The Botanical Review

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 299–311 | Cite as

Spatial distribution, population structure, and fecundity ofCeratozamia matudai lundell (Zamiaceae) in El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico

  • Miguel Angel Pérez Farrera
  • Andrew P. Vovides


We describe the spatial distribution, population structure, and fecundity ofCeratozamia matudai in two populations in the El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, in Chiapas, Mexico. Three random plots of 20 × 20 m were laid out in a cypress forest habitat of the cycad and six plots in a cloud forest habitat on Mount Ovando. The aggregated spatial pattern ofC. matudai showed a clumped local distribution on shallow soils on steep slopes. Individuals between the sites showed differences in leaf production, trunk diameter, height, and growth pattern. A population structure with an inverse “J” curve was obtained in both sites. Emergence of male and female cones appears to be synchronous in both populations, with a predominance of male cones recorded.


Population Structure Botanical Review Coffee Plantation Trunk Diameter Female Cone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Alejandre Rosas, J. A., M. I. Sánchez Tinoco &M. Vázquez Torres. 1990. Estructura poblacional deCeratozamia mexicana Brongn. (Zamiaceae) en un bosque del centre de Veracruz. La Ciencia y El Hombre 5: 93–112.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez Buylla, E. R., R. García-Barrios, C. Lara-Moreno &M. Martínez-Ramos. 1996. Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: Applications and perspectives for tropical rain forest tree species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 87–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begon, M., J. L. Harper &Y. C. R. Townsend. 1990. Ecology: individual, populations and communities. Blackwell, Boston.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, W. J. 1989. The tortoise and the hare: Ecology of angiosperm dominance and gymnosperm persistence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 36: 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, D. A. &D. B. Clark. 1987. Temporal and environmental patterns of reproduction inZamia skinneri, a tropical rain forest cycad. J. Ecology 75: 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ——. 1991. Herbivores, herbivory and plant phenology: Patterns and consequence in a tropical rain forest cycad. Pp. 209–225in P. Prince, G. W. Fernandez, T. M. Lewinsohn & W. W. Benson (eds.), Plant-animal interactions: Evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, D. B., D. A. Clark &M. E. Grayum. 1992. Leaf demography of a neotropical rain forest cycad,Zamia skinneri (Zamiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 79: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crane, P. R. 1988. Major clades and relationships in “higher” gymnosperms. Pp. 218–272in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. De Vries, P. 1976. Notes on the behavior ofEumaeus minyas (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Costa Rica. Brenesia 8: 103Google Scholar
  10. Deevey, E. S. 1947. Lite tables for natural populations of animals. Quart. Rev. Biol. 22: 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diario Official. 1994. Acuerdo por el que se establecen los criterios. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-Ecol-1994, que determina las especies y subespecies de flora y fauna silvestre terrestres y acuáticas, en peligro de extinción, amenazadas, raras y las sujetas a protección especial, que establece especificaciones para su protección. Diario Oficial de la Federación 488(10): 2–60.Google Scholar
  12. Donalson, J. S. 1995. Understanding cycad life histories: An essential basis for successful conservation Pp. 1–17in J. S. Donalson (ed.), Cycad Conservation in South Africa: Issues, priorities and actions. Cycad Society of South Africa, Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, M. 1993. Cycads as a possible cause of neurological disorders in the Western Pacific. Pp. 19–23in D. W. Stevenson & K. J. Norstog (eds.), The biology, structure, and systematics of the Cycadales: Proceedings of CYCAD 90, the Second International Conference on Cycad Biology. Palm & Cycad Societies of Australia Cycads, Milton, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Eckenwalder, J. 1980a. The cycads: The prime of their lives. Bull. Fairchild Tropical Gard. 35(1): 11–19.Google Scholar
  15. — 1980b. Dispersal of the West Indian cycadZamia pumila L. Biotropica 12: 79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García, E. 1981. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografía, Indianapolis 30, México, D.F.Google Scholar
  17. González, C. A. 1990. Algunas interacciones entreDioon edule (Zamiaceae) yPeromyscus mexicanus (Rodentia:Cricetidae). La Ciencia y El Hombre 5: 77–92.Google Scholar
  18. Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative plant ecology. Ed. 3. Butterworth’s Scientific Publications, London.Google Scholar
  19. Grove, T. S., A. M. O’Connell &N. Malajczuk. 1980. Effects of fire on the growth, nutrient content and rate of nitrogen fixation of the cycadMacrozamia riedlei. Aust. J. Bot. 28: 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hcnifin, M. S., L. E. Morse, S. Griffith &J. E. Hohn. 1981. Planning field work on rare and endangered plant populations. Pp. 309–312in M. S. Henifin & L. E. Morse (eds.), Rare plant conservation: Geographical data organization. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.Google Scholar
