Skip to main content
Log in

Geographical distribution of wildLactuca species (Asteraceae, Lactuceae)

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A broad survey of available world literature showed that at least 98 wildLactuca spp. (Asteraceae) have been described taxonomically. The distribution of the genusLactuca worldwide includes 17 species in Europe, 51 in Asia, 43 in Africa, and 12 in the Americas (mostly the North American subcontinent). Species originating in Asia, Africa, and the Americas form ca. 83% of knownLactuca spp. richness; however, they are very poorly documented from the viewpoint of taxonomic relationships, ecogeography, and variability. The phytogeography ofLactuca spp. regarding their distribution on different continents and in relation to the structure of the lettuce gene pool is discussed. A more detailed analysis of geographical distribution and habitats is given for some species (L. serriola, L. saligna, L. virosa, L. perennis, L. quercina, L. tatarica), which represent the primary, secondary, and tertiary gene pools of cultivated lettuce (L. sativa). Original and synanthropic distributions ofLactuca spp. and their occurrence in natural and secondary habitats are discussed, along with the representation of wildLactuca spp. in world gene-bank collections. Global biodiversity ofLactuca spp. and their representation in germplasm collections are poorly documented. Future studies of taxonomy, phytogeography, ecology, phylogenetic relationships, and genetic diversity are needed for a more complete understanding of this genus and taxonomically related genera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adler, W., K. Oswald &R. Fischer. 1994. Exkursionsflora von Österreich. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alain, H. 1964. Flora de Cuba. Vol. 5. Asociación de Estudiantes de Ciencias Biológicas Publicaciones, Havana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alton, S. &S. Linington. 2001. The UK flora programme of the Millennium Seed Bank Project: The outcome of a collaboration between volunteers and professionals. Plant Genet. Res. Newsl. 128: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreev, N., M. Antzev, S. Kozucharov, M. Markova, D. Peev &A. Petrova. 1992. Opredelitel naviste rastenija v Blgarija. Nauka Iskustvo, Sofia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, T. H. &B. C. de Wet. 1993. Plants of Southern Africa: Names and distribution. Brummeria, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrigoni, P. P. &B. Mori. 1976. Numeri cromosomici per la flora Italiana. Inf. Bot. Ital. 8: 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock,E. B. 1947. The genusCrepis, I and II. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 21 and 22.

  • -,G. L. Stebbins Jr. & J. A. Jenkins. 1937. Chromosomes and phylogeny in some genera of the Crepidinae. Cytologia, Tokyo, Fujii Jub., Vol.: 188–210.

  • Balick, M. J., M. H. Nee &D. E. Atha. 2000. Checklist of the vascular plants of Belize with common names and uses. Mem. New York Bot. Gard., 85. New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barceló, F. B. 1980. Flora de Mallorca. Vol. 4. Editorial Moll, Mallorca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barguin, E. &V. Voggenreiter. 1987. Prodromus del atlas fitocorológico de las Canarias Occidentales, I. Especies autóctonas y de interés especial. Instituto Nacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkert, D., F. Fukarek, H. Korsch &H. Meusel. 1998. Verbreitungsatlas der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Ostdeutschlands. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanca López, G. &M. Cueto Romero. 1984. Números cromosomáticos de plantas occidentales. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 41: 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boukema, I. W., Th. Hazekamp &Th. J. L. van Hintum. 1990. The CGN collection reviews: The CGN lettuce collection. Centre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, L. 1972. Revision systématique du genreSonchus s.l. Bot. Not. 125: 287–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1973. Revision systématique du genreSonchus s.l. Bot. Not. 126: 155–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974a. Revision systématique du genreSonchus s.l. Bot. Not. 127: 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974b. Revision systématique du genreSonchus s.l. Bot. Not. 127: 402–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowra, J. C. 1992. Prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola): A population explosion in Warwickshire. Bot. Soc. Brit. Isl. News 60: 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brako, L. &J. L. Zarucchi. 1993. Catalogue of the flowering plants and Gymnosperms of Peru. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, D. &Z. I. Bramwell. 