Protection from uv radiation in the economic crop, Opuntia SPP.
Cacti of the genus puntia are an economically important crop. Understanding the mechanisms they possess to protect against UV radiation is important for assessing their possible response to climatic change. Measurements of the concentrations of UV-screening compounds and epidermal transmittance for two species of platyopuntia, Opuntia engelmannii Salm-Dyck. and O. phaeacantha Engelm. during 1998 and 1999 were used to investigate the UV-protection afforded by the cactus epidermis. A UV-radiative transfer model was used to investigate the interception of UV radiation on differently oriented surfaces. We show that vertical morphology itself confers significant protection against UV radiation compared to a horizontal surface. Concentrations of UV-screening flavonoids were found to vary depending on the UV exposure of different surfaces. West-facing surfaces had lower concentrations than east-facing surfaces, although theoretically they should be identical. This might be explained by the higher mean temperatures on west-facing surfaces. Although UV-absorbing soluble flavonoids in the epidermis block both UV-B and UV-A, the structure of the epidermis alone may be sufficient to remove up to 94% of the UV-B portion of the spectrum. These data yield insights into possible mechanisms of recent declines in cacti populations.
Key WordsPlants UV radiation desert cacti flavonoids
- Björn L. O., and T. M. Murphy. 1985. Computer calculation of solar ultraviolet radiation at ground level. Physiologie Végétale 23:555–561.Google Scholar
- Caldwell, M. M. 1981. Plant response to solar ultraviolet radiation. Pages 169–197 in O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and H. Ziegler, eds., Physiological plant ecology, Vol. 12A. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
- Day, T. A. 1993. Relating UV-B radiation screening effectiveness of foliage to absorbing-compound concentration and anatomical characteristics in a diverse group of plants. Oecologia 95:542–550.Google Scholar
- Haberle, R. M., C. P. McKay, J. B. Pollack, O. E. Gwynne, D. H. Atkinson, J. Appelbaum, G. A. Landis, R. W. Zurek, and D. J. Flood. 1993. Atmospheric effects on the utility of solar power on Mars. Pages 845–885 in J. S. Lewis, M. S. Mathews, and M. L. Guerrieri, eds., Resources of nearearth space. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
- Joseph, J. H., W. J. Wiscombe, and J. A. Weinman. 1976. The delta-Eddington approximation for radiative transfer flux. Journal of Atmospheric Science 28:833–837.Google Scholar
- McLennan, A. G. 1987. The repair of ultraviolet light induced DNA damage in plant cells. Mutation Research 181:1–7.Google Scholar
- Omori, Y., H. Takayama, and H. Ohba. 2000. Selective light transmittance of translucent bracts in the Himalayan giant glasshouse plant Rheum nobile Hook.f. & Thomson (Polygonaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 132:19–27.Google Scholar
- Van de Staaij, J. W. M., W. H. O. Ernst, W. J. Hakvoort, and J. Rozema J. 1995. Ultraviolet-B (280-320 nm) absorbing pigments in the leaves of Silene vulgari: Their role in UV-B tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology 147:75–80.Google Scholar
- Vogt, T., P. Gülz, and H. Reznik. 1991. UV radiation dependent flavonoid accumulation of Cistus laurifolius L. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung 46c:37–42.Google Scholar