  21. IUCN. 1994. IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  22. Kershaw, K. A. &J. K. K. Looney. 1985. Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology. Ed. 3. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  23. Lundell, C. L. 1939. Studies of Mexican and Central American Plants, VII. Lloydia 2: 75–76.Google Scholar
  24. Mace, G. M. &R. Lande. 1991. Assessing extinction threats: Towards a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv. Biol. 5: 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martínez, R. M. &E. Alvarez B. 1995. Ecología de poblaciones de plantas en una selva húmeda de México. Bol. Soc. Bot. México 56: 121–153.Google Scholar
  26. Menges, E. S. 1986. Predicting the future of rare plant populations: Demographic monitoring and modeling. Natural Areas Journal 13: 13–25.Google Scholar
  27. — 1991. The application of minimum viable population theory to plants. Pp. 45–61in D. A. Falk & K. E. Holsinger (eds.), Genetic and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Mullerried, F. K. 1957. Geología de Chiapas. Publicaciones del Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas, México.Google Scholar
  29. Negrón-Ortiz, V. &G. J. Breckon. 1989. Population structure inZamia debilis (Zamiaceae), I. Size classes, leaf phenology and leaf turnover. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norstog, K. J. &T. Nicholls. 1997. The biology of the cycads. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  31. —,P. K. Fawcett &A. P. Vovides. 1992. Beetle pollination of two species ofZamia: Evolutionary and ecological considerations. Paleobotanist 41: 149–158.Google Scholar
  32. ——— &M. Duncan. 1993. Toxicity and insect-cycad symbiosis inZamia furfuracea. Pp. 42–50in D. W. Stevenson & K. J. Norstog (eds.), The biology, structure, and systematics of the Cycadales: Proceedings of CYCAD 90, the Second International Conference on Cycad Biology. Palm & Cycad Societies of Australia Cycads, Milton, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Ornduff, R. 1991. Size classes, reproductive behavior and insect associates ofCycas media (Cycadaceae) in Australia. Bot. Gaz. 151: 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Osborne, R. 1995. The world cycad census and a proposed revision of the threatened species status for cycad taxa. Biol. Conserv. 71: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. —,D. W. Stevenson &K. D. Hill. 1999. The world list of cycads. Pp. 224–239in C. J. Chen (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cycad Biology. International Academic Publishers, Beijing.Google Scholar
  36. Rzedowski, J. 1978. La vegetación de México. Edit. Limusa, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  37. Sánchez-Tinoco, M. Y., E. M. Engleman &A. P. Vovides. 2000. Cronología reproductora deCeratozamia mexicana (Cycadales). Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Botánica 66:15–23.Google Scholar
  38. Sarukhan, J. 1980. Demographic problems in tropical systems. Pp. 161–188in O. T. Solbring (ed.), Demography and evolution in plant populations. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  39. Schemske, D. W., B. C. Husband, M. H. Ruckelhaus, C. Goodwillie, I. M. Parker &J. G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75: 584–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schutzman, B., A. P. Vovides &B. Dehgan. 1988. Two new species ofZamia (Zamiaceae, Cycadales) from southern Mexico. Bot. Gaz. 149: 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaffer, M. L. 1981. Minimum population size for species conservation. Bioscience 31: 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tang, W. 1988. Seed dispersal in the cycadZamia pumila in Florida. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 2066–2070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vovides, A. P. 1990. Spatial distribution, survival, and fecundity ofDioon edule (Zamiaceae) in a tropical deciduous forest in Veracruz, Mexico, with notes on its habitat. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 1532–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. — 1991. Insect symbionts of some Mexican cycads in their natural habitat. Biotropica 23: 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. — &C. Iglesias. 1994. An integrated conservation strategy for the cycadDioon edule Lindl. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. —,V. Lunas &C. G. Medina. 1997a. Relación de algunas plantas y hongos mexicanos raros, amenazados o en peligro de extinción y sugerencias para su conservación. Acta Botánica Mexicana 39: 1–42.Google Scholar
  47. —,N. Ogata, V. Sosa &E. Peña-García. 1997b. Pollination of endangered Cuban cycadMicrocycas calocoma (Miq.) A. DC. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125: 201–210.Google Scholar
  48. Whiting, M. G. 1963. Toxicity of cycads. Econ. Bot. 17: 271–302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Angel Pérez Farrera
    • 1
  • Andrew P. Vovides
    • 2
  1. 1.Escuela de BiologíaUNICACHTuxtla GutiérrezMexico
  2. 2.Instituto de Ecología, A.C.XalapaMexico

Personalised recommendations