1990. Flores silvestres de las Islas Canarias. Ed. 3. Editorial Rueda, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brant, V., M. Svobodová, J. Šantrucek &J. Belka. 1999. Locika kompasová na pude uvádené do klidu (Prickly lettuce on soils transferred to the quiet). Pp. 11–17in B. Badalíková & R. Pokorný (eds.), Rostlinolékarství (Plant Medicine). Proceedings of Scientific Conference, Brno 9.-10.11.1999; Výzkumný ústav pícninárský s.r.o. Troubsko u Brna (Czech Republic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., A. A. Anderberg, P. O. Karis, B. Nordenstam, J. Lundberg &O. Ryding. 1994. Asteraceae: Cladistic and classification. Timber Press, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brullo, S. &P. Pavone. 1978. Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 464–483. Inf. Bot. Ital. 10: 248–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummitt, R. K. &C. E. Powell (eds.) 1992. Authors of plant names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbinge, N. T. &M. Gray. 1970. Flora of the Australian capital territory. Australian National Univ. Press, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, O. 1929. Beiträge zur Ökologie und Biologie der Kanarenpflanzen. Vol. 98 of L. Diels (ed.), Bibliotheca Botanica. Original-Abhandlungen aus dem Gesamtgebiete der Botanik. E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. N. &S. D. Prince. 1982. A history of the taxonomic treatment of unlobed-leaved prickly lettuce,Lactuca serriola L., in Britain. Watsonia 14: 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. The geographical distribution of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), I. A general survey of its habitats and performance in Britain. J. Ecol. 73: 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerovsky, J., V. Feráková, J. Holub, Š. Maglocký & F. Procházka (eds.) 1999. Red data book of threatened plants and animals of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic, 5. Vascular plants. Príroda a.s., Bratislava, Slovak Republic. (In Czech and Slovak)

  • Chalkuziev, P. 1974. Species novae florae Schachimardanicae. Bot. Mat. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Uzbek. SSR 19: 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charpin, A. &J. F. Casas. 1981. Iter secundum austrohispanicum. Candollea 36: 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, W. 1953. Neue kritische Flora von Schleswig-Holstein. Buchverlag Heinrich Möller Söhne GmBh, Rendsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, A. R., T. G. Tutin &E. F. Warburg. 1962. Flora of the British Isles. Ed. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, E. J. &M. C. Foster. 1994. Alien plants of the British Isles. Botanical Society of the British Isles, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collenettee, S. 1985. An illustrated guide to the flowers of Saudi Arabia. Scorpion Publishing, Buckhurtst Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutinho, A. X. P. 1974. Flora de Portugal. Vol. 98. J. Cramer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, R. M., D. M. Richardson &S. M. Pierce (eds.) 1997. Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. B. &P. D. Moore. 1985. Biogeography: An ecological and evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1980. Vascular flora of the southeastern United States, I. Asteraceae. Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cufodontis, G. 1972. Enumeratio Plantarum Aethiopiae Spermatophyta. Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvelev, N. N. 1989. Flora Partis Europae URSS. Vol. 8. Nauka, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, I. M. 1997. Origin and domestication ofLactuca sativa L. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 44: 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, D. 1982. Le genreLactuca L. (Asteraceae) en Afrique centrale. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 52: 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolezalová, I., A. Lebeda &E. Krístková. 2001. Prickly lettuce (L. serriola L.) germplasm collecting and distribution study in Slovenia and Sweden. Plant Genet. Res. Newsl. 128: 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,E. Krístková, A. Lebeda &V. Vinter. 2002a. Description of morphological characters of wildLactuca L. spp. genetic resources (English-Czech version). Hort. Sci. (Prague) 29: 56–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,A. Lebeda, J. Janecek, J. Cíhalíková, E. Krístková &O. Vránová. 2002b. Variation in chromosome numbers and nuclear DNA contents in genetic resources ofLactuca L. species (Asteraceae). Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 49: 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,E. Krístková, A. Lebeda, V. Vinter, D. Astley &I. W. Boukema. 2003a. Basic morphological descriptors for genetic resources of wildLactuca spp. Plant Genet. Res. Newsl. 