformations in the PreColumbian Americas. Columbia University Press, New York.
— 1983. Observations on Maya subsistence and the ecology of a tropical tree. American Antiquity 48(3):610–615.
Rivet, P. 1991. Industria del Sombrero en Ecuador y Panamá. Revista de Antropología. 11:21–41.
Schemo, D.J. 1999. The last tribal battle. The New York Times Magazine (31 October): pp. 70-77.
Schultze, R.E. and R. Raffauf. 2004. Vine of the soul: Medicine men, their plants and rituals in the Colombian amazon. Synergetic Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Simsek, I., F. Aytekin, E. Yesilada, and S. Yildirimli. 2004. An ethnobotanical survey of the Beypazari, Ayas and Güdül district towns of Ankara province (Turkey). Economic Botany 58(4):705–720.
Ventocillo, J., H. Herrera, and V. Núñez, with the editorial assistance of H. Roeder and translation by E. King. 1995. Plants and animals in the life of the kuna. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.
Vansina, J. 1965. Oral tradition: A study in historical methodology. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
Weeden Gamboa, A. 2000. Censos Nacionales X de Población, VI de Vivienda, Cifras Preliminares, Junio 2000. República de Panama: Contraloría General de la República.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MÜller-Schwarze, N.K. Antes and Hoy DÍa: Plant knowledge and categorization as adaptations to life in Panama in the Twenty-First Century. Econ Bot 60, 321–334 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[321:AAHDPK]2.0.CO;2
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[321:AAHDPK]2.0.CO;2