134: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,A. Lebeda, M. Dziechciarková, E. Krístková, D. Astley &C. C. M. Van de Wiel. 2003b. Relationships among morphological characters, isozymes polymorphism and DNA variability: The impact onLactuca germplasm taxonomy. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 39: 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,I. Tiefenbachová &E. Krístková. 2004. Taxonomic reconsideration of someLactuca spp. germplasm maintained in world genebank collections. Pp. 193–201in C. G. Davidson & P. Trehane (eds.), A Proceedings of the XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Fourth International Symposium on Taxonomy of Cultivated Plants, Toronto, Canada, 11–17 August, 2002. Acta Horticulturae 634. International Society for Horticultural Science, Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domac, R. 1973. Mala flora Hrvatske. Skolska knjiga, Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dostál, J. 1989. Nová kvetena CSSR, 2. díl.: 1112–1115. Academia, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dostálek, J. 1997. Frequency of occurrence of synanthropic plants along the roads in the territory of the Orlické hory Mts. and their foothills. Príroda (Prague) 11: 201–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, J. M. M. &F. Engelmann. 2002. Botanic gardens and agricultural genebanks: Building on complementary strengths for more effective global conservation of plant genetic resources. Plant Genet. Res. Newslet. 131: 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinbrun-Dothan, N. 1978. Flora Palaestina. Part 3 (text). Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feráková, V. 1976.Lactuca L. Pp. 328–331in T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (eds.). Flora Europaea. Vol. 4. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1977. The genusLactuca L. in Europe. Komenský University Press, Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, L. M. 1950. Gray’s manual of botany. Ed. 8. American Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, P. 1977. Les Quatre flores de la France. Ed. 2. Vol. I (text). Editions Lechevalier S.A.R.L., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietema, F. T. 1994. The systematic relationship ofLactuca sativa andLactuca serriola, in relation to the distribution of prickly lettuce. Acta Bot. Neerl. 43: 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietema de Vries, F. T., R. Van der Meijden &W. A. Brandenburg. 1994. Botanical files on lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Golleria Suppl. 2: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galland, N. 1988. Recherche sur l’origine de la flore orophile du Maroc: étude caryologique et cytogeographique. Travaux de l’Institut Scientifique, Série Botanique, No. 35, Rabat.

  • Garcke, A. 1972. Illustrierte Flora Deutschland und angrenzende Gebiete. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. 1974. The geography of the flowering plants. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossgejm, A. A. 1949. Opredjelitjel rastjenij Kavkaza. Sovjetskaja Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grulich, V. 2002.Lactuca L. Pp. 684–685in K. Kubat, L. Hrouda, J. Chrtek Jr., Z. Kaplan, J. Kirschner & J. Stepanek (eds.), Klíc ke kvetene Ceské republiky (Key to the flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, L., R. V. Rao &R. Reid (eds.) 1995. Collecting plant genetic diversity: Technical guidelines. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, A. S. 1983. Vegetación y flora de La Palma. Editorial Interinsular Canaria, Tenerife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajra, P. K., R. R. Rao, D. K. Singh &P. B. Uniyal (eds.) 1995. Flora of India. Vol. 12. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämet-Ahti, L., J. Suominen, T. Ulvinen &P. Uotila. 1998. Retkeilykasvio. Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Kasvimuseo, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R. &J. M. J. de Wet. 1971. Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20: 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. H. &O. W. Sonder. 1894. Flora Capensis. Vol. 3. Lovell Reeve, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegi, G. (ed.) 1987. Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, vol. 6, part 4, pp. 1113–1134. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, F. N. &I. Friis. 1994. The plants of Pehr Forsskal’s Flora Aegyptiaco-Arabica. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heß, H. E., E. Landolt &R. Hirzel. 1972. Flora der Schweiz und angrenzende Gebiete. Vol. 3. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H. 1978. Flowering plants of the world. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J. C. (ed.) 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintum, Th. J. L.van. 1995. Standardization in plant genetic resources documentation, III. Country and region codes. Pp. 89–96in Th. J. L. van Hintum, M. W. M. Jongen & Th. Hazekamp (eds.), Standardization in plant genetic resources documentation: Report of the second technical meeting of focal points for documentation in East European genebanks. Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands (CGN), Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenester, A. &W. Welß. 1993. Exkursionsflora für die Kanarischen Inseln mit Ausblicken auf ganz Makaronesien. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, N. H., P. K. Holmgren, R. A. Jess, K. M. McCauley &L. Vogel. 1998. Illustrated companion to Gleason and Cronquist’s manual. Illustrations of the vascular plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui-Lin, L., L. Tang-Shui, H. Tseng-Chieng, K. Tetsuo &De Ch. E. Vol. 1978. Flora of Taiwan, Vol. 4. Epoch Publishing Co., Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, E. 1968. Flora of Alaska and neighboring territories: A manual of the vascular plants. Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &M. Fries. 1986. Atlas of North European vascular plants, III. Commentary to the maps. Total Index. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. &J. M. Dalziel. 1963. Flora of west tropical Africa. Ed. 2. Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and Administrations, Millbank, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILDB. 2001. InternationalLactuca database. Data downloaded April 2001 from www.plant.wageningenur.nl/cgn/ildb.

  • IPNI. 2003. International Plant Names Index. Data downloaded April 2003 fromhttp://www.ipni.org/ index.html.

  • Iwatsuki, K., T. Yamazaki, D. E. Boufford &H. Ohba. 1995. Flora of Japan. Vol. IIIb. Kodansha, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs,M. 2001. The unfinished story ofLactuca altaica. M.Sc. thesis, Wageningen Univ.

  • Jafri, S. M. H. &A. El-Gadi. 1983. Flora of Libya. Al Faateh University, Tripoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, C. 1966. Notes on Compositae, I. The Cichorieae in East tropical Africa. Kew Bull. 18: 427–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975.Lactuca L. Pp. 776–782in P. H. Davis (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. Compositae. Pp. 4: 2035–2145in P. Hanelt (ed.), Mansfeld’s encyclopedia of agricultural and horticultural crops. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &H. J. Beenthje. 2000.Cichorieae. Pp. 63–108in H. J. Beenthje & S. A. L. Smith (eds.), Flora of tropical east Africa. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehlík, V. (ed.) 1998. Alien expansive weeds of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Academia, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josifovic, M. 1975. Flora Srbije. Vol. 7. Srpska Akademija Nauka i Umetnosti, Belgrade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg &P. F. Stevens. 1999. Plant systematics: A phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartesz, T. J. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada and Greenland. Ed. 2. Vol. 1, Checklist. Timber Press, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, G. 2001. Network aims to link species data from global collections. Nature 410: 290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kesscli, R. V. &R. W. Michelmore. 1986. Genetic variation and phylogenies detected from isozyme markers in species ofLactuca. J. Heredity 77: 324–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. The compositae: Systematically fascinating but specifically neglected. Pp. 179–191in A. H. Paterson (ed.), Genome Mapping in Plants. R. G. Landes Co., Georgetown, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, N. 2001.Lactuca stebbinsii (Lactuceae, Compositae), a puzzling new species from Angola. Willdenowia 31: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirpicznikov, M. E. 1964.Lactuca L. Pp. 29: 274–324in E. G. Bobrov & N. N. Cvelev (eds.), Flora of the USSR. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, M. 1979. Neo-Lineamenta Florae Manshuricae. A. R. Gantner Verlag Kommandit-Gesellschaft, Vaduz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klekovski, J. C. S. E. de &L. N. de Farkaš-Vukotinovic 1869. Flora Croatica. Apud. Fr. upan (Albrecht et Fiedler), Zagrabiae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, W. J. M. 1999. Plant systematics as useful tool for plant breeders: Examples from lettuce. Pp. 95–105in A. Lebeda & E. Krístková (eds.), Eucarpia leafy vegetables ’99. Palacký Univ., Olomouc, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 2002. A format forAsteraceae model voucher collections, developed inLactuca L. Pp. 9–20in W. J. M. Koopman, Zooming in on the lettuce genome: Species relationships inLactuca s.l. inferred from chromosomal and molecular characters. Ph.D. diss., Wageningen Univ.

  • —,J. H. De Jong &I. M. de Vries 1993. Chromosome banding patterns in lettuce species (Lactuca sect.Lactuca, Compositae). Plant Syst. Evol. 185: 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,E. Guetta, C. C. M. Van de Wiel, B. Vosman &R. G. Van den Berg. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships amongLactuca (Asteraceae) species and related genera based on ITS-1 DNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1517–1530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • -,J. Hadam & J. Dolezel. 2002. Evolution of DNA content and base composition inLactuca (Asteraceae) and related genera. Pp. 97–124in W. J. M. Koopman, Zooming in on the lettuce genome: Species relationships inLactuca s.l. inferred from chromosomal and molecular characters. Ph.D. diss., Wageningen Univ.

  • Krasnoborov, I. M. 1997. Flora Sibiriae, Asteraceae (Compositae). Vol. 13. Novosibirsk Nauka, Siberian Enterprise Ran, Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisch, H. 1989. Analyse der Verbreitung vonAgropyron ×obtusiusculum Lange undLactuca tatarica (L.) C. A. Meyer an der Ostseeküste der Deutschen Demokratischen Republic. Flora 183: 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krístková, E., A. Lebeda &I. Dolezalová. 2001. Collecting and evaluatingof Lactuca serrioia germplasm in Europe. Pp. 49–52in W. Swiecicki, B. Naganowska & B. Wolko (eds.), Broad Variation and Precise Characterization: Limitation for the Future. Eucarpia, Section Genetic Resources; Prodruk, Poznan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubát, K., L. Hrouda, J. Chrtek Jr.,Z. Kaplan, J. Kirschner &J. Štepánek (eds.) 2002. Klic ke kvetene Ceské republiky (Key to the flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, H. W. 1981. DieLactucae (Asteraceae) der azorischen Inseln. Willdenowia 11:211–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhe, J. E.de, L. Delvosalle, J. Duvigneaud, J. Lambinon &C. V. Berghen. 1983. Nouvelle flore de la Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, du nord de la France et des régions voisines. Ed. 3. Editions du Patrimoine du Jardin botanique national de Belgique, Meise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasser, T. 1964. Flora de Venezuela. Vol. X, Part 2. Edición Especial del Instituto Botánico, Ministerio de Agricultura y Cria, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. J. 2002. A comprehensive collection and regeneration strategy forex situ conservation. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 49: 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebeda, A. 1996. Research on resistance of genetic resources of horticultural crops: A model relationship betweenLactuca spp. andBremia lactucae. Zahradnictvi (Hort. Sci., Prague) 23: 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. Biodiversity of the interactions between germplasms of wildLactuca spp. and related genera and lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae). Report on research programme OECD Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems. HRI, Wellesbourne, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. Astley. 1999. World genetic resources ofLactuca spp.: Their taxonomy and biodiversity. Pp. 81–94in A. Lebeda & E. Krístková (eds.), Eucarpia leafy vegetables ’99. Palacký Univ., Olomouc, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,I. Dolezalová, E. Krístková, V. Vinter, O. Vránová, K. Dolezal, P. Tarkowski, I. Petrzelová, B. Trávnícek, R. Novotný &J. Janecek. 1999. Complex research of taxonomy and ecobiology of wildLactuca spp. genetic resources. Pp. 117–131in A. Lebeda & E. Krístková (eds.), Eucarpia leafy vegetables ’99. Palacký Univ., Olomouc, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—,— &B. Mieslerová. 2001a. Biodiversity and ecogeography of wildLactuca spp. in some European countries. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 48: 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—,—,J. Janecek, V. Vinter, O. Vránová, K. Dolezal, P. Tarkowski, I. Petrzelová, B. Trávnícek &R. Novotný. 2001b. Biodiversity of genetic resources of wildLactuca spp. Pp. 53–56in W. Swiecicki, B. Naganowska & B. Wolko (eds.), Broad Variation and Precise Characterization: Limitation for the Future. Eucarpia, Section Genetic Resources; Prodruk, Poznan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,D. A. C. Pink &D. Astley. 2002. Aspects of the interactions between wildLactuca spp. and related genera and lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae). Pp. 85–117in P. T. N. Spencer-Phillips, U. Gisi & A. Lebeda (eds.), Advances in downy mildew research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —,I. Dolezalová &D. Astley. 2004. Representation of wildLactuca spp. (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) in world genebank collections. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 51: 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick, E. &L. Steubing. 1957.Lactuca tatarica (L.) C. A. Meyer als Wanderpflanze und Inselendemit. Feddes Repertorium 59: 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. A. G. &B. L. D. Winkleman. 1999. The Times atlas of the world. Concise ed. Times Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindman, C. A. M. 1926. Svensk Fanerogamflora. P. A. Norstedt & Söners Förlag, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964. Nordens Flora, III. Wahlström Wildstrand, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, Y. &Ch. Shih. 1997. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Vol. 80(1), Angiospermae. Science Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, E. G. &A. C. Jiménez. 1974. ELENCO de la flora vascular Española (Península y Baleares). ICONA, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, J. &E. J. Jäger (eds.) 1995. Index Holmiensis. Vol. 8, Dicotyledoneae K-M. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martincic, A. &F. Sušnik. 1984. Mala flora Slovenije. Drzavna zalozba Slovenie, Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, R. L., T. M. Barkley, R. E. Brooks &E. K. Schofield. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Univ. Press of Kansas, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, P. E., E. J. Ryder, R. W. Michelmore, R. L. Clark, R. Antle, E. Emery, R. M. Hannan, R. V. Kesseli, E. A. Kurtz, O. Ochoa, V. E. Rubatzky & W. Waycott. 1993. Genetic resources of lettuce andLactuca species in California: An assessment of the USDA and UC collections and recommendations for long-term security. Report No. 12. Univ. of California Genetic Resources Conservation Program, Davis.

  • Mejías, J. A. 1993. Cytotaxonomic studies in the Iberian taxa of the genusLactuca (Compositae). Bot. Helvet. 103: 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. Self-fertility and associated flower head traits in the Iberian taxa ofLactuca and related genera (Asteraceae: Lactuceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 191: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meusel, H. &E. J. Jäger. 1992. Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montmoullin, B. de. 1986. Étude cytotaxonomique de la flore de la Crète, III. Nombres chromosomiques. Candollea 41: 431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouterde, P. S. J. 1983. Nouvelle flore du Liban et de la Syrie. Vol. 3, Texte. Dar El-Machreq Sarl, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, D. L. 1976. Tribe XI, Cichorieae. Pp. 440–454, 598–603in P. C. Standley, D. L. Nash & L. O. Williams (eds.), Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana, Botany 24(12). Chicago Museum of Natural History, Chicago.

  • Nasir, E. &S. I. Ali (eds.) 1972. Flora of West Pakistan: An annotated catalogue of the vascular plants of West Pakistan and Kashmir. Fakhri Printing Press, Karachi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarova, É. A. 1990.Takhtajaniantha Nazarova andLactucella Nazarova: Two new genera of the tribe Lactuceae (family Asteraceae). Biol. J. Armen. 43: 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nessler, C. L. 1976. A systematic survey of the tribe Cichorieae in Virginia USA. Castanea 41: 226–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohwi, J. 1965. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, J. &B. Navarro. 1977. Estudios en la flora de Macaronesia: Algunos números de cromosomas. Bot. Macaron. 3: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, N. V. (ed.) 1966. Flora Kazachstana, IX. Izdavatelstvo Nauka, Alma-Ata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B. &A. Jasiewicz. 1972. Flora Polska. Vol. 13. Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Kraków.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti, S. 1982. Flora d’ltalia. Vol. 3. Edagricole, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polatschek, A., M. Maier &W. Neuner. 1999. Flora von Nordtirol, Ostirol und Vorarlberg. Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poldini, L. 1991. Atlante corologico delle plante vascolari, nel Friuli-Venezia Giulia: Inventario floristico regionale. Universitá degli Studi di Trieste, Udine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polunin, O. &A. Stainton. 1984. Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, G. V. 1984. Two new species in the tribeLactuceae (Compositae) from Zambia. Kew Bull. 39: 167–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, J. R. &M. J. Short. 1994. Flora of Madeira. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, D. S. &R. N. Carter. 1977. Prickly lettuce (Lactuca serviola L.) in Britain. Watsonia 11: 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,— &K. J. Dancy. 1985. The geographical distribution of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), II. Characteristics of populations near its distribution limit in Britain. J. Ecol. 73: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rechinger, K. H. 1959. Zur Flora von Syrien, Libanon und den angrenzenden türkischen Gebieten. Ser. 2, Vol. 5, No. 1. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964. Flora of lowland Iraq. Verlag von J. Cramer, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1977. Flora Iranica. Flora des Iranischen Hochlandes und der Umrahmenden Gebirge. Academische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinink, K. 1999. Lettuce resistance breeding. Pp. 139–147in A. Lebeda & E. Krístková (eds.), Eucarpia leafy vegetables ’99. Palacký Univ., Olomouc, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollán, M. G. 1985. Claves de la flora de España (península y Baleares). Ed. 2. Vol. I. Ediciones MundiPrensa, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodwell, J. S. (ed.) 2000. British Plant Communities. Vol. 5. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmaier, W., R. Schubert &W. Vent. 1994. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Vol. 4. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,M. Bassler, E. J. Jagger &K. Werner. 1999. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Vol. 2, Gefässpflanzen. Grundband, ed. 17. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubatzky, V. E. &M. Yamaguchi. 1997. World vegetables. Ed. 2. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rulkens, A. J. H. 1987. DE CGN sla collectie: Inventarisatie, paspoort gegevens en enkele richtlijnen voor de toekomst. Report CGN-T 1987-1. CGN, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, E. J. 1998. Lettuce, endive and chicory. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, T. 1965. Flora Republicii Populare Romîne. Editura Academiei Republici Populare Romîne, Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebald, O., S. Seybold, G. Philippi &A. Wörz (eds.) 1996. Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Baden-Würtembergs. Pp. 6:339–344in Spezieller Teil (Spermatophyta, Unterklasse Asteridae) Valerianaceae bis Asteraceae. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfikas, G. 1987. Wild flowers of Crete. Efstathiadis Group, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, C. 1987. On circumscription of the genusPrenanthes L. andNotoseris Shih: A new genus of Compositae from China. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 25: 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988a. Revisionof Lactuca L. and two new genera of the tribeLactuceae (Compositae) on the mainland of Asia. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 26: 382–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988b. Revision ofLactuca L. and two new genera of the tribeLactuceae (Compositae) on the mainland of Asia (cont.). Acta Phytotax. Sin. 26: 418–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. On circumscription of the genusCicerbita Wall., and two new genera of Compositae from Sino-Himalayan region. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 29: 394–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicard, D., S. S. Woo, R. Arroyo-Garcia, O. Ochoa, D. Nguyen, A. Korol, E. Nevo &R. Michelmore 1999. Molecular diversity at the major cluster of disease resistance genes in cultivated and wildLactuca spp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 405–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren,E. 1973. Recent changes in the vascular flora and vegetation of the Azores Islands. Separata de Memórias da Sociedade Broteriana, Vol. 22.

  • Slavík, B. 1966. Pflanzengeographische Studie über die ArtLactuca perennis L. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. (Prague) 1: 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliškovic, T. 1983. Flora Bosnae et Hercegovinae. Vol. 4. Svjetlost, Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soják, J. 1961. Bemerkungen zu einigenCompositen, I. Novitates Bot. Horti Bot. Pragensis 1961: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962. Bemerkungen zu einigenCompositen, II. Novitates Bot. Horti Bot. Pragensis 1962: 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soó, R. 1970. A Magyar flóra és vegetádó rendszertani növényföldrajzi kézikönyve, IV. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, C. 1997. New flora of the British Isles. Ed. 2. Cambridge Univ., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavelíková, H., I. W. Boukema &Th. J. L. van Hintum. 2002. The internationalLactuca database. Plant Genet. Res. Newsl. 130: 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1937a. The scandent species ofPrenanthes andLactuca in Africa. Bull. Jard. Bruxel. 14: 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937b. Critical notes onLactuca and related genera. J. Bot. (London) 75: 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, J. A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausbaugh, P. D. &E. L. Core. 1978. Flora of West Virginia. Ed. 2. Seneca Books, Grantsville, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strid, A. 1980. Wild flowers of Mount Olympus. G. Tsiveriotis LTD, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &K. Kit Tan. 1991. Mountain flora of Greece. Vol. 2. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachtadjan, A. L. 1995. Flora Armenii. Vol. 9. Koeltz Scientific Books, Havlíckuv Brod, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Täckholm, V. 1974. Students’ flora of Egypt. Ed. 2. Cooperative Printing Company, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuisl, G. 1968. Der Verwandtschaftskreis der GattungLactuca L. im iranischen Hochland und seinen Randgebieten. Selbstverlag Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turland, N. J., L. Chilton &J. R. Press. 1993. Flora of the Cretan Area: Annotated Checklist & Atlas. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanoudakis, D. 1986. Chromosome studies in the Greek flora, I. Karyotypes of some Aegean angiosperms. Bot. Helv. 96: 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, B., S. Talavera &E. Fernández-Galiano (eds.) 1987. Flora vascular de Andalucía occidental. Vol. 3. Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, Seville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ham, R. W. J. M. 1981. Gifsla (Lactuca virosa L.) en kompassla (Lactuca serriola L.) in Nederland. Gorteria 10: 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ooststroom, H. 1956. Flora van Netherland. P. Noordhoff N.V., Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey, E. &L. Delvosalle. 1979. Atlas de la flore belgie et luxembourgeoise. Ed. 2. Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, Meise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, L. J. M. &I. W. Boukema. 1997. Genetic resources conservation of wild relatives with user’s perspective. Bocconea 7: 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velayos, M., F. Castilla &R. Gamarra. 1992. Archivos de flora Ibérica. Vol. 5, part 3, Corología ibérica. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Real Jardín Botánico—ICYT, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viney, D. E. 1994. An illustrated flora of North Cyprus. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. H. 1976. Flora of Okinawa and the southern Ryukyu Islands. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. J., W. R. Sykes &P. J. Garnock-Jones. 1988. Flora of New Zealand. Vol. IV. Botany Division, D.S.I.R., Christchurch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeda, E. J., R. Westra, H. Westra &T. Westra. 1991. Nederlandse oecologische flora, wilde planten en hun relaties 4. IVN, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, A. &M. Zajac (eds.) 2001. Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Poland. Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kraków.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, D. 1991. The wild genetic resources of cultivated lettuce (L. sativa L.). Euphytica 53: 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuloaga, F. O. &O. Morrone (eds.) 1999. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de la República Argentina, II. Acanthaceae-Euphorbiaceae (Dicotyledoneae). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lebeda, A., Dolezalová, I., Feráková, V. et al. Geographical distribution of wildLactuca species (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Bot. Rev 70, 328–356 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0328:GDOWLS]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0328:GDOWLS]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Navigation